UK: Are Notice Clauses Always Fair And Reasonable?

Last Updated: 25 April 2016
Article by Jeremy Glover

As we have discussed in previous issues of IQ and our Annual Review, under the FIDIC form there is a requirement on both the Contractor1 and Employer2 to submit notices about claims and that if they do not do so within the timescales set out in the contract there is a real chance that they will lose the right to make such a claim.

This issue came up in the recent English case of Commercial Management (Investments) Ltd v Mitchell Design and Construct Ltd & Anr.3  In April 2002 Regorco had entered into a subcontract with Mitchell to carry out certain ground treatment (or vibro-compaction) works at a site on which a warehouse was to be built. By a separate subcontract Regorco also agreed to carry out the piling at the site.  The vibro-compaction works were carried out at the end of March 2002, and the piling was installed a month or two later. Practical completion of the building was achieved on 19 December 2002. However, some nine years later, in November 2011, the sub-tenant in occupation of the warehouse complained of settlement of the slab beneath the production area.

Regorco's standard terms and conditions had provided at clause 12(d) that:

"all claims under ... this Contract must, in order to be considered valid, be notified to us in writing within 28 days of the appearance of any alleged defect ... and shall in any event be deemed to be waived and absolutely barred unless so notified within one calendar year of the date of completion of the works".

Regorco said that the limitation of liability clause, clause 12(d), meant that the claim could not be brought. The claim had not been notified within 28 days of the appearance of the defect or within a year of the completion of the works. The first question that the Judge, Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart, had to consider was whether and to what extent Regorco's standard terms applied. He held that they did not. However, the Judge went on to comment on whether or not clause 12(d) would have prevented the claim from being brought, had he decided otherwise.4

The Unfair Contract Terms Act

The Judge did this by reference to the English Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 ("UCTA"), which applies where one or other party puts forward its standard conditions. Section 1 of UCTA provides that, apart from cases of personal injury or death, a person cannot restrict his liability for negligence:

"except in so far as the term or notice satisfies the requirement of reasonableness".

Section 11 of UCTA further provides:

"(1) In relation to a contract term, the requirement of reasonableness ... is that the term shall have been a fair and reasonable one to be included having regard to the circumstances which were, or ought reasonably to have been, known to or in the contemplation of the parties when the contract was made."

Reference should also be made to the UCTA guidelines which say that the following should also be taken into account:  

"(a) The strength of the bargaining positions of the parties relative to each other, taking account (among other things) alternative means by which the customer's requirements could have been met;

(b) Whether the customer received an inducement to agree to the term, or in accepting it had an opportunity of entering into a similar contract with other persons, but without having to accept a similar term;

(c) Whether the customer knew or ought reasonably have known of the existence and extent of the term (having regard, among other things, to any custom of the trade and any course of dealing between the parties);

(d) Where the term excludes or restricts any relevant liability if some condition is not complied with, whether it was reasonable at the time of the contract to expect that compliance with that condition would be practicable; and

(e) Whether the goods were manufactured, processed or adapted to the special order of the customer."

The nature of the groundworks

The burden of showing that clause 12(d) was reasonable rested with Regorco, as the clause was part of their standard terms. The Judge concluded that the only operative trigger that would start the running of the 28-day period was the appearance of a defect. The event complained of could only be negligent design or construction in relation to that work. The Judge then went on to consider the nature of the groundwork in question and said that:

"In practical terms, any defect in the ground compaction work would never be visible because it would be concealed by the structure above it. Accordingly, any defect in that work would manifest itself in the form of some distress to the structure of the building, probably cracking of the floor slab or a wall.

It is in the nature of ground compaction work and piling that in general defects do not appear until sometime after the work has been carried out, although ... occasionally piles or ground improvement columns can fail whilst the contractor is still on site ... In general, failure is unlikely to occur until substantial loading is applied to the ground or piles ..."

As the Judge noted, this was what you would expect the designer of the ground treatment work to anticipate.  There would not only be the loads imposed by the building itself, but also the loads imposed by the use of the building. The Judge gave the example of forklift trucks moving goods around if the building was being used as a warehouse.  

This was of some importance as the Judge stressed that this meant that there would often be a substantial lapse of time between the carrying out of the work and the occurrence of any visible cracking to the fabric of the building, and an even longer lapse of time until the likely cause of the cracking is established. Even the building of a simple warehouse would take a few months. Therefore it would not be for a few months that it became loaded by the user. Although ground treatment works might fail whilst the subcontractor is still on site, here the potential for a claim is reduced because the subcontractor would have the chance to put the work right straightaway. The key to the reasonableness of the condition precedent in question was the nature of the work being undertaken. In this case what had to be taken into consideration was the fact that where the failure of ground or piles occurs under load, that failure is usually a gradual process.

Was the limitation clause reasonable?

This case was heard in the Technology and Construction Courts, where the judges have specialist experience of construction disputes. Here Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart said that:

"It is, in my experience at least, rare for a failure of ground or piles to manifest itself in a period measured in months, rather than in years. Of course, there may be exceptional cases when the design or construction is so poor that failure occurs almost immediately upon loading, but I cannot recall such a case. In this case, the lapse of time was in excess of 10 years: whilst I would not suggest that such a long period is normal, it is more of the order that one would expect.

Another feature of this type of failure is that it is almost invariably progressive, starting with small cracks which then grow larger. Such cracking, when it begins, may not be readily visible ... in these circumstances it is not unlikely that the first 'appearance' of cracking may go unnoticed by anyone for days if not weeks."

By this time, the contractor who was subject to the notice clause would not be the user of the building and would be in no position to observe any cracking when it appears. The Judge noted that the UCTA Guidelines are concerned with "what it is reasonable to expect, not what actually happens". Looking at those Guidelines, the Judge commented that whilst Mitchell could have sought to engage a subcontractor other than Regorco whose terms and conditions did not contain clause 12(d), he did not consider that it was reasonable to expect, at the time when the subcontract was made, that compliance by Mitchell with the 28-day time limit imposed by clause 12(d) would, in most cases at least, be practicable.

In other words the Judge thought that item item (d) of the UCTA Guidelines was the most important factor and concluded that the clause 12(d) failed the reasonableness test:

"the parties would not reasonably have expected - if they had thought about it - that compliance with both the 28 day time limit and the requirement to make a claim within a year would be achievable, let alone practicable, save in rare cases".

The FIDIC form

As one might expect, there was discussion in the judgment about the FIDIC time bar. The Judge thought that the circumstances of most projects where the FIDIC form is used were different to the project here. In particular:

  1. Contractors on building projects generally know when a contract is in delay or whether the work has been disrupted and so giving notice of the relevant event within 28 days should not, in the words of the Judge, "be unduly onerous".
  2. Under the FIDIC form, time runs from the date on which the contractor is aware, or should have been aware, of the event in question. Here, under clause 12(d) time ran from when the defect was capable of being seen, rather than from when the contractor knew or ought to have known about it, which made clause 12(d) more onerous than sub-clause 20.1 of the FIDIC contract.


This is undoubtedly correct, although many will disagree with the Judge's comment that the provisions of sub-clause 20.1 are not "unduly onerous".  However, there are likely to be instances on many construction projects where works are covered up with the result that defects can be difficult or impossible to identify.  Under the FIDIC form, as the Judge noted, where this happens, it will be difficult to suggest that the contractor was aware of the event, but equally, if that suggestion is made, this case provides support for the argument that attempting to rely on such a clause in those circumstances was unreasonable.



3. [2016] EWHC 76 (TCC)

4. Under English law, his comments are described as "obiter" which means that they are treated as observations only and do not form part of the judgment itself.

International Quarterly is produced quartely by Fenwick Elliott LLP, the leading specialist construction law firm in the UK, working with clients in the building, engineering and energy sectors throughout the world.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jeremy Glover
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.