UK: The AGA GAGA SAGA Or The Never-Ending Story?

Last Updated: 30 March 2016
Article by Bryan Johnston

EMI Group Limited v. O&H Q1 Limited

Like a Scandinavian drama, the AGA GAGA SAGA is compelling, dark, protracted and engaging. With each new episode there is an exciting twist as new characters contribute to the plot and the viewers try and work out what it all means.

In box set terms, the AGA GAGA SAGA has been running for five seasons – Good Harvest v. Centaur appearing in season 1 way back in 2010, K/S Victoria v. House of Fraser following in the Court of Appeal in 2012, Tindall Cobham v. Adda Hotels in the Court of Appeal in 2014 and UK Leasing Brighton v. Topland Neptune in the High Court in 2015. 

The latest instalment of the popular drama is EMI Group Limited v. O&H Q1 Limited [2016] EWHC 529. In this episode the heroine of the story (Miss Amanda Tipples QC) has to make a difficult choice to determine whether the Landlord and Tenant Covenants Act 1995 (the Act) prevents an assignor's guarantor becoming the assignee of the lease. 

She then has a further dilemma to grapple – if the arrangement is prevented by the Act, whether the assignment is void or just the tenant covenants in the lease. 

Is the assignment precluded by the Act?

Section 25 of the Act contains a wide anti-avoidance provision. We know it is wide as the then House of Lords said as much on the London Diocesan Fund and others v. Avonridge Property Company Limited (Avonridge) case in 2005. The Act voids any arrangement that frustrates the purpose of the Act – namely the release of a tenant from its obligations upon assignment (section 5) and the release of the tenant's guarantor from its obligations upon assignment (section 24). 

The Act allows for the assigning tenant to provide an Authorised Guarantee Agreement (AGA – section 16). However, the guarantor cannot provide an AGA (a GAGA). Instead, it can only provide a sub-guarantee (a SAGA). This is where the guarantor guarantees the assignor's performance of its AGA and does not guarantee the assignee's performance of the lease covenants (Good Harvest).

A tenant assignor with a guarantor cannot assign to another tenant who is then guaranteed by the same guarantor entity (K/S Victoria).

What Miss Tipples QC had to determine was whether or not a tenant can assign directly to its guarantor.

The guarantor raised a novel argument based on the guarantor being released in its status as guarantor, and then sequentially being bound to the tenant covenants in its status as assignee. The distinction is therefore drawn between the two different hats worn by the guarantor/assignee.

Miss Tipples didn't accept this "sequential" argument – "in practical terms ... there is no release at all for [the guarantor] in respect of its liabilities under tenant covenants". In reality, the guarantor is bound to the same extent upon assignment as it was before assignment, the consequence being that the assignment is caught by section 25 as the assignment frustrates the purpose of section 24 – the release of the guarantor upon assignment.

Therefore the obiter commentary from Lord Neuberger in K/S Victoria has been applied. He had stated that "the whole thrust of section 24(2), indeed of the 1995 Act itself, is that a person should not remain liable under a tenancy after the tenant whose liability he is associated with has been released from his liability". In coming to this conclusion, Miss Tipples rejected the view of Paul Morgan J, the leading actor in UK Leasing Brighton, who had considered the possibility of the arrangement being valid in a seminar delivered in November 2015. Her firm view was based on the "policy of the Act that a tenant or guarantor cannot, as the result of an assignment, re-assume the very same, or essentially the same, liabilities in respect of the tenancy". 

Miss Tipples re-emphasised the absurdity of the situation that arose despite the willingness of the parties to effect the arrangement – "the fact such a conclusion is unattractively limiting and commercially unrealistic is neither here nor there".

What is void – the assignment or the lease covenants?

The basic principle arising from Tindall Cobham is that the court has to take "a balanced approach to invalidation which, whilst neutralising the offending parts of the contract, does not leave it emasculated and unworkable". The court is entitled to look at "the structure of the agreement in an objective and common sense way".

The plot-line advanced by the guarantor was not for fooling Miss Tipples. Indeed she held that "[Counsel's] submissions as to what happens to the lease on an assignment to the claimant do not make any sense at all". 

The guarantor's argument was that the tenant covenants in the lease were void as against the guarantor, but that the lease itself still existed and was vested in the guarantor. The guarantor claimed that the lease was vested in the guarantor; the guarantor was not under any obligation to pay rent and the tenant covenant was void; but the landlord could then forfeit the lease (the forfeiture provision not being a tenant covenant) if the tenant did not pay rent.

Miss Tipples could not reconcile tenant covenants being void with the concept of the landlord being able to then forfeit for the tenant's failure to comply with the void covenants. This would "on any footing ... be enforcing by the 'back door' covenants rendered void by the Act". How could a landlord forfeit for non-payment of rent if the covenant to pay rent was void? In the judge's view, this could not work as a matter of law. In conclusion, Miss Tipples determined that the guarantor's position was "unbalanced as well as 'emasculated and unworkable'".

At the denouement, it was evident that the assignment itself was void. This avoided any unpleasantness in dealing with a shell lease. The assignment from tenant to guarantor frustrated section 24 of the Act and therefore was void. The consequence of this is that the assignment does not take effect to vest the lease in the guarantor as assignee. This is clear from K/S Victoria – "the lease could not be assigned to the guarantor, even where both the tenant and guarantor wanted it". 

The lease therefore remains vested in the original tenant and the guarantor remains bound as guarantor of the original tenant's obligations.   

A cliff-hanger ending?

It is helpful to have further judicial consideration of the Act. However, the fact that judicial time is being taken up with cases arising from the operation of the Act emphasises its fundamental flaws and lack of commercial and at times rational application.

A common thread throughout the cases is the fact that it is irrelevant what arm's length professional parties, independently advised, actually want – this is "neither here nor there". Well, for many parties it is a big issue. Tenant groups want to be able to restructure their arrangements. There may not be an adequate alternative guarantor. The Act frustrates this for no sensible reason. Why should a tenant not be able to assign to its guarantor if they both want this to happen? Similarly, why shouldn't a guarantor of a tenant not be able to guarantee that tenant's assignee?

It is clear that, as another gripping instalment of the AGA GAGA SAGA draws to a thrilling season finale, there is likely to be another season commissioned. However, what might be better would be for the authors of the Act to rewrite parts of the script of the Act to avoid series fatigue.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
28 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

On 26 July the FCA published its long-expected consultation paper on the extension of the SMCR to all FCA-authorised firms. The so-called "core regime" introduces the key concepts of regulator-approved senior managers, firm-approved certification staff and conduct rules applicable to virtually all staff.

3 Oct 2017, Conference, Zurich, Switzerland

As the founding Partner of the Europe-Iran Forum, Dentons Europe will once again support this year’s event. This compelling event which explores all Iran-related topics will take place in Zürich on 3rd and 4th October.

4 Oct 2017, Workshop, London, UK

We are hosting an interactive workshop where we will run a mock High Court trial of an employee competition case – where the members of the audience are the judges. The session, aimed at in-house counsel and HR professionals, will offer an insight as to how disputes involving employees moving to a competitor play out in practice.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.