UK: The Use Of Technology In Disclosure

Last Updated: 15 April 2016
Article by Lisa Kingston

The use of technology in disclosure

The disclosure of documents is an integral part of litigation in England and Wales and is governed in the practical sense by Practice Direction 31B with which parties must comply when conducting litigation. Whilst Practice Direction 31B makes provision for the extent of the search for electronic documents, it fails to specify the method for that search. As a result, litigating parties tend to be reluctant to fully commit to the use of predictive coding technology to assist with the review of electronic documents, instead preferring the traditional approach of linear review.1

Change may, however, be in the air following the decision of the High Court in Pyrrho Investments Limited and another v MWB Property Limited and others [2016] EWHC 256 (Ch) in February 2016. Master Matthews broke new ground in Pyrrho Investments by not only considering for the first time the method of search for electronic documents, but also endorsing the use of predictive coding software for the disclosure of electronic documents with only a limited manual review of the results.

The purpose of this 57th issue of Insight is to:

  1. provide a brief overview of electronic disclosure and predictive coding;
  2. review the decision in Pyrrho Investments Limited and another v MWB Property Limited and others [2016] EWHC 256 (Ch) and the practice points arising; and
  3. (iii) consider the future of electronic disclosure in the construction law context following the court's decision in Pyrrho Investments.

The obligation to search for documents

Parties who are ordered to give standard disclosure are under an obligation to make a reasonable search for documents (including electronic documents) under CPR Part 31. The Practice Direction to CPR Part 31, PD 31B, states that the search which must be made will depend upon the circumstances of the case. The factors that may be relevant in deciding the reasonableness of a search for electronic documents include (but are not limited to): the number of documents involved; the nature and complexity of the proceedings; the ease and expense of the retrieval of any document; and the significance of any document that is likely to be located during the search. The parties are also obliged to bear in mind that the overriding objective at CPR Part 1 includes dealing with the case in ways that are "proportionate".

Notably, other than a reference in PD 31B to the use of keyword searches or "other automated methods of searching if a full review of each and every document would be unreasonable", there is no guidance whatsoever as to how the search and review of electronic documents should be conducted. The TeCSA/SCL/TECBAR Protocol makes a reference to the use of automated or computer-assisted review tools at paragraph 5.3 but its status as a protocol means that it has no legal force (albeit the parties may be ordered to comply with it in default of proposing a suitable alternative).

Electronic disclosure

Electronic disclosure is a term that has been adopted to refer to the disclosure of electronic documents and has become increasingly important over recent years in light of the fact that around 90% of daily business communication is now electronic.

Over the past few years, the court has put specific measures in place to deal with the disclosure of electronic documents in the form of a Menu Option at CPR 31.5. Under the Menu Option, the court has the power (amongst other things) to make any order in relation to the disclosure of electronic documents that it considers appropriate and the court therefore has complete discretion in relation to eDisclosure.

Predictive coding2

Predictive coding is a document review undertaken by proprietary computer software as opposed to human beings, and was created by eDisclosure providers as a potential solution to the time and cost associated with linear review.

Typically, the parties agree a protocol, after which a representative sample data set of potentially relevant documents is obtained and reviewed for relevance by lawyers who are familiar with the issues in the case and who program the software to review the whole document set. The document review software then applies complex algorithms to the lawyers' review to suggest similar documents for review, and employs search technology to "score" documents for relevance having regard to the issues in the case, and to predict the degree of relevance of the remaining documents in the data set. Documents that achieve a sufficient score can then either be immediately disclosed, or put through a traditional manual review. 

The decision in Pyrrho Investments

Pyrrho Investments was a multimillion-pound case that arose out of allegations of payments that were made in breach of fiduciary duty. Disclosure posed a particular problem as even after deduplication was performed and search terms were run, there were still in excess of 3.1 million relevant documents that remained to be reviewed. Following extensive correspondence, the parties agreed to the use of predictive coding in principle, subject to the approval of the court. The court's endorsement was considered necessary by the parties for two reasons: first, because the method of predictive coding that was contemplated meant that not all the documents disclosed by one of the parties would be reviewed by its legal team prior to disclosure, and secondly, because there was no English law authority specifically endorsing the use of predictive coding.

Master Matthews in the Chancery Division of the High Court referred to the decision of the US Federal Court in Moore v Publicis Groupe 11 Civ 1279 (ALC)(AJP) and the decision of the Irish High Court in Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Ltd v Quinn [2015] IEHC 174, both of which provide helpful commentary on and approval of the use of predictive coding in those jurisdictions. 

The Master approved the use of predictive coding having regard to the facts of the case and because experience in other jurisdictions suggested that predictive coding was useful in "appropriate" cases. Master Matthews found there was nothing to suggest that predictive coding was less reliable than manual review alone, or keyword searches and manual review combined. He also noted that predictive coding can be superior to a linear review as using a computer to apply the approach of a senior lawyer towards the initial sample to the entire document allows for far greater consistency than using a number of lower-grade fee–earners each taking an independent view as to which documents are relevant to which issue. Predictive coding therefore allows for electronic documents to be reviewed at proportionate cost in circumstances where manual review would be much more time-consuming, and probably less reliable.

The Master further pointed out that there was nothing in the Civil Procedure Rules or their associated Practice Directions prohibiting the use of predictive coding; the parties had agreed its use, and the trial was some way off so there was scope for other review methods to be used if necessary. Finally, Master Matthews was of the view that there were no factors pointing against the use of predictive coding in the case.

Practice points

  • The costs of predictive coding (and electronic disclosure in general) are usually considerably less than an equivalent manual review. In Pyrrho Investments, the estimates given for the use of predictive coding in the case ranged from nearly £182,000 plus monthly hosting costs of £15,700, to £468,000 plus monthly hosting costs of nearly £21,000. Master Matthews remarked that this was obviously far less expensive than the full manual alternative which would likely be in the region of several millions of pounds at least.
  • Unlike human review, the cost of predictive coding does not increase proportionally to the number of documents, which makes it a cost-effective and proportionate method of reviewing a large number of electronic documents.
  • The approval of the Master is not currently a prerequisite for a party's use of predictive coding software, but whether predictive coding will be expressly approved by the court depends upon the particular circumstances of the case.
  • Following the reasoning of Master Matthews in Pyrrho Investments, as a general rule, predictive coding may be regarded as being suitable by the court if the quantum is in excess of £3 million, in which case predictive coding would result in a substantial cost-saving and the costs of using the technology would be proportionate to the value of the claim.

The future of electronic disclosure

Despite the availability and merits of predictive coding technology, litigating parties have historically been reticent to use predictive coding because it was not defensible, and the question of whether the English courts would accept predictive coding as a valid electronic disclosure tool had not been answered prior to the decision in Pyrrho Investments. Whether the court's decision will herald the birth of a new standard order for cases that are suitable for predictive coding remains to be seen, but the implication at first instance is that predictive coding is here to stay. At the very least, Master Matthews' decision confirms the benefits and use of predictive coding in appropriate cases in England and Wales, and the decision (at its highest) may lead to a body of English judicial authority supporting its use.

Whether predictive coding is appropriate for complex construction disputes which invariably involve numerous technical issues that may develop over time and can be interrelated, is much less certain. It would be almost impossible, for example, to teach the software how drawings, spreadsheets of data, and photographs relate to the issues in dispute as these documents are held in files that the algorithms cannot read.

Whether predictive coding software will find acceptable solutions to these problems in the future remains to be seen.

Linear review is a method of document review within an electronic discovery review platform whereby reviewers will look at one document after another (usually ordered by date or keyword relevance) until the entire data set is complete. This method of document review can be very time-consuming and expensive, particularly in the case of large-scale document reviews.

Predictive coding is also known as technology-assisted or computer-assisted review.

Please click here to view previous issues of Insight

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Lisa Kingston
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.