ARTICLE
3 August 2006

Landlords take note...

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

Where premises are let partly for residential and partly for business purposes and the tenant resides in the residential part the landlord will not be entitled to evict the tenant from the premises (including the commercial part) unless he complies with Section 2 of the Eviction Act 1977 - i.e. the more stringent requirements for re-entry of residential premises apply to the commercial premises too.
United Kingdom Real Estate and Construction

Where premises are let partly for residential and partly for business purposes and the tenant resides in the residential part the landlord will not be entitled to evict the tenant from the premises (including the commercial part) unless he complies with Section 2 of the Eviction Act 1977 - i.e. the more stringent requirements for re-entry of residential premises apply to the commercial premises too.

Section 2 provides that any right of re-entry or forfeiture will not be lawful other than by way of court proceedings. This requirement is more onerous than the requirements of section 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925 which landlords of commercial premises are generally familiar with and where landlords can basically forfeit by written notice (or even without notice for non payment of rent).

The section 2 provision will typically capture landlords who let shops or public houses with flats above them where the flats are occupied by the retailer or publican. Such landlords should be mindful of the need to make an application to court where it is considering re-entry.

Law: Pirabakaran v Patel

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 02/08/2006.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More