UK: ISPs Ordered To Block Websites Committing Trade Mark Infringement

Last Updated: 5 November 2014
Article by Michael Gardner

High Court acts to protect "CARTIER" brand

In what represents a landmark decision, the High Court has granted an injunction in favour of luxury brand owner Richemont, which requires various ISPs to block access to a number of websites (Cartier International AG & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting & Ors 2014 EWHC 3354 (Ch)).  The novel factor in this decision is that the injunction was granted to protect against the infringement of trade mark rights, rather than copyright.


There has long been specific provision in English law which enables copyright owners to seek injunctions against ISPs to block or restrict access to sites that infringe copyright.  These powers, contained in s97A of the Copyright Designs & Patents Act 1988 ("CDPA") have been used on a number of occasions in the UK – chiefly to stop illegal file sharing of music and films via the internet.   There is at least some evidence that the orders have had a degree of success in reducing the amount of illegally downloaded and shared material.

However, in contrast to the powers expressly set out in the CDPA, there is no specific equivalent provision in the UK's domestic trade mark legislation,  the Trade Marks Act 1994 ("the TMA").  Nor are such measures specified in the Enforcement (Intellectual Property etc) Regulations 2006 ("the Regulations") which were introduced in the UK in response to an earlier EU Directive to beef up the remedies available to IP rights holders.

In the Richemont case, the claimants sought injunctions against Sky and the other main ISPs on the basis that injunctions were needed to help crack down on the activities of various websites that were selling counterfeit and infringing goods under the "Cartier" trade mark.

With one possible exception in a Danish case, the Richemont case is believed to be the first time in the EU that anyone has obtained such relief against an ISP in a case of trade mark infringement (as opposed to a case of copyright infringement).

In a substantial judgment running to 266 paragraphs, the judge Mr Justice Arnold, had to decide firstly whether he had jurisdiction to make such an order at all (whether under domestic or EU legislation) and secondly, if he did have the right to do so, whether it was justified in the circumstances.

Was there power to make an order against ISPs in a trade mark case?

In relation to the first issue, the judge held that the English Court very clearly did have the power to impose such an injunction.

From the domestic standpoint, the judge noted that the English Court has a general and very broad jurisdiction to grant injunctive relief under section 37 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 ("the SCA").  This meant that it didn't matter that there was no specific power set out in the TMA.  Similarly, when parliament had implemented the EU Enforcement Directive and introduced the 2006 Regulations it appeared to be under the impression that no new laws were needed to cover the trade mark position because the power was there already.  In the circumstances, the judge felt that parliament had clearly intended that such a power should be present and since domestic legislation has to be interpreted in a manner consistent with a relevant EU Directive, the English Court needed to be able to grant such relief to trade mark owners as well as to copyright owners.

So on both bases, the English court was entitled to make orders against ISPs in trade mark cases.

In making his ruling on these points, the judge also noted the decision of the Court of Appeal in the Apple v Samsung litigation in which the Court had imposed an injunction ordering Apple to publicise the fact that it had lost its design claim against Samsung.  On that occasion, although the Regulations only provided for a situation in which a losing infringer could be ordered to publicise the result of a case, the Court of Appeal had relied upon the jurisdiction in section 37 of the SCA to make an order the other way around.  Thus, it was Apple as the losing claimant, who had to publicise the fact that their claim against Samsung had been unsuccessful.

Having decided that the Court did have the power to impose an injunction against ISPs to require them to block access to websites that infringed trade mark rights, the judge then had to weigh up various factors so as to decide whether or not he should exercise that power.

Was an injunction appropriate?

The judge considered a number of different factors in weighing up the pros and cons of making the orders sought by Richemont.

For example, he considered whether or not they had done enough themselves to try and stop the infringing activity, through the use of legal action or by writing to the internet hosting companies through whom the infringers' websites were operated.    He appeared to accept that these measures had their limitations.

Other significant factors were the costs that would be borne by the ISPs to introduce the blocking of the sites – both immediately and in the longer term – and the impact on innocent users who might be inconvenienced by the making of such injunctions.  There was also the proportionality factor – was the relief sought "proportionate" in all the circumstances?

Ultimately (though not, he admitted, without hesitation) the judge came down on the side of granting the injunctions sought.  However, he also imposed some further conditions before doing so.

These were that first, the ISPs needed to set up the blocking so that where someone tried to access one of the affected websites, they were met with a notice explaining what had happened and giving that person the right to apply to the Court for the order to be varied or set aside.

Secondly, provision was to be made for the ISP's subscribers to apply to set aside or vary the injunction.

Thirdly, he was of the view that the injunctions should be in place for an initial period of 2 years and that it was up to the rights owners to apply before the expiry of that date if they wanted a longer injunction and the ISPs to make representations at that point if they wished it to be lifted.  The duration of any such "sunset clause" will be dealt with at a further hearing if agreement is not reached between the parties.


The internet is used on a daily basis as a means of advertising and selling a vast amount of counterfeit merchandise which damages the IP rights of brand owners.   The fact that the Court has shown itself willing to come to their aid in this way is encouraging for the brand owners affected.  It demonstrates that the Court accepts the difficulties rights holders face in combating this activity – and the limitations that more usual types of enforcement can have in practice.

The judgment also contains very useful guidance for both ISPs and brand owners as to the factors the Court will weigh up when dealing with such applications.

However, for the ISPs, this represents an unwelcome extension of use of blocking orders and another headache for them in terms of administrative time and cost.  Although the Court considered that the costs of compliance had to be viewed as an overhead of running such a business, there must be a concern among ISPs that the Richemont decision may pave the way for a flood of similar applications from other brand owners.  For that reason alone, it is possible that they will seek to appeal the ruling, if only to delay the inevitable.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.