UK: The Proposed Bill On Insurance Law: What Does It Mean For Business Insurers?

Last Updated: 7 April 2014
Article by Nigel Brook and Michelle M. Radom

The Law Commissions produced some draft clauses in January which they intend to include in a new Bill on insurance contract law later this year. Following further work, they have now published the remaining clauses for the Bill.

They intend that this Bill will follow the special Parliamentary procedure for uncontroversial Law Commission bills (in the hope, no doubt, that Royal Assent can be obtained before the next election in May 2015).

We set out below the key changes being introduced, as well as important details on contracting out, and how these changes might affect business insurers.

1) Warranties

It is proposed that all basis of the contract clauses will be prohibited (as is already the case for consumer contracts) and the Law Commissions have now confirmed (somewhat unexpectedly) that it will not be possible for business insurers to contract out of this particular change. This proposed change has, in any event been gaining increasing support in the market, with a recent AIRMIC campaign to persuade insurers to remove such clauses from their policies receiving approval from some leading insurers.

It is also proposed that all warranties will become "suspensive conditions", with the effect that an insurer will still be liable for losses under the policy prior to the breach of a warranty and also after the breach has been remedied. The Law Commissions have explained that this means that where, for example, an insured breaches a warranty that an alarm system will be inspected every six months, that breach will be "remedied" if the system is inspected after seven months and so coverage will be suspended for only one month in such circumstances.

Where a term (not just a warranty - this could include, for example, a condition precedent) is designed to reduce the risk of a particular type of loss, or the risk of loss at a particular time or in a particular place, a breach will only entitle the insurer to refuse claims for losses falling within that category of risk. So, for example, the breach of a warranty to install a burglar alarm would suspend coverage for loss caused by a burglar but not a flood. However, where there is a burglary, nothing is payable, regardless of whether the burglar alarm would have prevented the particular theft in question.

However, where a term is not designed to reduce a particular risk but is instead designed to delimit the scope of the insurance contract more generally, a breach will allow an insurer to reject a claim even if the loss was not caused by the breach. The example given by the Law Commissions is where a yacht-owner breaches a warranty forbidding the yacht to be used for commercial gain. The insurer in that case will be able to reject a claim arising out of (say) storm damage.

(2) Utmost good faith/non-disclosure

These proposed changes will apply only to business insurance (consumer insurance having already been dealt with in a recent 2012 Act). It is proposed that the duty to volunteer information will be retained (unlike the current position for consumer policies). An insured will have to make a fair presentation, which will include putting a prudent insurer "on notice" and giving sufficient "signposts". An example given is where an insured says he makes valves and then lists his 3 principal clients (all in the petrochemical industry). This would be sufficient to inform the insurer of the possible increased risks should the valves fail because they are being used in a combustible industry.

The Law Commissions also intend to target the practice of convoluted presentations and data dumping: "a lack of structuring, indexing and signposting may mean that a presentation is not "fair"". Hence, a proposed clause requires disclosure "in a manner which would be reasonably clear and accessible to a prudent underwriter".

When deciding what an insured knows, it is the knowledge of senior management or those responsible for arranging the insurance which matters. An insured must carry out a reasonable search for information, and what is reasonable will depend on the size, nature and complexity of the business.

An insurer "ought reasonably to know" something if it is known to an employee/agent who ought reasonably to have passed it on, or relevant information which is readily available. An insurer will also be presumed to know things which are common knowledge, or which an insurer offering insurance of the class in question to insureds in the field of activity in question would be expected to know in the ordinary course of business.

It will be possible to avoid a policy (and keep the premium) where the misrepresentation or non-disclosure was deliberate or reckless. In other cases, a scheme of proportionate remedies will apply: where the insurer would have declined the risk altogether, the policy can be avoided, with a return of premium; where the insurer would have accepted the risk but included a contractual term, the contract should be treated as if it included that term; and where the insurer would have charged a greater premium, the claim should be reduced proportionately (for example, if the insurer would have charged double the premium, it need only pay half the claim). This contrasts with some other jurisdictions, where only the additional amount of premium is payable to the insurer.

It is also worth noting that the test of what the insurer would have done had it known the true facts is entirely subjective. In practice, it will be hard for insureds to disprove that a particular insurer would have viewed a certain breach as so serious that he/she would not have written the risk at all. The issue will become one of credibility.

Our experience is that some brokers have recently been pushing for wider wording in relation to the inquiries which an insurer must undertake and the remedies available (for example seeking a clause providing that the only remedy available will be the additional premium which the insurer would have charged). So it is to be hoped that the finalisation of the Bill will indicate where the boundaries of change are now going to lie, thus introducing greater certainty for business insurers.

(3) Damages for late payment

The Law Commissions propose that it will be an implied term of an insurance contract that insurers will pay sums due within a reasonable time. Late payment will attract damages from the insurer. Insurers will be allowed a reasonable time for investigating the claim and reasonableness will depend on, amongst other things, the type of insurance and the size and complexity of the claim. Where an insurer can show reasonable grounds for disputing a claim, failure to pay the claim while the dispute continues will not be a breach of the implied term. An insured will also still be entitled to recover interest pursuant to the contract and/ or statute (eg section 35A of the Senior Courts Act 1981).

This proposal introduces a fair amount of uncertainty for insurers when deciding whether they can validly delay payment because of concerns regarding a claim. The safest course would be to carefully record all decisions regarding a claim in order to help support an argument that an insurer has acted reasonably in disputing coverage and delaying payment. What is likely to constitute a "reasonable time" for dealing with a claim is an issue which will most likely need to be tested before the courts.

(4) Good faith

In addition to the specific duty of good faith in relation to non-disclosure and misrepresentation, the Law Commissions have also dealt with the overarching principle of good faith, which applies to both the insured and the insurer. In particular, the Law Commissions have noted that where an insurer breaches this duty, the remedy of avoidance is unsatisfactory because the insured generally wants its claim paid. Accordingly, the Law Commissions propose abolishing the remedy of avoidance for a breach of the duty of utmost good faith. The Law Commissions do not suggest a remedy of damages instead (despite contemplating introducing that remedy in their sixth issues paper). Rather, they suggest that the courts will allow good faith to be used as "a shield rather than a sword", ie insurers may be prevented from exercising an apparent right if they have not exercised it in good faith. It is perhaps unclear, though, how a legitimate right can be exercised in a manner which amounts to bad faith (and the Law Commissions acknowledged in their sixth issues paper (at para 4.79) that there is conflicting case law on how far the courts will recognise this concept).

(5) Fraudulent claims

The Law Commissions propose retaining the rule that an insurer is not liable to pay a fraudulent claim and can recover any sums already paid in respect of it. It is proposed that the insurer will also have the option of terminating the contract from the date of the fraudulent act (not discovery), without any return of premium. The insurer can then refuse to pay any claims from that point onwards (but will remain liable for legitimate losses before the fraud).

Further provisions have now been proposed regarding group insurance claims, with the effect that, where a group member acts fraudulently, only that member would forfeit the entire benefit of the claim (and, at the insurer's option, any subsequent benefit) but the other group members would be entirely unaffected. However, the Law Commissions envisage that this proposal will apply only to consumer contracts (since the current position is that insurers do not treat, for example, policies taken out by a parent company for a number of group companies, as a "group insurance" policy).

Contracting out of the changes

The Law Commissions have confirmed that these proposals are only intended to be a "default regime" for non-consumer insurance. However, they have also said that they wish to discourage "boiler plate clauses which opt-out of the default regime as a matter of routine, particularly in the context of mainstream business insurance.... in sophisticated markets including the marine insurance market we expect contracting out will be more widespread". Where insurers do intend to opt out (and hence include a "disadvantageous term"), they must take sufficient steps to draw that to the insured's attention before the contract is entered into and the disadvantageous term must be "clear and unambiguous as to its effect".

In other words, business insurers (and query where the line will be drawn between mainstream and sophisticated business insurance) cannot expect it to be "business as normal" by simply inserting a clause into a policy to the effect that the changes in the new Act (when it is passed) do not apply. Instead, they will need to identify each and every change which they do not intend to apply and cater for an opt-out for each change separately in the policy. So, for example, if an insurer wishes to retain the right to rely on the breach of a condition precedent even where that breach has not contributed to the loss, that will have to be clearly and expressly stated in the policy (and drawn to the insured's attention prior to inception). Accordingly, very careful consideration will have to be given to the drafting of business insurance policies going forward.

Illustrations of the new requirements are included in the accompanying notes. So, for example, where a medium-sized enterprise buys insurance through a regional/non-specialist broker, where an insurer emails the broker a scanned copy of its standard conditions (and one term, which modifies an aspect of the default regime provisions, is marked with an asterisk), but does not mention that term during telephone conversations with the broker, that term will be effective (albeit that this is said to be "at the limit of what was sufficient to bring the term to the notice of the insured (through its agent)". Additional steps by the insurer would be needed where a small business purchases insurance online but, conversely, more leniency will be allowed where a sophisticated insurance buyer purchases cover at Lloyd's ("this is a fast-paced market, and we would not want to interfere unnecessarily with its operation").

It is perhaps worth noting that the Law Commissions' wish to discourage boiler plate clauses is not expressly catered for in the proposed Bill. Nevertheless, it might be envisaged that such clauses will be the subject of challenge before the courts in light of the Law Commissions' views and hence a safer strategy would be to pay careful attention to policy wordings going forward.

Furthermore, certain opt-outs will not be allowed at all.

As mentioned above, it will not be possible for business insurers to contract out of the prohibition for basis of the contract clauses (although they can, of course, still specifically agree a warranty in respect of any particular matter). Furthermore, although business insurers will be able to contract out of the proposals for damages for late payment of a claim, they will not be able to do so if their failure to pay a claim within a reasonable time was "deliberate or reckless" (eg where the insurer refuses a valid claim or fails to pay within a reasonable time either knowing or not caring that that was the case).

The contracting-out provisions will not apply to settlement agreements (and hence an insured will still be able to enter into a settlement on less favourable terms than the default rules) and the transparency requirements will not apply to cancellation clauses.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
Michelle M. Radom
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Clyde & Co
Holman Fenwick Willan LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Clyde & Co
Holman Fenwick Willan LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions