UK: Insurance And Reinsurance Weekly Update - 3 June 2014

Last Updated: 17 June 2014
Article by Nigel Brook

Diag Human Se v Czech Republic

Whether a New York Convention arbitration award had become binding and so could be enforced in England

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2014/1639.html

The claimant sought to enforce a New York Convention award made in the Czech Republic against the defendant. The defendant resisted enforcement on the ground that the award had "not yet become binding on the parties" (section 103(1)(2)(f) of the Arbitration Act 1996). Eder J held as follows:

(1) A decision by the Austrian Supreme Court (in separate enforcement proceedings) that the award is not binding gave rise to an issue estoppel between the parties, with the effect that the claimant could not argue otherwise. The judge rejected the claimant's argument that in proceedings to enforce under the New York Convention, issue estoppel cannot arise from decisions in other states on enforcement itself. The only conditions which had to be met were those affirmed by the Court of Appeal in The Good Challenger [2004]: (1) the judgment was given by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction; (2) the judgment is final and conclusive and on the merits; (3) there is identity of parties; and (4) there is identity of subject matter (i.e. the issue decided by the foreign court was the same as that arising in the English proceedings). Those conditions were met here.

(2) Even if there had been no issue estoppel, the judge would have found that the award was not binding. Having reviewed prior caselaw, Eder J concluded that if an award is subject to "ordinary recourse", rather than "extraordinary recourse", in the courts of its home jurisdiction, it will not be binding. However, he said he was "extremely reluctant to provide any definition of either category" and did not approve the claimant's argument that "ordinary recourse" should mean "a genuine appeal on the merits" (as opposed to an application to set aside, usually on procedural irregularity grounds). The judge held that here, the decision of the Municipal Court of Prague that two issues should be resolved by a review tribunal meant that the award was subject to a process of "ordinary recourse" and so was not binding.

(3) The judge also rejected the claimant's argument that it was entitled to an award of interest on the capital sum awarded by the tribunal. The claimant had argued that even if an award cannot be enforced in full, such part of the award in respect of which is there is no realistic or credible challenge can still be enforced and entitles the claimant to an award of interest (see IPCO v Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (No 2) (Weekly Updates 17/08 and 41/08)). However, here there was no pending application in the foreign jurisdiction to set aside an award. Instead, the award was not binding and so: "In my view, that conclusion is fatal to any question of partial enforcement. I know of no case in which the English Court (or indeed any court) has permitted enforcement of any award in such circumstances i.e. which it has held is not binding. The fact that a particular sum may be said to be "indisputable" ... does not, in my view, justify the relief sought".

Hone & Ors v Abbey Forwarding

Court of Appeal assesses damages for the breach of a cross-undertaking where freezing injunction should not have been made and whether general damages can be awarded

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/711.html

As is customary, the respondents had provided a cross-undertaking in damages in return for the grant of a freezing order against the appellants. At first instance, the judge ordered the respondents to pay the appellants almost GBP 30,000 for losses suffered as a result of the freezing order (which, it was subsequently shown, had been made without justification). On appeal, having reviewed prior caselaw, the Court of Appeal agreed with the judge that the starting point for an assessment of those damages was that set out by Lord Diplock in Hoffmann-La Roche v Secretary of State [1975]: "The assessment is made upon the same basis as that upon which damages for breach of contract would be assessed if the undertaking had been a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant that the plaintiff would not prevent the defendant from doing that which he was restrained from doing by the terms of the injunction".

However, there was a caveat to that basic position: "Logical and sensible adjustments may well be required, simply because the court is not awarding damages for breach of contract. ...The court is compensating for loss caused by the injunction which was wrongly granted. It will usually do so applying the useful rules as to remoteness derived from the law of contract, but because there is in truth no contract there has to be room for exceptions. In my judgment, the law also meets the justice of the matter. A defendant wrongly injuncted should be compensated for losses that he should not have suffered, but a claimant should not be saddled with losses that no reasonable person would have foreseen at the time when the order was made, unless the claimant knew or ought to have known of other circumstances that was likely to give rise to the particular type of loss that occurred in the case at hand. A claimant may, however, find himself liable for losses which would not usually be foreseen in particular cases. One such case may be if a loss, not usually foreseeable, arises before a defendant has had any real opportunity to notify the claimant of the likely loss or sensibly to apply to the court for a variation".

Applying these principles to this case, an additional GBP 10,000 was awarded. However, the Court of Appeal also said that the appellants could not claim for loss of individual investment or earning possibilities if those possibilities had never been mentioned to the respondents. They could not simply argue that, given the respondents' attitude to the administration of the freezing order, there had been no point in discussing potential investments with them.

The Court of Appeal further held that general damages for distress and anxiety were recoverable in respect of a cross-undertaking (even though such damages are not usually recoverable for a breach of contract). In this case, there had been the aggravating feature of the "needlessly aggressive approach" of the respondents' solicitors to the administration of the order. The Court of Appeal ordered GBP 15,000 to be paid to each of the three appellants under this head (instead of the GBP 8,000 ordered by the judge).

Dar Al Arkan & Anor v Al Refai

Court of Appeal confirms that the English courts have jurisdiction to commit a foreign director of a foreign company for contempt

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/715.html

The first instance decision in this case was reported in Weekly Update 01/14. The claimant foreign company was in contempt of court for breaches of court orders and Smith J held that the claimant's managing director (who is domiciled and resident in Saudi Arabia) could be served with committal proceedings because the English court had jurisdiction under CPR r81.4 to make a committal order against the director. The director appealed against that decision.

The Court of Appeal has now unanimously dismissed that appeal. Although CPR r81.4 (which provides that a committal order can be made against the director of a company which is in breach of a judgment, order or undertaking) does not expressly have extra-territorial effect, the Court of Appeal held that the legislative intention behind the rule was that it should have such an effect. That was because, absent such a power, the English courts would have "significantly weakened" powers to deal with contempt of its orders by companies with foreign directors. In reaching this conclusion, Beatson LJ noted that following the introduction of the CPR, "the general position is that reference to authorities under the former rules is generally no longer relevant and the courts generally refuse to look at equivalent provisions in the RSC as an aid to interpretation".

The Court of Appeal also drew a distinction between this case and Masri v Consolidated Contractors (see Weekly Update 30/09), where the House of Lords held that the English courts did not have jurisdiction to order the examination of a foreign director of a debtor company under CPR r71: "In my judgment, the nature of committal proceedings is very different from the nature of the power of the court under Part 71 to obtain information from judgment debtors" (as per Beatson LJ).

Furthermore, the judge had been correct to exercise his discretion to give permission for service out. That was because the notice of the committal application did fall within the meaning of a "claim form" under CPR r6 as it commenced "proceedings", which in turn included committal proceedings.

The Court of Appeal also referred to Article 22(5) of Regulation 44/2001 which provides that, in proceedings concerned with the enforcement of judgments, the courts of the Member State in which the judgment has been or is to be enforced shall have exclusive jurisdiction, "regardless of domicile". At first instance, the judge held that this Article did not apply because the director was not domiciled in an EU Member State. In reaching that conclusion, the judge said that he was bound by the Court of Appeal's decision in Choudhary & Ors v Bhatter & Ors (see Weekly Update 44/09). Although not required to decide the point, the Court of Appeal nevertheless expressed the view that, in light of ECJ caselaw, there was a "compelling" argument that Choudhary was incorrectly decided and that the English courts did have jurisdiction under the Article, no matter where the defendant is domiciled.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions