UK: Review Of Recent Pension Ombudsman Determinations - October 2014

Last Updated: 24 October 2014
Article by Mark Howard and Paul Hodges

In this periodic round-up of complaints from pension scheme members to the Pensions Ombudsman, we look at:

  • A death benefits case where the Trustees failed to look into the personal circumstances of a deceased member properly
  • An overpayment case where the complainant changed his position as a result of the overpayment
  • A scheme administration case where various administrators "lost" a member's record

Siegfried (PO-1427) - Death benefits

Summary: A deferred member of the Credit Industriel et Commercial Retirement Benefits Scheme died. The Complainant co-habited with the deceased member of the pension scheme and had two children together. However, at the time of the member's death, the Complainant was not living with the deceased member.

The Complainant informed the Trustees of the member's death. The Trustees requested the death certificate, the will and the marriage certificate from the Complainant. The Complainant provided the death certificate and confirmed that the deceased member did not have a will and that they were not married. The Trustees paid the refund of contributions to the Complainant while failing to make any further enquiries into the 'family' relationship of the deceased member and the Complainant.

The scheme rules allowed a deferred member's pension to be payable to one or more persons who the Trustees were satisfied were partial or whole dependants. The Complainant enquired about the payment of the spouse's pension to her or their two children after the Trustees had paid her the refund of contributions. The Trustees determined that the children are eligible for a child's pension, but the Complainant was not eligible for a spouse's pension because she was not married to the deceased member or financially dependent immediately prior to death. The Complainant argued that:

  • The Trustees paid her the refund of contributions but have refused to pay her the widow's pension
  • She was the deceased member's partner during his employment at the principal employer of the scheme
  • She was his named beneficiary under his will
  • She lived with the deceased member for 18 years as a 'married' family
  • She was paid 'alimony' fortnightly by the deceased member

Determination: The Trustees, in exercising their discretion, are required to:

  • Ask the correct questions
  • Direct themselves properly in law
  • Take into account relevant factors
  • Not to arrive at a perverse decision

The Trustees undertook no enquires into the potential beneficiaries of the deceased member's benefits. The Ombudsman believed there needed to be a wider investigation. It seemed that the only reason the Complainant was paid the refund of contributions was because she was nominated to receive the deceased member's benefits when he died. The Trustees' failure to investigate the dependant's and spouse's benefits amounted to maladministration.

The minimal evidence the Trustees did have did not justify their conclusions on not giving the spouse's benefits. They were basing their judgement on co-habitation and not what the rules specify - dependency. The Trustees had been provided with bank statements during the internal resolution procedure evidencing that the Complainant was dependent on the deceased member. Essentially, the Trustees failed to ask the correct questions, misinterpreted the scheme rules, took into account irrelevant factors and did not undertake reasonable enquiries before reaching their decision on the member's death benefits. The Ombudsman determined that the Trustees must start again and make new reasonable enquires before coming to the same or a new conclusion on the benefits payable.

The Ombudsman also awarded the claimant a high sum of GBP 750 for the distress and inconvenience she had suffered as a result of the maladministration.

Comment: Trustees must be aware of their obligations in exercising their discretion. The Ombudsman was particularly unimpressed by the Trustees' failure to enquire into the deceased member's children or his direct family especially when it was known that the member was not married but had an unmarried partner and children. While Trustees are not obliged to consider all possible potential beneficiaries, they are required to properly consider any potential beneficiaries as their reasonable enquiries might reveal before making their decision.

Clift (PO-2066) - Overpayment

Summary: The Complainant was in the Industry Wide Coal Superannuation Scheme – which was established post privatisation in 1994. He took voluntary redundancy in April 1998 and in April 1999 was awarded an ill-health pension backdated to October 1998.

In May 1999 the Complainant ordered a conservatory which was paid for in July 1999. In June 1999, the Trustees discovered an error in calculating the pension. The lump sum had been overpaid by around GBP 3,800. The pension had been overpaid as well, but the backdating of the ill health award meant that this had already been recovered. The Complainant argued that the expenditure on the conservatory had been in reliance of being paid the incorrect lump sum. The Trustees accepted this change of position defence and so did not recoup the GBP 3,800.

In 2011 the Trustees discovered another error in the pension. As with the first one this related to the calculation of overtime in the pension, but related to the benefits which should have been given following his transfer in from a previous Coal industry scheme in 1994.

The pension benefits were therefore overstated twice.

Determination: The Pensions Ombudsman agreed that if the conservatory was a successful change of position defence in 1999, it was equally a good one in 2011. The Ombudsman noted that the Complainant had agreed to expenditure of GBP 11,000 to purchase the conservatory based on a lump sum (as notified to him in April 1999) of around GBP 8,500, but would not have purchased it if he had been told of his correct entitlement of GBP 4,600 (June 1999); then he would equally have not proceeded if he had been told that his true entitlement was only about GBP 4,000 (August 2011).

The Complainant also argued that the Trustees should be prevented from recovering under the Limitation Act 1980. This provides that the time limit for a claim of mistake does not run until "the plaintiff has discovered the ... mistake ... or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it." The Trustees argued that this did not require them to have done everything possible. The first error was in relation to an incorrect date. Once corrected there was no need to have investigated further. The second error related to earnings history prior to joining the Scheme in 1994 and could only have been reasonably discovered in 2011 when "odd results" were thrown up in calculations.

However, the Ombudsman rejected this because this was an error carried over from the previous scheme. There was a case for saying that the Trustees should have discovered this error when setting up the Scheme in 1994 (which was designed to mirror the predecessor scheme). However, he concluded that the error should have been discovered with reasonable diligence either in 1998 (when the original pension was set up) or in 1999 (when the first error was discovered). So the Trustees were time barred for claims for pension overpaid before 2005.

Comment: When Trustees discover a mistake in a member's pension calculations, Trustees should be aware that reasonable diligence needs to be carried out in establishing whether there have been any further mistakes. The Ombudsman restated the general position that members should only receive the benefits they are entitled to under the Rules of the Scheme and that Trustees can reclaim money which has been overpaid unless the member has a defence that their financial position has changed as a result of the overpayment.

Smith (PO–1746) - Scheme administration

Summary: The Complainant became a member of a scheme in 1990, which later merged into the Global Shipping Services Money Purchase Scheme in 1997. In 1995 certain members' pots were transferred by ANBC to Mercury Asset Management, a new investment manager for the Scheme. The Complainant's pot had a transfer value of GBP 6,181.88.

In 1999, Mercer became the new administrators of the Scheme. The handover documentation from ANBC confirmed that the Complainant was still a member of the Scheme, but he had no investment units. Mercer calculated a Scheme surplus and used this to balance deficits in other Scheme funds.

The Scheme changed administrators again in 2001 with the intention of winding up. In 2004 the Scheme bought out all of its known liabilities. The buy-out provider stated that the Scheme had no investment unit holdings for the Complainant. Therefore, the Trustees did not include the Complainant in the buy-out calculations.

The Complainant left the Scheme's employer in 1996. In 2007 the successor scheme's administrators wrote to the Complainant and asked him to confirm his membership. The Complainant responded that he was a deferred member of the Scheme. In 2009 when the Complainant wished to retire he wrote to the original administrator to enquire about starting to draw his pension. The Trustees of the Scheme were told by the administrators that the Complainant was not included in the buy-out arrangements when the Scheme was wound up. HMRC confirmed that the Complainant was contracted-out between the period he was employed until January 1996.

Determination: The Ombudsman determined that the Complainant's benefits should have been secured in the buy-out. It was not clear what happened with the Complainant's funds and when they were mislaid. The documentation provided by ANBC was not accurate and Mercer did not attempt to reconcile the problem until over a year after they had taken over the administration.

The civil burden of proof, the balance of probabilities, was applied by the Ombudsman. The primary fault was the administrators who should have held accurate records for each of the transfers. There is a heightened risk when transferring out funds. A professional services firm should have adequate procedures in place to protect their clients from the increased risk.

The Ombudsman found that there was maladministration by the two administrators and the Trustees. Liability was equally shared between the three parties. The employer was ordered to pay the Trustee's share of the liability.

Comment: As the buy-out and de-risking market grows, this case highlights the importance of having accurate member data and records for administrators and trustees to avoid additional liabilities coming out of the woodwork after the event. It also highlights increased risks when transferring a scheme's administration to new administrators.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Mark Howard
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.