Worldwide: Insurance And Reinsurance - 3 March 2015

Last Updated: 9 March 2015
Article by Nigel Brook

Tchenguiz v Thornton UK

Commercial Court makes an adverse costs order because statement of case was too long

The Commercial Court Long Trials Working Party's recommendation that statements of case in the Commercial Court should be no longer than 25 pages was adopted by the Commercial Court Guide in 2009. Despite that long-standing requirement, the particulars of claim in this case were 94 pages long and were served without first requesting permission from the court to serve a statement of case which was longer than 25 pages. Furthermore, there were other breaches of the Guide, such as the inclusion of background facts and contentious phrasing.

The counsel who had drafted the particulars argued that the length of the document was necessary because of the serious allegations being made. That argument was rejected by Leggatt J: "It must be abundantly clear to anyone who is accused in a statement of case of fraudulent conduct that extremely serious allegations are being made against them. It is unnecessary to repeat the assertion that the person has been fraudulent again and again". He also rejected an argument that the omission of certain details would have led to the defendants seeking full particulars pursuant to CPR r18. Nor did it matter that the defendant himself had not objected.

The judge therefore struck out the particulars of claim (whilst disallowing the costs of drafting the particulars) and ordered fresh particulars, of no more than 45 pages, to be served within 21 days. He added: "I have shown this judgment in draft to the Judge in charge of the Commercial List, who endorses the principle that flagrant disregard of the guidance applicable to statements of case may lead to adverse costs orders". Although there would be some delay to the case because of this order, in the longer term the efficient conduct of the case would be assisted by fresh particulars.

Laporte v Commissioner of Police

Defendant penalised for refusing to mediate

The defendant won on every substantive issue in this case. However, it had refused to engage in ADR, in part because it believed that the claimant was imposing a pre-condition to mediation that the defendant's lawyer have instructions to "make a meaningful offer".

It is well established that there could be adverse costs consequences if a party unreasonably refuses to agree to ADR. A list of factors which may be relevant to this issue was set out in Halsey v Milton Keynes [2004]. Applying those considerations to this case, Turner J held that the defendant had been unreasonable and that, as a result, would be entitled to only two thirds of its costs. In particular, the judge held that:

a) It could not be said that a mediation would not have had a reasonable prospect of success. As mentioned above, the defendant had formed the view that the claimant would only have accepted a financial offer, which the defendant was unlikely to make, and so it believed that ADR was not appropriate. However, the judge noted that the claimant had never insisted on the making of a money offer as a pre-condition to ADR and "Simply because one side makes a prediction of what it might take to reach a settlement does not entitle the other side to treat such a prediction, without more, as a formal pre-condition. Tactical positioning should not too readily be labelled as intransigence".

b) Nor was this the sort of a case where a defendant would be reasonable in "taking a stand", whatever the costs risk of that approach.

c) This was also not a case where the claimant was seeking to litigate a point of legal principle; the claimant could have succeeded in obtaining some level of damages even if it had lost on the law.

Property Alliance v Royal Bank of Scotland

Whether a document should be disclosed in possible breach of obligation to foreign regulator

The issue in this case was whether the defendant could object to inspection of one of its disclosed documents on the basis that it believes it owes obligations to a foreign regulator and that it would be putting itself at risk of criminal contempt of a foreign court order.

The defendant has entered into settlements with a number of regulators and prosecuting authorities, including the US Department of Justice, with which it has a Deferred Prosecution Agreement. A footnote to that agreement provided that the document in question should be held in confidence and not made available to the public. Although no formal court order was drawn up, the defendant claims that a subsequent comment by a US District Judge meant the document had to be kept under seal.

Birss J rejected the argument that the document should not be inspected in the English proceedings. It was potentially of real significance and confidentiality is not a reason for refusing inspection. Furthermore, the risk of the defendant being found to be in criminal contempt by the US courts was, in this case, low. Reference was made to prior caselaw in which the risk of prosecution under a foreign law provided no defence to the making of an order for disclosure or inspection (and in both the cases referred to, a prosecution was held to be highly unlikely).

The judge held that the order to produce the document for inspection would take effect in four weeks from the date it was made. That would allow the defendant time to make an application to the US Court, should it wish to do so. The judge was of the opinion that the US Court would be likely to permit the defendant to fulfil its obligations to the English court. Not only would there be the usual procedural safeguards in the English proceedings, but the judge also required permission to be sought here before the document could be referred to in open court.

COMMENT: As mentioned, this case follows prior caselaw that the risk of prosecution under a foreign law for contempt is no reason to prevent inspection of a document, at least in circumstances where the risk of foreign prosecution is low. That therefore begs the question whether a court would still adopt the same stance when exercising its discretion where the risk of prosecution was shown to be significant (albeit not definite).

Barry v Butler

Whether a witness statement could be passed to a third party

CPR r32.12 provides that a witness statement can used only for the purpose of the proceedings in which it is served, unless the witness consents, the court gives permission, or it has been put in evidence at a hearing held in public. One of the issues in this case was whether witness statements served by both parties could be passed by the defendants to the Crown Prosecution Service.

Warby J held that CPR r32.12 does not require a party to obtain the court's permission where it seeks to pass its own witness statements to third parties (subject to any restriction imposed by the court). In any event, in such a situation, the party can normally obtains the witness's consent to disclosure of the statements. As for the claimant's witness statements, it was a "frail and insubstantial basis" to seek disclosure to the CPS just because the CPS had shown an interest in seeing those statements. It had not even been argued that the documents were necessary for the CPS's investigation. Accordingly, these could not be given to the CPS before trial.

Peak Hotels v Tarek Investments

Application for security for costs and the effect of an earlier payment into court

The defendants sought security for costs on the ground (inter alia) that there was reason to believe that the claimant company will be unable to pay the defendants' costs if ordered to do so. One of the points raised by the claimant was that the court should take account of an amount of USD 10 million which it was about to pay into court. That amount was to stand as security for payment of any damages pursuant to the claimant's cross-undertaking in damages (which it supplied whilst applying for injunctive relief from the court).

Henderson J said that that amount could not be treated as an asset of the claimant (so as to demonstrate the claimant's ability to pay an eventual costs order): " I am satisfied that the money standing in court cannot be regarded as an asset available to [the claimant] unless and until an application is made by [the claimant] for some or all of the money to be released to it, and the court accedes to the application. Mr Brisby QC submitted on behalf of [the claimant] that USD 10 million is now far in excess of any possible exposure of [the claimant] pursuant to the cross-undertakings, but the fact remains that no such application has yet been made".

The judge therefore decided to order security. He rejected a further argument advanced by the claimant that the defendants already had more than adequate security for costs because of the USD 10 million paid into court. There had been no proviso to the original order that this amount could be used for anything other than payment of damages pursuant to the claimant's cross-undertaking in damages.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Nigel Brook
In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions