UK: Bumper New Year Edition - That Age Old Problem Won´t Retire

Last Updated: 11 January 2007
Article by James Libson and Joanna Blackburn

In a previous bulletin, we discussed the impact of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 ('the Regulations') that came into force on 1 October 2006. The Regulations protect employees, applicants and contract workers from discrimination, harassment or victimisation on the basis of their age (or perceived age). Just as employers are updating their processes to conform to the Regulations, a recent High Court action may force us all to rethink our approach.

Heyday, the membership organisation for people planning for, or already in, retirement (and which is backed by Age Concern), is seeking judicial review of the Regulations. The Regulations implement a European Directive, which was designed to promote equal treatment in employment and which prohibits age discrimination in the workplace. The Regulations remove the upper age limit for unfair dismissal claims and also give employees the right to ask to work beyond 65. However, the Regulations also state that it is lawful to retire a person at/or above 65 as long as the employer complies with the requirements of providing notice and the duty to consider any request to continue working

Heyday considers that enforced retirement at the age of 65 or over, even subject to compliance with the procedure, is direct discrimination on the grounds of age and is therefore unlawful under the European Directive. The Government argues that the discrimination is objectively justified, and therefore lawful, on the ground that it assists employers to prepare for the future.

The High Court has now referred the issue to the European Court of Justice (the 'ECJ') for guidance. If the ECJ rules that the Regulations do not fully implement the European Directive, the Government will be forced to amend the legislation to give those at or over the age of 65 the same protection as younger workers. Even before any such amendments are made, the response of the ECJ will have particular effect on employers in the public sector because all public sector employers are regarded as bound by European Directives in the event that a domestic government has failed to implement that Directive accurately or at all. Private sector employers would not face the same problems initially; however there would clearly be pressure on the Government to change the law quickly to avoid a two-tier situation of public sector versus private sector.

The effect on public sector employers of a ruling that the Regulations are unlawful could be very serious. Any person who considers that their public sector employer forced them to retire at/or over the age of 65 under the Regulations may potentially have a claim. This state of uncertainty will continue until the ECJ issues its guidance, until then cases will be stayed. In the meantime, the potential cases could pile up. If the Regulations are considered unlawful, the potential claims could relate to retirements that happen at any time under the Regulations, both before the ECJ ruling and after it. The impact is that despite complying with the law of England and Wales, employers could be found to be acting unlawfully under European law. The usual time limit for a claim under the Regulations is three months from the date of the discrimination. However, an Employment Tribunal is able to extend the limitation period where it considers that it is just and equitable to do so. Alternatively, if a claim can be brought under the Human Rights Act 1998 for an unlawful infringement of human rights by a public body, then the limitation period is a year from the date of the act complained of. There is also the possibility of an extension if the court or tribunal considers it equitable, having regard to all of the circumstances. Whether the limitation periods can be extended and for how long is a question for each case based on its facts.

Recent advice in preparation for 1 October 2006 and beyond has been to set all retirement ages at 65 and to implement the prescribed procedures to ensure that most, if not all, employees retire at 65. Should the ECJ find the Regulations unlawful then the position may be that it will be safer for employers to avoid implementing a retirement age at all. That will ensure that the employer does not fall foul of the Directive and discriminate on the grounds of age. However, the problem that employers will then face is that the workforce will have no set date to retire. With employees being able to retire when they choose, employers will face significant problems in planning for the future of the workforce.

Given that references to the ECJ can take around 18 months to be resolved, there is no quick answer to this point. The High Court took the decision to refer this to the ECJ in early December 2006, however the exact questions for the ECJ will not be formulated later this month or February 2007. Employers will need to keep a watch for the response and be prepared to react quickly to avoid unwittingly breaching the Directive. In the meantime, employers should continue to comply with the Regulations as they stand from 1 October 2006.

Government orders a 'Root and Branch' review of Employment dispute procedures

In October 2004 the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations were introduced. The new rules were widely publicised as an instrument that would enable employment tribunals to handle their growing caseload more effectively and efficiently, reducing the cost and waste of management time by encouraging the resolution of disputes through dialogue rather than litigation.

The Government had been placed under pressure to do something about the volume of claims being brought before employment tribunals. The number had trebled over the course of the 1990's and reached a peak of 130,408 in 2000. According to the Government, employers with written procedures were more likely to reach a settlement or have an application against them withdrawn than employers without. A particular concern was the lack of procedures operated by small employers (with less then 250 employees), who accounted for a disproportionately high share of tribunal claims. Although such businesses only accounted for 18% of the workforce, they featured in nearly 30% of tribunal applications.

The Government's proposed solution was the introduction of the Employment Act 2002, which places obligations on employers and employees alike to follow certain minimum basic procedures in relation to disciplinary and grievance matters. The objective was to assist employers and employees to resolve their differences without the need to resort to litigation, to reduce costs and wasted time of the parties as well as the employment tribunals. Unfortunately, the procedures have not achieved their aims. After falling initially, the number of claims lodged with employment tribunals rose in 2005 from 86,181 to 115,039, back to the levels of 2003-2004.

However, in relation to very small employers the Regulations may have had the intended effect of settling claims but not, it appears, for the right reasons. The CBI employers' organisation conducted a survey in September 2006, which reported that 100% of companies with fewer than 50 staff had settled every claim out of court despite advice that they would win almost half the cases. The reasons cited for this were cost and the fact that they see the employment tribunal as being too adversarial.

On 7 December 2006, Alistair Darling, Trade and Industry Secretary, announced an expanded Government review of the framework for settling disputes between employers and employees. The review will be led by Michael Gibbons (a member of the DTI's Ministerial Challenge panel) and will involve representatives from businesses, unions and employees. It will build upon the work done in compiling the Government's 'Success at Work' policy statement, which was published in March 2006.

Alistair Darling has cited the aim of the review as "[to] work out how the Government can best deliver our common aim of faster and better dispute resolution". He also said that "By reducing the number of disputes, and resolving those that do happen more quickly, we can raise the UK's productivity and ensure better employee relations. We can also cut the cost of dealing with disputes, which can be substantial."

Michael Gibbons is due to make his eagerly anticipated recommendations in Spring 2007.

New Year, New Cap

The new limits on statutory awards were announced in November and will apply to dismissals taking effect on or after 1 February 2007. The statutory cap for unfair dismissal will be increased from £58,400 to £60,600. The minimum basic award for defined dismissals (such as trade union dismissals or health and safety dismissals) will be increased from £4,000 to £4,200. At the same time, the cap on a week's pay for the purposes of calculating the basic award for unfair dismissal and redundancy payments will increase from £290 to £310.

This article is only intended as a general statement and no action should be taken in reliance on it without specific legal advice.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions