UK: Douglas v Hello! Ltd

Last Updated: 23 May 2005
Article by Susan Barty

Everyone will recall the glamorous couple Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones, more used to red carpets than courtrooms, fighting for their privacy over wedding photos sold to Hello! The couple sold exclusive rights of their wedding to OK! for £1m in order to retain control over the media and their privacy. The Claimants based their claim on breach of confidence, breach of privacy and breach of the Data Protection Act. Aside from the celebrity angle, this case has attracted much attention because it has tested the bounds of the right to privacy, introduced in 2000 by the Human Rights Act.

Commercial exploitation of privacy or "image rights"

The Court of Appeal ruled that whilst Hello! had breached the Douglases' confidentiality, that confidentiality did not extend to OK!, the third Claimant. OK! had no cause of action against Hello! for breach of commercial confidence. The decision will come as a blow to magazines and newspapers wishing to protect their exclusive rights to stories and is a victory for those running 'spoilers'. The judgment raises important points regarding the extent to which the law of confidence can be used to protect the commercial exploitation of privacy or "image rights".

Right to privacy – is there or isn't there?

Following the approach in the European Court of Human Rights case of von Hannover, the Court of Appeal affirmed that the courts in England and Wales have a duty under the Human Rights Act to protect the privacy of an individual from an unjustified invasion of privacy by another. The Court of Appeal further affirmed that the courts will do this through developing the common law duty of confidence. The Court of Appeal also indicated that, in certain circumstances, injunctions for breach of confidence should be granted by the courts more readily.

To view the article in full please see below:


Full Article

Everyone will recall the glamorous couple Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones, more used to red carpets than courtrooms, fighting for their privacy over wedding photographs sold to Hello!

Background to Douglas v Hello!

The couple sold exclusive rights of their wedding to OK! for £1m with a view to retaining control over the media and their privacy. Outwitting the strict security measures in force on the day, a photographer snatched some photographs of the happy couple, which then appeared splashed across the pages of Hello!, spoiling the exclusive story promised to OK! Although originally granted a temporary injunction against Hello!, this was overruled on the "balance of convenience", on the basis that damages would be an adequate remedy, since it would be straightforward to calculate the extra profits made by Hello! if publication went ahead. The claim was based on breach of confidence, breach of privacy and breach of the Data Protection Act. Aside from the celebrity angle, this case has attracted much attention because it has tested the boundaries of the right to privacy, introduced in 2000 by the Human Rights Act.

When the case came to trial in 2003, the judge ruled that the Defendants had breached the confidence of all three Claimants (the third being the publishers of OK! magazine, Northern & Shell) and ordered Hello! to pay OK! over £1m in compensation. The Douglases were entitled to damages for breach of confidence because the wedding was essentially a private affair, whereas OK! was awarded damages on the basis that the breach of confidence was in the form of a trade secret. Yesterday, the Court of Appeal ruled that OK! had no cause of action against Hello! and consequently must repay the damages awarded for loss of sales.

Commercial exploitation of privacy or "image" rights

Many jurisdictions recognise the rights of celebrities to commercialise private information about themselves. In France, for example, the Code Civil contains a "droit a l’image" and, in the US, it is not uncommon for actions to be brought against anyone who seeks to benefit from the commercial exploitation of a celebrity’s identity without consent.

The law in the UK does not recognise "image rights" as such, however, the decision of the judge at first instance had suggested that the UK was edging towards the introduction of a new commercial privacy right. The judge compared information regarding the Douglases’ wedding to a trade secret, which the Douglases had the right to exploit and to keep confidential until exploited. Hello! contended that no such right existed under UK law. In considering this issue, the Court of Appeal raised two important points:

The Douglases’ Claim for Breach of Commercial Confidence

The Court of Appeal saw no reason, in principle, for not protecting a person’s opportunity to profit from confidential information about themselves, in the same way that, a person’s opportunity to profit from confidential information in the nature of a trade secret is protected. In analysing the previous decisions on this issue, the Court considered that they reflected the following principle:

"Where an individual (‘the owner’) has at his disposal information which he has created or which is private or personal and to which he can properly deny access to third parties, and he reasonably intends to profit commercially by using or publishing that information, then a third party who is, or ought to be, aware of these matters and who has knowingly obtained information without authority, will be in breach of duty if he uses or publishes the information to the detriment of the owner".

Applying the above principle to the facts, the Court dismissed the appeal against the judgment in favour of the Douglases based on commercial confidence. The Douglases had taken steps to ensure that their wedding was a private event and that no unauthorised photographs were published. Hello! was aware of this and was also aware of the fact that the Douglases intended to exploit their private wedding commercially by publishing authorised photographs in Hello!. Hello! had deliberately obtained photographs,knowing that such photographs were unauthorised and published them to the detriment of the Douglases, causing them commercial loss. As a result, Hello! was liable to the Douglases for breach of commercial confidence.

OK!’s Claim for Breach of Commercial Confidence

The trial judge had awarded damages to OK! for breach of confidence and had compared the nature of confidentiality of the photographs to that of a trade secret, the confidentiality of which can be shared and sold between others. The Court of Appeal did not agree with this analysis and concluded that:

"…confidential information or private information, which is capable of commercial exploitation but which is only protected by the law of confidence, does not fall to be treated as property that can be owned or transferred"

The Douglases’ right to protection of the information regarding their wedding did not arise as a result of any proprietary interest in it but arose as a result of Hello’s knowledge of the confidential nature of the information and the fact that Hello! had obtained the information in breach of commercial confidence. The Court considered that the contract with OK! did not transfer any proprietary rights in the photographic information regarding the wedding, but merely granted to OK! a licence to exploit the approved photographs commercially for a nine month period. It did not grant any rights to OK in respect of any other photographs of the wedding. OK!’s complaint was not that Hello! had published the approved photographs for which OK! had been granted the exclusive licence to publish but that Hello! had published other images, which could not be published by anyone who knew that such images were confidential. These unapproved photographs were confidential only to the Douglases and not OK! and therefore, OK! did not have any right to protect the confidentiality of the photographs.

The Court of Appeal found in favour of Hello! in relation to OK!’s claim for commercial confidence and concluded that the trial judge was wrong to hold that OK! could invoke commercial confidence in relation to the wedding photographs. In doing so, the Court has narrowed the extension afforded to privacy as a commercial right provided by the trial judge.

Right to privacy – is there or isn’t there a right?

In reviewing the question of privacy, the Court of Appeal followed the landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in von Hannover. In von Hannover, the ECtHR had considered whether photographs of Princess Caroline of Monaco and her children amounted to privacy infringement. Weighing up the conflicting Convention rights of Article 8 (right to private and family life) and Article 10 (right to freedom of expression), the judgment of the ECtHR held that national courts have a duty to protect privacy of individuals against the intrusion of others. Moreover, the ECtHR ruled that, even if a photograph is taken in a public place, the photograph will constitute an infringement of privacy, unless it contributes to a debate of genuine public interest.

Following the approach in von Hannover, the Court of Appeal affirmed that the courts in England and Wales have a duty under the Human Rights Act to protect the privacy of an individual from an unjustified invasion of privacy by another. The courts have been developing the law in this regard for some time. However, the Court of Appeal’s affirmation of this suggests that we may well see an increased protection of privacy rights in future. The courts would do this through developing the common law duty of confidence in a way that will give effect to the right for privacy under the Human Rights Act.

The judges also made it clear in obiter statements that the original application for an injunction should have been granted, as damages would not have been an adequate remedy for the Douglases, suggesting that judges, in future, may more readily grant interim injunctions in privacy cases.

Although the press have hailed the outcome as a victory for Hello! because OK! is not entitled to compensation (although OK! has said it intends to seek leave to appeal to the House of Lords), the judgment and, in particular these observations, may be worrying for the media. Developing the law of confidence may well seriously curtail the ability of the media to publish information about individuals.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 20/05/2005.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.