UK: Lessons Learned From Outsourcing Disputes

Last Updated: 20 May 2014
Article by Peter Dickinson and Rani Mina

The New Norm

The current challenging economic conditions are driving additional outsourcing activities. However, the need for companies to achieve greater efficiencies and reduce budgets means that customers are being forced to do more with less. In addition, the pace of technological change is accelerating and companies need to be able to swiftly react to unanticipated changes in the marketplace or otherwise fall behind the competition.

With outsourcing contracts historically having terms ranging from five to ten years, the industry has reached a point where there are examples of high profile failures—and the hidden risks and causes of these failures can be identified more easily. Recent examples of cases that have ended up in court include the dispute between Ericsson and H3G, arising out of the termination by H3G of an IT outsourcing contract, and the well-publicised case between BSkyB and EDS/HP, where EDS/HP paid BSkyB a reported £318 million in damages.

For every example of a failed outsourcing deal that is taken to court or reported in the media, our experience shows that there will be several more troubled deals in which the issues are resolved quietly between the parties behind closed doors.

The purpose of this article is to consider what lessons can be learned from some of those troubled sourcing deals.

Improving the Chances of Success from the Outset

When many of the long-term sourcing transactions now reaching maturity were entered into, the economic backdrop was very different: no one had foreseen the global downturn or the pace of technological change. Although most contracts provided for a limited degree of change without the parties having to renegotiate the contract (e.g., by use of the ARCs and RRCs model), they were not sufficiently flexible—in terms of their operating or charging models—to cope with the degree of change required.

It is essential that customers and suppliers need to recognise that through the lifecycle of any contract, unanticipated macroeconomic events or significant technological changes may arise which could materially impact the demand for services (both in terms of nature and volume).

One obvious way to mitigate this risk is to have shorter contract terms. Over the last few years, terms of between three and five years have become the norm. As a consequence, if and when unforeseen events do arise, the parties are more likely to be able to find a solution to address them. However, that is by no means the only potential mitigation.

When entering into an outsourcing contract, a key issue for the customer will be whether the value of the deal is greater than the value of the alternatives that the outsourcing arrangement will preclude. It is common to undertake financial modelling when making these assessments, but companies will not properly understand the real value unless risk is factored in. If not, it is easy for the up-front financial value to be eroded quickly and for disputes to arise.

In recognition that the environment to be supported will almost inevitably change, and, therefore, so will demand for the services (both in terms of nature and volume), the contract should be designed to give much greater flexibility than was historically the case. The charging model underpinning the deal should recognise this fact also. For example, securing a lower unit cost by giving a minimum revenue commitment may make economic sense at the outset, but if the demand for services subsequently falls below the minimum revenue commitment, it becomes unsustainable.

When entering into an outsourcing contract, a key issue for the customer will be whether the value of the deal is greater than the value of the alternatives that the outsourcing arrangement will preclude.

A financial model which requires the payment of a partial termination fee if the consumption of services falls below a prescribed level could also become problematic at a time of unpredictable demand.

Solutions that include "financial engineering" (giving lower charges in the early years, in exchange for less competitive charges in the later years) are also best avoided, as they can limit flexibility.

Historically, the change control procedures contained in contracts simply provided that if one party wanted to materially change the nature or volume of the services, the agreement of the other party was required, often leading to disputes. Having predictability as to the cost of change should be a key objective. An agreed cost standard should be incorporated in the contract, making clear which changes will be at no cost (e.g. re-deploying a particular resource to another task which requires the same amount of effort) and which changes will be chargeable (e.g. an increase in scope) and setting out the basis upon which changes to the charges will be determined (and an expedited dispute resolution process if agreement cannot be reached).

Life Cycle Management (Including Resolving Outsourcing Disputes)

Getting the contract right at the outset is of critical importance. However, managing the arrangements and the risks carefully and effectively throughout the lifecycle of the contract is of equal importance.

Outsourcing disputes can be extremely difficult to resolve. Suppliers provide critical services, become embedded in a customer's business and are expected to deliver transformational change and savings to the customer. As a result, outsourcing disputes tend to be high value and highly significant for the customer and supplier.

The key to avoiding this situation is a clear understanding of the reasons why outsourcing relationships run into difficulties, and a realistic assessment by businesses of the benefits and risks of entering into large scale, long term outsourcing arrangements. Our experience of outsourcing disputes across a wide range of sectors and industries suggests that there are some common root causes:

  • There is a tension between the desire of the customer to generate cost savings, and do so quickly, and the desire of the supplier to "win the deal" and protect profitability over the life of the deal. Pushing too hard at the outset on price may be attractive but counterproductive.
  • Failure to define the scope of services. Vagueness in this area, or an agreement to agree the details later, is often a recipe for later disputes.
  • Failure to allow for market developments in areas (such as IT outsourcing) where technology can develop rapidly over the course of an agreement spanning several years. This can leave a customer with no option but to pay for additional or different services in order to maintain efficiencies.
  • The complex nature of many outsourcing deals means that, even in the best drafted agreements, it is impossible to anticipate every situation that may occur in a contract that could last for many years.

A key consideration in resolving any disputes which do arise is whether to litigate. For every outsourcing dispute that is litigated, numerous others are resolved by a private renegotiation.

A key consideration in resolving any disputes which do arise is whether to litigate. For every outsourcing dispute that is litigated, numerous others are resolved by a private renegotiation. There are good reasons for this "behind the scenes" approach, other than a healthy fear of litigation:

  • Reputation—other than in extreme circumstances, suppliers do not want to be seen to be in dispute with their customers;
  • There are other business drivers to continue the arrangement—this is often a long term contract, with most of the economic benefit derived from the later years;
  • There is a real risk of business disruption if it were necessary to end the relationship;
  • Where staff have transferred across to the supplier, it may be difficult to take the outsourced service in-house or set up new arrangements; and
  • The complexity of many outsourcing relationships, and the interdependencies required from both parties to make it work, means that establishing where fault lies is costly and challenging in itself.

A good contract will provide many alternatives to legal action, gradually escalating from informal dispute resolution procedures, through formal exit provisions and all the way to litigation or arbitration.

At the outset of any dispute, it's important to identify the legal remedy that is available and to take steps to preserve this and ensure it is not prejudiced by any of the other steps taken, should it eventually become necessary to take legal action. The usual legal remedies to be considered are:

  • Mandatory injunctions;
  • Order for specific performance;
  • Termination of the contract; and
  • Claim for damages.

Potential Claim for Economic Duress

Supply- and service-level threats are a common negotiating tactic, which can leave the customer with little choice but to give in to the supplier's immediate demands.

A customer might also contemplate withholding payment under the contract in the event of a dispute, however, this would not be sensible unless the contract expressly allowed for this as part of the dispute resolution mechanism.

If a supplier were to use such threats to extract more money from a customer, the customer could potentially have a claim for economic duress. This claim might be available under English law if:

  • as a result of an illegitimate position taken by the supplier;
  • the customer pays money to the supplier or incurs loss or expense; and
  • for commercial and economic reasons, the customer had no other option.

Factors that the court will consider are whether the supplier's conduct was an actual or threatened breach of contract, whether the supplier acted in bad faith, whether the customer had any realistic practical alternative and the customer protested at the time and confirmed or sought to rely on the contract.

Managing Outsourcing Disputes

In the event a dispute were to arise, certain steps should be considered at the outset to preserve the usual remedies:

  • Expressly reserving the right to terminate, so that any steps taken in the meantime cannot be construed as a waiver or affirmation;
  • Preserving documents/data needed to prove the claim;
  • Setting up a paper trail showing the evolution of the dispute, while at the same time, avoiding the creation of sensitive documents that may need to be disclosed;
  • Ensuring access to witnesses, a concern where key personnel leave during the course of the dispute or where witnesses are consultants who are under no obligation to cooperate;
  • Recording costs incurred in connection with the dispute, including management time; and
  • Taking sensible steps to mitigate losses.

Outsourcing disputes can be costly to resolve and the costs are front loaded to a large extent. Some of the reasons for this are:

  • The disputes tend to be complex, with no quick and easy solution;
  • Dispute resolution clauses tend to be multi-layered;
  • A detailed investigation is needed to identify the cause of the dispute and who is at fault;
  • Disputes around interpretation of the contract are inherently uncertain;
  • Legal advice is needed to assess the legal merits of the dispute, identify options to resolve the dispute and to formulate a strategy;
  • Steps need to be taken to minimise the risk that remedies will be lost or prejudiced and to ensure recovery is maximised;
  • Outsourcing projects generate a lot of documentation, much of which will need to be reviewed by lawyers; and
  • Technical expert assistance is often needed to assist in the investigation and pursuit of any claim.

A key means of controlling costs is to ensure there is flexibility to use different processes to resolve different issues in dispute. Each process can be tailored to keep the costs incurred to a reasonable level. For example:

  • Time limits can be imposed on the parties in terms of making and responding to claims and resolving the dispute informally;
  • Limits can be imposed on the length of written submissions; and
  • If a form of expert determination is used, a decision could be given on a document only basis or following a very short oral hearing.


In the best relationships, outsourcing proceeds well, with each party feeling comfortable that they are being treated fairly. In other cases, disputes arise that are complex, costly and difficult to resolve. These disputes can put the outsourcing relationship at risk, threaten the customer's business and take up valuable management time.

Both parties have an interest in minimising uncertainty in their relationship and avoiding disputes, or if disputes arise, in rationally resolving them as quickly and as amicably as possible.

If sufficient attention is paid to clarity at the time the contract is entered into, if the risks and potential causes of failure are managed carefully throughout the contract and if potential disputes are addressed when trouble first appears, the chances are that disputes can be avoided altogether or resolved without too much difficulty.

This article was previously published on Feb 14th in Supply Chain Europe magazine.

Visit us at

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.