UK: Brexiting Is Easy, Getting The Right Deal's The Hard Part

Last Updated: 11 July 2016
Article by Ian Stewart

The decision facing UK voters in the polling booths on 23rd June was deceptively simple – to remain in or to leave the EU.

Now comes the hard part. It falls to politicians to interpret the vote and turn it into some sort of reality.

That reality could yet leave the UK as a member of the EU. Yesterday former Prime Minister Tony Blair said that the UK "should keep our options open" on leaving the EU and suggested that as the implications of Brexit emerge the "will of the people" may shift.

Though the front runner for the Conservative leadership, Teresa May, described it yesterday as "a destabilising factor", an early General Election cannot be ruled out. Given the political surprises of the last ten days who could be sure that such an election would confirm the vote to leave the EU?

But for now, at least, the most likely outcome seems to be that the UK will leave the EU. All the contenders for the Conservative Party leadership appear to be committed to taking the UK out of the EU; Conservative Party members who will elect the new leader also strongly favour exiting the EU.

The new leader of the Party and Prime Minister will be elected in just over ten weeks, on 9th September. He or she will face an epic balancing act - to interpret the meaning of the referendum, to weigh it against what is economically desirable and politically workable, and to turn it into a negotiating plan.

The trade-off facing a Prime Minister in the event of a Brexit vote has long been apparent. At its heart is Britain's desire to retain access to the Single Market while imposing controls on EU migration. Free movement of people is one of the four pillars of the EU, enshrined in the 1992 Maastricht Treaty.

Battle lines are emerging. Last week the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, reminded the UK that EU members could not "cherry pick" the parts of the Single Market that suited them and ignore those that didn't. At the same meeting Mr Cameron told his fellow EU leaders that people had voted for Brexit because of concerns about migration.

The choices facing the UK form a spectrum. At one end is sovereignty and control of immigration, at the other full access to the Single Market. There is no perfect solution; everything depends on what the UK regards as vital and what the EU is prepared to agree.

In the last week there has been some talk in the media that the UK should pursue a so-called "Norway option" by joining the European Economic Area (EEA) along with current members Norway, Liechtenstein and Iceland. Such an arrangement would largely maintain the status quo in terms of access to the Single Market in goods and services and movement of capital. It would also allow the UK to strike its own trade deals independently of the EU. For these reasons I would imagine many business groups see EEA membership as the least disruptive alternative to EU membership.

Such advantages come at a price. Most importantly, EEA membership involves the same commitment to free movement of people and the provision of welfare benefits to EU citizens as being a member of the EU. If the referendum vote were a vote against free movement EEA membership, as currently constituted, is not the solution.

The EEA has other drawbacks from the point of view of a UK government committed to leaving the EU.

EEA members accept EU regulation but have no influence over them. They must meet EU 'rules of origin', which impose controls on the use of products from outside the EU in goods which are subsequently exported within the EU. (The costs involved are considerable. US research suggests the cost of border formalities to determine the origin of products amount to at least 3.0% of the value of the goods concerned, a far higher cost the average 2.3% tariff countries, such as the US or Australia, pay to access the Single Market under the rules of the World Trade Organisation). EEA members must also implement EU rules on employment, consumer protection, environment and competition policy, limiting the UK's ability to "take back control" outside the EU. Finally, EEA members pay a fee to access the Single Market, albeit at a somewhat lower rate than the cost of full membership.

A second, widely canvassed alternative is the Swiss option membership of the European Free Trade Area. The advantages are that it allows comprehensive access to the Single Market in goods and, like the Norway option, would allow the UK to strike trade agreements independent of the EU. It offers a rather more distant relationship than the EEA, partly because it provides greater independence in policy areas including social and employment law.

But, like the Norway option, the Swiss route of EFTA membership requires free movement of people. This element was challenged by Switzerland's decision, in a close referendum vote in 2014, to impose controls on EU migration. In an episode that has uncanny parallels with Britain's Brexit vote, the Swiss have been trying for two years to secure some limits on EU migration while maintaining access to the Single Market. The European Commission shows few signs of conceding on free movement of people, leaving some Swiss newspapers arguing that the Swiss and the UK should make common cause in securing a deal.

The Swiss option shares two further drawbacks with the Norway model in that Switzerland must accept EU regulations without having any say in them and are subject to the EU's rules of origin. Even more significantly for the UK, Swiss access to the EU market in services is restricted, particularly for financial services. Despite extensive negotiations on the matter, there is no general agreement on the free movement of services between the EU and Switzerland; Swiss financial services providers must generally establish a subsidiary or branch in the EU in order to provide cross-border services. Finally, Switzerland's arrangement is the product of scores of bi-lateral agreements which, according to the think Open Europe, took almost a decade to put in place.

If the UK cannot reach an agreement with the EU on immigration the UK might be left with no choice but to exit the Single Market. Countries outside the Single Market sell into it, albeit on more restricted terms than members. This takes us to options three and four.

Option three is for the UK to trade with the EU as a member of the World Trade Organisation, creating a similar relationship to that which the US, Australia or China have with the EU. UK exports to the EU would be subject to Most Favoured Nation tariffs set under WTO guidelines. In 2013, the EU's trade-weighted average MFN tariff was 2.3% for non-agricultural products, a level which does not seem prohibitively high. However average tariffs on some goods, particularly agricultural produce, such as dairy products, sugar and confectionery, and animal products range between 20% and 30%. Tariffs on cars are 10%. This would raise the cost of exporting to the EU for UK firms, though it would also allow the UK to levy reciprocal charges on EU imports. Nonetheless, operating under WTO rules China, India and the US conduct a thriving bi-lateral trade in goods with the EU.

A further downside of the WTO route is that many restrictions on trade in services that are forbidden within the EU remain applicable to firms outside the EU. Thus under WTO rules UK services would face higher levels of non-tariff barriers such as domestic laws, regulations and supervision. The House of Commons library concludes that, "the level of market access [for UK services] would generally be far more limited for UK exporters" under the WTO than as a member of the EU.

Given that, in 2014, services made up 37% of total UK exports to the EU this is a material drawback to the WTO option.

Our final option, number four, also involves leaving the Single Market, with the UK negotiating a preferential trade agreement with the EU. This is sometimes referred to as the Canada option after the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (Ceta) negotiated by the EU and Canada. (The deal has not yet been ratified). Ceta gives Canada preferential access to the Single Market but leaves it facing costly rules of origin requirements. Services are only partially covered and a Ceta-type deal would not give UK financial services the EU market access they have now. It would be hard for London-based banks to get "passporting" rights for their services in the EU - rights that they value hugely now.

Even a cursory examination of alternatives to EU membership demonstrates that there are no easy choices. The UK can leave the EU and, if it seeks the Norway option, hope to maintain current access to the Single Market. But it is unlikely to be able to do so and impose controls on free movement of people from the EU. If that is an overriding aim the UK will probably have to leave the Single Market and operate under the rules of the World Trade Organisation or strike a trade deal with the EU. Both options would impose costs and complexity on UK exporters and would restrict UK service exports to the EU, particularly exports of financial services.

But that isn't quite the end of the story. The EU's trade surplus with the UK may create an incentive on the part of the EU's big exporters to go for a deal which keeps trade flowing. After all, EU has, on occasions, interpreted its own rules flexibly as when some countries were allowed to join the euro without meeting the exact criteria. And outside the Single Market the UK might be able to secure bi-lateral trade deals more quickly than the EU can, which is negotiating on behalf of 27/28 nations. The recent EU/Canada deal was, for instance, delayed by Greece's insistence that it be granted exclusive rights to use the term "feta" for the salty cheese it produces. Nor should we lose sight of the fact that many countries export successfully to the Single Market without being a member of it.

Much is possible, but little is certain. Perhaps the best guide to the type of trade deal the next Prime Minister aims for with the EU will come through in the language used during the leadership campaign. The more emphatic the winning candidate is about accessing the Single Market the more likely we are to go down the Norway or Swiss route. If the winning candidate stresses immigration during the leadership campaign it's more likely to be a WTO or Canadian route.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Field Fisher
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Field Fisher
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions