UK: A Ray Of Light For Developers: Injunctions vs Damages

Last Updated: 14 April 2014
Article by Emma Humphreys

With the Law Commission's proposals for reforming rights of light showing no signs of making any speedy progress, it is no surprise that there have been grumblings from developers and those advising them about the potential for the current narrow and inflexible constraints to hinder the recovery of our property market. Fortunately, the Supreme Court appears to have heard these complaints and it recently took the opportunity in Coventry v Lawrence (2014) - a claim about noise nuisance rather than rights of light – to signal that the recent decisions of the courts on assessing whether to grant an injunction have taken a wrong turn.

Recent history

The difficulties with the law in this area started with the first Court of Appeal decision on rights of light since 1975 - Regan v Paul Properties DPF No.1 Ltd (2007). In that case, the Court confirmed that an injunction should be the primary remedy where there has been an infringement of a property right and applied the narrow tests set out in Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co. (1895) for determining whether damages should be awarded instead of an injunction (see below). The potential for this decision to hinder developments – or to deter developers entirely as a result of the increasing costs of settling neighbour claims – was shown in HXRUK II (CHC) Ltd. v Heaney (2010), where the developer was ordered to adjust his building despite the projected cost of doing so sitting somewhere between £1-2million.

Direction from Supreme Court

In Coventry, Lord Neuberger confirmed that the courts should be more flexible when assessing whether damages should be awarded instead of an injunction. In particular, it was agreed by all members of the Supreme Court that any failure to meet all four of the conditions in Shelfer (see below) should not mean the automatic grant of an injunction to a complainant. Indeed, Lord Sumption said that Shelfer was "out of date", commenting that it was unfortunate that it had been followed "so recently and so slavishly".

In Lord Neuberger's view, a more balanced approach to using the Shelfer criteria should be adopted by the courts and he emphasised that the decision over the correct remedy is one of discretion according to the relevant circumstances; there should be no prior inclination towards an injunction. There was a suggestion in some of the judgments that an injunction should not be ordered where the activity has planning permission, but the Justices were not agreed on this. There was no need to decide the point in this case so this may offer an area for further argument in the future.

Indeed, there are a number of issues which remain to be explored. For example, it seems there may be room for argument as to whether the burden should lie on a wrongdoer to show why an injunction should not be granted. It also remains uncertain how far the level of damages - in particular where they go beyond a "small money payment" - will dictate the court's decision as to whether to grant an injunction. Interestingly, the judgments involved some discussion – without conclusion – as to whether damages awarded in lieu of an injunction should allow the complainant to share in the benefit to the infringing party of overriding the relevant property rights. This appears to be an area for potential debate – and probably further case-law – in the future.

The Supreme Court mentioned their view that rights of light cases are potentially a unique class, although the decision on the correct approach to the remedy of an injunction or damages should apply just as much to rights of light cases as to other wrongful interferences with property rights. However, there are indications in Coventry that distinctions might well be made between cases of domestic interference with light and adjoining owners who are commercial occupiers. In particular, two members of the Supreme Court indicated that, in the case of interference with rights of light enjoyed by a private home, the primary remedy may well be that of the injunction.


Following the Coventry decision, parties affected by rights of light matters will need to reassess their positions – in particular the possibly reduced prospect of a complainant obtaining an injunction and the uncertainty as to the basis on which damages will be calculated. Naturally, if the risk of the injunction is less, then any ransom fees being negotiated may well be reduced. Much will depend on the particular circumstances and it is clear that developers must still have proper regard to rights of light enjoyed by neighbours. However, the decision in this case is hopefully the first step towards a sensible adjustment of the law in this area.

Shelfer's "good working rule"


  1. the injury to the complainant's legal rights is small; and
  2. is capable of being estimated in money; and
  3. can be adequately compensated by a small money payment; and
  4. the case is one in which it would be oppressive to the defendant to grant an injunction;

then damages in substitution for an injunction may be given.

These criteria should now be applied more flexibly by the courts following the decision in Coventry v Lawrence, where the Supreme Court confirmed that it wished to "signal a move away from the strict criteria derived from Shelfer".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Emma Humphreys
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.