UK: Beware Of The Dangers Of Refusing To Mediate

Last Updated: 18 July 2014
Article by Caroline Greenwell

Phillip Garritt-Critchley & Others -v- Andrew Ronnan & Solarpower PV Limited [2014] EWHC 1774 (Ch) ("Garritt-Critchley")

The cost consequences of failing to take part in mediation have been highlighted in the recent High Court case of Garritt-Critchley, in which His Honour Judge Waksman QC (sitting in the Chancery Division, Manchester District Registry) awarded indemnity costs to the Claimants as a result of the Defendants' consistent refusal to mediate; an approach which the Court deemed unreasonable.

The decision highlights the caution which should be adopted by parties in litigation when responding to requests to mediate, and the risks of refusing the same.

The Facts

A dispute arose between the parties from the Defendants' failure to allot shares in a company in accordance with an alleged agreement. The issue for the Court to decide upon was whether or not there was a binding agreement between the parties.

The Claimants' letter of claim (which stated their claim at £208,000) indicated that the Claimants would be prepared to engage in ADR, such as mediation. The Defendants' response said that they did not wish to engage in mediation at that stage.

Subsequently, in the Allocation Questionnaire, the Defendants once again made it plain that they were not prepared to engage in any settlement activity, stating that "the parties are too far apart at this stage". Their solicitors said that they and their clients were aware of the potential penalties if they were found to have unreasonably refused mediation but were "extremely confident" of their clients' position and did not consider the Claimants' claim to have a reasonable prospect of success. As a result the Defendants considered their rejection of ADR to be reasonable.

This was in contrast to the Claimants' Allocation Questionnaire, in which they confirmed that they remained willing to negotiate and sought a one month stay of the proceedings to allow the parties to explore settlement.

Throughout the litigation the Claimants' willingness to mediate was reiterated on numerous occasions and on each occasion such offers were rejected on the basis that the Defendants remained extremely confident that they would defeat the claim.

At the CMC on 28 May 2013, the District Judge gave directions to trial and recorded that the Court considered that the overriding objective would be served by the parties seeking to resolve the claim by mediation. The parties were directed to file witness statements in a sealed envelope in advance of the trial explaining any refusal to mediate.

In November 2013 (approximately two months before trial) the Claimants put forward a Part 36 offer in the sum of £10,000. The offer was not accepted within the permitted period. On 14 December 2013 the Defendants put forward a counter offer that the Claimants discontinue their claim and pay 75% of the Defendants' costs. This was not accepted, but the Claimants reiterated that they remained willing to progress matters if the Defendants' position changed and they agreed to negotiate constructively. No further progress was made prior to the trial.

Following a four day trial in January 2014, Judgment was reserved to be delivered orally on 3 February 2014. In the period between the conclusion of trial and delivery of Judgment, the Defendants sought the Claimants' permission to accept the Part 36 offer that had been made in November 2013.

The Claimants granted permission and the Defendants accepted the offer, which in turn meant that the Claimants should be paid their costs on the standard basis up to the date of acceptance. The parties addressed the Court on costs at a hearing on 4 February 2014, at which the Claimants sought an indemnity costs award on the basis of the Defendants' failure to engage in mediation.

The Decision

HHJ Waksman QC accepted that cases such as Garritt-Critchley did not generally provide any natural middle ground on liability between the parties because they centred on whether a concluded agreement had been reached or not. He said, however, that an argument that mediation was therefore not worthwhile was misconceived. The sort of case whose nature might rule out mediation would be where a party wished to resolve a particular point of law or considered that a binding precedent would be useful.

In contrast, he said that Garritt-Critchley was, by its very nature, eminently suitable for ADR, as the Claimants had recognised in their letter before action. The case lent itself to the usual risk analysis, in which each party should have engaged, as to the likelihood of their position being favoured by the Court. He said that it was a classic matter for mediation as a result of the wide range of possible scenarios that could have arisen in relation to quantum and, as such, it was not reasonable for the Defendants to say that the odds were so stacked in their favour that there was no conceivable point in discussing settlement.

He went on to say that the Defendants' contention that there was too much dislike and mistrust between the parties for mediation to be worthwhile was flawed given that it is in situations where there is considerable distrust and heightened emotion that a mediator's skills are most useful.

The Judge commented that had the Defendants been so confident of their position, they ought to have made an application for Summary Judgment. As established in Halsey - v- Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA CIV 576, "extreme confidence" could not be considered a reasonable basis on which to refuse mediation.

Finally, the Judge considered and rejected the Defendants' analysis that the parties were too far apart for settlement to be reached. He concluded that parties do not know whether they are too far apart unless they explore settlement in a form such as mediation.

Accordingly, on the basis of the Defendants' consistent failure to engage in mediation, the Judge ordered that the Defendants pay the Claimants' costs on the indemnity basis to the date upon which the Claimants' Part 36 offer was accepted.

Lessons Learned

The decision emphasises how strongly mediation is advocated by the Judiciary and that parties and solicitors need to very carefully consider the potential consequences of a refusal to engage in ADR.

The key points to note are:

  • Extreme confidence in a case or a belief that there is no middle ground between the parties are not to be considered legitimate reasons for refusal to engage.
  • Dislike and mistrust are issues which the Judiciary consider can be very effectively addressed by mediation, and certainly not reasons to refuse it.
  • It is advisable for the party proposing ADR to clearly highlight to its opponent that any refusal to engage in ADR is likely to result in indemnity costs being sought by it, should the matter reach trial.
  • In the event that a party considers that there are reasonable grounds not to mediate sufficient for a party to refuse engaging in ADR, those grounds should be clearly set out in writing to the proposer of ADR, very careful attention having been paid to the relevant authorities.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Caroline Greenwell
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.