UK: The true colours of English law governing refund guarantees

In the recent case of Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskantoor BV v Bank of China Ltd [2015] EWHC 999 (Comm), the Commercial Court considered the nature of refund guarantees and whether a foreign court order affects the bank's liability to pay on demand. The decision is timely, clarifying repeatedly occurring issues arising out of refund guarantees. It sends a clear message that English law governing refund guarantees is of the nature of a performance bond and the obligation to pay on demand should not be affected by extraneous matters, even, in some cases, fraud.


Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskantoor BV (SBV), a Netherlands ship operator, brought two actions against Bank of China (BOC) in respect of refund guarantees issued by BOC in support of two shipbuilding contracts between SBV as buyer and Chinese sellers. Between October 2006 and July 2011, SBV paid instalments of US$28.68 million towards the purchase price, on terms that the instalments would be refunded with interest if the contracts were cancelled. The BOC guarantees secured the sellers' obligation to refund.

The ships were not delivered on time and SBV claimed repayment of the instalments from the sellers. This was disputed, so SBV obtained arbitration awards against the sellers.

Meanwhile, the sellers brought two sets of proceedings against SBV and the engine suppliers in China, alleging that SBV and the engine suppliers conspired fraudulently to provide defective refurbished engines to the sellers for installation aboard the ships. BOC was not a party to those proceedings. The sellers obtained ex parte orders from the Chinese court in 2011 prohibiting BOC from making any payment, anywhere in the world, under the BOC guarantees to SBV.

SBV unsuccessfully challenged the jurisdiction of the Chinese courts, citing the arbitration clauses in the shipbuilding contracts. Thereafter, it fully defended the claims in the Chinese proceedings, but again failed. In April 2013, the Chinese court awarded the sellers substantial damages for fraud. In April 2014 those judgments were upheld on appeal, becoming effective and enforceable.

SBV brought claims in England against BOC for payment under the guarantees. BOC defended the claim, on the basis that the Chinese judgments afforded BOC a defence to SBV's claims under the guarantees, or alternatively argued that a stay of enforcement was justified.

The wording of BOC refund guarantees

The BOC refund guarantees contain the following material terms:

We, Bank of China, as the primary obligor, not as security, do hereby irrevocably, unconditionally and absolutely guarantee repayment to you by the Seller of an amount up to ... as you may have paid to the Seller under the [shipbuilding contract] prior to the delivery of the Vessel...
Should the Seller fail to make such payment, we shall pay you the amount the Seller ought to pay with interest on that amount...within 30 days after our receipt of the relevant written demand from you for repayment.
Our obligations under this guarantee shall not be affected or prejudiced by any dispute between you as the Buyer and the Seller under the Shipbuilding Contract...

The nature of the refund guarantees

BOC's primary case was that the refund guarantees are contracts of surety. If so, any material variation of the terms of the principal contract (i.e. the shipbuilding contract) discharges the surety. BOC contended that there had been a breach of an implied term of the shipbuilding contracts (to the effect that SBV would not prevent or hinder the sellers from performing its obligation to deliver vessels with new engines) and so BOC should be discharged from liability.

As a matter of construction, Carr J concluded that the guarantees were in the nature of performance bonds. The guarantees only secured the obligation of the sellers under the shipbuilding contracts to refund advance instalment payments (with interest) in the event of cancellation of the shipbuilding contracts. Their target was cashflow, a hallmark of a performance bond.

In this regard, Carr J relied on the authority Wuhan Guoyu Logistics Group Co Ltd v Emporiki Bank of Greece SA [2012] EWCA Civ 1629 ("Wuhan"), where the Court of Appeal cited, with approval, Paget's Law of Banking, which sets out the following factors:

"Where an instrument (i) relates to an underlying transaction between the parties in different jurisdictions, (ii) is issued by a bank, (iii) contains an undertaking to pay "on demand" (with or without the words "first" and/or "written") and (iv) does not contain clauses excluding or limiting the defences available to a guarantor, it will almost always be construed as a demand guarantee."

Carr J held that three of the four Paget factors justifying a presumption in favour of a performance bond were present: the guarantees were issued by a bank, in the context of international trade between international parties, with an undertaking to pay "on demand". In her view, the guarantees made it clear that any disputes between SBV and the sellers were irrelevant to BOC's obligation to pay. The phrase "should the Seller fail to make...repayment" did not impose a secondary liability, but rather pointed to the circumstances in which BOC's obligation was triggered.

Effect of findings of fraud in China

BOC also argued that their obligation was discharged by the Chinese courts' findings of fraud against SBV. If the BOC guarantees were performance bonds rather than contracts of surety, then this defence fell away. However, for completeness, Carr J concluded that even if the guarantees were true guarantees and not performance bonds, their express terms excluded discharge, even for fraud as determined by the Chinese courts.

As to whether the English courts should recognise the Chinese judgments and orders, this turned on whether SBV had submitted to Chinese jurisdiction. In choosing to defend the claims against it in the Chinese proceedings, SBV was held to have done so. Accordingly, Carr J held that there was no residual judicial discretion for the court to evaluate the overseas court judgment on the ground of public policy by reference to breach of an arbitration agreement.

That said, Carr J held that the clear intention of the guarantees, objectively construed, was that any dispute between buyer and seller, resolved or unresolved, should not affect BOC's obligations to pay.

The stay of enforcement

The English court has a discretionary power to stay enforcement. So in the alternative, BOC sought a general stay of execution, on the basis that the English court should have due regard to the Chinese court orders as a matter of international comity. Carr J rejected international comity as a factor in this case. This was not to disrespect the Chinese courts but when considering an English law contract, English law regards illegality by the law of the place of the performing party's domicile, or place of business, as irrelevant.

The Chinese law experts agreed that BOC would not be at any real risk of criminal prosecution, given the lack of the necessary intention by BOC to flout the Chinese court orders, so risk of sanction was not a factor to take into account. Nor was the alleged risk of double jeopardy without a stay, as there was, in Carr J's view, a real prospect of onward subrogated recovery by BOC.

In any event, BOC, as an international commercial organisation in the business of providing external guarantees, is aware of these risks when entering into the guarantees on the terms that it did. For these reasons, the application for a stay was dismissed.


The decision is a helpful judicial clarification of the nature of refund guarantees. Although it is a matter of construction in each case, the usual guarantee wording was construed as a performance bond rather than a contract of surety, imposing an irrevocable, unconditional and absolute obligation on the issuer to pay on demand, independent of the underlying contract. As such, foreign judgments and orders against the buyer in respect of the underlying shipbuilding contract are unlikely to provide a defence to the issuer of the guarantee, even though those judgments and orders are to be recognised by the English court. The decision emphasises the desire of the English court to give effect to the contractual bargains between parties, and to recognise the commercial purpose behind refund guarantee arrangements.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions