UK: Don’t "Mind The Gap" In Cohabitation For A Successful Claim For A Cohabitee Under The Inheritance (Provision For Family And Dependants) Act 1975 - Kaur v Dhaliwal

Last Updated: 17 July 2014
Article by Rebecca Piper

An appeal judgment was handed down this month in the case of Kaur v Dhaliwal which was considered by the Honourable Mr Justice Barling sitting in the Chancery Division of the High Court. The Applicant in this claim sought to bring a claim for financial provision from her fiancé's estate under s1(1A) of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 ("the Act"). In order for her to have standing under s1(1A) she would have to be a person who "during the whole of the period of two years immediately before the date when the deceased died...was living in the same household as the deceased, and as the...wife of the deceased". This appeal was focussed on the preliminary issue of whether the Applicant had satisfied the requirement of living with the Deceased for the period of two years prior to the date of death of the Deceased in order that she was eligible to bring her claim.

The Facts

The Applicant met the Deceased in May 2005 and they were engaged the following month. A few months prior to the Deceased meeting the Applicant his wife of 25 years had committed suicide. The Deceased has been charged for her manslaughter (by allegedly triggering her suicide) however he was acquitted in March 2006 (the acquittal upheld by the Court of Appeal in May 2006).

At the time of the engagement the Deceased was still living in the family home with his two sons (the Defendants to the claim) and the Deceased and the Applicant decided to keep their relationship secret until the elder son was married the following year. However, following their engagement the Deceased would often stay with the Applicant at her home and the Applicant began working in a cafe owned by the Deceased, eventually giving up her job to work there full time (7 days a week) and so unsurprisingly it did not take long for the Deceased's sons to become aware of the relationship.

In July 2006 a flat owned by the Deceased became vacant, and he and the Applicant moved in together. From the evidence it is unclear how long the Deceased and the Applicant lived together in this property but the first instance Judge found this to be until September 2006 (so a period of approximately 3 months) and found that the couple were living in the property at this time as man and wife and in the same household (so satisfying the criteria laid down in s1(1A) of the Act for this period).

From September 2006 (when the Deceased's son and his wife moved in to the property) it is not clear what the living arrangements were for the Deceased and the Applicant, and the Judge made no findings in relation to this (although it was acknowledged that the Deceased stayed with the Applicant at her home when he could, as at the start of their relationship, and that they both stayed with the Applicant's friend for a period of 2 weeks in May or June 2007).

At the beginning of July 2007, another of the Deceased's properties became vacant, and he and the Applicant moved into this property until around April 2009 when they moved together to a house purchased by both of them, where they lived together until the Deceased died on 7 June 2009.

It was therefore accepted that for 1 year and 49 weeks immediately prior to the Deceased's death the Applicant was living in the same household as the Deceased as his wife. She was therefore 3 weeks short of satisfying the requirement of living in the same household as the Deceased for 2 years immediately prior to his death (which she was required to satisfy under s1(1A) for the Act to be an eligible claimant).

The question before the Court was therefore whether, when considering:

  1. the initial 3 month period of cohabitation (July 2006 to September 2006) where the couple were living in the same household as husband and wife;
  2. the period of 8 months which followed this before the couple again lived in the same property;
  3. the 1 year and 49 weeks of cohabitation where the couple were living in the same household as husband and wife, immediately before the Deceased's death;

the Applicant could have been said to have been living in the same household as the Deceased as man and wife for the period of 2 years immediately prior to the Deceased's death.

If the Judge found that the criteria set out in s1(1A) of the Act was satisfied then the Applicant would be eligible to bring her claim If he found it was not satisfied then she would not have standing to bring a claim under the Act.


The Court of First Instance allowed the Applicant's claim, finding that the criteria was satisfied for the required period of 2 years. When addressing the issue of the gap of cohabitation the Judge stated that "it is common ground that once a qualifying relationship is established the occasional separation of the length arising in this case does not matter". The Judge therefore appeared to consider that the period of cohabitation had begun in July 2006 and the relationship had continued to be a qualifying relationship under the terms of the Act until the Deceased's death in June 2009. The 8- month gap in cohabitation would not cause the Applicant to lose standing to bring her claim.

The Appeal

The Defendants (the Deceased's two sons) appealed against this decision. This was allowed and the matter was remitted to the Judge of First Instance. The Judge once again found in favour of the Applicant, clarifying the first judgment in certain respects. He found the fact that the couple worked together and spent a great deal of time together, and the emotional turmoil that the Deceased's family had been through following the suicide of the Deceased's wife were "two special features" which must be borne in mind when considering the relationship between the Deceased and the Applicant.

With reference to the 8-month gap in cohabitation the Judge stated that "a failure to prove exactly where they were living or cohabiting does not prohibit a finding that the relationship continued in full measure. When I say the relationship...I am talking about a qualifying relationship, which is one which meets the statutory requirements of the Act and thus encompasses being part of the same household, which is different from living under the same roof."

The Judge looked at the reasons that the couple separated at the end of September 2006 and found this was not a suspension in the relationship, or reflection of a cooling off of the relationship, but was to do with the Deceased's family circumstances.

The Judge found that the period of cohabitation began in July 2006 and that this was the 'norm'; the approximate 8-month gap in cohabitation which followed (before the couple resumed permanently living together in the same property) was a temporary interruption but the relationship continued to be a 'qualifying relationship' during this time.

The Second Appeal

The Defendants once again appealed. They argued that whilst potential applicants can satisfy the statutory procedure if there is a temporary separation (for example due to a holiday or business trip, or due to a spell in hospital or nursing home) the facts of this case (where following a period of cohabitation of only 3 months there followed an 8- month gap until cohabitation was again resumed) precluded a finding that the statutory criteria was satisfied.

The appeal was heard in the Chancery Division of the High Court. On the facts Mr Justice Barling found that the Judge of First Instance was entitled to conclude that the parties' settled relationship, which fulfilled the statutory criteria from July 2006 to September 2006 continued throughout the disputed period (the 8-month gap in cohabitation) until the Deceased's death. The relevant points in reaching this conclusion were that throughout the disputed period the couple were working together everyday in the Deceased's cafe, their settled cohabitation was disrupted in September 2006 for family reasons unconnected to their own relationship and their engagement continued throughout the whole period with the knowledge of their respective families.

Mr Justice Barling found that the Judge's finding was not dependent upon the couple living under the same roof during the disputed period, but that their relationship, which was a qualifying relationship, continued in "full measure" during that period, thus restating the accepted position that a couple can be living in the same "household" whilst not living in the same "house".

The relevant period was therefore considered to have begun in July 2006 and continued for the 2 years and 11 months until the Deceased's death – during this time it was deemed that the couple were living in the same household as husband and wife. Accordingly the appeal was again denied.


This case has arguably pushed the remit of what can be considered as an acceptable 'break' in cohabitation further than previous cases. It is perhaps significant that the Applicant was only 3 weeks short of 2 years' continuous cohabitation with the Deceased immediately prior to his death, and you can see why such circumstances may have aroused the sympathy of the Court.

It is questionable what the outcome of the case may have been if the Applicant had never resumed cohabiting with the Deceased again after the initial 3-month period if the Deceased's family circumstances had continued to make this an implausible option, or if the Applicant had only been living with the Deceased for a matter of months before his death. For her to have succeeded in such circumstances would have been a more surprising decision – but arguably the same principles would have applied.

There were of course exceptional circumstances in the facts of this case, but following this judgment lawyers when faced with potential Applicants under the Act should perhaps be taking steps to look in more detail at the circumstances of the relationship to explore if there has ever been a period of cohabitation on which they can pinpoint the two-year period to commence running, no matter how brief.

This case is an illustration of the difficulties that non-married couples can face in bringing a claim under the Act. In this case, albeit that it was acknowledged that there was a formed and settled relationship and the Applicant was engaged to the Deceased, the Applicant would not have been successful in her claim had she not lived with the Deceased for the relatively short period of 3 months some 8 months before they permanently began residing together.

The upcoming amendments to the Act (contained in the Inheritance and Trustees' Powers Act 2014 – due to come in to force on 1 October 2014) have not addressed the inequality that those in long term and stable relationships face (when compared to their married counterparts) if they have not cohabited together for 2 years immediately prior to the death of the Deceased when seeking to bring a claim under the Act.

A couple may have been in a stable relationship for 8 years, been engaged for half of that time but only lived together for 18 months and they would be barred from bringing a claim, they may have a child together, but still the bereaved partner would not be able to bring a claim for provision from their deceased's partner's estate on a strict reading of the legislation.

These circumstances are difficult to legislate on, marriage is 'black and white' and easily proven in law to exist. Being married gives you automatic standing to bring a claim, even if the parties to the marriage lived apart or led separate lives, or were even formally separated, the marriage certificate gives automatic standing to bring a claim under the Act.

In today's world, the traditional family unit is something less often seen. The stigma attached to those choosing to cohabit or have children before marriage is not what it was, or indeed not a stigma at all. It is not uncommon to see adult children living with their parents well into their 20s or 30s or returning to their parents' homes in order that they can save money to step on the first rung of the property ladder. The economic circumstances people are faced with may mean that committed couples do not have the finances to live together. They may be living separately in order to save money with the goal of purchasing a home together. This does not by default make them less committed to their relationship, however they are arguably penalised by the Act for their unmarried status. It is difficult to legislate on such matters however because something is difficult does not mean it should not be addressed. This case is another example of the Courts seeking to find a way to allow justice to prevail where the legislation on a strict reading has failed to assist. However it is disappointing that the Inheritance and Trustees' Powers Act 2014 has not taken steps to update the law in line with changes in society.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Rebecca Piper
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.