UK: (Re)insurance Weekly Update 4 - 2016

Last Updated: 3 February 2016
Article by Nigel Brook

A summary of recent developments in insurance, reinsurance and litigation law.

This Week's Caselaw

ERGO Insurance v IF P&C Insurance: Court of Justice of the European Union considers the applicable law in a contribution claim between insurers∂=1&cid=781370

A tractor pulling a trailer overturned in Germany (due to the driver's negligence), causing property damage to a third party. The Lithuanian insurer of the tractor paid the third party and then sought a contribution from the Lithuanian insurer of the trailer (on the basis that it was jointly liable for the damage). Under German law (but not Lithuanian law), liability would be shared with, and a contribution could be sought from, the trailer's insurer. A dispute therefore arose as to whether German or Lithuanian law applied to this issue, and the question was referred by the Lithuanian courts to the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU"). It has now ruled as follows:

  1. The EU Motor Insurance Directive, which helps EU residents involved in a road accident in another EU country, did not assist with resolving this issue, since it was concerned with compensating road accident victims, rather than with the relationship between motor insurers.
  2. There is no contractual relationship between the two insurers and so the applicable law governing the relationship between them must be determined in accordance with the Rome II Regulation (EC Regulation 864/2007), rather than the Rome I Regulation (EC Regulation 593/2008).
  3. Article 4 of the Rome II Regulation provides that the applicable law to determine the issue of contribution between the insurers will be that of the country in which the harm was sustained, i.e. German law on the facts of this case.
  4. However, it is first necessary to determine whether the non-paying insurer is under any duty to compensate the victim of the accident. That issue will be determined by that insurer's contract with its insured. The paying insurer could then be subrogated to the victim's rights against the non-paying insurer.
  5. The issue of whether the non-paying insurer is liable to the victim is therefore governed by the Rome I Regulation. Article 7 of that regulation provides that the law of the country where the insurer has his habitual residence (i.e. Lithuania) will apply (unless it is clear from all the circumstances that the case is more closely connected to another country).

The case was therefore remitted to the referring courts to determine which applicable law applied on the facts.

COMMENT: How does the CJEU's approach fit with the approach adopted under English law to these issues? The CJEU categorised the paying insurer's claim for contribution as arising from its right to be subrogated to the rights of the victim against the insurer. Under English law, a contribution claim is based on equitable principles (and so is non-contractual (as was confirmed recently by the judge in XL v AXA (see Weekly Update 44/15), albeit there it was held that the claim arose out of the operation of law, rather than equity) and so the dispute between the insurers would presumably be governed by Rome II and not Rome I). However, in order for a claim of contribution to arise between insurers, there must be two policies covering the same risk or peril, and that is a contractual issue which, presumably would be governed by Rome I. It remains to be confirmed, though, how the English courts would approach a similar factual scenario to the one in this case.

Deutsche Bank AG v Sebastian Holdings: Court of Appeal considers non-party costs application

The first instance decision in this case was reported in Weekly Update 24/14. The judge made a non-party costs order against Mr Vik, the sole shareholder and sole director of the defendant. Mr Vik appealed and the Court of Appeal has now dismissed that appeal.

Mr Vik had raised three objections:

  1. It was argued that the application was separate from the underlying action against the defendant and so should be treated in the same way as any independent proceedings. The Court of Appeal held that, in principle, a summary procedure should be adopted by the court considering a non-party costs application. Furthermore, "the critical factor in each case is the nature and degree of [the non-party's] connection with the proceedings, since that will ultimately decide whether it is appropriate to adopt a summary procedure".
  2. Mr Vik also argued that the application should not have been granted because he had not been warned that the claimant might seek an order against him. It was held that, in this case, Mr Vik could and did contest the claimant's factual and legal case. Therefore, the only advantage which a warning would have given him would have been an opportunity to reconsider his own position in relation to the proceedings. However, no evidence had been adduced from Mr Vik to support a suggestion that his approach would have been different, and it was held that it would not be appropriate to admit that evidence now. The Court of Appeal therefore concluded that the judge had been right to find that the failure to warn was "of very little weight at all".
  3. Mr Vik also argued that he should not, in any event, be required to pay the costs of accountants to reconstruct records which the claimant ought to have maintained. The Court of Appeal found that there was no reason to exclude these fees from the costs ahead of a detailed assessment of the costs: "the basis of the judge's order for costs against Mr. Vik was not that he had caused the Bank to incur the experts' fees but that he was the real party to the litigation".

The Court of Appeal also referred to the earlier Court of Appeal decision of Oriakhel v Vickers (see Weekly Update 28/08), in which insurers were refused a non-party costs order against a third party who had acted as a witness, in part because an order would have infringed the principle of witness immunity. That case was distinguished from this one and it was said that the earlier Court of Appeal's views on this issue were only obiter and should be "treated with caution". The witness in Oriakhel had not funded and controlled the litigation for his own benefit. The possibility of a costs order against a witness should not be excluded, although the power should be exercised with considerable care: "To make an order for costs against a witness simply because he has given false evidence might well infringe the principles of witness immunity, but to make such an order on the grounds that he had conspired with others to pursue a claim that was entirely fabricated would not, even if in order to support it he had given false evidence".

C&S Associates v Enterprise Insurance: Costs consequences for adducing expert evidence without permission/producing trial bundles with irrelevant documents

Following judgment of various preliminary issues (see Weekly Update  01/16), costs in this case were reserved as a Part 36 offer had been made. However, Males J held that the claimant must in any event bear the following costs:

  1. The costs of preparation of the claimant's expert report. The expert had included a lengthy section in his report on a topic for which no permission had been given. The claimant had sought to argue that the costs order should be confined to the costs of preparing the particular section in question but the judge said that it was necessary to "mark the disapproval of the court" and that "a party who deliberately chooses for tactical reasons to adduce expert evidence for which in large part no permission has been given should bear the risk that, in appropriate circumstances, the costs of preparing such a report may be entirely disallowed".
  2. 80% of the costs of preparing the trial bundles. The claimant had produced 29 bundles dealing with individual claims and only one of these bundles was even opened during the trial.  The contents added nothing to any understanding of the case. The judge commented that: "It is true that disclosure of the documents contained in these bundles had been ordered, but it does not follow that it was reasonable, let alone necessary, for these to be included in the trial bundles". However, the judge accepted that approximately 20% of the bundles would have been required in any event.

Commodities Research v King and Wood Mallesons LLP: Whether reference to dates of meeting with lawyer are privileged

It is an established principle that not everything in a lawyer's records are covered by legal professional privilege. For example, the date and time of a meeting with a lawyer would not be privileged (see R v Manchester Crown Court ex p. Rogers [1999]). Accordingly, a reference to such matters will not normally constitute a waiver of privilege over what took place at the meeting.

However, in this case, such a waiver was held to have taken place when reference was made to meetings with the claimant's solicitors. That was because the claimant had used that information in order to elaborate on its claim for lost management time as a result of the litigation (and this was an issue in the proceedings). Accordingly, a reference in the witness statement of the CFO of the claimant to the dates of communications with the claimant's solicitors had amounted to a waiver of privilege in those communications (some of which included the solicitors' advice on the merits of the underlying case).

(Re)insurance Weekly Update 4 - 2016

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Nigel Brook
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions