UK: Brexit Q & A's: Finance And Financial Services

The Brexit process

What is the mechanism for leaving the EU?

The UK government is likely to use Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, under which a member state wishing to leave the EU must give notice of its intention to withdraw (a period of negotiation of two years is envisaged). That period may be extended with the agreement of all 27 remaining member states. Reaching the end of the two year period without such an agreement, and without all 27 member states accepting an extension, would result in the UK leaving the EU with no immediate replacement agreed. Any analysis of the long term consequences of Brexit is necessarily speculative at this stage, until the UK's future relationship with the EU is settled.

What will happen next?

Today the UK will still be a member of the EU. A period of intensive negotiation of the terms of exit is likely to follow. It is conceivable that the EU will offer further concessions in an attempt to head-off Brexit, but difficult to see how this would be compatible with the Brexit vote. The Prime Minister has consistently stated that given a vote for Brexit he would have no choice but to serve a notice under Article 50 without delay, but with his decision to resign, the likelihood is that such notice will not be served immediately. In any event, this only starts the Brexit process. For the next two years at least the UK will almost certainly remain an EU member.

To bring about the UK's departure from the EU as a matter of domestic law, primary legislation would be required. This would involve the repeal or amendment of the European Communities Act 1972, accompanied by a decision on what elements of current UK laws derived from EU law should remain in place and what should be repealed, amended or replaced. In the short to medium term much EU derived law is likely to remain in place.

In the event of a further referendum on Scottish independence, there might be parallel negotiations for the UK to leave the EU, for Scotland to leave the UK, and for Scotland to join the EU.

Will the UK lose access to the single market?

Without negotiating fresh trade agreements with the EU, the UK is likely to lose free access to the single market. Whether the UK can negotiate such access without accepting the free movement of EU citizens and budgetary transfers to the EU is impossible to answer at present.

The loss of "passport rights" (i.e. the right for a UK financial institution to carry out regulated activities in another EU jurisdiction) could have potentially serious consequences for UK institutions and the ramifications of this would need to be worked through both nationally and by individual firms. One option for financial institutions relying on the passport granted under single market directives in carrying out business throughout the EU from a base in the UK is to relocate to another EU country. Many factors would impact the relocation issue including those relating to consolidated supervision and regulatory capital considerations. Where the EU legislation provides for institutions authorised in countries with equivalent levels of legislation to enjoy special access rights, no doubt the UK would look to obtain status as such a country. Under MiFID 2 financial services businesses based outside the EU could in principle benefit from an ESMA registration regime for third country entities operating in wholesale markets. The UK having an equivalent financial regulatory regime would be a precondition to benefiting from this although this is not a given, notwithstanding the UK being stricter in several regulated areas or conforming with international regulatory standards that are followed by most major financial centres (including the EU).

Many established financial institutions do of course already operate in a number of European jurisdictions and for them it would be more a reorganisation rather than a relocation.

It appears that the UK will also have to try to strike trade deals with non-EU countries where the EU has a trade deal, because on Brexit the UK will no longer benefit from the existing trade deals between the EU and those countries although membership of the WTO may replicate the position for a number of important jurisdictions.

Note incidentally that this issue is not just one for looking on a passport out into Europe by a UK financial institution but the challenge of deciding how financial institutions organise passporting in rights : there would need to be a review of how these arrangements could continue to work– or have to be reinvented.

What might the new structure look like?

Many commentators think that the likelihood is that the UK would end up with its own special new structure which does not follow any particular model currently enjoyed by another European country.

The most likely outcome appears to be a period of some years while the UK seeks to negotiate such bilateral deals with the EU and other countries. It is uncertain at present what stance the EU will treat on things like tariffs and import duties. Other possible outcomes include a Norwegian model of the UK joining the European Economic Area and a World Trade Organisation model relying on rights and obligations under the WTO rules. Replicating the EU's arrangements with Norway or Switzerland (which is part of European Free Trade Association) would require the UK to comply with many present and future EU regulations and continuing to allow the free movement of people, and Brexit campaigners have consistently said that this would be an unacceptable outcome .

What will happen to existing EU related laws in the UK?

EU law is deeply embedded in the UK. EU Regulations are "directly applicable" in all Member States but would presumably cease to apply in the UK on actual Brexit, unless replicated or preserved by new legislation here (which in many cases would be a likely outcome at least as a stop-gap until tailored legislation could be put in place). EU Directives apply as implemented in the UK, sometimes by primary legislation, but more often by various forms of secondary legislation pursuant to section 2 of the European Communities Act 1972, and this may affect how far such legislation would automatically fall away. Simply allowing all UK domestic law derived from the EU to lapse, or revoking it, would be unworkable in the short term.

In much of the financial services space, the UK had comprehensive regulation in advance of implementing the numerous EU driven initiatives and, in numerous instances, kept gold plating. Known for providing a prudent regulatory environment, that approach is unlikely to change – and indeed should not be expected to change given that the UK regulators would still be expected to take a lead within the wider global regulatory environment – within the IOSCO framework etc.

Is the UK government likely to introduce legislation to address the risk?

We think it highly likely that the UK government will introduce some form of overarching legislation to address the fundamental legal uncertainties caused by Brexit. An obvious parallel (ironically) is the position at the time the UK was considering adopting the euro where it seemed likely that legislation would be required to avoid any doubts about the continuity of contracts notwithstanding a change of currency.

How will trade organisations in the financial sector such as the Loan Market Association and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association respond?

We cannot speak for the LMA, ISDA or any other industry association, but think it inevitable that they will take a part in addressing the consequences of Brexit and in particular on the effect it will have on new and existing documentation. It is, however, likely to take some time for documentation and practice to settle in the light of Brexit. It is also possible that such bodies will consider that they have no remit to issue general guidance on Brexit. The LMA will not, for example, offer legal advice to the loan markets, and may confine itself to lobbying the government as to its response, and to addressing issues in its standard form of documents.

General issues affecting loan documentation

What effect will a wider or prolonged period of market volatility have?

There is no simple answer to this. The question is speculative and largely beyond the scope of this note. It has been suggested that it seems reasonable to expect a period of volatility in financial markets, with possible increases in interest rates, increased costs for non-UK lenders in funding in sterling, and a reluctance to lend to UK businesses in currencies other than sterling. FX rates may be volatile, changing the mark-to-market value of transactions. Companies with a financial year (or half-year) ending on 30 June may have to test their financial covenants at that point, however many borrowers use an average exchange rate over the relevant period, which should smooth out immediate FX fluctuations.

There may though be some immediate issues. For example, we have been providing urgent advice to investment fund managers who need to plan ahead in case of an immediate period of market volatility means that it is impossible to ensure fair pricing of a fund, and so there may be exceptional circumstances which trigger suspension of dealing in units of the fund.

What effect will a Brexit vote have on existing loan documentation?

The Brexit vote will be followed by a period of negotiation. It is unlikely that existing loan documentation will automatically terminate or that the parties will have contractual rights to terminate it, unless such rights have been expressly negotiated, certainly in the period up to actual Brexit. It has, however, been relatively uncommon in the run-up to Brexit to include "Brexit terms": i.e. terms dealing specifically with the consequences of a vote for Brexit. Following Brexit, a party may be in a stronger position to claim that a contract has been frustrated (i.e. that performance has become impossible for reasons beyond that party's control), but this seems relatively unlikely to be successful in the case of loan and security documentation, and will be subject to any general legislation that might be introduced to preserve existing contracts. A contract heavily dependent on EU legislation could in theory be frustrated by Brexit, or a force majeure term might be triggered, particularly for a contract heavily dependent on the ongoing operation of particular EU legislation, but such a claim would be difficult in the absence of issues such as the loss of passport rights (see further point 20 below).

How will governing law be affected?

English law facility documentation almost invariably contains an express choice of law provision. The current EU rules on governing law are set out in Rome I and II Regulations. The UK may choose to leave the substance of these rules in place, but under the supervision of the UK courts. Alternatively it may fall back on the rules in place in the UK immediately before those Regulations. In the case of contractual obligations, these were contained in the Rome Convention, which is broadly similar to Rome I, and respects the parties' choice of law. Courts elsewhere within the EU would presumably continue to respect the parties' choice of governing law in an English law document, because they would continue to apply Rome I and II.

How will jurisdiction be affected?

The facility documents will also usually contain a submission to jurisdiction, typically that the courts of England have exclusive jurisdiction to settle disputes, but with a right for the finance parties to take proceedings or concurrent proceedings elsewhere. There will often also be security documents governed by appropriate local laws in respect of assets located outside England. Obligors incorporated outside England should have appointed a process agent in England for service of legal proceedings.

The Recast Brussels Regulation sets out which courts of EU Member States have jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters, and provides for mutual recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial disputes within the EU. The general rule is that the courts where the defendant is domiciled have jurisdiction, but this is usually "trumped" where the parties have agreed that the courts of another Member State should jurisdiction, or where assets such as real estate are the subject matter of the contract.

On Brexit, the UK will probably accede to the 2007 Lugano Convention (currently in force in the EU, Switzerland, Norway and Iceland), which is broadly similar to the current EU regime in terms of jurisdiction, and would generally oblige EU courts to recognise a choice of jurisdiction provision in favour of the English courts in a finance document. Even without this, the English courts are still likely to uphold an English choice of law provision, but how the courts of other Member States will regard such provisions is a matter for their own laws, and may give rise to uncertainty.

If the UK does not accede to the Lugano Convention, there would be no bar to parallel proceedings, provided the courts in other jurisdictions are prepared to accept jurisdiction under their own rules of private international law.

At present, English law permits legal proceedings to be served outside the jurisdiction with the agreement of the parties, within the EU where the UK has jurisdiction under the Recast Brussels Regulation, or otherwise with the leave of the English courts. Unless the UK accedes to the Lugano Convention on Brexit, which contains similar rules, the leave of the English courts may become necessary in order to serve proceedings in the EU.

How will enforcement of judgements be affected?

The recognition and enforcement of judgments within the EU is provided for in the Brussels Regulation. Without that, and unless the UK accedes to the Lugano Convention, the enforceability of judgments of the English courts elsewhere in the EU will depend on the laws of each Member State. This may increase the attractions of a provision for arbitration of disputes under the facility documents, using the enforcement mechanisms under the New York Convention.

Will the substance of English law be affected?

It is uncertain how far the UK government will decide to leave existing EU law in place as part of English law on Brexit. Given how deeply EU law is embedded in UK law, whether being directly effective here, incorporated by secondary legislation, or simply referenced in UK legislation, a measure to ensure substantial continuity post-Brexit seems inevitable. If the UK opts for EEA membership, present and future EU legislation falling within the scope of the EEA Agreement will apply to the UK.

Will references to EU law in the documentation continue to work?

Facility documentation often contains references to particular legal enactments, including EU Regulations or UK legislation implementing EU Directives, such as the Financial Collateral Regulations or Rome I and II. The standard approach in finance documents is to include a term that a provision of law is a reference to that provision as amended and re-enacted. This means that the documents should be read as referring automatically to whatever may replace such EU derived enactment under English law, although there is scope for uncertainty and a need to review documentation with this issue in mind.

Specific Facility Documentation issues

Will the same answers apply to every facility document?

There is a reasonable degree of consistency across documentation in the commercial loan markets, particularly in the case of "boilerplate" provisions1, but of course documentation varies and must be reviewed in each case before advice can be given. Additional considerations may be relevant to retail lending, such as the principle of "treating the customer fairly" as may similar consumer related practices, rules and guidance.

How will references in the documentation to EU law work post Brexit?

Given that a period of negotiation with the EU of at least two years is required before Brexit, there is a window for review and potential renegotiation between parties to existing finance documents. The vote for Brexit is, however, likely to have a more immediate effect on the negotiation of new finance documentation, although detailed consideration will be required to determine when it is necessary to amend provisions dependent upon or derived from EU laws which remain in place, for the time being, or may be preserved or replicated on Brexit.

Will defiinitions and interpretation provisions work?

References to EU Regulations and Directives no longer in force in England will need to be replaced in due course. A standard term that references to a provision of law are to that provision as amended or re-enacted should mean that the relevant term should "update" to a replacement UK provision, assuming it can be said to "amend or re-enact". Subject to some sort of statutory measure to continue EU laws, many references to EU laws, such as to the "centre of main interests" (COMI) under the Regulation on Insolvency Proceedings, will presumably either continue to operate or will fall away as meaningless.

TARGET2, which is frequently defined, is the real time gross payment system for the settlement of euro transactions within the Eurozone and as such references to it seem likely to be unaffected. The Bank of England (and the Sveriges Riksbank of Sweden) do not participate in TARGET2.

Can the facility still be utilised?

Short of the facility agreement being frustrated (which seems unlikely) Brexit will only affect the ability to draw or roll over advances if it constitutes or triggers an event of default (or possibly potential event of default), or if repeating representations become untrue.

How will optional currency provisions work?

There seems no obvious reason why Brexit should affect the optional currency provisions of a facility agreement.

Will prepayment and cancellation provisions be triggered?

Brexit seems unlikely to trigger the illegality provisions of a facility agreement unless the loss of the single passport means that lenders or their affiliates lose the necessary licences or authorisations to perform their obligations and to continue as lenders. Financial institutions whose home state regulator is in the UK will have to revisit how they ensure the proper licences and authorisations are in place for any business originated out of branches in EU member states operating under a passport. If it ultimately became illegal for a lender to continue its activities this would be likely to trigger a repayment obligation or, depending on the terms of the documents or as a result of negotiation, a shift of lending office or transfer of the loan to another lender. A loss of passporting rights may cause serious difficulties for financial institutions, but since a syndicated facility does not usually tie lenders to a particular lending office, still less to one in the UK, Brexit seems unlikely in itself to trigger prepayment obligations.

Borrowers may seek to negotiate prepayment rights linked to Brexit, but this seems a largely commercial rather than legal issue.

Depending on the documentation, many borrowers will often have a right of prepayment of single lenders invoking tax gross-up provisions, tax indemnity or increased costs provisions.

Will interest provisions continue to operate?

No immediate changes to definitions of LIBOR or EURIBOR seem called for.

Will market disruption clauses be triggered?

The drafting of such provisions varies, but a lender whose costs of funds is in excess of LIBOR usually has a right to pass on increased costs, and a borrower may have a right to prepay that lender. If screen rates of interest become unavailable there are a number of potential fall-backs, including reference banks. At this stage it is difficult to say whether such provisions may be engaged and whether market-standard provisions will be heavily negotiated. The Eurozone crisis saw a number of lenders considering whether they could invoke increased costs clauses in view of their difficulties in obtaining funds in the interbank markets.

Will tax gross up and indemnities be triggered?

The tax impact of Brexit will depend on a number of factors, including the nature of the UK's future relationship with the EU. Brexit will have no impact on the UK's network of double tax treaties, which is not based on EU membership, and there is no immediate reason to suppose that the withholding tax position under facility agreements will be adversely affected, or that the relevant provisions require amendment. But in due course, Brexit will probably mean that the European Directives providing exemption from withholding tax on intra-group interest payments will cease to apply to UK companies, which could impact UK headquartered groups. Loans form lenders or bondholders should not be affected, save that loans to Italian borrowers will become subject to withholding tax at the point the UK leaves the EU.

FATCA provisions are likely to be unaffected, since they largely depend on agreements with the US that are put in place at national rather than EU level, such as the UK/US agreement of September 2012.

The EU VAT Directives have been implemented in the UK by domestic UK legislation. Brexit will not, therefore, cause the UK legislation implementing the VAT Directives to fall away automatically, and VAT will continue to apply in the UK, although there could be an impact on cross-border supplies.

In relation to trade finance, the EU Customs Duty Regulations will no longer apply to the UK on actual Brexit, leaving the UK without any customs duties, but the position will depend on what new arrangements were put in place.

Will increased costs and other indemnities apply?

Increased costs provisions for costs attributable to lenders having funded advances are usually tied to the introduction or change in law or regulation, with certain matters being excepted, often to prevent double counting. As such they seem likely to catch a range of increased costs that may apply from arrangements put in place on Brexit, and it would appear unrealistic in most cases for borrowers to expect to exempt Brexit from this, because that would depart from the traditional allocation of risk between lender and borrower. An argument that a lender should bear the risk of Brexit because it can assess the impact it will have on it at this stage may be a difficult one.

Will representations and undertakings be breached?

Representations will require review for applicability in the light of Brexit. A representation such as that a borrower's COMI is and will remain in the UK may be analysed in a number of ways, and will ideally be amended or dispensed with. An argument that it is breached on Brexit seems unattractive.

The practical effect on undertakings to comply with laws will depend on the new legal structure post Brexit, and the principles of construction used in the documents. Our assumption is that in the short term at least the UK will need to preserve EU-derived legislation in force, and that wholesale revisions to representations and undertakings is not required. The number of express references to EU legislation in facility documentation is relatively few. To the extent borrowers remain subject to EU laws then representations and undertakings referring to such laws should continue to apply. Seeking to require compliance with EU laws no longer applicable in the UK will in most cases seem unreasonable. Undertakings such as compliance with laws will automatically pick up what is applicable to borrowers and their businesses from time to time.

Will there be an event of default?

Those most likely to be relevant (subject to any legislation to preserve existing contract rights and obligations) are probably misrepresentation, unlawfulness and material adverse change.

The wording of material adverse change events of default differ. Case law has slightly reduced the risks a lender runs in seeking to invoke an event of default on the basis of material adverse change: if there is no event of default a demand will be ineffective, but failure to allow utilisation of the facility runs the risk of a damages claim. Invoking such a provision on the basis of Brexit will probably be something of a last resort, although there may be situations where Brexit is likely to be particularly detrimental to a borrower's business. In any event, a lender cannot usually invoke such a provision in relation to facts known at the time the facility agreement was entered into.

How will payment mechanics provisions be affected?

It is difficult to say how payment mechanisms will be affected in the long term by Brexit. Although payment services are subject to EU legislation, it would be unduly alarmist to suggest that Brexit will cause issues for the interbank markets that will not be dealt with. It seems unlikely that Brexit will trigger a Disruption Event (a material disruption to payment or communications systems) under an LMA style facility agreement, or that any specific amendment to such provisions is appropriate.

How easily can the documentation be amended?

Bilateral facility agreements are likely to restrict amendments to their terms without the consent of both parties. Syndicated facilities usually permit variations and waivers with the consent of majority lenders (or of all lenders for "all lender matters") and of the obligors.

One option to consider is to include a right for the lender, or the lenders/agent, to amend the facility documents to the extent that it or they (perhaps acting reasonably and in consultation with borrower) determine is necessary (perhaps to reflect market practice) as a result of Brexit. Borrowers may be expected to resist such a provision unless it requires their consent, but some such right for lenders to make amendments has been relatively common over the years, being either a general right, or one triggered by a particular contingency such as the UK adopting the euro or a Brexit.

Should agency provisions be amended?

Agents and security trustees will review their duties and protections under a syndicated facility, and no doubt take a cautious approach. It is conceivable that Brexit will involve a considerable administrative burden, but in general the documents should already provide adequate protection.

Should governing law and enforcement provisions be amended?

Most of the reasons why parties choose English governing law for facility documentation appear to be unrelated to the UK's membership of the EU, and a choice of English governing law should remain appropriate and effective. Depending on the arrangements put in place on Brexit, it is possible on a worst case scenario that the ability to serve proceedings before the English courts elsewhere in the EU may require the leave of the English courts. It is therefore all the more important to require borrowers and security providers to appoint a process agent in England. That is of course already common practice.

What will be the effect on security documents?

Many of the general issues likely to arise from Brexit have already been mentioned.

In general security interests should not be prejudiced by Brexit, although clearly the value of the collateral could be affected. English law security creates a property right and this will remain intact regardless of Brexit, although matters such as cross-border insolvency and enforcement regimes deriving from EU laws should be reviewed. The lender's remedies under its security should be largely unaffected, although the right of appropriation of financial collateral derives ultimately from the Financial Collateral Directive and may be prejudiced by a repeal of the European Communities Act without some holding measure being put in place.

There is no reason to suppose that lenders' contractual rights under English law guarantees will be adversely affected. A guarantee may be released by many steps taken without the guarantor's consent, unless there is suitable protective wording, but Brexit is unlikely to prejudice guarantees in the absence of some exceptional provision or circumstances. The usual provision that the guarantee is not prejudiced by unenforceability or illegality of the guaranteed liabilities ought to remain effective, failing which there is usually an indemnity provision for the lender to fall back on.

Swap Documentation issues

How will Swap documentation be affected?

Many of the considerations set out above with respect to loan documentation will apply equally to swap documentation, subject to well understood differences between the two types of documentation. Under standard ISDA master agreements, a Brexit is unlikely to trigger an event of default (including a breach of representation), an early termination event (including an illegality or a force majeure event) or any of the standard disruption events applicable under relevant ISDA Definitions to vanilla interest rate and FX derivatives. There may, however, be Part 5 provisions in individual Schedules (including cross-default provisions to a related loan agreement that is itself triggered by a Brexit) that lead to a different conclusion.

EMIR will remain relevant as the UK will want to enact measures that are at least equivalent to EMIR, not least in order to ensure that UK clearing houses can become recognised third country central counterparties. The implications for swap documentation containing provisions relating to EMIR are at this stage unclear, as is the issue of applicability of such provisions following a Brexit but pending transposition.

How will repo and stocklending documentation be affected?

Again similar considerations apply and, as before, there are unlikely to be any immediate consequences for standard repo and stock-lending master agreements. It remains to be seen whether the UK will want to transpose regulations such as SFTR and CSDR. Our guess is that the UK will want to do so, as these regulations are such an integral part of the European market for repo and stock-lending.

Footnote

1 Boilerplate clauses are those which are not specific to a parcular transacon (generally having nothing to do with the commercial terms), and are typical for commercial agreements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.