European Union: Credit Risk Mitigation And Legal Opinions

Last Updated: 19 April 2016
Article by Azad Ali and Oliver Abel Smith


The Capital Requirements Regulation (EU Regulation No. 575/2013) ("CRR") is part of the EU's legislative package to implement regulatory capital standards issued by the Basel Committee.  The CRR consolidates standards arising from the Basel III package with preceding standards from the Basel II Accord that remained unchanged under the Basel III standards.  Rules relating to eligible credit risk mitigation ("CRM") were largely unchanged under Basel III although the Basel Committee may in due course tighten the CRM regime.

CRM is important for many banking institutions as it reduces credit risk-weighted assets, and therefore the amount of credit risk capital required.  Leverage ratio requirements have to a degree undermined this driver as the calculation of the exposure measure in the leverage ratio ignores any CRM associated with any given credit asset.  More recently, the European Central Bank, in its new guise as the prudential supervisor for significant banking institutions within the Single Supervisory Mechanism, has carried out examinations of the balance sheets of banks within its supervisory purview, which has included reviewing the documentation and legal opinions related to the use of CRM.  This process is prompting many such institutions to make documentary and procedural changes to ensure that their use of CRM is robust and subject to proper due-diligence from a legal perspective.

The CRR is directly applicable to financial institutions in the EU and came into force on 1 January 2014.  This note serves as a reminder of the types of credit risk mitigants that are contemplated under CRR and of the specific requirement for legal opinions introduced by the CRR.

Unfunded Credit Protection

Unfunded CRM includes uncollateralised guarantees (and, by analogy, risk participations) and credit derivatives, in each case provided by eligible protection providers and satisfying certain conditions.  Eligible protection providers include sovereigns, local governments, banks, investment firms and other rated entities (whether rated externally or ascribed an internal rating (in the case of banks using the Internal Ratings Based (IRB) approach to credit risk)). Additional conditions apply to IRB banks.  Other requirements address the legal enforceability of the credit protection in all relevant jurisdictions and, in the case of credit derivatives, to the scope of the credit event and settlement provisions.  Guarantees are also subject to specific eligibility conditions.

Funded Credit Protection

One method for a bank to ensure that loans are pre-funded or are derecognised as credit assets from its balance sheet under IAS 39 is to enter into funded participations. The participant provides the funds for the loan by way of a settlement payment rather than by way of cash collateral. In turn, the loan exposure comes off the balance sheet of the lending bank (the grantor of the participation) for both accounting and regulatory capital purposes and is assumed by the participant instead.  The participant also assumes an exposure to the lending bank as it relies on that bank to pass on loan repayments to it. As this type of participation does not generate a credit exposure for the lending bank, it does not fall to be considered within the CRM provisions in the CRR.  Funded participations are typically documented under an English-law governed template agreement prepared by the Loan Market Association or, for trade finance transactions, under the BAFT-IFSA master participation agreement (although the latter would not necessarily allow de-recognition under IAS 39 without amendment).

Funded credit protection, as envisaged in the CRR, typically takes place by way of on-balance sheet netting or the provision of collateral.  On-balance sheet netting is permissible typically in relation to loans and deposits involving the same counterparty where there is an agreement between the bank and the counterparty to provide for the loan exposure to be offset by the deposit liability.  On-balance sheet netting can also apply in relation to repo transactions and securities or commodities lending or borrowing transactions.

Other types of funded credit protection could involve a credit-linked note (provided the embedded credit default swap itself qualifies as eligible unfunded credit protection) or collateral that supports a guarantee, a credit derivative or other economically equivalent arrangements such as risk participations.  There are additional rules determining which types of collateral are eligible and what haircuts are to be applied to the collateral including in the case where there is a currency mismatch between the loan and the collateral.  Wrong way risk, where there is a material positive correlation between the credit quality of the obligor and the value of the collateral, is also addressed in terms of limits on eligible collateral.  These are supplemented by operational requirements in respect of collateral management.  Additional rules address the minimum maturity for credit protection and limits on the recognition of CRM where the maturity of the protection is shorter than that of the underlying loan.

Requirement for Legal Opinion(s)

The key change introduced by CRR in respect of CRM - both funded and unfunded - is set out at Article 194(1) CRR.  This provides that "the lending institution shall provide, upon request of the competent authority, the most recent version of the independent, written and reasoned legal opinion or opinions that it used to establish whether its credit protection arrangement or arrangements meet the condition [that such arrangements are effective and enforceable in all relevant jurisdictions]".   This marks a significant departure from the position pre-CRR, where financial institutions may not as a matter of course have obtained legal opinions in relation to CRM - instead relying on internal legal review, analogous opinions, individual experience and market practice.

Specific to funded credit protection, Article 194(4) CRR requires that "institutions may recognise funded credit protection in the calculation of the effect of credit risk mitigation only where the lending institution has the right to liquidate or retain, in a timely manner, the assets from which the protection derives in the event of a default, insolvency or bankruptcy....of the obligor and, where applicable, of the custodian holding the collateral."  It would seem necessary therefore to include reasoned insolvency analysis in the opinion(s) provided under the relevant Articles of CRR.

In addition, the requirement for legal review under the CRR extends additionally to the issue of enforceability of collateral arrangements in all relevant jurisdictions (Article 207(3) in relation to financial collateral and gold and Article 209(2)(c) CRR in relation to receivables) and also to the enforceability of guarantees and credit derivatives (Article 213(3) CRR) – all of which supplement the obligations in Article 194.

As to how the requirement for a legal opinion should be interpreted, the EBA has stated1 that "Article 194(1)....requires that credit protection is legally effective and enforceable in all relevant jurisdictions.  This condition must be met before the credit protection can be considered as an eligible credit risk mitigation technique.  The only way for an institution to establish whether this condition is met is to obtain a legal opinion".  The EBA goes on to say that such opinion need not be obtained from external legal counsel but that, as long as it is "independent, written and reasoned", it may also be provided by internal legal counsel.

On the question of whether generic opinions are acceptable, the EBA states "On the issue of whether an opinion must be specific to the relevant transaction covered and the technique employed by the institution or whether it can be a generic one, it depends mainly on the nature of the two.  If an institution engages in the same type of transaction, with counterparties located in the same jurisdiction and uses the same credit risk mitigation technique, then it can rely on the same opinion.  For example, if an institution uses a master netting agreement for which a generic opinion exists, it can use that opinion as long as the latter clearly indicates that the agreement is legally effective and enforceable in all the jurisdictions relevant to the transactions covered by that agreement".

A good example of the type of master netting agreement under contemplation is the International Deposit Netting Agreement sponsored by the BBA, in respect of which legal opinions as to enforceability have been obtained in multiple jurisdictions.  By contrast, ISDA-commissioned close-out netting opinions may not pass muster, since they are concerned generally with the efficacy of close-out netting provisions across multiple derivative transaction types – they do not attest to the enforceability of bespoke credit default swap transactions employed as CRM for individual exposures.  In other words, a top-up opinion may be required2.  Similarly, opinions for repeat deals are likely also to require top-ups, issued by internal if not external legal counsel.

One important point to note is that the relevant netting agreement should not contain a walk away clause3.  There has been debate about whether flawed asset provisions - such as section 2(a)(iii) of the ISDA Master Agreement - constitute a type of walk away provision that falls foul of CRR, but that debate is beyond the scope of this note.


The onus is on relevant institutions seeking to reduce risk capital requirements against credit assets to ensure that they have the requisite legal opinions in place and, if not, to consider what opinions need to be obtained.  Where opinions are required, thought should be given as to whether these can be tailored for repeat deals - with or without top-ups - or whether reliance can be placed upon generic and/or in-house opinions.


1 Question and answer 2013_23 dated 29 July 2013.

2 This is likely to allude, among other things, to the well-known Potts opinion, which helpfully concludes that credit default swap transactions are not insurance as a matter of English law. The Potts opinion is not without its critics, however, although the market operates in reliance upon it.  See additionally in this regard Article 213(3) CRR concerning the requirement for legal review of unfunded credit protection arrangements generally (Including credit derivatives).

3 Article 296.2(d) CRR

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions