UK: Losing Low-Cost Homes - Five Things We've Learned

Last Updated: 9 September 2014
Article by Roy Pinnock

The initial wave of appeal decisions under a government regime that allows developers to challenge affordable housing obligations contains some pointers on how the system is shaping up.

Affordable housing is under pressure as grant funding, planning policy and land values pull in different directions. Planning obligations under section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 are often wrongly seen as a safer bet than conditions to secure essential affordable provision. To date, obligations have given planning authorities more control; they must no longer serve a "useful planning purpose" and until recently could not be appealed for at least five years.

However, legislative changes introduced via the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013 are now making their presence felt. The new section 106BA, which gives developers a right to ask councils to review housing obligations, and section 106BC, which gives developers a right to appeal against review outcomes, came into force on 25 April 2013. Where a scheme is judged not to be economically viable, the planning authority must modify affordable housing obligations so that it becomes so. Crucially, the process is a numerical exercise; there is no scope to reopen the planning merits.

Exploitation of this procedure to date has been surprisingly modest. Developers' desire to maintain good relations with planning authorities for later phases and new schemes may explain its low uptake. Also, the regime has limited application to larger schemes because any uncompleted elements will revert to the original obligation after three years or from April 2016.

Eight of the first 11 review appeals made under section 106BC resulted from non-determination, rather than refusal, by local authorities. Six of the first ten appeals decided were successful, while four received straight rejections. Most have been decided within four months of the original application. The number of affordable homes lost as a result is small, at around 100 units.

  1. The direction in the government's statutory guidance that actual land costs should be used in appraisals to see whether applicants overpaid for the land is being followed by inspectors.

    In section 106BC appeals involving developments at Holsworthy Showground in Devon (DCS Number 200-001-292) and South Norwood in south London (DCS Number 200-002-000), developers' overbids were discounted by inspectors. However, identifying genuinely comparable values for specific schemes and areas remains a problem in securing agreement on appraisals at appeal.
  2. Care is needed on the viability information submitted and accepted during the initial planning stages.

    Planning authorities should be wary of accepting unrealistic cost and value assumptions at the application stage. Small changes to build costs or sales values may result in affordable provision being stripped out later. Once permission has been granted, and financial and other obligations secured, it may be easy for developers to show that the planning requirements do not stack up.

    The government guidance is clear that the assumptions used during initial section 106 negotiations will set the agenda for reviews and appeals, apart from those such as build costs that are intended to be updated. Appellants seeking a higher profit margin at a later stage have been given short shrift. In the Holsworthy case, the developer sought a 20 per cent profit margin in its review appraisal, despite having used a lower rate in its original planning appeal. The higher rate was rejected.

    In a case from Surrey, a developer's request to waive a commuted sum for off-site affordable provision to improve profitability from eight to ten per cent was rejected in light of the scheme's low risk profile. The fact that the appellant had embarked on the development using an appraisal showing a loss of £84,000 did not help. Crafting appraisals to show very low margins at the planning application stage, starting the development and then seeking a higher margin generally will not work.
  3. Many authorities will find it hard to respond robustly to appeals within the 28 days allowed by the legislation owing to time and resource pressures.

    Where councils choose to resist section 106BC appeals, they should seek good valuation and other advice to ensure it is not futile. Setting up a panel of internal or external advisers who can be called on at short notice is important.

    In the South Norwood case, the authority did its homework on build costs and the inspector saw no reason to overturn its refusal. But on a scheme in Suffolk, the council appears to have done too little too late on build costs and likely sales values, and the appeal was allowed. In a case from Blackpool, the council was allowed to submit updated benchmarked sales values, build costs and land values on the last day of the inquiry.
  4. Any modifications made to obligations must ensure that schemes "become viable" at the date of the decision. While the guide emphasises that this means at today's costs and values, the approach to uncertainty over future values has caused difficulties.

    A proposal that simply makes an unviable scheme less unviable should not succeed. The legal test requires immediate deliverability and the guidance stresses its importance. An appeal involving outline permission for a scheme in Cornwall (DCS Number 200-001-440) was dismissed on the grounds that the appellant's revised appraisal did not reflect a costed, deliverable scheme.

    By contrast, an inspector allowed a section 106BC appeal on the 100-unit Mast Pond Wharf scheme in Woolwich (DCS Number 200-001-500) despite the developer's appraisal confirming that the project would remain unviable even if all the agreed affordable provision were removed. The local authority called for a review mechanism as a hedge against future increases in sales values. The inspector did not question its ability to impose one but decided that it was unnecessary, given that relaxation of the obligation's requirements would only last until 2016. He saw this as sufficient to ensure that the scheme would be delivered in the "current market", in line with the guidance.

    The inspector's analysis was directed primarily at the guidance's impetus to get construction moving. He did not address the fact that local sales values had increased by almost 30 per cent over the preceding three years, nor the duty to apply "such other modifications" as inspectors consider "necessary or expedient" to ensure the effectiveness of obligations at the end of the three years.

    However, those points did not feature in the legal challenge brought by the local authority. Its grounds were that the inspector had misapplied the law on the need for the scheme to become viable at the decision date, misunderstood its reasons for asking for the review mechanism and given inadequate reasons for refusing to impose one. In June, the High Court dismissed these claims as unarguable.
  5. Few authorities have taken the initiative by proposing different modifications put forward by developers. A more adventurous approach is needed from councils.

    Under section 106BA(6), obligations can be modified in "some other way" from those sought by the applicant. In an appeal decision this month from east London, the inspector accepted that the scheme was unviable, though not to the extent claimed by the appellant, and imposed a commuted sum towards off-site provision. Also, the regime does not explicitly prohibit councils from modifying obligations to anticipate future increases in profitability. This is worth considering, if it can be done in way that preserves minimum levels of profitability and the ability to fund and deliver the scheme straightaway.

    Conditions can still be used to secure affordable housing, and any appeal on requests to vary them is subject to an overall judgement on the planning merits. Wider use of conditions would kill off some of the tortured drafting and negotiation of affordable housing obligations by lawyers. Where obligations are used, authorities should consider how review mechanisms can be built in more consistently. Properly drafted, this could oust section 106BA altogether.

This article appeared in Planning magazine, 29 August 2014

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
6 Sep 2018, Business Breakfast, Glasgow, UK

Decarbonising our heat is a key component of The Scottish Energy Strategy and an essential piece of the complex matrix we must tackle if we are to meet our climate change obligations.

11 Sep 2018, Business Breakfast, Milton Keynes, UK

Join us for our next development breakfast round table event reflecting on the on-going planning discussion regarding the Oxford-Cambridge corridor and helping you consider how best to cash in on the exciting opportunities by considering the benefits of promotion and option agreements.

20 Sep 2018, Seminar, London, UK

Environmental regulation and liability have risen up the boardroom agenda over the past decade. Recent changes to environmental sentencing have brought this area of risk even more into focus.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions