UK: The EU’s MiFID 2: The Scope Of The Transparency Requirements

Last Updated: 17 April 2015
Article by Juan Jose Manchado

The EU's Markets in Financial Instruments Directive reform package, comprising a new Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and a new Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation—collectively known as MiFID 2—will introduce significant changes for investment firms and other financial markets participants when it is implemented by EU member states starting in January 2017 (see Special Report by Emma Radmore and Juan Jose Manchado, of Dentons UKMEA LLP, London, at WSLR, October 2014, page 3).

In the first article in a series by Dentons UKMEA LLP focussing on specific elements of MiFID 2, Emma Radmore, of the firm's London office and a member of the World Securities Law Report Advisory Board, examined changes MiFID 2 will make to the way firms deal at a high, overall level with their customers and clients, and what firms will have to do to make sure they comply with the new standards (see WSLR, February 2015, page 3).

This new article, the second in the series, examines the changes the MiFID 2 package brings to transparency requirements, and considers the key elements of the new regime to which firms will need to adapt in time for January 2017.

What does MiFID 1 require?

The first Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID 1) introduced harmonised transparency requirements for trades in shares taking place on a trading venue. The aim was to improve price formation and to facilitate clients verifying that their brokers comply with "best execution" rules. It also harmonised the reporting of market data, which regulators use to monitor the fair and orderly functioning of markets.

What does MiFID 2 do?

The Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR), which comprises a key part of MiFID 2, extends the scope of these transparency requirements to non-equity instruments, a term which covers bonds, structured finance products, emissions allowances and derivatives. Money-market instruments and derivatives entered into between non-financial counterparties for risk management purposes remain exempt.

This extension of scope seeks to address difficulties that markets encountered, throughout phases of the latest financial crisis, to obtain information on and value non-equity financial instruments.

Further transparency will be brought about by extending the transparency requirements on bilateral systematic internalisation to the execution of non-equity instruments.

To shed light on multilateral trading in non-equity instruments which takes place within a firm's own systems subject to that firm's discretion, MiFIR creates a new category of trading venue: the Organised Trading Facility (OTF).

Finally, reporting requirements are fine tuned to bring them in line with ongoing regulatory reforms.

The downside of transparency is that publication of trade data may negatively impact the execution of trades or related risk-management hedges entered into after execution, hurting the very price formation and best execution objectives pursued by the transparency requirements. 

This article analyses the transparency and reporting requirements applying to trading venues (OTFs plus the existing regulated markets and multilateral trading facilities), to investment firms and to systematic internalisers in respect of trades in non-equity financial instruments.

The technical details of the requirements are not yet final. Therefore, this article refers to the versions of the delegated acts current as of March 2015, that is, the advice the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) submitted to the European Commission in December 2014 (Advice) and the draft regulatory technical standards (RTS) and Addendum that ESMA is consulting on. The relevant RTS for transparency issues is RTS 9, while that for reporting obligations is RTS 32.

Transparency requirements on trading venues and investment firms

Pre-trade transparency requires that trading venues publish information on the current bid and offer prices and the volume of trading at those prices in their systems. One of the annexes to the RTS sets out the details of the information that each trading system needs to make public. Trading systems include those relevant for both equity and non-equity instruments (continuous auction order book, quote-driven and periodic auction) and those commonly used in the non-equity space: request-for-quote and voice trading. The requirements now also extend to actionable indication of interests. These are defined by ESMA as binding expressions to trade that contain sufficient information.

Post-trade transparency involves the publication of data on the trades once these are executed. This data is a subset of that included in regulatory reporting. The required content, format and flags are further detailed in annexes to the RTS. ESMA is no longer proposing the use of flags to disclose that execution has taken place on a systematic internaliser. Publication must occur as close to real time as technically possible, with a maximum permissible delay of 15 minutes during the first three years after entry into force of the RTS and of five minutes subsequently.

These same post-trade transparency requirements apply also to investment firms, which have to make public information on the trades they conclude on their own account or on behalf of clients. Despite this, investment firms will be exempted from post-trade transparency requirements in respect of certain over the counter (OTC) transactions where the exchange of financial instruments is determined by factors other than their market valuation. These include securities financing transactions; the exercise of options, covered warrants or convertible bonds; primary markets transactions; give-ups or give-ins; and the transfer of instruments in the context of collateral and margin requirements.

The downside of transparency is that publication of trade data may negatively impact the execution of trades or related risk-management hedges entered into after execution, hurting the very price formation and best execution objectives pursued by the transparency requirements. This is particularly so for trades in less liquid instruments and for large-sized block trades.

MiFIR makes available waivers for these trades.

Waivers and deferred publication for illiquid financial instruments and large trades

National competent authorities (NCAs) may waive pre-trade transparency requirements for financial instruments for which there is not a liquid market (in this article referred to as liquid or illiquid instruments). A liquid market is defined as one where there are ready and willing buyers and sellers on a continuous basis, provided that the market surpasses certain thresholds set by reference to the:

  • average frequency and size of trades over a range of market conditions, having regard to the nature and lifecycle of products;
  • number and type of market participants; and
  • average size of spreads.

ESMA will apply this liquidity test at the level of subclasses of non-equity financial instruments. This is known as the Classes Of Financial Instruments Approach (COFIA). For the sake of simplicity, COFIA assumes that instruments within the same sub-class share the same liquidity characteristics. The demarcation between liquid and illiquid sub-classes is set out in annexes to the RTS.

This liquidity test is closely aligned to that used for determining whether a derivative subject to the clearing obligation will also be mandated to trade on a trading venue. Derivatives not subject to the trading obligation can therefore also benefit from the pre-trade transparency waiver.

NCAs may also waive pre-trade transparency requirements for orders that are large in scale (LIS) compared with normal market size and for actionable indications of interest in request-for-quote and voice trading systems that are above a size specific to the financial instrument (SSTI). Pre-trade transparency of an SSTI order can be waived only where otherwise the liquidity provider would be exposed to undue risk, such as difficulties in hedging its risk following execution.

The RTS use the COFIA segmentation to set the thresholds for establishing when an order is LIS or SSTI. To reflect market conditions, ESMA is proposing that, from 2018, it will recalculate these thresholds annually while applying a minimum coverage ratio aimed at capturing, under the transparency requirements, at least a certain percentage of LIS and SSTI trading. The LIS threshold would then be set at the greater of either the trade size below which lie 90 percent of all the trades, that below which lie 70 percent of the total volume of the trades, or the regulatory floor (set in Section 11 of Annex 3) for that sub-class. The SSTI would be set at 50 percent of the relevant LIS.

As regards post-trade transparency, NCAs may authorise deferral of publication until up to 48 hours after execution of a trade in a LIS, SSTI or illiquid instrument. NCAs may make the authorisation for deferred publication subject to the publication of certain details of the trade. They may also authorise, for an extended time period, the non-publication of volume data or the publication of trades in aggregated form.

An NCA may also suspend temporarily the pre-and post-trade transparency requirements if monthly trading in an instrument drops below a certain percentage, and provided that the market does not meet the characteristics of a liquid market just mentioned. The RTS sets those drops triggering suspension at 40 percent for liquid instruments and 20 percent for illiquid instruments, calculated as a measure of the average monthly volume for the year preceding the drop. The drop must have been sustained for over 30 days.

Transparency requirements on systematic internalisers

Systematic internalisers are defined as investment firms which, on an organised, frequent, systematic and substantial basis, take the other side of client orders when executing those orders outside a trading venue. The thresholds for determining when systematic internalisation is taking place in respect of non-equity financial instruments are set in the Advice. Whether trading is frequent and systematic will be measured against total trading in the EU for a particular liquid instrument and, if the instrument is illiquid, by reference to whether the firm deals in that instrument OTC at least once per week. Substantial trading occurs if the size of a firm's OTC trading in an instrument exceeds a percentage of the total notional amount executed by the firm in that instrument or a percentage of the total nominal amount of trading in that instrument across the EU.

The requirements on these firms to make public firm quotes they provide to clients will now also be extended to quotes for trades in liquid non-equity financial instruments. If the instrument is illiquid, the firms must disclose quotes upon request for disclosure by a client. If trading in an instrument has registered a drop similar to those that would trigger a suspension of trading venue transparency, the firm will not be subject to the obligation to publish a quote. Neither does a firm need to publish a quote in respect of a trade which is above a size specific to the financial instrument (SSTI, the calculation of which should be closely aligned to the SSTI criteria applying to trading venue request-for-quote and voice trading transparency). Unless any of these waivers apply, firms must publish the quotes they provide to clients. Once published, a quote will be available to and actionable by the firm's clients, but the firm may restrict access to it based on objective grounds. Additionally, a firm may publish limits to the amount of trades it undertakes to enter into pursuant to a quote.

Trade reporting and data reporting services

In addition to post-transparency disclosures, investment firms must also report to the relevant NCA complete and accurate details of the trades they execute. This must occur as quickly as possible and no later than the working day following that of the execution of the trade. The obligation applies in respect of instruments that are, have as underlying, or track an instrument admitted to trading. This means that reporting also extends to trades executed under a waiver from pre-and post-trade transparency and to OTC trades. The only reportable lifecycle events are those that decrease or increase notional.

On top of the content that MiFID 1 currently requires from these reports, MiFID 2 also mandates that they contain designations to flag aspects such as short selling (to be determined considering the position of the legal entity as a whole), the identity of the clients on whose behalf the trade has been executed (either by using a legal entity identifier or, in the case of individuals, a unique national number), and the identity of the firm, persons and computer algorithms responsible for the investment decision and execution. An order will not be reportable by a transmitting party if it has a written agreement with the receiver and all reportable information under MiFID 2 has been sent to the receiver, which will also have to ensure the information is complete and accurate before reporting.

The firm may delegate reporting on the trading venue or on an Approved Reporting Mechanism (ARM). In that case, the trading venue or ARM assumes responsibility for completeness, accuracy and timely submission, subject to the firm taking reasonable steps to verify it. Reporting of derivatives can also be satisfied with the reports sent to a Trade Repository (TR) that is approved as an ARM. The TR must be satisfied that the information provided is sufficient to satisfy reporting obligations under MiFID 2, and not just those under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR)—the EU regulation governing OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories.

In addition to the ARM discussed above in the context of regulatory reporting, MiFIR lays the ground for the establishment and authorisation of Approved Publication Arrangements (APAs) and Consolidated Tape Providers (CTPs) that will facilitate the dissemination of post-trade data (in the case of CTPs, in the form of a consolidated and continuous electronic data stream). If the derivatives data reported to TRs is already being used to analyse the definition of liquid market and calculate the LIS and SSTI thresholds for derivatives, the data collected by CTPs will be crucial to calibrate the application of transparency requirements to other non-equity instruments.

By September 3, 2020, the European Commission has to report on the satisfactory functioning of the consolidated tape in respect of non-equity instruments. This will be measured by the availability on reasonable commercial terms and timeliness of high quality, easily accessible and usable post-trade information. If the Commission is not satisfied by the performance of CTPs up to that moment, a public procurement process will be used to appoint an entity to operate, in exclusivity, the consolidated tape as a public utility.


The definition of liquidity is one of the keystones of MiFIR, as it will determine what derivatives are mandated to trade on a trading venue, whether transparency waivers are available for non-equity instruments, and when the requirements on systematic internalisers are triggered. Calibration will be an ongoing process reliant on the quality of post-trade data gathered by TRs and CTPs.

It remains to be seen whether the private solution to creating a satisfactory consolidated tape of post-trade information will be successful. Once enough data is available, the challenge will be to strike the right balance between transparency and liquidity.

Industry associations have criticised as too blunt the application of COFIA (instead of an instrument by instrument approach) to assessing bond and structured product liquidity, and the proposal to force transparency onto at least minimum ratio of trades. They have also opposed ESMA's view on how infrequent must trading in a non-equity instrument be for it to be deemed illiquid.

Now that the flagship project of the Commission is the Capital Markets Union, it would be self-defeating to stifle, under transparency rules, the development of secondary markets for non-equity instruments.

A further obstacle lies for cross-border trades: If equivalence decisions are not made due to MiFIR not being aligned with similar reforms in other jurisdictions (for example, due to MiFIR's top-bottom approach to declaring the trading obligation or the relative generosity of some of the transparency waivers), counterparties to a cross-border trade would have to comply with the rules applying to all the jurisdictions involved.

The text of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU is available here.

The text of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 is available here.

The text of ESMA's December 2014 advice to the European Commission is available here.

This article first appeared in the April 2015 edition of Bloomberg BNA. Written by Juan Jose Manchado in Dentons' London office.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
28 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

On 26 July the FCA published its long-expected consultation paper on the extension of the SMCR to all FCA-authorised firms. The so-called "core regime" introduces the key concepts of regulator-approved senior managers, firm-approved certification staff and conduct rules applicable to virtually all staff.

3 Oct 2017, Conference, Zurich, Switzerland

As the founding Partner of the Europe-Iran Forum, Dentons Europe will once again support this year’s event. This compelling event which explores all Iran-related topics will take place in Zürich on 3rd and 4th October.

4 Oct 2017, Workshop, London, UK

We are hosting an interactive workshop where we will run a mock High Court trial of an employee competition case – where the members of the audience are the judges. The session, aimed at in-house counsel and HR professionals, will offer an insight as to how disputes involving employees moving to a competitor play out in practice.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.