UK: Religious Discrimination To Dismiss Teacher Who Stood By Sex Offender Husband

Last Updated: 6 July 2016
Article by Taylor Wessing

Pendleton v (1) Derbyshire County Council (2) The Governing Body of Glebe Junior School UKEAT/0238/15/LA

Why care?

Under the Equality Act 2010, indirect religion and belief discrimination occurs where:

  • A applies to B a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) which would apply also to those who do not have the same religion or belief (or lack of the same) as B,
  • that PCP puts or would put persons who share B's religion, belief, or lack of the same, at a particular disadvantage compared to others (known as group disadvantage)
  • That PCP puts or would put B at that disadvantage (individual disadvantage), and
  • A cannot show that the PCP is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (objective justification).

In Nottingham City Transport Ltd v Harvey (2012), the EAT held that a one-off flawed disciplinary procedure was not a PCP since it could not be a provision or criterion, and a practice required an element of repetition.

In this case, a school was faced with a unique (in its experience) situation when it had to decide whether to continue the employment of a Christian teacher who believed in the sanctity of her marriage vows, and whose husband had been convicted of sexual offences against pupils at the school where he worked.

The case

The Claimant was a junior school teacher and a committed and practising Anglican Christian married to the headteacher of another local school. In 2013, her husband and later convicted of downloading indecent images of children and of voyeurism involving school pupils.

Immediately after the arrest in January 2013, the Claimant took a period of sick leave from work having been reassured by Mrs Seymour, the head of her school, that her job would remain open. The Claimant decided that, whilst she did not condone or wish to give the impression of condoning her husband's activities, she would stay with her husband provided she was satisfied he had demonstrated unequivocal repentance. She did so because of the importance she placed on her marriage vows and specifically her commitment, in the presence of God, for better or worse.

Despite both the Council and the School's confirmation that there was no evidence the Claimant had known about or been involved in her husband's actions, it was made clear to the Claimant that it would not be appropriate to return to work if she continued to stand by her husband and that disciplinary procedures would be implemented. The Claimant was warned that if she decided to stay with her husband, the governing body of the School and the parents did not wish her to return (although no evidence of this was provided). When the Claimant asked if she was being invited to choose between her marriage vows and her career, she was met with "shrugs and raised eyebrows".

After her husband's conviction, the Claimant was suspended and the HR director of the Council told the School that it considered the Claimant to be unsuitable as a teacher for as long as she stood by her husband. Following a discliplinary hearing in September 2013, she was summarily dismissed for having chosen to maintain a relationship with her husband, which the panel believed made her unsuitable to carry out her safeguarding responsibilities, and because her decisions were in direct contravention to the school's ethos. Her appeal was dismissed.

The Claimant brought Employment Tribunal proceedings for wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal and indirect religion or belief discrimination. The Tribunal held she had been wrongfully and unfairly dismissed, that she believed her marriage vow was sacrosanct and an expression of her religious faith, and that the school had a policy (PCP) of dismissing those who chose not to end a relationship with a person convicted of crimes such as those her husband had committed. However, the Tribunal found that there was no group disadvantage since she would have been dismissed irrespective of her Christian beliefs. It went on to say that, had there been a disadvantage, then her dismissal was not a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (safeguarding).

The Claimant appealed to the EAT against the finding there was no group disadvantage; the Respondents cross-appealed the findings there had been a PCP and that her dismissal was not a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

The EAT upheld the Claimant's appeal, and dismissed the Respondents' cross-appeals, holding that whilst "policy" was not the word used in the Equality Act, a policy was capable of being a practice. The Respondents' practice had been to dismiss any employee who stood by their partner or spouse in the Claimant's position. Whilst this might have been the only time they had faced this "highly unusual" situation, the Tribunal had found that the Respondents had operated a "closed mind" to the Claimant's circumstances, taking the view there could be no alternative to dismissal, and the evidence of the Chair of Governors was that this was how they would have treated anyone in such circumstances (whereas in Nottingham City Transport Ltd v Harvey, the flawed disciplinary procedure was not standard practice).

The EAT held that there had been a group disadvantage. The correct question was whether being forced to choose between their partner and their career might have given rise to a particular disadvantage (all other things being equal) for those with a religious belief in the sanctity of marriage vows. Both those in long-term loving relationships outside marriage and those who were married would face a very real additional disadvantage if forced to choose between their partner and their career; those who also held a religious belief in the sanctity of marriage would face a particular dilemma and disadvantage.

What to take away

Would it be discrimination to dismiss someone in a long-term unmarried relationship? The EAT took great care to stress that no less respect should be given for those who are in a loving and committed relationship (whether or not married) but did not share the Claimant's religious views about marriage. However, it is possible that someone could make out a similar claim based on philosophical belief.

The case also demonstrates the difference between a "one off" act and what happened here, where even although the Respondents had never faced that situation before, the evidence was sufficient for the Tribunal to find what its practice or policy would be.

A word of caution: it seems that the Respondents did not adduce evidence before the Tribunal to demonstrate that the decision to dismiss was objectively justified, but did not do so. In principle, if they had been able to demonstrate this, the claim might still have failed.

Although not raised in this case, it is unlawful to discriminate because of marital status. In several cases, the question has arisen as to whether a female employee is protected where the reason for the treatment complained of was not that she was married, but that she was married to a particular person. There are three conflicting EAT decisions in this area. In Hawkins v Atex Group Ltd and others (2012), the President of the EAT stated that the key question is whether the claimant suffered the treatment complained of because she was married to the man in question. The relevant comparator is a person who is not married, but whose relevant circumstances are otherwise the same as those of the claimant (usually someone in a "common law" marriage with the same person).

The Claimant in this case was a junior school teacher. Had she been an infant school teacher working with the youngest pupils, there would have been an added complication to the case. The Childcare Act 2006 and subsequent secondary legislation makes it necessary in certain circumstances for those working with children to disclose the convictions of those with whom they share a household (even if only as a lodger) and they may be barred from relevant childcare provision (under Regulation 9 of the Childcare (Disqualification) Regulations 2009. This includes staff working with pre-schoolers and Reception age children and children receiving childcare up to the age of 8 in school settings outside school hours, and those who manage such a provision. This includes volunteers. Further details of the Regulations and what they mean for schools and employers are to be found in the government's Guidance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions