UK: The Football League Limited V Edge Ellison

Last Updated: 15 July 2006
Article by Sarah Clover

The High Court decision in The Football League Limited v edge ellison was handed down on 23 June. It deals with the difficult question of whether a solicitor owes a duty of care outside the express terms of his retainer and, if so, the scope of that extended duty. Although the decision concerned a solicitor, similar principles are likely to apply to other professionals.

In a judgment to be welcomed by professionals and their insurers, the Court took a narrow approach to the scope of duty, confirming that there is no such thing as a general retainer and that only in limited circumstances will a solicitor’s duties go beyond the express terms of his retainer. The question to be determined is whether in the particular circumstances it is necessary to imply the relevant duty in order to give effect to the presumed intention of the parties. Moreover, the decision evidences a continued willingness (which follows on from the earlier decisions in Clarke Boyce v Mouat (1994) and Pickersgill v Riley (2004)) seriously to curtail the circumstances in which a solicitor will bear responsibility for business decisions reached by commercially astute clients.

The background

At the beginning of 2000, the Football League put out to tender its broadcasting rights. This process was conducted by the League’s Commercial Committee, a group of businessmen specifically chosen for their business acumen. The Football League appointed various external advisers to assist in the tender process, including edge ellison to provide legal advice and Active Rights Management Limited ("ARM") to conduct the commercial negotiations via its owner and principal, Stephen Townley.

A number of broadcasters were interested in bidding for the rights including ITV Digital (then known as ONdigital). ITV Digital was a relatively new company and a joint venture between its ultimate parents Carlton and Granada, and was their flagship venture into the new field of digital broadcasting.

The market for the rights was a complicated one because many of the broadcasters were also bidding for the Premier League rights and there were several rounds of bidding. The "auction" came to a head on 14 June 2000 when the rights for the Premier League matches were sold and Mr Townley gave the four broadcasters still apparently interested in the Football League’s rights 24 hours to submit their final bids. Only ITV Digital submitted a bid by the deadline, so a deal had to be closed immediately before they realised that they had no competition and the market collapsed.

At an evening meeting on 15 June 2000, final negotiations took place. Mr Townley skilfully negotiated a fee from ITV Digital of £315 million for a three-year contract despite the fact that by that stage ITV Digital was (unbeknown to itself) the only remaining bidder. A short form contract was signed, having been approved and in part drafted by edge ellison. Carlton or Granada were not parties to this contract, and there was no separate agreement by which Carlton and Granada guaranteed ITV Digital’s obligations.

Although there were subsequent negotiations intended to lead to a long form agreement, no such agreement was ever signed.

The bid document submitted by ITV Digital on 7 June 2000 had contained the following sentence: "ONdigital and its shareholders will guarantee all funding to the FL outlined in this document". In subsequent litigation, the Court heard the Football League’s argument that Carlton and Granada had guaranteed ONdigital’s obligations under the contract. ITV Digital’s evidence, however, was that this sentence was not intended to be a formal offer of guarantees.

As is well known, ITV Digital got into financial difficulty and went into administration in March 2002 owing £178.5 million under the broadcast rights contract.

Following the failure of its litigation against Carlton and Granada, the Football League launched a £140 million action against edge ellison.

The allegations

In summary, the Football League’s allegations were that edge ellison:

  • was expressly instructed that the Commercial Committee required financial security as an essential part of the transaction;
  • owed a duty to the Football League to obtain its instructions as to whether it wanted parent company guarantees to be part of the contract; and
  • should have raised the issue of parent company guarantees on, or at some time after, 7 June 2000 on the basis of the wording in the bid document which suggested that Carlton and Granada might be prepared to provide parent company guarantees.

The decision

Mr Justice Rimer ruled that the Football League’s claim against edge ellison failed. Dealing with the first allegation, he concluded that at no point had edge ellison been instructed to advise on, or obtain the security of parent company guarantees. Taking into account the Commercial Committee’s admission that they fully understood the concept of parent company guarantees, the Court also concluded that the Commercial Committee had implicitly taken the commercial decision that it was content to deal with ITV Digital alone, and at no point had the committee intended that guarantees should be sought.

The key issue was therefore whether, absent a specific direction to do so and against this factual background, edge ellison owed a duty to the Football League proactively to seek its instructions as to whether parental guarantees should be sought.

In ruling that edge ellison owed no such duty, the Court followed the principles set out in Pickersgill which held that whilst a solicitor has a duty to point out any "legal obscurities" or "hidden pitfalls" which he comes across in the course of his work, he is under no duty to warn clients of the commercial risks of a transaction when not asked to do so and when the clients are experienced in the matters at hand. The Court concluded that the issue of whether guarantees should be sought was not a "hidden pitfall" but a pure business decision made by experienced committee members who were well aware of the potential risks and in which the solicitors had "no implied duty to play any part in". Further, the circumstances did not warrant the imposition of a duty on edge ellison to prompt the Commercial Committee to consider the issue of bidder-solvency.

The judge did, however, find that although edge ellison had not been provided with a copy of the bid document until after the short form contract was signed, nevertheless the solicitor should have asked for a copy on the evening of 15 June because the bid document was referred to in the short form contract upon which the solicitor was advising. Having seen the document, he should have picked up the possible suggestion that Carlton and Granada would give parent company guarantees. However, had he done so, the Football League would not have insisted on guarantees which would have delayed the signing of the contract. Further, the judge found that the solicitor should have picked up the bid document reference during the course of the negotiation of the long form agreement but, once again, had he done so this would not have resulted in Carlton and Granada providing parent company guarantees. He awarded £4 nominal damage in respect of these two breaches of duty.

Conclusion

Football League suggests that the courts are alive to the need to keep any proposed expansion of the implied duties of solicitors in check. When picking over failed commercial transactions with the benefit of hindsight, it is tempting for claimants to turn on their advisers, often blurring the distinction between legal and commercial considerations in the process. If the Court had agreed with the Football League, the door would have been opened to claims that a solicitor is bound to "review the whole range of commercial considerations that underlie a particular deal, work out which ones he is concerned the client may not have given sufficient thought to and remind him about them". This would have been too great a burden to impose on solicitors. The decision also confirms that the experience of the client will continue to be key in the consideration of the duty owed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions