UK: Non-Compete And Step-In Clauses: High Court Carewatch Case Confirms Their Validity

Last Updated: 11 November 2014
Article by Babette Märzheuser-Wood, Sam Szlezinger, Robyn Chatwood and Alex Haffner

Recently, the English High Court handed down its judgment in the carefully-watched Carewatch case 1

The case considered the validity of the non-compete and step-in clauses in a franchise agreement which a franchisor had sought to enforce against its former franchisee.

The High Court confirmed that the leading case at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on non-compete provisions in a franchise agreement, Pronuptia2, remains good law. Franchisors will be relieved that the position has not changed and so post-termination non-compete clauses in a franchise agreement (which restrict competition) will be valid if they are necessary to protect the franchisor's legitimate business interests.

The step-in provisions in the Carewatch agreement had entitled the franchisor to operate the franchised business on termination from the premises and to buy certain franchisee assets. The High Court commented that they were not "particularly stringent or onerous"3 and they were upheld. However, the franchisor did not have a right to buy the franchised premises from the franchisee as the agreement had simply failed to provide for the possibility. The oversight is an expensive lesson.

The background facts to the case

The background to the case had a surprising start. Carewatch Care Services (Carewatch) first received notices to terminate the franchise agreement from one of its franchisees, Focus Caring Services (Focus). Focus had since 1999 operated a number of the franchised outlets. Carewatch is the second largest provider of home care services in the UK, operating through both directly-owned and franchised outlets.

Carewatch may not have thought, when the franchisee terminated, that it would need to rely on the Court (after a six-day trial) to enforce the post-termination non-compete clauses in the franchise agreement. The dispute arose in 2013 when Focus decided to start operating competing home care services under different brand names (Purely Care and Poppy Care) while the Carewatch franchise agreement was still on foot. Focus had taken this step as it was aggrieved that Carewatch had decided to operate company-owned outlets in Focus's non-exclusive territory. Carewatch considered Focus to be in breach of the franchise agreement and initially efforts were made by both parties to resolve matters. However negotiations broke down and Focus decided to terminate its franchise agreement.

In its termination letter, Focus agreed that it would comply with its post-termination obligations to extricate itself from the Carewatch franchise system, but stated that it was not prepared to comply with the post-termination non-compete obligations. Focus argued that the provisions which prohibited Focus for a period of 12 months after termination from either competing with Carewatch in the territory covered by the franchise arrangements or from soliciting any of its employees/customers were void and unenforceable under competition law.

Competition law and franchise agreements: the Pronuptia test

By way of background, EU and UK competition rules prohibit provisions in commercial agreements which restrict, prevent or distort competition. Taken out of context, a non-compete obligation risks breaching these rules on the basis that the parties effectively agree not to compete with one another within a defined territory. At worst, such a restriction can amount to market-sharing, which is regarded as one of the most serious breaches of competition law.

Nevertheless, competition law recognises that a rigid approach to non-compete restrictions undermines the very basis on which many commercial arrangements are entered into and the legitimate commercial bargain which the parties are willing sign up to.

This is particularly true of franchise agreements. Franchisors necessarily provide and enable their franchisees to take advantage of the franchisor's established business name, know-how and business methods. In return, the franchisor reasonably expects the franchisee not to take that knowledge and reputation and use it for the benefit of the franchisor's competitors.

The leading case on the relationship between the competition law rules and franchise agreement is Pronuptia de Paris4 - a case which arose out of a dispute between the French owner of a wedding goods franchise system and its German master franchisee. In this case, the CJEU held that there are certain restrictions in franchise agreements which are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of a franchise system and so fall outside the competition law rules altogether. These are provisions which are essential to:

  1. ensure that the know-how and assistance provided by the franchisor to the benefit of the franchisee does not benefit the franchisor's competitors; and
  2. maintain the identity and reputation of the franchise network.

When giving its judgment however, the CJEU stated that it should be confined only to distribution franchises, being those where a franchisee sells products under the franchisor's name. However, the principles adopted by the CJEU have since been applied more widely to other types of franchise and so are relied upon by franchisors as a "safe harbour" from competition law for a wide range of restrictions/obligations which are typically included in franchise agreements, including non-compete provisions.

Applying the Pronuptia test in Carewatch

Focus argued that the non-compete covenants in its franchise agreement with Carewatch went further than permitted under the competition law rules. If that argument had been accepted by the Court, the provisions which breached the competition law rules would be deemed void and unenforceable from the moment the agreement was made. This would have prevented Carewatch from enforcing them.

The judge in Carewatch considered the Pronuptia test that held that a non-compete covenant which prohibited a franchisee from opening a business of the same or similar nature in the relevant area where it can compete directly with a member of the franchise network was permissible so long as such provisions apply only for a "reasonable" period after the termination of the franchise agreement.

The Carewatch parties did not dispute that the scope of the non-compete obligations was reasonable (these were limited to businesses which directly competed with the franchisor's business). However, the reasonableness of the 12-month duration of the non-compete was disputed. The Court stated, considering the relevant precedents5 and applying the Pronuptia test, that an analysis of the specific facts was required to determine whether, on termination of the agreement:

"the know-how and assistance provided by the franchisor to the franchisee is of an extent likely to turn that franchisee into an effective competitor".

For Carewatch, the judge was in no doubt that this test was satisfied - particularly in light of the facts that Focus's owners had taken on the Carewatch franchise without any prior knowledge or experience of the care industry and that it was the know-how and assistance provided by Carewatch which had enabled Focus to build its profitable business in an industry characterised by the highly personal relationship between care providers and their customers.

The result was that the Court upheld the non-compete covenants in its franchise agreements and gave Carewatch the injunction against Focus which it had sought to prevent Focus's owners from establishing and operating the competing business.

Step-in rights

Another aspect of the case was to do with the franchise agreement's step-in provisions. These gave rights to the franchisor, on termination of the franchise agreement, to purchase certain assets of the franchised business from the franchisee and to enter the franchised premises and operate the franchised business. The parties were in dispute about whether the franchisor was entitled to buy the franchise property on termination in order to give business efficacy to its rights to step-in and operate the business following termination. The High Court upheld the step-in rights but noted that that they failed to provide for the possibility that the franchised premises might be freehold premises owned by the franchisee - this was described as an oversight. As a result, the franchisor did not have the right to buy the freehold. The Court noted that the franchisee was nevertheless obliged to give up possession of the property to enable Carewatch to take over and run the franchise and for that purpose, Carewatch needed no more than a licence to occupy the property. The case emphasises the importance to spell out clearly in the agreements the various scenarios and the specific entitlements of the parties after termination.

Lessons to be learnt from the case

The case provides franchisors with useful guidance on when non-compete restrictions will be enforceable and is an important reminder of the interaction between the UK/EU competition rules and franchise agreements.

There are two main lessons from the Carewatch case:

  • It emphasises that provisions in a franchise agreement which restrict competition will be permitted only if necessary to protect the franchisor's legitimate business interests. Where called upon to determine the validity of a restriction, a court will look beyond the language of the franchise agreement and focus on the relevant circumstances under which the franchise agreement is performed and whether the franchisor should be entitled to the level of protection sought. Franchisors should ensure that any restrictions imposed on its franchisees from the outset are justified.
  • The case emphasises the importance of thinking through the various scenarios and rights that the franchisors will require following a termination. The rights to purchase assets of the former franchisee need to be clearly articulated in the agreement.


1 Carewatch Care Services Ltd v Focus Caring Services Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 2313 (Ch).
2 Pronuptia de Paris GmbH v Pronuptia de Paris Ermgard Schillgalis [1986] ECR I-353.
3 Above no. 1, at [85].
4 Pronuptia de Paris GmbH v. Pronuptia de Paris Ermgard Schillgalis [1986] ECR I-353.
5 Pirtek (UK) Limited v Jointplace and Ors [2010] EWHC 1641 (Ch).

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
6 Sep 2018, Business Breakfast, Glasgow, UK

Decarbonising our heat is a key component of The Scottish Energy Strategy and an essential piece of the complex matrix we must tackle if we are to meet our climate change obligations.

11 Sep 2018, Business Breakfast, Milton Keynes, UK

Join us for our next development breakfast round table event reflecting on the on-going planning discussion regarding the Oxford-Cambridge corridor and helping you consider how best to cash in on the exciting opportunities by considering the benefits of promotion and option agreements.

20 Sep 2018, Seminar, London, UK

Environmental regulation and liability have risen up the boardroom agenda over the past decade. Recent changes to environmental sentencing have brought this area of risk even more into focus.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Field Fisher
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Field Fisher
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions