UK: Weekly Tax Update - Monday 24 March 2014

Last Updated: 27 March 2014
Article by Smith & Williamson

1 General news

1.1 Budget 2014

Smith & Williamson's 2014 Budget commentary and a 2014/15 tax rate card are available to download from our website:

  • link to the commentary booklet:

www.smith.williamson.co.uk/uploads/publications/budget-report-2014.pdf

  • link to the Tax Rate Card:

www.smith.williamson.co.uk/uploads/publications/tax-rate-card-2014.pdf

2 Private client

2.1 Painting treated as plant, so CGT exempt

The Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of the Upper Tax Tribunal, finding in favour of the taxpayers, the executors of Lord Howard of Henderskelfe (deceased). This confirmed that a painting owned by the Executors of Lord Howard, but used by a company in its trade at Castle Howard, fell to be treated as plant and as such it was exempt from capital gains tax in the hands of the Executors.

This decision could have significant effects for owners of art and other chattels used in a business such as a stately home or for owners of significant art collections who consider allowing a business to use the art or chattels in their trade. Computations may need to be revisited where the exemption under TCGA 1992 s.45 has not been considered. Points of Interest

  • TCGA 1992 s.45 states that capital gains tax is not due on wasting assets, although there are exceptions under s.45 (2) and (3), eg this doesn't apply to assets that are used solely for the purpose of a trade, profession or vocation from the time of acquisition to disposal. However the Court of appeal accepted that s.45 (2) and (3) did not apply to the case, so the exemption from CGT for wasting assets applied.
  • TCGA 1992 s.44 defines a wasting asset as an asset with a predictable life of less than 50 years. Plant and machinery is deemed in s.44(1)(c) to always have a predicable life of less than 50 years.
  • The case relied on the classic explanation of plant, which is to be found in Yarmouth v. France (1887) 19 QBD 647, i.e. 'whatever apparatus is used by a business man for carrying on his business, - not his stock-in-trade which he buys or makes for sale; but all goods and chattels, fixed or movable, live or dead, which he keeps for permanent employment in his business'.
  • The Court of Appeal judges agreed that the painting was plant as the interest in the asset had a sufficient degree of permanence and it was used in the company's trade.
  • HMRC had tried to argue that the executors, rather than the company, sold the painting and that as the executors were not trading they could not claim that the asset was plant. This assertion was rejected as TCGA 1992 s.44 did not impose the limitation that plant and machinery can only be subject to the exemption in TCGA s.45(1) if the disposal of the plant was by the trader who used the plant.
  • The decision confirms that plant and machinery is to be regarded as having a useful life of less than 50 years and is therefore a wasting asset and is not affected by the fact that its useful life may be longer in reality and it may appreciate in value (as was the case here).
  • It was acknowledged that the legislation inevitably raises potential difficulties in, for example, a case in which there is a significant delay between the use of the plant in a trade and the disposal. The legislation does not provide for any apportionment in such situations. However, it was decided that provided there is no significant gap between use as plant and sale, the CGT exemption is still available.

www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/278.html&query=henderskelfe&method=boolean

2.2 HMRC's view of the tax treatment of venture capital schemes

a. Following recent press reports of HMRC's withdrawal of VCT status from Oxford Technologies, which had exceeded the 15% maximum holding it could retain in an AIM listed vaccine company, HMRC has issued a note setting out its view of the tax treatment of venture capital trusts.

The note considers HMRC's interpretation of the wording around when a VCT loses approval. The legislation says that HMRC "may" withdraw approval in certain circumstances. While some commentators believe this provides an element of choice, HMRC considers that "may" should be interpreted as meaning "must". A similar interpretation of the word "may" has been used by HMRC in other areas.

www.hmrc.gov.uk/news/vct-note.pdf

b. Last week HMRC issued a note on the interaction between EIS and co-productions in film and TV.

Its general view was that co-productions generally fail the EIS test in ITA 2007 s.183 that no part of the qualifying trade is carried on by a person other than the company or a qualifying 90% subsidiary. We understand from HMRC that this view is concerned with arrangements which seek to exploit the tax benefits available from EIS and co- productions in film & TV (primarily through the use of newly incorporated SPVs).

This new view does not indicate a general principle that other joint venture arrangements entered into by EIS companies cause the ITA 2007 s.183 test to be failed. Budget 2014 announced an upcoming consultation on the use of venture capital schemes for activities with a low risk and contrived structures.

3 Business tax

3.1 Taxi driver Glenn Whittle case around requisite business records

This case makes interesting reading, particularly around TMA 1970 s.12B and requisite records. The taxpayer, Glen Whittle (GW), successfully appealed against assessments for additional tax and penalties levied by HMRC, following use of their business modelling to determine undeclared income. The lack of an enquiry into GW's wife's affairs entitled her to privacy.

The First-tier Tax Tribunal in Glenn Whittle v HMRC [2014] UKFTT 254 (TC) allowed the appeal by the taxpayer in full .The appeal considered whether the assessments were reasonable; if penalties were payable; what constituted sufficient records to maintain for a business; whether income was undeclared in the light of family expenditure and whether financial information was not supplied to HMRC because of secrecy rather than the fact that the information was available from his wife who was not the subject of the enquiry.

Points of Interest:-

  • TMA 1970 s.12B concerns the requirement for records to be 'requisite for the purpose of enabling him to make and deliver a correct and complete return'. The meaning of 'requisite records' has been the subject of debates around Business Record Checks. HMRC had been asked to provide details of any requirements under TMA 1970 s.12B, in respect of GW's activities, but no details were supplied.
  • GW had maintained an income and expenditure record book based on slips of paper (which had been destroyed). The fact that the slips were destroyed was not a reason to cite inadequate record keeping as they were not the primary records and were 'of no more evidential value than a weekly summary of the same'. The records were considered 'requisite'.
  • HMRC had used a standard model of income and expenditure to suggest that GW's income was exceeded by his expenditure and therefore contended there was undeclared income. GW and his wife's domestic circumstances did not fit the standard model (for example the mortgage in joint names was effectively paid by his wife's income) and the tribunal decided that their joint income was commensurate with their joint expenditure based on the evidence supplied and therefore there had been no under-declaration of income.
  • Using a standard model of expected income and expenditure to determine undeclared income for a year in isolation could produce an incorrect result. Part of the income receipts declared related to a 'drawdown' pension policy, which can allow for variable pension income amounts being drawn down in any tax year. Clearly if a taxpayer had drawn down a significant amount of pension income in one year and nothing in the next; they lived off the income in first year and the next and if HMRC investigated the later year it might seem that there was low income in the later year.
  • HMRC did not raise an enquiry into GW's wife's tax affairs despite their ability to do so and therefore his wife was entitled to privacy and did not have to disclose information. She did provide information to assist with the enquiry but she was not obliged to in the absence of an enquiry into her tax affairs. The tribunal pointed out that HMRC, in contrast, repeatedly refuse to give information about other taxpayers when requested to do so by appellant taxpayers on the same grounds.

www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2014/TC03393.html&query=glen+and+whittle&method=boolean

3.2 Investment manager exemption

SI 2014/685 expands the lists of 'investment transactions' that will not subject a fund to UK corporation tax (the white list).

The white list has two purposes:

" to identify activities that may qualify for the investment manager exemption; and

" to specify that, subject to the existing conditions in the relevant regulations, certain transactions ("investment transactions") are not treated as trading transactions for UK tax purposes.

According to the statutory instrument an investment transaction includes:

(a) any transaction in stocks and shares;

(b) any transaction in a relevant contract;

(c) any transaction which results in a fund becoming a party to a loan relationship or a related transaction in respect of a loan relationship;

(d) any transaction in units in a collective investment scheme;

(e) any transaction in securities of any description not falling within paragraphs (a) to (d);

(f) any transaction consisting in the buying or selling of any foreign currency;

(g) any transaction in a carbon emission trading product; and

(h) any transaction in rights under a life insurance policy.

www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/685/pdfs/uksi_20140685_en.pdf

3.3 OECD BEPS project - discussion draft on Action 6 (prevent treaty abuse) The OECD has issued a draft discussion document on preventing treaty abuse (Action 6 of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project) for comment by 9 April 2014. The discussion draft includes the preliminary results of the work carried out in the three different areas identified in Action 6 namely:

a) Develop model treaty provisions and recommendations regarding the design of domestic rules to prevent the granting of treaty benefits in inappropriate circumstances. A three pronged approach is put forward:

  • use the title and preamble of tax treaties to clearly state that in entering into the tax treaty the parties wish to prevent tax avoidance and avoid creating opportunities for treaty abuse;
  • include in tax treaties a specific anti-abuse rule based on the limitation-on- benefits provisions included in treaties concluded by the United States and a few other countries; and
  • include a more general anti-abuse rule to catch situations not caught by the above;

b) Clarify that tax treaties are not intended to be used to generate double non-taxation. It is proposed that the title and preamble of tax treaties should clearly state that the prevention of tax evasion and avoidance is a purpose of tax treaties and that the parties enter into the treaty to eliminate double taxation without creating opportunities for tax evasion and avoidance

c) Identify the tax policy considerations that, in general, countries should consider before deciding to enter into a tax treaty with another country.

Some amendments to the introduction to the OECD model tax convention are proposed that articulate more clearly the policy considerations for entering into a tax treaty.

There will be a public consultation meeting on 14-15 April 2014 in Paris at the OECD Conference Centre to discuss the proposals.

In its 19 March 2014 publication on 'Tackling aggressive tax planning in the global economy' the UK Government indicated it fully supported the objective of preventing treaty abuse, and pointed out that it has:

".. included in its tax treaties provisions aimed at denying benefits where persons have a main purpose of taking advantage of a treaty's provisions (see for example the UK's tax treaties with Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Russia)"

www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/discussion-draft-action-6-prevent-treaty-abuse.htm

www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/293742/PU1651_BEPS_AA_-_FINAL_v2.pdf

3.4 OECD BEPS project - action plan and hybrid mismatch arrangements

The OECD has issued two discussion drafts concerning its action points on hybrid mismatch arrangements. The documents are designed to generate comment and feedback is requested before 2 May 2014. The announcement includes the following comment:

'The first discussion draft (Neutralise the effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements – Recommendations for Domestic Laws) sets out recommendations for domestic rules to neutralise the effect of hybrid mismatch arrangements and the second discussion draft (Neutralise the effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements – Treaty Aspects of the Work on Action 2 of the BEPS Action Plan) discusses the impact of the OECD Model Convention on those rules and sets out recommendations for further changes to the Convention to clarify the treatment of hybrid entities. The recommendations set out in these discussion drafts do not represent the consensus views of the CFA [Committee on Fiscal Affairs] or its subsidiary bodies but rather are intended to provide stakeholders with substantive proposals for analysis and comment'.

Amongst other things the recommendations for domestic rules consider targeting specific hybrid arrangements, the possibilities of a co-ordinated approach by countries and the practicalities of parallel rules in different countries. HMRC's 19 March 2014 paper on 'Tackling aggressive tax planning in the global economy', mentioned above, also supports the OECD's work in this area and recognises the practical difficulties in arriving at workable rules. It also suggests consideration is required for special rules for intragroup hybrid regulatory capital instruments that are a direct consequence of regulatory requirements.

www.oecd.org/tax/discussion-drafts-action-2-hybrid-mismatch-arrangements.htm

www.oecd.org/ctp/aggressive/hybrid-mismatch-arrangements-discussion-draft-domestic-laws-recommendations-march-2014.pdf

www.oecd.org/ctp/treaties/hybrid-mismatch-arrangements-discussion-draft-treaty-issues-march-2014.pdf

4 VAT

4.1 VAT and zero rating of alterations to listed buildings

In the case of Ian Owen, the First tier Tribunal allowed the taxpayer's appeal and concluded that HMRC stuck too rigidly to the guidance in their manuals, which cannot cover every eventuality, in refusing zero rating for work done on an approved alteration to a listed building, so as to include an attached garage.

HMRC's guidance comments:

"VCONST08240 - Zero-rating the 'approved alteration' of a 'protected building': is the work to a 'protected building': garages A 'protected building' is a single building, with the single exception of a garage which can be in a separate building.

The law allows a garage to form part of a building designed to remain as or become a dwelling when it is occupied together with the dwelling and is either:

  • constructed at the same time as the dwelling; or
  • where the building has been substantially reconstructed, at the same time as that reconstruction.

Where a garage qualifies as part of the dwelling, it can take the form of a separate building or be part of the same building as the dwelling.

It is not necessary for the garage to have been constructed as a garage (that is as an enclosure for the storage of motor vehicles). It can also have been constructed as something different, for example a barn. Provided the enclosure is in use as a garage before the alteration (or reconstruction) and continues to be in use afterwards, and meets the remaining conditions stated above, it qualifies as part of the 'protected building'. However the work done in the Ian Owen case consisted of the alteration of the house (by adding on a garage), so that it was not necessary to import the words in VATA Sch8 group 6 note 2 to assess whether the garage was a 'protected' or 'listed' building. In the context of HMRC's guidance, the Tribunal commented:

"That general guidance cannot cover all of the wide variety of factual situations that arise in practice and we also accept that there will be specific situations where that guidance leads to the correct answer."

www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2014/TC03384.html

We have taken care to ensure the accuracy of this publication, which is based on material in the public domain at the time of issue. However, the publication is written in general terms for information purposes only and in no way constitutes specific advice. You are strongly recommended to seek specific advice before taking any action in relation to the matters referred to in this publication. No responsibility can be taken for any errors contained in the publication or for any loss arising from action taken or refrained from on the basis of this publication or its contents. © Smith & Williamson Holdings Limited 2014

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions