UK: Short-Circuiting The Allocation Of Costs In Marley v Rawlings [2014] UKSC 51

Last Updated: 7 October 2014
Article by Katelyn Silver

On 18 September 2014, Lord Neuberger of the Supreme Court handed down his judgment (with whom Lords Clarke, Sumption, Carnwath and Hodge agreed) in relation to how the costs of the proceedings should be allocated following the Supreme Court's landmark judgment overturning the High Court and Court of Appeal's decisions in the case of Marley v Rawlings [2014] UKSC 2.

The Facts

The case of Marley v Rawlings concerned the execution of Mr & Mrs Rawlings' wills. Mr & Mrs Rawlings instructed their solicitor to prepare simple mirror wills for them which would benefit the survivor of them and thereafter, Mr Marley who they treated as an adopted son. The wills excluded their two biological sons leaving nothing to them. However, on Mr Rawlings death (his wife having predeceased him) it was discovered that when the solicitor attended the couple's home to execute the wills, he mistakenly handed Mr Rawlings' will to his wife to sign, and vice versa and the couple therefore inadvertently signed each other's wills.

This discovery lead to the couple's sons seeking to challenge the validity of Mr Rawlings' will, as if it were held to be invalid they would benefit through the intestacy rules. Mr Marley commenced probate proceedings seeking to rectify the will and seeking probate to be granted of the rectified will.

Mr Marley's claim was dismissed at first instance, in the High Court by Proudman J on the grounds that (i) the will did not satisfy the formalities laid down in section 9 of the Wills Act 1837 ("the Wills Act") and (ii) even if it had done so, it was not open to her to rectify the will (on the basis that the error was not one of a "clerical" nature) under section 20 Administration of Justice Act 1982.

Mr Marley appealed to the Court of Appeal, who upheld Proudman J's decision on the first ground (that the will failed to comply with the Wills Act formalities), and so found it unnecessary to consider the point on rectification. Mr Marley then appealed to the Supreme Court which overturned this decision, finding that (i) Mr Rawlings' will did in fact satisfy the formalities of the Wills Act so as to be a "will" within the scope of section 20 and (ii) that it could be rectified to allow the deceased couple's testamentary wishes to come in to effect. Further details of the Supreme Court's landmark judgment can be found here. All that remained was for the Supreme Court to consider the allocation of costs in the proceedings.


As Lord Neuberger confirmed, he took "an unusual approach in order to achieve a just result" in relation to the allocation of costs.

Mr Marley argued that as he was the successful party, the sons (who had lost in the Supreme Court) should pay his fees as well as their own. Conversely, the sons argued that as it was not unreasonable for them to have brought a claim, their costs and those incurred by Mr Marley should be paid by the estate or in the alternative, by the insurers of the solicitor who was responsible for the unfortunate error.

Not unsurprisingly, the solicitor's insurers agreed with Mr Marley and argued that Mr Marley's costs should be paid by the sons.

Lord Neuberger considered each of the arguments above and acknowledged that whilst the usual rule was that the "loser pays", the authorities also reveal that where there has been a reasonable challenge to a will based on an error in drafting or execution, the court will often order that all parties' costs are paid from the estate.

The difficulty with this approach in this particular case was that the estate was only worth £70,000 which would be consumed by the parties' costs depriving Mr Marley of any benefit he would have received from the estate.

This left the court with the option of making an order against the solicitor's insurers, a third party to the proceedings. The insurers argued that it would be odd to require them to pay the sons costs given that the solicitor did not owe a duty to them and that it was not the solicitor's fault that the sons had chosen to pursue the case to the Supreme Court, or at all. The Supreme Court dismissed these arguments as it was the error of the solicitor which gave rise to the proceedings and the insurers had required Mr Marley to bring proceedings to seek to have the will upheld as valid.

A further complication arose as a result of the conditional fee agreements ("CFAs") which had been entered into by the sons with their solicitors and counsel. As the sons had lost the case, the CFAs provided that they were not required to pay their solicitors' fees. However, the sons' solicitors' CFAs did require the sons to pay the disbursements incurred by the solicitors, including counsel's fees. The court examined counsel's CFAs in detail and determined that an uplift (which is traditionally an additional payment on success) could be applied despite the result, if it was ordered that the sons' fees be paid by the estate or an opposing party.

The Supreme Court therefore invited the sons' counsel to disclaim their entitlement to the uplift of 100% as the court did not consider it appropriate for counsel to receive this additional payment in circumstances where they had not been successful. If counsel disclaimed their entitlement to the uplift, the court confirmed that it would order that the solicitor's insurers should pay the following:

  1. Mr Marley's costs up to and including the Supreme Court;
  2. the sons' solicitors' fees up to and including the Court of Appeal;
  3. the sons' solicitors' disbursements; and
  4. the sons' counsel's fees in relation to the appeal to the Supreme Court.

If however, the sons' counsel refused to disclaim their entitlement to the uplift, the court confirmed that it would order that the insurers pay the costs at 1 to 3 above leaving the costs at 4 to be paid by the sons themselves. As anticipated, before judgment was handed down the sons' counsel confirmed that they would disclaim their entitlement to the uplift. Accordingly, the solicitor's insurers were ordered to pay all of the costs at 1 to 4 above.


The Supreme Court has, by its own admission imposed a "practical short-circuiting of an order that (a) the estate pays the costs, (b) the estate be reimbursed by the solicitor, and (c) the solicitor be reimbursed by the insurers".

Costs are a key consideration in any litigation, which should not be entered into lightly. Strictly speaking the court could have required the parties to recover their costs in the manner detailed above i.e. that the estate pay the parties' costs, necessitating a claim against the solicitor to recover those costs and thereafter a claim by the solicitor to his insurers for reimbursement under his insurance policy.

However, this would have prolonged the litigation process for the parties and the Supreme Court appears to have taken the view that further litigation and delay would only serve to increase costs yet further in relation to an estate of extremely modest value. The solicitor's insurers had required Mr Marley to bring the claim and fight it through to the Supreme Court which was a key factor in the court's approach to the allocation of costs.

When facing an estate or trust dispute, it is essential to seek specialist expert advice sooner rather than later.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.