UK: Libor Intensive – The Benchmark Rate Rigging Fallout Continues

The focus of recent headlines on the fallout from the LIBOR manipulation scandal has shifted from financial institutions to the individuals charged with the manipulation of the benchmark rate. While investigations into financial institutions continue, with Deutsche Bank becoming the latest to enter a settlement with regulators, the first individual, Tom Hayes, has been found guilty and sentenced to 14 years in prison. In this article, we look at recent developments in LIBOR actions internationally and conclude with a broader look at developments in relation to benchmark rate rigging.

Criminal prosecutions of individuals

In July 2015, a jury in Southwark Crown Court found Tom Hayes to be guilty of 8 counts of conspiracy to defraud, sentencing him to 14 years in prison. Tom Hayes, the former UBS and Citigroup trader, was the first of 13 individuals who have been charged following the Serious Fraud Office's ("SFO") investigation into the manipulation to stand trial.

Two further trials, one involving a number of brokers who allegedly conspired with Tom Hayes are due to commence in October 2015, with the second involving traders who allegedly manipulated the US Dollar LIBOR commencing in January 2016. One of the traders pleaded guilty to manipulating the US Dollar LIBOR in October 2014.

There has been commentary in the media regarding the lack of senior figures at financial institutions that have faced criminal charges in respect of the manipulation of LIBOR. During the SFO interviews in 2013, Tom Hayes told the SFO that senior employees at UBS were aware of the manipulation of LIBOR, with the manipulation "openly discussed" during meetings allegedly attended by senior management at UBS.

In March 2015, Lee Stewart, a former trader at Rabobank, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud before US District Judge Rakoff. In 2014, two other former Rabobank employees Takayuki Yagami and Paul Robson also pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud. The three individuals will face sentencing in 2017. Rabobank has previously paid fines totalling USD 325 million to US regulators in relation to manipulation charges.

As a result of the guilty pleas, the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA") has taken steps to ban both Paul Robson and Lee Stewart " from performing any function in relation to any regulated activity" given that their misconduct highlights their lack of honesty and integrity. It should be noted that the press release relating to Lee Stewart's ban refers to the 14 warning notices the FCA has issued to date in respect of benchmark rates, "and continues wider investigations into individuals' conduct in relation to LIBOR misconduct". We may see the FCA taking further action against individuals in the future.

Press reports suggest that the US Department of Justice ("DoJ") is investigating the conduct of a number of former Deutsche Bank traders in respect of the US Dollar LIBOR. Although to date the DoJ has not brought any changes against any individuals.

Litigation against institutions

Numerous lawsuits have been filed in the United States relating to LIBOR manipulation. Recently, the District Court in the Southern District of New York certified a class of purchasers of Barclays ADS. The group of shareholders led by Carpenters Pension Trust Fund of St Louis and St Clair Shores Police & Fire Retirement System allege that Barclays inflated its stock prices by manipulating LIBOR.

The civil litigation landscape in the US can be expected to continue to develop. Class action proceedings against a number of financial institutions have been consolidated for pre-trial purposes and with threshold legal rulings in a number of lead cases awaited. The co-ordinating judge (Judge Buchwald) dismissed the plaintiffs' antitrust claims in March 2013 on the basis that they had not alleged an anti-trust injury. However, it has since been determined that the plaintiffs can pursue an appeal against this decision in the Second Circuit Court of Appeal. If the claims are reinstated, this would have significant impact given the potential for the award of triple damages. Some commentators have speculated that the refusal by the Judge in the consolidated Forex action in the US to allow the defendants motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' anti-trust claim may assist the plaintiffs in the LIBOR action in developing their arguments.

In the UK, more litigation is expected. We commented in our September 2014 Review on the two key cases to date; Graiseley Properties Limited & Ors v Barclays Bank plc (2012) and Deutsche Bank AG v Unitech Limited (2013). The Graiseley case settled in 2014 but the Deutsche Bank claim continues and will be monitored closely by others considering LIBORrelated claims. These cases have been joined by Property Alliance Group Limited v the Royal Bank of Scotland Plc which is expected to go to trial in May 2016, and which was the subject of a much publicised privilege battle earlier this year.

Regulatory investigations

Deutsche Bank is the latest financial institution to be fined by US and UK regulators for its participation in the manipulation of benchmark rates, which include, amongst others, LIBOR. (There have since been a number of global settlements relating to benchmark manipulation, including settlements relating to Forex in May and August this year.) In April 2015, Deutsche Bank agreed to pay fines totalling USD 2.5 billion, which comprised fines imposed by the FCA (GBP 226.8 million), DoJ (USD 775 million), US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USD 800 million) and New York State Department of Financial Services ("NYSDFS") (USD 600 million). It is notable that the settlement included the NYSDFS which required the Bank to terminate the employment of seven employees, including a Managing Director based in London, who were involved in the manipulation of LIBOR.

At the beginning of 2015, the former CEO of Martin Brokers, David Caplin and its former compliance officer Jeremy Kraft were fined GBP 210,000 and GBP 105,000 by the FCA respectively and banned from holding a significant influence function as a result of their lack of competence in their respective roles. These fines follow the fine of GBP 630,000 imposed on Martin Brokers in March 2014.

In July 2015, the FCA published a thematic review of oversight and controls of financial benchmarks. The review found that while there had been "some progress" on improving oversight and controls, there has been a lack of urgency to implement the changes which Tracey McDermott director of supervision – investment, wholesale and specialists at the FCA described as "disappointing". In order to address the issues identified in the review, the FCA is writing to the firms that participated to provide individual feedback.

Regulatory focus has extended well beyond the UK and US. For example BaFin, Germany's financial regulator, is continuing its investigation into Deutsche Bank. According to press reports the regulator has criticised the Bank in respect of attempts to manipulate benchmark rates such as LIBOR in a report sent to Deutsche Bank in May 2015 and has threatened the bank with further sanctions. Reports suggest that the Bank responded to the regulator in July 2015 denying any allegations of wrong-doing and the regulators' case against Arishu Jain, its outgoing joint leader have been dropped.

Going forward, domestic and international regulators continue to focus on putting measures in place to address the legal and regulatory loopholes that allowed the benchmark rate rigging to happen. On 10 March 2015, the FCA published a policy statement on bringing seven additional financial benchmarks into its regulatory and supervisory regime (PS15/6), following its consultation in December 2014. Later that month the FCA published its 2015/2016 business plan. This set out that the FCA would continue to pursue enforcement outcomes relating to benchmark rigging and would encourage reform within the UK and the EU.

A further key development has been the Fair and Effective Markets Review published by the Bank of England, FCA and the Treasury in June this year. The Review published 21 recommendations, including legislative changes that would make it illegal to manipulate markets such as foreign exchange, and rules to bring the fixed-income, currencies and commodities markets (FICC) into line with rules governing equities. There is also a proposal for a market standards body to oversee a new code of conduct for broader issues of corporate and personal behaviour akin to the Takeover Panel, which supervises the mergers and acquisitions market, as well as an extension of the Senior Managers Regime.

In September 2013, the EU Commission proposed the Benchmark Regulation on the indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts. In May 2015, the Parliament announced it had agreed a negotiating mandate on the Benchmark Regulation with the aim of engaging with trialogues with the Council and the Commission. Trialogues were held in June 2015 and it is expected that the final version of the Regulation will be agreed by the end of 2015.


The LIBOR story will continue to run, and the Market will be watching the US civil litigation closely. LIBOR cannot of course be viewed in isolation, and beyond the investigation into Euribor, Swiss Franc LIBOR and other related rates, there has been investigation into the alleged fixing of other benchmark rates including ISDA and, most prominently, Forex. The pattern of activity in relation to Forex has been similar to that in relation to LIBOR, with mass regulatory settlements, and consolidated civil litigation proceeding in the US courts, with criminal proceedings against individuals beginning a couple of months ago.

It has been commented that the USD 2bn settlement in the US between nine banks and thousands of investors in relation to alleged manipulation of Forex may be the game changer that opens the floodgates to thousands of investor claims in the UK given the size of the UK Forex market. There have been suggestions that this may be assisted by the coming into force of the Consumer Rights Act on 1 October which includes provision for class actions in relation to anti-competitive conduct.

Whilst the Market will be watching these latest developments closely, the impact upon the market has not, to date, proved to be the "cat" event that some had feared. Regulatory and criminal settlements and penalties will not be picked up by the market, and defence costs of the large financial institutions have generally not been at the levels to exceed the policy retentions.

Consumer Rights Act 2015

On 1 October 2015 the main provisions of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 ("CRA") will come into force in the UK. The CRA reforms a large body of consumer law in the UK, and broadly speaking applies to businesses of all kinds - including financial institutions, financial services professionals and wealth managers – in relation to their dealings with consumers (a term which is limited to individuals acting wholly or mainly for non-business purposes, but which will encompass even very sophisticated, high net-worth private individuals). A number of key changes are introduced by the CRA, including:

–– Additional implied terms about the standard firms must meet when supplying services to consumers, in particular relating to information provided about the service and/or the firm

––New consumer remedies for breach of the statutory implied terms in relation to the supply of services, including rights in certain circumstances to repeat performance or a price reduction

–– Changes to the law on unfair terms insofar as it relates to consumers

––New specific provision for supplies of paid-for digital content to consumers

–– Establishment of an "opt-out" regime for consumer class actions in relation to anti-competitive behaviour

Better Late Than Never?

In a surprise move, the Law Commissions announced on 17th September that a section on late payment damages has been in included in the Enterprise Bill, laid before Parliament the day before.

The Bill provides that a further clause will be inserted into the Insurance Act 2015. This new clause (to be called section 13A of the Insurance Act) will provide that it is an implied term of every insurance contract that an insurer must pay any sums due in respect of a claim made by the insured "within a reasonable time" (which will include a "reasonable time" to investigate and assess the claim).

Reasonableness will depend on all the relevant circumstances, including the size and complexity of the claim, the type of insurance and factors outside of the insurer's control.

The new section will also provide that where an insurer can show that there were reasonable grounds for disputing the claim (either in full or as to quantum), the insurer will not breach the new implied term "merely by failing to pay the claim...while the dispute is continuing, but..the conduct of the insurer in handling the claim may be a relevant factor in deciding whether that term was breached and, if so, when". Thus, in principle, an insurer might breach the implied term even though it had reasonable grounds for contesting a claim (which is subsequently proved to be valid) – where, for example, the insurer has conducted the investigation unreasonably slowly, or has been slow to change its position when new facts come to light.

The remedies for breach of the new implied term are said to include damages (in addition to having the claim paid and interest).

The new section does envisage that insurers will be able to contract out of these changes (although not for consumer insurance). However, contracting out will not be valid where there has been a deliberate or reckless breach by the insurer. Recklessness in this context means where the insurer did not care whether or not it was in breach. The general contracting out rules set out in the Insurance Act will apply to terms in non-consumer policies relating to non-deliberate/reckless breaches.

The new section will not apply to settlement contracts.

The new section mirrors the clause previously inserted by the Law Commissions into the Insurance Act (and which was removed in order to allow that Act to follow the Law Commissions' uncontroversial bills route).

As we have previously reported, it has long been argued that the rule in Sprung v Royal Insurance (UK) Ltd 1999 is an anomaly which places England and Wales out of step with many other jurisdictions (including Scotland). However, insurers have expressed concern that the late payment damages clause will introduce considerable uncertainty for their working practices and might require additional expenditure, such as the recruitment of additional staff to handle claims. There is also a perceived risk that, when suing insurers, policyholders might include a claim for damages for late payment in order to pressure insurers into dropping defences.

Exactly how much time will be reasonable for investigation and payment will become fully clear only with further future case law on the point. However, it might be worth noting that the FOS (which hears complaints from consumers and micro-businesses) already applies a remedy of damages for late payment, with broad acceptance from the industry. Consumers and micro-businesses are, in any event, far more likely to sustain losses as a result of late or non-payment of a claim than larger businesses, which in general will have better cash flows to cope with delayed insurance claims. Furthermore, insurers' ability to (largely) contract out of the change when covering business risks might go some way to alleviate concerns.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.