UK: Executives Confront New Extradition Threat

Last Updated: 2 November 2005
Article by Alistair Graham and Larry Byrne

This article originally appeared in the September 2005 issue of International Financial Law Review.

Alistair Graham and Larry Byrne, who act for a UK executive facing extradition to the US over price-fixing claims, argue that the new extradition system between the countries is deeply flawed.

The reach of US law has recently been extended. A new fast-track extradition regime between the US and the UK, coupled with the aggressive approach of the US authorities towards prosecuting alleged white-collar criminals and the willingness of the US courts to adopt a broad approach to assuming jurisdiction over a defendant, means UK executives are facing heightened risks of being extradited from their home country to the US for alleged white-collar crimes.

If extradited to the US, they face a judicial system where plea-bargaining is prevalent, conviction rates in some US courts exceed 90% and sentences are stiff. The 25-year sentence handed down to Bernie Ebbers, ex-WorldCom chief executive demonstrates the US crackdown on white collar crime.

Given that almost all UK businesses have some link to the US, whether it be direct (for example, a subsidiary or branch office) or indirect (for example, a customer or a shareholder) it is imperative that UK businesses are aware of the risk of investigation and prosecution by US authorities. Even links to the US that would be viewed by most as flimsy might be enough to find jurisdiction in the US: an email or fax that crosses US borders could be enough. As a result, an individual can fall within the jurisdiction of the US courts without ever having carried out any substantive business in the US or, indeed, visited the country.

Also, because the new extradition arrangements between the US and the UK have only been ratified by the UK, a one-way street has been created. UK citizens are subject to the new US/UK extradition regime, which does not require any evidence to make a successful extradition application, while US citizens still benefit from the protections afforded by the previous extradition arrangements.

Pressure is being brought to bear in the UK parliament, numerous extradition cases concerning UK citizens are being fought and the High Court has granted two judicial review applications arising from the extradition arrangements. But whatever the outcome of these challenges, the new extradition regime and associated risks for UK executives will stay, in the short-term at least.

The Ian Norris Case

The case of Ian Norris, one of the UK’s highest profile extradition cases, illustrates the flaws of the new regime. Norris is the ex-chief executive of The Morgan Crucible Company plc, a blue-chip UK company that manufactures carbon products. Morgan is alleged to have had dealings with a European cartel that extended to the US. Despite the fact that the alleged cartel was European and was dealt with by the European Commission in 2003, the US authorities proceeded with criminal charges against some individuals, including Norris, in respect of peripheral instances of price-fixing that are said to have occurred in the US.

Under the old regime, price-fixing would not have been an extraditable offence because it did not appear on the specified list of extraditable offences. However, under the 2003 Act, even though price-fixing offences were not criminal in the UK at the time they were said to have been committed, the US Department of Justice (DoJ) proceeded with an extradition request on the basis that price-fixing might amount to the English common law crime of conspiracy to defraud, in an attempt to observe the rule of dual criminality. The DoJ is not deterred by the fact that a UK citizen has never before been prosecuted for conspiracy to defraud in relation to price-fixing offences.

Norris has no way to properly contest the charges in the English courts. The extradition request is based on information set out in the US indictment and in an affidavit by one of the prosecuting lawyers at the DoJ. The English courts must accept this information and are unable to examine the evidence, or lack thereof, relating to the charges.

Norris’s case shows that the DoJ will target UK citizens in circumstances where the alleged conduct took place primarily outside the US. It is of no consequence that the vast majority of the evidence required for a substantive defence of the allegations is based outside the US; there is no concept of ‘natural forum’ in extradition. If extradited, Norris will have to defend the charges from the US, far from where the actual evidence is based, and possibly from prison if bail is not granted.

The New Regime

The Extradition Act 2003 and the 1972 Extradition Treaty between the UK and the US govern the US/UK extradition process. In 2003, a new extradition treaty was agreed between the UK and the US to ease the extradition process from both the UK to the US and the US to the UK. Although the provisions of the 2003 Treaty have been implemented in the UK, they are not in force in the US, since the 2003 Treaty is yet to be ratified there. At this time, the US Senate has not scheduled any ratification vote.

Under the previous regime, offences had to appear on a list of specified offences considered serious enough to warrant a case for extradition. But under the 2003 Act now just two essential requirements must be met for an offence to be classified as an extradition offence. The first is that the alleged conduct constitutes a crime in both the UK and the US, that is, there must be dual criminality. The second is that the crime in each country carries a potential prison sentence of at least 12 months. The result is that almost all financial crimes in the UK will fall within the definition of an extradition offence.

In tandem with this, US authorities now need not provide any evidence of the alleged offences. Previously, the US had to produce evidence demonstrating a prima facia case. But now a US prosecutor only has to provide a so-called hearsay affidavit that sets out the allegations of the suspected crimes. There are no safeguards regarding the source of information; this is left to the discretion of the individual prosecutor. Furthermore, even if the defendant is completely innocent of the alleged offences, there is no opportunity for a UK citizen to contest the actual charges in England.

Contesting an extradition request from the US within this new framework is challenging. The 2003 Act contains bars to extradition, but although these bars provide limited possibilities of defending an extradition request, in most cases of extradition to the US they will be irrelevant. Furthermore, new statutory time limits on the extradition procedures have been imposed and rights of appeal curtailed. The initial extradition hearing at London’s Bow Street Magistrates’ Court must begin within three months of the date of arrest. Even in the most complex cases, the hearing is unlikely to take more than a few days. The request for extradition is then sent to the UK Secretary of State to make an order for extradition. Whereas the Secretary of State previously had discretion whether or not to make an order for extradition, under the new arrangements this discretion has been removed.

Following the Secretary of State ordering extradition, there are two levels of appeal. The first is to the High Court; the second is to the House of Lords. It might also be possible to appeal points under the Human Rights Act to the European Court of Human Rights.

Targeting White-Collar Crime?

Statistics from the Home Office state that, to date, the US has made 39 extradition requests of the UK under the new regime and that of these 12 are for offences involving fraud. The Home Office does not collate statistics for extradition requests relating to white-collar crime, but it has been widely cited in public and parliamentary debate that about half of US extradition requests to the UK under the new regime have been for white-collar offences.

Whatever the precise statistics, one matter is certain: although the roots of the new extradition regime lie in the effort to combat international terrorism, it is clear that the US DoJ intends to use the powers granted to it within the new framework to target alleged white-collar criminals.

What the Future Holds

If enough pressure is applied, there is the possibility that the Treaty will be ripped up altogether: the termination clause in the 2003 Treaty provides that either state may terminate the Treaty at any time by giving written notice to the other state effective six months after the receipt of such notice. Alternatively the UK Government may remove the US from the list of designated States in the Extradition Act 2003 that are permitted to dispense with prima facie evidence: this is the crux of Ian Norris's application for judicial review regarding current US/UK extradition procedures, which was granted in July of this year.

A third outcome is that the US may sign the 2003 Treaty, although there is no indication that this will occur this year.

Whatever the imbalances and injustices of the current UK/US extradition regime, its existence is a fact and UK businesses should be taking a long hard look at themselves to ensure they have adequately analyzed and prepared for the risk of doing business with the US.

Alistair Graham and Larry Byrne are dispute resolution partners. They represent Ian Norris, a UK citizen facing possible extradition to the US under the new fast track extradition arrangements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.