UK: Collateral Warranties - Time For Change?

Last Updated: 17 June 2005
Article by Clive Lovatt

The Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 has now been in force over five years. It remains a much under used piece of legislation and its application is still specifically excluded from many property development and construction contracts. There are a number of reasons why the Act has received a reluctant welcome. There are other and better reasons why that reluctance should be overcome.

Privity of Contract

As is well known, the Act creates an exception to "privity of contract" – the doctrine that generally a contract cannot confer rights or impose obligations on any person save those who are party to the contract - which has long been central to English law. The point was established as long ago as 1861 in Tweddle v. Atkinson and in 1915 the then Lord Chancellor, Viscount Haldane, delivering his judgement in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company Limited v. Selfridge & Co. Limited said:

"…in the law of England certain principles are fundamental. One is that only a person who is a party to a contract can sue on it."

It should therefore be of no surprise that attempts to amend the doctrine of privity have been slow to come to fruition and slow to gain acceptance. Just how long though is surprising. In 1937 the 6th Interim Report of the Law Revision Committee said:

"We therefore recommend that where a contract by its express terms purports to confer a benefit directly on a third party, the third party shall be entitled to enforce the provision in its own name, provided that the promisor shall be entitled to raise as against the third party any defence that would have been valid against the promisee."

Notwithstanding this, it was not until the Law Commission Report on privity of contract made in 1996 that sufficient momentum was generated for the Act to reach the statute books, with it provisionally coming into force in November 1999 and fully so in May 2000, a full 63 years after the Law Revision Committee's report.

In the interim, English law had been inventive in providing aggrieved parties with remedies. The tort of negligence expanded rapidly through the 1960s and 1970s only to be cut back to first principles by decisions of the House of Lords at the end of the 1980s. In the law of contract, some cracks appeared in the façade of privity of contract with decisions in cases such as St. Martins Property Corporation v. Sir Robert McAlpine and Darlington Borough Council v. Wiltshier Northern Limited. Above all, English law and specifically the property and construction industries, adopted the use of collateral warranties.

Why is use of the Act avoided?

Almost all property and construction lawyers would agree that collateral warranties are often time consuming, difficult and expensive to negotiate and procure. The absence of executed warranties can delay the signing of transactions. Some warranties, for example those given by sub-contractors, can by their nature remain unexecuted many months after the date of the original transaction. The costs of pursuing recalcitrant warrantors can form a significant percentage of the legal costs incurred in a property development or construction project.

Despite this, the operation of the Act is excluded from property and construction documents on many more occasions than its use is adopted. Even projects based on the JCT Major Projects form (the first important new form to be produced by the JCT following the coming into force of the Act) often actually proceed on the basis that collateral warranties will be provided. This is notwithstanding the fact that the standard form produced by the JCT utilises the provisions of the Act.

Why is this the case? When the Act first came into force, a number of commentators expressed concerns that many clauses in commercial contracts could be construed as conferring unintended rights on third parties. It was perceived as "safer" to exclude operation of the Act in total. In addition, and crucially, the attitude to the Act of professional indemnity insurers was unknown.

Five years on, it is clear that the Act can be used effectively and that insurers have few concerns as to the operation of the Act itself (whilst of course remaining concerned as to the nature and extent of the rights confered on third parties). However, the familiarity and certainty of warranties, coupled with the entrenched habits of both legal advisers and their clients have ensured the the continued use of warranties.

Time For Change?

The Act is an effective piece of legislation. Such concerns as to its operation as remain (these are explored in more detail below) can be overcome. The Act offers the opportunity to reduce cost and save time. Most importantly, use of the Act can remove commercial barriers to the closing of property and construction transactions. These advantages should be embraced.

At Addleshaw Goddard, we have sought to do just this. In recent months we have introduced to the property and construction market our initiative under the Act "Three in One Contracting – an end to collateral warranties". At the heart of the initiative are a suite of documents, covering consultants' appointments, bespoke amendments to the principal JCT forms of contract and forms of sub-contract, which incorporate the drafting necessary to make effective use of the Act.

So in a "typical" development project, the usual beneficiaries of collateral warranties still benefit from the protection that a warranty would provide, but instead of receiving a warranty document each beneficiary is instead nominated by service of a pro-forma notice. This is sent by the developer's legal advisers to the relevant consultants and contractors and sets out the identity of the beneficiary, the nature of the beneficiary's interest and the nature of the rights confered upon him.

By way of example, a beneficiary under an appointment acquires the benefit of the duty of care clause under the appointment along with the copyright clause, professional indemnity clause and the prohibited materials clause. Funders obtain the benefit of step-in provisions (about which more is said below).

The position is similar for beneficiaries under the building contract, save that in place of the duty of care clause, the beneficiary acquires the the benefit of the contractor's promise to carry out the works in accordance with the building contract along with (in design and build projects) the contractor's warranty of skill and care in design.

Using the Act

The introduction of Three in One Contracting has raised questions and concerns from consultants and contractors and from beneficiaries. Set out below are some of the more frequently raised concerns along with our approach to the problems raised.

Will there be uncontrolled numbers of beneficiaries?

In the same way as the number of collateral warranties which may be given in favour of any category of beneficiary are normally limited by the principal contract to which the warranty relates, that contract can and should limit the number of beneficiaries who may be nominated to receive rights under the Act.

The risk of confering unintended rights on third parties can be simply avoided by excluding the Act save to the extent that rights are expressly confered on a beneficiary.

What happens to "no greater liability" clauses?

No greater liability clauses are commonly found in collateral warranties. Their purpose is to make it clear that the warranty does not impose a burden which is greater or different to that imposed by the principal contract to which the warranty relates. The wording of such clauses is often the subject of detailed negotiation and construing the effect of completed clauses can be problematical.

Using the Act overcomes these difficulties. The Act states at sections 1(4) and 1(5) that a third party can only enforce a contract term subject to and in accordance with any other relevant terms of the contract and that for the purpose of enforcing a term, the third party has the remedies he would have had if he had been a party to the contract.

How is set-off dealt with?

We have approached set-off in the same way as we would do so in relation to a warranty, namely that a beneficiary should be affected by financial claims by the consultant or contractor against the employer only where that beneficiary has exercised a right of step-in.

What about assignment?

A right given under the Act can be assigned in the same way as any other right under a contract and it is therefore up to the parties to place any commercial limitation on assignment which they wish to see.

What about net contribution?

Net contribution provisions remain amongst the most hotly debated clauses in collateral warranties. If the principle of net contribution is accepted, a net contribution clause can be added to an appointment or building contract, insofar as concerns liability towards any beneficiary.

How long do the third party rights last?

Section 7(3) of the Act amends the Limitation Act 1980 so that a third party's ability to claim under the Act is limited to six years for a simple contract an twelve years for a deed.

How do step-in provisions work?

The Act addresses rights (or benefits) but does not deal in any way with the obligations (or burdens) of a contract . The Act cannot of itself therefore adequately address step-in provisions, which will normally set out obligations as to payment and the continued observance of the terms of the contract by the party exercising the right of step-in.

The problem is easily resolved, however, by specifying that any notice of step-in must be in the form of a deed and must include an undertaking by the relevant beneficiary to pay, or to guarantee payment, in accordance with the step-in provisions of the appointment or building contract.

How does use of the Act affect termination and variations?

The manner in which a contract can be terminated or varied is a matter for the parties to the relevant contract. We have approached our standard documents by making it clear that the contracting parties can exercise a right of termination without needing to obtain the consent of any nominated beneficiary. The exception to this is of course where a beneficiary has been given step-in rights, in which case he is entitled to be given the specified period of notice of intention to terminate.

The employer is in addition allowed to vary the works or any consultant's services without needing the consent of any beneficiary. Any other changes to the terms of any appointment or building contract require the consent of the beneficiaries if any have already been nominated.

Does adjudication apply to the third party?

The threat of adjudication under the Construction Act from a third party beneficiary would be a serious (and probably well founded) concern for many contractors and consultants. It is not, however, a real threat. Section 108 of the Construction Act only confers an entitlement to adjudicate on a party to the contract. Section 7(4) of the Act makes it clear that the grant of third party rights does not make the beneficiary of those rights a party to the contract.


The Act offers benefits in terms of cost and time saving to those involved in property development and construction projects which are difficult to ignore. To the extent that the Act does not resolve issues of importance to the contractors and consultants giving third party rights and the beneficiaries of such rights, those issues can be resolved by careful drafting of the relevant contract provisions.

The questions which have been raised with us since our launch of Three in One Contracting, however, illustrate that the Act and its workings are still unfamiliar to a significant proportion of the property market. The benefits of the Act have been embraced by a number of developers, but others (including importantly banks and others providing property finance) have barely considered its use.

The process of familiarisation is in the hands of the market's advisers and it is a task which we should undertake with enthusiasm.

Cases Cited

Tweddle v. Atkinson (1861) 1 B. & S. 393;

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v. Selfridge & Co Ltd [1915] A.C. 847;

St Martins Property Corporation v. Sir Robert McAlpine 57 BLR 57;

Darlington Borough Council v. Wiltshier Northern Limited 69 BLR 1.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions