UK: Fraudulent insurance claims – development of Common Law rules

Last Updated: 19 January 2006
Article by Stephen Crabb

There has been much judicial and academic debate in recent years on the scope and effect of the common law rule relating to fraudulent insurance claims. The latest two cases Axa General Insurance Ltd -v- Gottlieb and Danepoint Ltd -v- Allied Underwriting Insurance Ltd add to the body of established case law and follow what now appear to be established principles.

General Principles

In the case of Manifest Shipping Co -v- Uni-Polaris Insurance Co Ltd [2001], better known as the "Star Sea", the House of Lords confirmed that the duty of utmost good faith does apply after placement but that, in the claims context, the duty is limited to an obligation not to make a fraudulent claim. The question that was left undecided was whether that duty was imposed by Section 17 of the Marine Insurance Act 1906, thereby entitling Insurers to avoid the policy "ab initio" and recoup payments made in satisfaction of previous untainted claims.

Lord Justice Mance considered that issue in Agapitos -v- Agnew [2002]. He took the view that the common law principle governing fraudulent claims had a separate origin to Section 17 of the 1906 Act and the remedy of avoidance "ab initio" was not therefore available for its breach. Rather, the remedy was for forfeiture of the relevant (and perhaps any future) claim, rather than avoidance of the whole contract.

Lord Justice Mance applied this reasoning once again in the recent case of Axa General Insurance Ltd -v- Gottlieb. The Defendant householders were insured under a buildings’ policy with the Claimant Insurers. During the period of cover the Defendant made four claims under the policy and payments were made. The Defendant acted fraudulently in pursuing a bogus claim for alternative accommodation in respect of one claim and submitted a forged document in support of another. The remaining claims were untainted by fraud. The Insurers subsequently brought proceedings to recover all payments made, on the basis that the Defendant acted fraudulently in two separate respects in pursuit of two of the claims. It was found as a matter of fact that the Defendant’s fraud arose in respect of the first claim from late September 1999 and, as to the second claim, from 20 June 2000, that is after the two untainted claims were paid.

At first instance, the judge held that the Claimant was entitled to recover from the Defendant Insured all sums paid in respect of those claims tainted by fraud, but rejected the Insurers’ claim that they were also entitled to recover the sums they had paid on the claims which were not the subject of fraud. The Court of Appeal upheld these findings. Lord Justice Mance concluded that there was no basis or reason for giving the common law rule relating to fraudulent claims a retrospective effect on prior, separate claims which had already been settled under the same policy before any fraud occurred. He concluded "there seems to me some force in the argument that the common law rule relating to fraudulent claims should be confined to the particular claim to which any fraud relates, while the potential scope and operation of more general contractual principles might in some circumstances also require consideration".

On 20th October 2005, his Honour Judge Coulson delivered judgment in Danepoint Ltd -v- Allied Underwriting Insurance Ltd, which also considered a number of fraudulent claims. The facts of the case were relatively straightforward. On 13 June 2001, there was a fire at the Claimant’s premises, a large property that had been divided into a number of rented flats. The Claimant made a claim under its policy with the Defendant Insurers, claiming for reinstatement costs and loss of rent. In respect of the reinstatement costs, loss adjusters acting on behalf of both parties agreed costs at £83,000 and that the works would be carried out by a company called Titchfield Construction. The Defendant Insurers paid £25,000 on account and then received interim invoices totalling £60,000 from a company called Gulf Falcon. (The Judge later found as a matter of fact that only about £25,000 of work and materials had been performed or provided when the interim invoices were received.) The Claimant also submitted a loss of rent claim for approximately £53,000, which was based on grounds that the entire premises were vacated from the date of the fire.

On discovering the above, the Defendant Insurers notified the Claimants that it considered the policy void, for breach of the fraud general condition which purported to void the policy if a fraudulent claim was made. Subsequently, they averred that the reinstatement and loss of rent claims were fraudulent.

Reinstatement claim

The most serious allegation concerning fraud was that Gulf Falcon claimed £60,000 when only £25,000 worth of work and materials had been provided. The Judge agreed that the two invoices were wholly overstated and "stood at the very edge of credibility". However, the Judge found that the exaggerated claims were not material. This was on the basis that the payment of the additional sums over and above the £25,000 already paid would have always depended on the Defendant loss adjuster’s site inspections. The inflated invoices were a "try-on which could not hope to get past [the Defendant’s] scrutiny". The Judge also took into account previous authority that said that wherever appropriate fraudsters should be given the benefit of the doubt. In this regard, he followed the guidelines articulated by Lord Hoffman in Orakpo to the effect that it is less probable that disputes over valuation which depended on opinion will or can be fraudulent.

Loss of rent

The loss of rent claim was framed on the basis that all tenants moved out of the property straight after the fire i.e. on 13 June 2001. However, the Judge found on the evidence that this contention "was demonstrably false". Many of the flats were not vacated at all. The Judge was prepared to infer that the tenants must have been paying rent since the Claimant failed to produce any accounts supporting their position that they were not. Further, the judge was not persuaded that the errors in the loss of rent calculation were honest mistakes. The claims were grossly exaggerated, deliberate, material and substantial.

The Judge went on to consider the impact of this fraud on the reinstatement claim. He found that since the reinstatement and loss of rent claims amounted to one claim on the policy, albeit for two different heads of loss, the entire claim was forfeit and the interim payment of £25,000 had to be returned. This decision follows Gottlieb.

Conclusion

The following principles can be derived from these cases and other case law in this area – remember the parties can agree to alter the impact of these common law principles by using appropriate wording in the policy:

1. Where all or part of the claim is fraudulent, or where fraudulent devices are used to promote a genuine claim, the Insured cannot thereafter recover in respect of any part of the claim.

2. The rule applies to a claim which is initially honest, but later fraudulently exaggerated or supported by fraudulent devices.

3. The rule enables the recovery from a fraudulent Insured of all sums paid out in respect of a claim in ignorance of the fraud subsequent to its commission, including any such sums relating to genuine loss in respect of which the Insured was entitled to indemnity apart from the effect of the fraud.

4. The rule does not enable the insurer to void the policy "ab initio".

5. The onus of proving fraud is on the party alleging it.

6. The fraud must be material in that it must have a decisive effect on the readiness of the Insurers to pay.

7. The fraud must be substantial i.e. greater than de minimis - mere exaggeration of an insurance claim will not in itself be fraud. Exaggeration which is wilful or which is allied to misrepresentation or concealment will in all probability be fraudulent.

It should be noted however, that the court in these cases did not have to decide (and thus left unanswered) whether a fraudulent claim bought the policy to an end. Thus, it is still not clear whether insurers can refuse to pay a legitimate claim that is made after a claim tainted by fraud.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 17/01/2006.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions