UK: Assessing Damages For A Repudiatory Breach Of Contract – The Impact Of The Gulf War

Last Updated: 29 March 2007
Article by Jeremy Glover

The repudiation of a contract by one party, if accepted by the other (often known as the injured party), will bring that contract to an end and release both parties from their primary obligations under the contract. The injured party is entitled to recover damages against the repudiator to compensate him for any financial loss which the repudiator's breach has caused him to suffer.

So far so simple. However the dispute in the case of Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishka Kaisha [2007] UKHL 12, over how to calculate those damages went all the way to the House of Lords and split their lordships 3:2.

On 17 December 2001, the owners of a ship accepted the charterer’s repudiation of a charterparty which still had nearly four years to run. A dispute arose as to the extent of owner’s entitlement to damages. The difficulty here was that clause 33 of the charter provided that if a war broke out between certain named countries then both parties would have the right to cancel the charter. The named countries included the UK, USA and Iraq.

On 20 March 2003, the Second Gulf War broke out. An arbitrator found as a fact that the charterers would in any event then have cancelled the charterparty. He also concluded that as at 17 December 2001, a reasonably well-informed person would have considered that war (or large-scale hostilities) between the United States/United Kingdom and Iraq was merely a possibility. There was no dispute that the owners were entitled to damages for having been deprived of the value of this charterparty for the fifteen months or so up to the outbreak of the War. The question before the House of Lords was whether they were entitled to compensation on the basis that the charterparty would have continued for the whole length of its nominal term (i.e. another four years) or did the outbreak of the Second Gulf War put a time limit on the recoverable damages?

It is a basic compensatory principle of the law of contract that the damages recoverable by the injured party are intended to put him in the same financial position as if the contract had been performed. However should the injured party's loss be assessed as at the date he suffers the loss, or shortly thereafter, in the light of what is then known, or at a later date when the assessment happens to be made, in the light of such later events as may then be known?

Questions of mitigation arise. For example here, as there was an available market for the chartering of vessels, the injured party's loss would be calculated on the assumption that he had, on or within a reasonable time of accepting the repudiation, taken reasonable steps to find alternative employment for his vessel for the best price reasonably obtainable. Whether the owner acted in such a way or not would be irrelevant. The reasoning behind this rule was described as one of "commercial fairness". Whilst the injured party owes no duty to the repudiator, fairness requires that he should not be allowed to rely on his own unreasonable conduct to increase the amount of his compensation.

A single issue was formulated:

"Where damages for an accepted repudiation of a contract are claimed, in what circumstances can the party in breach rely on subsequent events to show that the contractual rights which have been lost would have been rendered either less valuable or valueless?"

An early example of the basic legal position can be found in section 51(3) of the Sale of Goods Act 1893:

"Where there is an available market for the goods in question the measure of damages is prima facie to be ascertained by the difference between the contract price and the market or current price of the goods at the time or times when they ought to have been delivered, or, if no time was fixed, then at the time of the refusal to deliver."

However, when the rule is applied in more complex situations, including construction contracts, the situation is not so straightforward. For example the case of Radford v De Froberville [1977] 1 WLR 1262 concerned a defendant's contractual failure to build a wall on the plaintiff's land. Oliver J said this:

"It is sometimes said that the ordinary rule is that damages for breach of contract fall to be assessed at the date of the breach. That, however, is not a universal principle and the rationale behind it appears to me to lie in the inquiry—at what date could the plaintiff reasonably have been expected to mitigate the damages by seeking an alternative to performance of the contractual obligation?"

Alternatively, in Dodd Properties (Kent) Ltd v Canterbury City Council [1981] 1 WLR 433, a case of liability for serious structural damage, Megaw LJ said this:

"The true rule is that, where there is a material difference between the cost of repair at the date of the wrongful act and the cost of repair when the repairs can, having regard to all relevant circumstances, first reasonably be undertaken, it is the latter time by reference to which the cost of repair is to be taken in assessing damages. That rule conforms with the broad and fundamental principle as to damages…"

A little later, Megaw LJ (at p 453) added:

"I agree with the observations of Oliver J in Radford v De Froberville … as to the relationship between the duty to mitigate and the measure, or amount, of damages in relation to a question such as the question with which we are here concerned."

Here, as in Dodd Properties, the majority of the House of Lords felt that account had necessarily to be taken of post-breach events. For example, if the War had started a year earlier, on 20 March 2002 it would have been impossible to ignore. The majority of the House of Lords held that the owners were only entitled to restore themselves to the same position they would have been in but for the breach, not substantially to improve upon it. Here, the owners were suggesting that the arbitrator when finally determining the damages should ignore subsequent events. As the contract contained clause 33, it would not have required any performance by the charterers after March 2003. They were seeking compensation exceeding the value of the contractual benefits of which they were deprived. It should follow that, in principle, the owners, the injured party, were not entitled to any damages in respect of the period thereafter.

The difficulty was of course that as at the date of the owners' acceptance of the charterers' repudiation of the charterparty, the owners had lost a charterparty with slightly less than four years to run. However the way the majority said this had to be looked at was that the charterparty contained clause 33. Therefore the owners had lost a charterparty which contained a provision that would enable the charterers to terminate the charterparty if a certain event happened. The event did happen and it happened before the damages had been assessed.

The owners also argued that priority should be given to the principle of certainty and finality. The contract had four years to run. The loss calculation was simple and straightforward. Another potential problem with the majority’s view was that if, on the repudiation being accepted, the charterers had promptly honoured their secondary obligation to pay damages, the transaction would have been settled well before the Second Gulf War became a reality. If the owners were, as the arbitrator held, entitled to be compensated for the value of what they had lost on the date it was lost, then what the owners lost at that date was a charterparty with slightly less than four years to run. The owners said that the idea that a party's accrued rights can be changed by subsequent events was objectionable in principle.

By describing the prospect of war in December 2001 as "merely a possibility", did the arbitrator mean that it was seen as an outside chance, thereby not affecting the marketable value of the charter at that time? Indeed the arbitrator had seen the force of this, but felt that legally he had no option but to hold that the damages should be assessed on the basis that the charter would have come to an end at the outbreak of war. He could not ignore the reality of the situation before him. Lord Mance in the Court of Appeal had summarised the position thus:

"Certainty, finality and ease of settlement are all of course important general considerations. But the element of uncertainty, resulting from the war clause, meant that the owners were never entitled to absolute confidence that the charter would run for its full seven-year period. They never had an asset which they could bank or sell on that basis. There is no reason why the transmutation of their claims to performance of the charter into claims for damages for non-performance of the charter should improve their position in this respect."

Lord Coswell in the House of Lords agreed with Lord Mance saying:

"considerations of certainty and finality have in this case to yield to the greater importance of achieving an accurate assessment of the damages based on the loss actually incurred."


These two quotations show how the majority of the House of Lords solved the dilemma. In reality the assessment of loss had to be made on the basis of all the information before the tribunal. Therefore, when that assessment was carried out, they could not ignore the impact of the Second Gulf War. However the owners might rightly feel a little frustrated by the result. At the date of their loss, the date the contract was broken, the contract had four years to run and no-one could have foreseen what might happen. Against that, and this may be what swayed the majority, if the compensation had been based on the full term then the owners would have received a windfall. For, had the contract not been broken and had the contract continued to run, it would have come to an end in any event in March 2003, on the outbreak of hostilities.

This article is based on an article from a forthcoming issue of the Fenwick Elliott Dispatch, a monthly newsletter which summarises recent key developments relating to contentious and non-contentious construction law issues. To see the current issue please visit

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jeremy Glover
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.