UK: Review Of Recent Pension Ombudsman Determinations - October 2014

Last Updated: 24 October 2014
Article by Mark Howard and Paul Hodges

In this periodic round-up of complaints from pension scheme members to the Pensions Ombudsman, we look at:

  • A death benefits case where the Trustees failed to look into the personal circumstances of a deceased member properly
  • An overpayment case where the complainant changed his position as a result of the overpayment
  • A scheme administration case where various administrators "lost" a member's record

Siegfried (PO-1427) - Death benefits

Summary: A deferred member of the Credit Industriel et Commercial Retirement Benefits Scheme died. The Complainant co-habited with the deceased member of the pension scheme and had two children together. However, at the time of the member's death, the Complainant was not living with the deceased member.

The Complainant informed the Trustees of the member's death. The Trustees requested the death certificate, the will and the marriage certificate from the Complainant. The Complainant provided the death certificate and confirmed that the deceased member did not have a will and that they were not married. The Trustees paid the refund of contributions to the Complainant while failing to make any further enquiries into the 'family' relationship of the deceased member and the Complainant.

The scheme rules allowed a deferred member's pension to be payable to one or more persons who the Trustees were satisfied were partial or whole dependants. The Complainant enquired about the payment of the spouse's pension to her or their two children after the Trustees had paid her the refund of contributions. The Trustees determined that the children are eligible for a child's pension, but the Complainant was not eligible for a spouse's pension because she was not married to the deceased member or financially dependent immediately prior to death. The Complainant argued that:

  • The Trustees paid her the refund of contributions but have refused to pay her the widow's pension
  • She was the deceased member's partner during his employment at the principal employer of the scheme
  • She was his named beneficiary under his will
  • She lived with the deceased member for 18 years as a 'married' family
  • She was paid 'alimony' fortnightly by the deceased member

Determination: The Trustees, in exercising their discretion, are required to:

  • Ask the correct questions
  • Direct themselves properly in law
  • Take into account relevant factors
  • Not to arrive at a perverse decision

The Trustees undertook no enquires into the potential beneficiaries of the deceased member's benefits. The Ombudsman believed there needed to be a wider investigation. It seemed that the only reason the Complainant was paid the refund of contributions was because she was nominated to receive the deceased member's benefits when he died. The Trustees' failure to investigate the dependant's and spouse's benefits amounted to maladministration.

The minimal evidence the Trustees did have did not justify their conclusions on not giving the spouse's benefits. They were basing their judgement on co-habitation and not what the rules specify - dependency. The Trustees had been provided with bank statements during the internal resolution procedure evidencing that the Complainant was dependent on the deceased member. Essentially, the Trustees failed to ask the correct questions, misinterpreted the scheme rules, took into account irrelevant factors and did not undertake reasonable enquiries before reaching their decision on the member's death benefits. The Ombudsman determined that the Trustees must start again and make new reasonable enquires before coming to the same or a new conclusion on the benefits payable.

The Ombudsman also awarded the claimant a high sum of GBP 750 for the distress and inconvenience she had suffered as a result of the maladministration.

Comment: Trustees must be aware of their obligations in exercising their discretion. The Ombudsman was particularly unimpressed by the Trustees' failure to enquire into the deceased member's children or his direct family especially when it was known that the member was not married but had an unmarried partner and children. While Trustees are not obliged to consider all possible potential beneficiaries, they are required to properly consider any potential beneficiaries as their reasonable enquiries might reveal before making their decision.

Clift (PO-2066) - Overpayment

Summary: The Complainant was in the Industry Wide Coal Superannuation Scheme – which was established post privatisation in 1994. He took voluntary redundancy in April 1998 and in April 1999 was awarded an ill-health pension backdated to October 1998.

In May 1999 the Complainant ordered a conservatory which was paid for in July 1999. In June 1999, the Trustees discovered an error in calculating the pension. The lump sum had been overpaid by around GBP 3,800. The pension had been overpaid as well, but the backdating of the ill health award meant that this had already been recovered. The Complainant argued that the expenditure on the conservatory had been in reliance of being paid the incorrect lump sum. The Trustees accepted this change of position defence and so did not recoup the GBP 3,800.

In 2011 the Trustees discovered another error in the pension. As with the first one this related to the calculation of overtime in the pension, but related to the benefits which should have been given following his transfer in from a previous Coal industry scheme in 1994.

The pension benefits were therefore overstated twice.

Determination: The Pensions Ombudsman agreed that if the conservatory was a successful change of position defence in 1999, it was equally a good one in 2011. The Ombudsman noted that the Complainant had agreed to expenditure of GBP 11,000 to purchase the conservatory based on a lump sum (as notified to him in April 1999) of around GBP 8,500, but would not have purchased it if he had been told of his correct entitlement of GBP 4,600 (June 1999); then he would equally have not proceeded if he had been told that his true entitlement was only about GBP 4,000 (August 2011).

The Complainant also argued that the Trustees should be prevented from recovering under the Limitation Act 1980. This provides that the time limit for a claim of mistake does not run until "the plaintiff has discovered the ... mistake ... or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it." The Trustees argued that this did not require them to have done everything possible. The first error was in relation to an incorrect date. Once corrected there was no need to have investigated further. The second error related to earnings history prior to joining the Scheme in 1994 and could only have been reasonably discovered in 2011 when "odd results" were thrown up in calculations.

However, the Ombudsman rejected this because this was an error carried over from the previous scheme. There was a case for saying that the Trustees should have discovered this error when setting up the Scheme in 1994 (which was designed to mirror the predecessor scheme). However, he concluded that the error should have been discovered with reasonable diligence either in 1998 (when the original pension was set up) or in 1999 (when the first error was discovered). So the Trustees were time barred for claims for pension overpaid before 2005.

Comment: When Trustees discover a mistake in a member's pension calculations, Trustees should be aware that reasonable diligence needs to be carried out in establishing whether there have been any further mistakes. The Ombudsman restated the general position that members should only receive the benefits they are entitled to under the Rules of the Scheme and that Trustees can reclaim money which has been overpaid unless the member has a defence that their financial position has changed as a result of the overpayment.

Smith (PO–1746) - Scheme administration

Summary: The Complainant became a member of a scheme in 1990, which later merged into the Global Shipping Services Money Purchase Scheme in 1997. In 1995 certain members' pots were transferred by ANBC to Mercury Asset Management, a new investment manager for the Scheme. The Complainant's pot had a transfer value of GBP 6,181.88.

In 1999, Mercer became the new administrators of the Scheme. The handover documentation from ANBC confirmed that the Complainant was still a member of the Scheme, but he had no investment units. Mercer calculated a Scheme surplus and used this to balance deficits in other Scheme funds.

The Scheme changed administrators again in 2001 with the intention of winding up. In 2004 the Scheme bought out all of its known liabilities. The buy-out provider stated that the Scheme had no investment unit holdings for the Complainant. Therefore, the Trustees did not include the Complainant in the buy-out calculations.

The Complainant left the Scheme's employer in 1996. In 2007 the successor scheme's administrators wrote to the Complainant and asked him to confirm his membership. The Complainant responded that he was a deferred member of the Scheme. In 2009 when the Complainant wished to retire he wrote to the original administrator to enquire about starting to draw his pension. The Trustees of the Scheme were told by the administrators that the Complainant was not included in the buy-out arrangements when the Scheme was wound up. HMRC confirmed that the Complainant was contracted-out between the period he was employed until January 1996.

Determination: The Ombudsman determined that the Complainant's benefits should have been secured in the buy-out. It was not clear what happened with the Complainant's funds and when they were mislaid. The documentation provided by ANBC was not accurate and Mercer did not attempt to reconcile the problem until over a year after they had taken over the administration.

The civil burden of proof, the balance of probabilities, was applied by the Ombudsman. The primary fault was the administrators who should have held accurate records for each of the transfers. There is a heightened risk when transferring out funds. A professional services firm should have adequate procedures in place to protect their clients from the increased risk.

The Ombudsman found that there was maladministration by the two administrators and the Trustees. Liability was equally shared between the three parties. The employer was ordered to pay the Trustee's share of the liability.

Comment: As the buy-out and de-risking market grows, this case highlights the importance of having accurate member data and records for administrators and trustees to avoid additional liabilities coming out of the woodwork after the event. It also highlights increased risks when transferring a scheme's administration to new administrators.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Mark Howard
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions