UK: It Always Pays to Win – But Sometimes It Pays More

Last Updated: 3 August 2006
Article by Julia Ford

Under the English Civil Procedure Rules the Court has discretion as to whether costs are payable by one party to any other, the amount of those costs and when they are to be paid. (CPR 44.3) The general rule is that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party (i.e., their legal expenses—covering solicitors’ and counsel’s fees, together with disbursements that usually include expert fees, Court fees, costs of transcribers, photocopying and other associated expenses), although the Court has the power to make a different order.

According to Parts 44.3(4) and (5) of the Civil Procedure Rules, in deciding what order (if any) to make about costs, the Court must have regard to all the circumstances, including —

(a) the conduct of all the parties;

(b) whether a party has succeeded on part of his case, even if he has not been wholly successful . . . ;

(5) The conduct of the parties includes;

(a) conduct before, as well as during, the proceedings . . . ;

(b) whether it was reasonable for a party to raise, pursue or contest a particular allegation or issue; and

(c) the manner in which a party has pursued or defended his case or a particular allegation or issue . . . ."

The Court has the option of assessing costs on the standard or the indemnity basis. In assessing costs on the standard basis the Court will only allows costs which are proportionate to the matters in issue, and resolve any doubt it may have as to whether costs were reasonably incurred or reasonable and proportionate in amount in favor of the paying party. On the other hand, if costs are assessed on the indemnity basis, the Court will resolve any doubt as to whether costs were reasonably incurred or were reasonable in amount in favor of the receiving party. In either case, the Court will not allow costs which have been unreasonably incurred or are unreasonable in amount.

The circumstances in which indemnity costs can be awarded have been the subject of much judicial discussion recently. In Tradigrain S.A. & Ors. v Intertek Testing Services Canada Ltd. & Anor [2006] EWHC 926 (Comm), Mr. Justice Langley emphasized the general point, made in his earlier decision in Amoco v. BAO [2002] BLR 135, that "a victory, however resounding, is not enough of itself to justify indemnity costs. There has to be some added factor to justify departure from what is and remains the general rule that costs are to be assessed on the standard basis." The basic principle is, therefore, that there must be some conduct or some circumstance which takes the case out of the norm. Indemnity costs are not intended as a punishment, rather as a device to ensure a more equitable result for the beneficiary of a costs award; the costs paid still have to have been "reasonably" incurred although the burden will be shifted to the paying party to prove that the relevant costs were not reasonably incurred.

The second recent case to discuss indemnity costs was handed down by Mr. Justice Tomlinson in respect of (1) Three Rivers District Council And Others and (2) Bank Of Credit And Commerce International Sa (In Liquidation) v The Governor And Company Of The Bank Of England [2006] EWHC 816 (Comm). BCCI was a bank based in Pakistan that collapsed in the early nineties causing considerable hardship for its creditors,many of whom were small investors. BCCI was founded in 1972 by Pakistani businessman Aga Hasan Abedi. It operated in 60 countries and its regulation was split between the Bank of England, the Cayman Islands and Luxembourg, which led to difficulties when it was being wound up. During the 1980s, evidence emerged of BCCI’s links with terrorist organizations, arms shipments to Arab states and South American drug cartels. (The background to this murky affair is contained in A Report to the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate by Senator John Kerry and Senator Hank Brown December (1992 102d Congress 2d Session Senate Print 102- 140).) The English liquidators of the collapsed bank, acting on behalf of 6,500 UK-based depositors, who lost money when it was shut down in 1991, sued the Bank of England (UK’s central bank) for about £1bn for "knowingly or recklessly" failing in its supervisory role. The Bank was legally protected from negligence claims. The liquidators therefore pursued a claim of "misfeasance," which implied that Bank officials were not just reckless but acted dishonestly.Misfeasance is the "wrongful exercise of lawful authority."Various employees were accused of dishonesty in the pleadings, and in the extensive press reporting of the case that ensued. The case took 10 years to reach the Courts but the liquidators withdrew their claim after the (lengthy) cross examination of the Bank’s first two witnesses. When a claim is discontinued in English proceedings, costs are usually payable by the claimant. In this instance the liquidators had already offered to pay the Bank’s costs on an indemnity basis.

The Bank of England sought the above mentioned judgment, however, to confirm their legal, as opposed to commercial, entitlement to indemnity costs. Both sides no doubt understood that any ensuing judgment on the Bank’s entitlement to indemnity costs would contain criticism of the liquidators’ handling of the case, and this is why, despite the liquidators’ agreement to pay on the indemnity basis, the Bank of England still sought confirmation from the judge that they were entitled to indemnity costs.

This judgment has excited considerable comment in both the legal and national press in the United Kingdom in particular because of the strident criticisms made by the judge in relation to the conduct of the legal team representing the liquidators of BCCI. Given both its profile and the detailed analysis by Mr. Justice Tomlinson of the factors he considered in awarding indemnity costs to the Bank of England, the BCCI judgment provides a helpful restatement of the criteria adopted in awarding indemnity costs against a losing party. Above all:

The Court should have regard to all the circumstances of the case and the discretion to award indemnity costs is extremely wide.

There must be some conduct or some circumstance which takes the case out of the norm.

The Court can and should consider the conduct of an unsuccessful claimant both before and during the trial, in particular whether it was reasonable for the claimant to raise and pursue particular allegations and the manner in which the claimant pursued its case and its allegations. If the conduct of the unsuccessful claimant is relied on as a ground for ordering indemnity costs then the test is the "unreasonableness" of the conduct.

Although each decision will be based on its own facts, a claimant can expect to pay indemnity costs if it fails on a claim which contains one or more of the following elements:

The claim is speculative, weak, opportunistic or thin (e.g. a claimant who chooses to pursue it is taking a high risk); The claim includes allegations of dishonesty or conduct meriting an award to the claimant of "exemplary" damages, and those allegations are pursued aggressively, inter alia by hostile cross-examination of witnesses:

The unsuccessful allegations are the subject of extensive publicity, especially where such publicity has been courted by the unsuccessful claimant: and

Conduct attracting moral condemnation is, in itself, a ground for an award of indemnity costs.

In the BCCI case, Mr. Justice Tomlinson took particular note of the fact that (as he saw it) the liquidators commenced and pursued large-scale and expensive litigation in circumstances calculated to exert commercial pressure on the Bank. During the course of the trial , they resorted to advancing a constantly changing case in order to justify the allegations made, only then to withdraw the claim. The allegations were "thin (and, in some respects, far-fetched) and irreconcilable with the contemporaneous documents."They effectively turned the case into an unprecedented factual enquiry by the pursuit of an unjustified case. They advanced and aggressively pursued serious and wide-ranging allegations of dishonesty or impropriety over an extended period of time against a large number of Bank officials (despite the lack of any foundation in the documentary evidence for those allegations. They maintained those allegations, without apology, to the bitter end. And the Court found that they actively sought to Court publicity for those allegations of dishonesty both before and during the trial in the international, national and local media.

Mr. Justice Tomlinson therefore held that an award of indemnity costs against the liquidators was justified. The fact that the judgment was handed down at all was in itself significant, since the liquidators had already agreed to pay indemnity costs to the Bank and had sought to preventMr. Justice Tomlinson ruling on the question of indemnity costs (or awarding the costs of the Bank’s application). Instead,Mr. Justice Tomlinson held that, although the claim had been withdrawn before he could make a judicial determination on the facts, "In my judgment the Bank was fully entitled to pursue this application. It would have been an affront to justice and contrary to the public interest had the liquidators successfully stifled publication of the Court’s conclusions. It was of itself unreasonable of the liquidators to deny the Bank’s entitlement to the costs order which it sought."

There is no doubt that the device of awarding indemnity costs provides some protection against the practice of bringing claims in the belief there is a "deep pocket" (often an insurer) who could be persuaded into an early settlement to curtail expenses. In the insurance context, under English law, ex gratia payments do not automatically attract the benefit of reinsurance protection; therefore, the settlement of such speculative litigation is unattractive to an insurer both from a commercial, as well as a moral, perspective. However, even an award of indemnity costs will leave some costs unrecovered. In most cases, whether costs are assessed on a standard or indemnity basis, a vindicated party will still end up bearing some of the costs of successfully defending a claim. If the party has insurance coverage it will still be responsible for the deductible. If it has no insurance coverage then it must bear all of the unrecovered costs.

The case law emphasizes that the award of indemnity costs is not intended to be punitive. The question, therefore the question remains: Does the threat of being charged with costs on an indemnity basis—coupled with the prospect of critical comments in the judgment awarding such costs—a deterrent, on its own, to the active pursuit of high value, but in some cases highly egregious,"nuisance" claims?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.