UK: The Shape of Things to Come (Outsourcing & Technology)

Last Updated: 3 February 2005
Article by Lee Curtis

Originally published January 2005

The European Trade Marks Directive explicitly provides for the registration of the shape of products and their packaging as trade marks. However, case law over the years has shown that the registration of shapes as trade marks is not straightforward. With regards the shape of packaging the road to registration would appear difficult and in the case of the shape of products near impossible. So what guiding principles can be gleaned from the case law to date in this area of trade mark law?

The first law trade marks

The well known case of Procter & Gamble v OHIM (BABYDRY) established the important, but maybe obvious principle, that a trade mark possesses a real distinctive character when it is capable of being understood by the public as a means of distinguishing between the goods or services of one undertaking and those of other undertakings.

This basic principle of trade mark law was expanded upon in the cases of Bosch v OHIM (Kit Pro and Kit Super Pro) and Nestle Waters France v OHIM (Shape of a bottle) in which it was held that marks falling within the provisions of Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation, which prohibits the registration of marks which are ‘devoid of distinctive character’, are those which from the point of view of the relevant public, are commonly used in trade for the presentation of the goods and services concerned or there exists, at the very least, concrete evidence justifying the conclusion that they are capable of being used in that manner. Furthermore, in Rewe-Zentral v OHIM (LITE) it was found that the signs referred to in Article 7(1)(b) are incapable of performing the essential function of a trade mark, namely that of identifying the origin of the goods or services, thus enabling the consumer who acquired them to repeat the experience, if it proves to be positive, or to avoid it, if it proves to be negative, on the occasion of a subsequent acquisition.

The basic principle of trade mark law explained above, established in BABY-DRY and expanded upon in later cases, is the guiding principle, which must always be remembered when dealing with the registration of shapes as trade marks. If a shape inherently or via use enables a consumer to identify the trade origin of the goods in question, then registration should be allowed. This simple, maybe obvious principle is often lost when one gets down to the intricacies of the registration of shapes as trade marks.

How much distinctive character is needed?

In Eurocool Logistik v OHIM (EUROCOOL) it was held that a minimum degree of distinctiveness is sufficient to render inapplicable the ground of refusal set out in Article 7(1)(b) of the Regulation. It was held in EURO-COOL that it was clear from the case law of the First Court of Instance (CFI) that the absence of distinctive character cannot arise merely from the finding that the sign in question lacks an additional element of imagination or a minimum amount of imagination. A trade mark is not necessarily a work of invention and is founded not on any element of originality or imagination, but the ability to distinguish goods or services on the market from goods and services of the same kind offered by competitors.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) although holding that the shape of product which comes about purely as a result of the need to obtain a technical result is not registrable, held in the case of Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV and Remington Consumer Products Limited, that the shape of the article in respect of which the sign is registered does not require any capricious addition, such as an embellishment which has no functional purpose. Essentially if the overall impression of the shape is distinctive then registration should be granted, there is no need for an outrageous addition to make the mark distinct.

Thus, we are back to the basic principle of trade marks, and what EURO-COOL held was that all that is needed for a mark to be distinctive as a whole is some minimum degree of distinctiveness.

How do we assess distinctive character?

It has been upheld in various cases of Henkel v OHIM concerning the registration of the shape of washing liquid bottles that the distinctive character of a trade mark within the meaning of Article 7(1)(b) must be assessed by reference, first, to the goods or services in respect of which registration is sought, and secondly to the perception of the relevant public. That means the presumed expectations of an average consumer who is reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect. Also in assessing whether or not a shape has any distinctive character, the overall impression given it must be considered. Thus in assessing distinctive character the whole should be considered and not the individual component parts.

It was explicitly held in the case of Nestle Waters France v OHIM that a sign consisting of a combination of elements, each of which is devoid of distinctive character, can be distinctive provided that concrete evidence, such as the way in which the various elements are combined, indicates that the sign is greater than the mere sum of its constituent parts.

Accordingly when one is considering the question of whether a shape has ‘distinctive character’ one must follow a three part test: -

(a) What are the goods for which registration is sought,

(b) What are the perceptions and expectations of the consumer of those goods,

(c) Taking into account the first two points, the overall impression of the mark must be considered not the individual component parts.

It might be felt that the first part of the test is an easy question to answer. However, it needs remembering that the BABY-DRY case clearly established that the question of distinctive character must only be considered in relation to the specific goods for which registration is sought and not for those in similar fields.

Perceptions of the consumer

It was recently confirmed in the case in Mag Instruments Inc v OHIM, which concerned the registration of the shape of a torch, that the criteria for assessing the distinctive character of three dimensional marks consisting of the shape of the product or its packaging are no different from those applicable to other categories of trade mark. It was held nonetheless, for the purpose of applying those criteria, the relevant public's perception is not necessarily the same in the case of a three dimensional mark of a product or its packaging as it is in the case of a figurative or word mark. Average consumers are not in the habit of making assumptions about the origin of products on the basis of their shape or the shape of their packaging. In the absence of any graphic or word element it could therefore prove more difficult to establish distinctiveness in relation to three dimensional marks than in relation to word or figurative marks.

In Mag Instruments it was held that the more closely the shape for which registration is sought resembles the shape most likely to be taken by the product in question, the greater the likelihood of the shape being devoid of distinctive character. Only a mark, which significantly departs from the norm or customs of the sector and thereby fulfils its essential function of indicating origin, is not devoid of any distinctive character. In the case of Mag Instruments the court found that any aesthetic qualities or the unusual original design of the Mag torch originated as variants of the common torch design, rather than shapes capable of differentiating the goods and on their own, designating commercial origin. There were a large number of variously shaped torches on the market and the shape of Mag's torches were not sufficiently distinct from the norm for such shapes to be taken as badges of trade origin. It was found that evidence merely showing excellence of design or the high level of the aesthetic or functional qualities of the products under consideration does not prove distinctiveness.

Therefore, an important principle established in the Mag Instruments Inc case is to assess firstly what is ‘the norm’ or ‘established custom’ with regards to the shapes of products or their packaging for the goods under consideration and then to assess whether the shape in question differs significantly from that norm. If the shape under consideration is a common variant of the product for which registration is sought, then registration will be denied. The logical end to such a reasoning is the possibility in markets where most traders use a standard shape of packaging, that relatively small differences to such a shape would be sufficient to warrant registration, whereas in the case of markets where a multitude of shapes are being used, the shape of the product or packaging in question must be all the more different.

The Mag Instruments Inc decision follows on from the Deutsche SiSi-Werke Gmbh & Co. Betriebs KG v OHIM case, which concerned the registration of the shape of pouches containing beverages, where the CFI held that the elements claimed by the applicant to be distinctive were simply common to the trade and in the words of the Mag Instruments decision did not differ sufficiently from the established norms or customs in the market.

Levels of attention

It was also held in the Nestle Waters France case that the perceptions of the consumer is influenced by its level of attention, which is likely to vary according to the category of goods or services in question. In the Nestle Waters France case, which concerned the registration of the shape of bottle containing mineral water it was accepted that certain operators had for several years sought in the shape of the packaging the means to differentiate their goods from those of the competition and to attract the public's attention. The Court thus accepted that it was quite possible for the average consumer to perceive the shape of packaging in the mineral water sector as a badge of commercial origin. Essentially the Court of First Instance held that the consumer of mineral water had been educated to differentiate certain types mineral water by the shape of the packaging of the product. The aforesaid principle was confirmed in the recent CFI case between Henkel KgaA v OHIM dating from 24th November 2004 concerning the registration of the shape of a bottle for washing up liquid.

The principle of the establishing whether shape does in practice act as a distinguishing element in the purchasing process in a particular sector of the market, when one is considering the question of the registration of the shape of a product or its packaging, has also been established in UK trade mark practice. In the well known case concerning the registration of the shape of Viennetta ice cream, it was held that as ice cream products were principally sold in boxes and the shape of the ice cream was not seen until after the product had been purchased, the principal ‘badge of trade origin’ in the ice cream market are word marks. The Viennetta decision has been further strengthened by a recent UK Trade Marks Registry decision whereby the shape of the well-known Bounty chocolate bar was denied registration as again the product was wrapped and its shape was not revealed until after the product was purchased.

The price and ‘everyday nature’ of the product in question will also play a part in how much attention is paid to the shape of a product or its packaging by the purchasing public. In another case concerning Henkel KgaA v OHIM that considered the case of the registration of the shape of dishwashing tablets, the CFI found that given that such products were everyday items that the level attention devoted to their purchase would be low and thus the public would be unlikely to differentiate such a product by its shape.

Guiding Principles

So what conclusions can be drawn from all this case law? Well it would appear:

  1. The registration of the shape of products would appear near impossible, given the Mag Instruments decision, which held that the shape of products, which derive from the shape of the product category itself, is not registrable. The shapes of the majority of products derive from some common shape of the product category as a whole. Although the Remington decision held that a shape need not incorporate a ‘capricious addition’ to be registrable, in the case of the registration of the shape of products it would appear that only such an addition would overcome the registrability criteria held in the Mag Instruments Inc case. It would seem that commercially it is unlikely that manufacturers would wish to incorporate such additional features to their products and thus, the registration of the shape of products would appear difficult. Further the shape of any product, which is everyday, cheap or wrapped in some way, would appear exceedingly difficult to register.
  2. The registration of the shape of packaging would appear easier, but either an established practice must have developed in the market in question whereby the public have learnt to distinguish by the shape of packaging (Nestle Water France) or the shape in question differs to such an extent to the established norm that the mark ‘stands out’ (Mag Instruments). The later principle would appear to enable the registration of ‘unusual’ shapes of packaging where other traders use standard generic shapes in particular.

All in all the road to the registration of shapes as trade marks is difficult to follow.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.