UK: Douglas v Hello! Ltd

Last Updated: 23 May 2005
Article by Susan Barty

Everyone will recall the glamorous couple Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones, more used to red carpets than courtrooms, fighting for their privacy over wedding photos sold to Hello! The couple sold exclusive rights of their wedding to OK! for £1m in order to retain control over the media and their privacy. The Claimants based their claim on breach of confidence, breach of privacy and breach of the Data Protection Act. Aside from the celebrity angle, this case has attracted much attention because it has tested the bounds of the right to privacy, introduced in 2000 by the Human Rights Act.

Commercial exploitation of privacy or "image rights"

The Court of Appeal ruled that whilst Hello! had breached the Douglases' confidentiality, that confidentiality did not extend to OK!, the third Claimant. OK! had no cause of action against Hello! for breach of commercial confidence. The decision will come as a blow to magazines and newspapers wishing to protect their exclusive rights to stories and is a victory for those running 'spoilers'. The judgment raises important points regarding the extent to which the law of confidence can be used to protect the commercial exploitation of privacy or "image rights".

Right to privacy – is there or isn't there?

Following the approach in the European Court of Human Rights case of von Hannover, the Court of Appeal affirmed that the courts in England and Wales have a duty under the Human Rights Act to protect the privacy of an individual from an unjustified invasion of privacy by another. The Court of Appeal further affirmed that the courts will do this through developing the common law duty of confidence. The Court of Appeal also indicated that, in certain circumstances, injunctions for breach of confidence should be granted by the courts more readily.

To view the article in full please see below:


Full Article

Everyone will recall the glamorous couple Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones, more used to red carpets than courtrooms, fighting for their privacy over wedding photographs sold to Hello!

Background to Douglas v Hello!

The couple sold exclusive rights of their wedding to OK! for £1m with a view to retaining control over the media and their privacy. Outwitting the strict security measures in force on the day, a photographer snatched some photographs of the happy couple, which then appeared splashed across the pages of Hello!, spoiling the exclusive story promised to OK! Although originally granted a temporary injunction against Hello!, this was overruled on the "balance of convenience", on the basis that damages would be an adequate remedy, since it would be straightforward to calculate the extra profits made by Hello! if publication went ahead. The claim was based on breach of confidence, breach of privacy and breach of the Data Protection Act. Aside from the celebrity angle, this case has attracted much attention because it has tested the boundaries of the right to privacy, introduced in 2000 by the Human Rights Act.

When the case came to trial in 2003, the judge ruled that the Defendants had breached the confidence of all three Claimants (the third being the publishers of OK! magazine, Northern & Shell) and ordered Hello! to pay OK! over £1m in compensation. The Douglases were entitled to damages for breach of confidence because the wedding was essentially a private affair, whereas OK! was awarded damages on the basis that the breach of confidence was in the form of a trade secret. Yesterday, the Court of Appeal ruled that OK! had no cause of action against Hello! and consequently must repay the damages awarded for loss of sales.

Commercial exploitation of privacy or "image" rights

Many jurisdictions recognise the rights of celebrities to commercialise private information about themselves. In France, for example, the Code Civil contains a "droit a l’image" and, in the US, it is not uncommon for actions to be brought against anyone who seeks to benefit from the commercial exploitation of a celebrity’s identity without consent.

The law in the UK does not recognise "image rights" as such, however, the decision of the judge at first instance had suggested that the UK was edging towards the introduction of a new commercial privacy right. The judge compared information regarding the Douglases’ wedding to a trade secret, which the Douglases had the right to exploit and to keep confidential until exploited. Hello! contended that no such right existed under UK law. In considering this issue, the Court of Appeal raised two important points:

The Douglases’ Claim for Breach of Commercial Confidence

The Court of Appeal saw no reason, in principle, for not protecting a person’s opportunity to profit from confidential information about themselves, in the same way that, a person’s opportunity to profit from confidential information in the nature of a trade secret is protected. In analysing the previous decisions on this issue, the Court considered that they reflected the following principle:

"Where an individual (‘the owner’) has at his disposal information which he has created or which is private or personal and to which he can properly deny access to third parties, and he reasonably intends to profit commercially by using or publishing that information, then a third party who is, or ought to be, aware of these matters and who has knowingly obtained information without authority, will be in breach of duty if he uses or publishes the information to the detriment of the owner".

Applying the above principle to the facts, the Court dismissed the appeal against the judgment in favour of the Douglases based on commercial confidence. The Douglases had taken steps to ensure that their wedding was a private event and that no unauthorised photographs were published. Hello! was aware of this and was also aware of the fact that the Douglases intended to exploit their private wedding commercially by publishing authorised photographs in Hello!. Hello! had deliberately obtained photographs,knowing that such photographs were unauthorised and published them to the detriment of the Douglases, causing them commercial loss. As a result, Hello! was liable to the Douglases for breach of commercial confidence.

OK!’s Claim for Breach of Commercial Confidence

The trial judge had awarded damages to OK! for breach of confidence and had compared the nature of confidentiality of the photographs to that of a trade secret, the confidentiality of which can be shared and sold between others. The Court of Appeal did not agree with this analysis and concluded that:

"…confidential information or private information, which is capable of commercial exploitation but which is only protected by the law of confidence, does not fall to be treated as property that can be owned or transferred"

The Douglases’ right to protection of the information regarding their wedding did not arise as a result of any proprietary interest in it but arose as a result of Hello’s knowledge of the confidential nature of the information and the fact that Hello! had obtained the information in breach of commercial confidence. The Court considered that the contract with OK! did not transfer any proprietary rights in the photographic information regarding the wedding, but merely granted to OK! a licence to exploit the approved photographs commercially for a nine month period. It did not grant any rights to OK in respect of any other photographs of the wedding. OK!’s complaint was not that Hello! had published the approved photographs for which OK! had been granted the exclusive licence to publish but that Hello! had published other images, which could not be published by anyone who knew that such images were confidential. These unapproved photographs were confidential only to the Douglases and not OK! and therefore, OK! did not have any right to protect the confidentiality of the photographs.

The Court of Appeal found in favour of Hello! in relation to OK!’s claim for commercial confidence and concluded that the trial judge was wrong to hold that OK! could invoke commercial confidence in relation to the wedding photographs. In doing so, the Court has narrowed the extension afforded to privacy as a commercial right provided by the trial judge.

Right to privacy – is there or isn’t there a right?

In reviewing the question of privacy, the Court of Appeal followed the landmark decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in von Hannover. In von Hannover, the ECtHR had considered whether photographs of Princess Caroline of Monaco and her children amounted to privacy infringement. Weighing up the conflicting Convention rights of Article 8 (right to private and family life) and Article 10 (right to freedom of expression), the judgment of the ECtHR held that national courts have a duty to protect privacy of individuals against the intrusion of others. Moreover, the ECtHR ruled that, even if a photograph is taken in a public place, the photograph will constitute an infringement of privacy, unless it contributes to a debate of genuine public interest.

Following the approach in von Hannover, the Court of Appeal affirmed that the courts in England and Wales have a duty under the Human Rights Act to protect the privacy of an individual from an unjustified invasion of privacy by another. The courts have been developing the law in this regard for some time. However, the Court of Appeal’s affirmation of this suggests that we may well see an increased protection of privacy rights in future. The courts would do this through developing the common law duty of confidence in a way that will give effect to the right for privacy under the Human Rights Act.

The judges also made it clear in obiter statements that the original application for an injunction should have been granted, as damages would not have been an adequate remedy for the Douglases, suggesting that judges, in future, may more readily grant interim injunctions in privacy cases.

Although the press have hailed the outcome as a victory for Hello! because OK! is not entitled to compensation (although OK! has said it intends to seek leave to appeal to the House of Lords), the judgment and, in particular these observations, may be worrying for the media. Developing the law of confidence may well seriously curtail the ability of the media to publish information about individuals.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 20/05/2005.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions