UK: Yadda Yadda Adda (Again)

The Case of the Valid Repeat Guarantee
Last Updated: 22 January 2015
Article by Bryan Johnston

The case involving Adda Hotels really is the case that keeps on giving. The thrust of the litigation concerns whether a guarantee of an assignee by the same guarantor of the assignor is valid. To date the case has been fast-tracked through the Court of Appeal. Morgan J in the High Court has now determined further issues arising from that litigation. The decision highlights the inherent problems in giving effect to the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act (the Act).

The law in practice

From a commercial perspective, it would seem straightforward - a tenant wants to assign to an inter-group company and its landlord is happy for the assignee to become the tenant so long as the same parent guarantees the assignee (a repeat guarantee). Every party is keen for this to happen and it makes perfect commercial sense.

Unfortunately, in respect of what should be an easy transaction, the Act lacks any form of business efficacy. By way of section 25, it has been held by the Court of Appeal that a repeat guarantee is void as the guarantor is not released from guaranteeing the assignee's obligations. The repeat guarantee amounts to an invalid guarantee because the Act provides for the release of an assignor and its guarantor (sections 5 and 24) but crucially it also provides that only an assignor can guarantee the assignee's performance of the lease covenants by way of an Authorised Guarantee Agreement (AGA) (section 16). There are no equivalent AGA provisions for a guarantor and therefore the Court of Appeal concluded that, where the original guarantor also guarantees the assignee, the subsequent guarantee was void irrespective of how much the parties wanted the transaction to happen and regardless of how much commercial sense the transaction made.

Background of Adda

In Adda, Morgan J had to consider the slightly unusual situation of an assignment that took place without consent. Consequently the original tenant (T1) and guarantor (G) were not released from their original obligations when the lease was assignment to the assignee (T2) (section 11). The landlord and tenant both wanted to unwind this assignment in order to restore the position whereby T1 became tenant again and G guaranteed T1. It should not have been difficult. The Act begged to differ. Due to the complications presented by the Act, the landlord and tenant disputed how the unwinding was to take effect.

Landlord's position - The landlord's position was the lease should simply be assigned from T2 back to T1 and G should guarantee T1. The tenant's view was that this would be void - the guarantee amounting to a repeat guarantee which the earlier case of K/S Victoria held to be void.

Tenant's position - The tenant's argument was that in order for the arrangement to be valid, T2 had to assign to a third party entity who would then onward assign to T1. G would guarantee T1. The tenant's view was that this would avoid the guarantee being a repeat guarantee and therefore the guarantee would be valid. The landlord was concerned that the third party may not assign and further that the arrangement itself amounted to a contrived arrangement to avoid the purpose of the Act (i.e. to release parties upon assignment). 

Court's decision in Adda

Morgan J rejected the tenant's position.

He held that such an arrangement fell foul of section 25 as it operated to "otherwise frustrate the operation of... this Act" (section 25). The arrangement frustrated the provision in the Act that released G upon assignment (section 24(2)). Further, such arrangement in any event amounted to a sham deliberately designed to circumvent the anti-avoidance mechanism in the Act and for this reason would also be void. Morgan J's logic on this is absolutely right as it is a consistent application of K/S Victoria. It further emphasises the uncommercial nature of the Act - no matter how much the parties may have wanted the arrangement to happen and no matter how much sense the proposed arrangement made, the Act arbitrarily voids it.

Significance of Adda

What is of more interest is Morgan J's acceptance of the landlord's position.

In short, Morgan J held that the assignment by T2 to T1 and the guarantee by G of T1's tenant obligations was valid. On the face of it, the judge concluded that G could repeat its guarantee of T1 and that this would be perfectly valid. 

On assignment by T2 to T1

  • T1 was released from its obligations that continued following the unauthorised assignment;
  • G was also released at the same time;
  • T1 became liable for the tenant covenants again as assignee; and
  • G became T1's valid guarantor.

Morgan J was able to thread the camel through the needle in reliance on the Court of Appeal judgment in K/S Victoria. Whilst the basic position is that a guarantor cannot guarantee the assignor's assignee, it is possible for the guarantor to guarantee the assignor's liability under an AGA. In summary, the guarantor was released "to the same extent" as the assignor (section 24(2)). Morgan J considered that it was open to him to interpret this in such a way so as to produce a "sensible commercial result".

On the facts, T1 is released on assignment and is then liable directly for the tenant covenants. G is also released and a direct guarantee would make G liable for the tenant covenants as well. By analogy with the above, Morgan J held that this arrangement amounted to a release of G "to the same extent" as T and, consequently, such release was valid. This approach is an extension of obiter comments by Lord Neuberger in K/S Victoria.


Does this mean that repeat guarantees should now be considered as valid? The answer is a firm "no". Adda should be contextualised within its own particular facts. In the case, the assignment concerned unwinding an unlawful assignment. T1 was taking liability for the tenant covenants again and G was simply mirroring T1's obligations. This is not the case where T1 is effecting a valid assignment to T2 and G is expected to guarantee T2. In this situation, G is guaranteeing T2 as opposed to T1's AGA and therefore this more typical situation will result in the guarantee being void as G is not released to the same extent as T1.

The Court did consider a rather left-field argument whereby T1 should not be considered released upon the assignment from T2 to T1 and therefore T1 and consequently G simply remain liable for the tenant covenants with no release taking effect to potentially void the guarantee. Morgan J rejected this as the Act cannot be interpreted in such a way that T1 is not released upon T2's assignment to T1.

Morgan J hinted at other alternative arrangements, although he did not comment in detail on them. These included rescinding the unlawful assignment or the parties agreeing to surrender the lease and regrant it to T1. The former arrangement would be for the Court to determine, if a suitable case presented itself. The latter surrender arrangement is unlikely to be appealing to a tenant given the likely SDLT consequences. 

At the end of the judgment, Morgan J considered obiter a further alternative, namely the assignment of the lease by T2 to G and G assigning to T1 with a fresh guarantee from G. Morgan J held that the assignment by G to T1 with G guaranteeing (in the form of an AGA) would be valid. However, he remained concerned that the assignment from T2 to G would be void as a result of obiter comment by Lord Neuberger in K/S Victoria to the effect that an assignment from a tenant to a guarantor was void. That said, Morgan J noted that Lord Neuberger's comment was obiter and "somewhat tentative". He was asked the question if Lord Neuberger's statement was really correct, but declined to comment further. This is important as it casts doubt on the dicta in K/S Victoria concerning this issue.


Adda should be treated with caution and on its own peculiar facts. Adda is not authority for repeat guarantees being valid. The judge dealt with a straightforward set of facts in a complex statutory and precedent matrix and reached a practical solution that will allow the parties to effect their arrangements without risk of security invalidity. It is quite possible that the judgment would be susceptible to challenge in the Court of Appeal. However, that is highly unlikely as the parties have the result that they wanted. 

Adda does continue to highlight the fundamental problems posed by the Act and the uncommercial and nonsensical situations that arise from its drafting and interpretation. Such problems are judicially recognised as well as, more importantly, by both landlords and tenants. Reform of the Act is therefore important in order to provide fairness and business efficacy in a context where parties should be free within reason to transact as they see fit. Reform of the Act is possible in such a way so as to protect the purpose behind its enactment as well as allowing business common sense to prevail where a tenant wants to assign to a third party and provide the same guarantor to that third party and the landlord commercially agrees to such assignment. In absence of reform, landlords and tenants will continue to have to find alternative ways to effect intra-group restructurings in compliance with the Act. This is an unsatisfactory state of affairs and highlights the need for swift reform of the Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
28 Sep 2017, Seminar, London, UK

On 26 July the FCA published its long-expected consultation paper on the extension of the SMCR to all FCA-authorised firms. The so-called "core regime" introduces the key concepts of regulator-approved senior managers, firm-approved certification staff and conduct rules applicable to virtually all staff.

3 Oct 2017, Conference, Zurich, Switzerland

As the founding Partner of the Europe-Iran Forum, Dentons Europe will once again support this year’s event. This compelling event which explores all Iran-related topics will take place in Zürich on 3rd and 4th October.

4 Oct 2017, Conference, Munich, Germany

Dentons Global Real Estate Group is delighted to be exhibiting once again at EXPO REAL, the International Trade Fair for Property and Investment which takes place on 4-6 October, 2017 in Munich, Germany.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.