UK: (Re)Insurance Weekly Update 03-14

Last Updated: 13 March 2014
Article by Nigel Brook

Haxton v Philips Electronics

Court of Appeal decides whether a widow could recover full loss of dependency in proceedings brought in her own name – of possible interest to employers' liability insurers

The first instance decision in this case was reported in Weekly Update 26/13. Mrs Haxton contracted mesothelioma during the course of her husband's employment with the defendant because she used to wash his work clothes, which were covered with asbestos dust. She brought two claims against the defendant: (1) a claim as executrix of her late husband's estate; and (2) a claim in her own name for her own mesothelioma. In the first claim, she claimed her loss of future dependency under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976. However, it is well-established that the amount of such a claim will depend on the life expectancy of the dependant and in this case, that had been reduced due to the admitted negligence of the defendant.

Mrs Haxton therefore sought to recover in the second claim the full loss of future dependency which she would have recovered, had she not developed mesothelioma. She argued that the compensatory nature of damages in personal injury claims should put her into the position which she would have been in had the wrong not occurred. That claim was rejected by the judge and she appealed. The Court of Appeal has now allowed her appeal.

It held that there were no policy reasons why the diminution in the value of her right to recover for loss of dependency could not be recovered as a head of loss in the claimant's personal action. Nor was the loss too remote: "It is reasonably foreseeable that a curtailment of life may lead to a diminution in the value of a litigation claim and if a claimant has such a claim, the wrongdoer must take the victim as he finds him. I would be inclined to think that this would be the case even if Mrs Haxton's tortfeasor had not been the same as her husband's. But the remoteness argument is, in my judgment, even harder to sustain in circumstances where the same tortfeasor is responsible for injuries to both husband and wife".

Dinsdale Moorland v Evans & Ors

Complying with an unless order for disclosure

An unless order was made against the three defendants on the basis that their disclosure had been inadequate (specifically, that one composite list had been served, rather than three separate lists). Three lists were subsequently served on the claimant but the claimant alleged that the unless order had been breached and so sought a declaration that the defences had been struck out.

Behrens J, applying Realkredit v York Montagu [2013], held that as lists had been provided following the unless order, it would have to be shown that there had been a lack of good faith by the defendants, or that the lists were "illusory" in order to justify the declaration being sought (i.e., in the words of Toulson LJ, "it was obvious from patent deficiencies in the list that it had been prepared in apparent but not real compliance with the obligation to give discovery".

It was held that this test had not been satisfied here. Although reasons for redactions had not been stated in the lists, and some documents had been inadvertently omitted, those grounds did not amount to a lack of compliance with the unless order. Nor did it matter that an application for specific disclosure would, or might, elicit further documents.

The judge also referred to the recent Court of Appeal decisions of Mitchell (Weekly Update 43/13) and Durrant (Weekly Update 46/13), and said that if he had found that the unless order had been breached, it would have been most unlikely that he would have been able to grant relief from sanctions (although he would not have awarded the claimant all its costs because it had failed to set out its concerns regarding the lists, despite being asked to do so by the defendants).

Webb Resolutions v E-Surv

Application to extend time to seek permission to appeal/application of Mitchell where no sanction specified

An order refusing permission to appeal (on paper) was made in July 2013 but the defendant did not receive that order until 10 October 2013. The defendant subsequently served an application for an extension of time within which to seek an oral renewal of its application for permission. Blair J then made an order both extending time and giving permission to appeal. The claimant sought to set aside that order (relying on CPR r23.11(2) which allows a party which did not attend a hearing (as was the case with the claimant here) to have the application re-listed).

Turner J noted that the power to re-list an application should be used sparingly. He went on to find that Blair J had mistakenly taken into account the delay in sending the order to the defendant. Instead, CPR r52.3(5) provides that a request to renew an application for permission to appeal "must be filed within 7 days after the service of the notice that permission has been refused". There was no causal connection here between the delay in receiving the notice and the defendant's failure to comply with that 7 day deadline.

The Mitchell decision was handed down on the same day as the hearing before Blair J and the judge reached his decision without reading that judgment. However, Turner J held that the case had been of central relevance here. He said that although CPR r52.3(5) does not provide for a specific sanction if the application is served out of time (and so, strictly speaking CPR r3.9 did not apply), "I am satisfied, however, that it is appropriate for the court to apply the same approach to such an application as falls to be examined in this case as did the Court of Appeal to the breach relating to the costs budgeting in Mitchell". That was because CPR r52.3(5) was unequivocally expressed in mandatory terms, the 7 day deadline was deliberately short and there was a clear and compelling priority for there to be an end to litigation here.

Therefore, applying the Mitchell test, he found that the delay here had not been trivial and that there had been no good reason for it. Indeed, the defendant's solicitors' excuse that instructions had not been received from their client until after the 7 day deadline had expired was said to be a "thoroughly bad" reason.

Accordingly, Blair J's order was set aside.

COMMENT: Since no sanction was specified in the rules for a breach of the relevant provision in this case, the parties here could have agreed to extend time but since the claimant was obviously not prepared to do so, a contested application had to be brought. Although Mitchell was decided in the context of an application for relief from sanctions, this case makes it clear that the principles laid down in that case will be applied by the courts in relation to applications to extend time too, since such applications will still be governed by the new overriding objective which places an emphasis on enforcing compliance with rules, practice directions and orders.

M A Lloyd v PPC International

Failure to serve witness statement in time/whether witness cannot be called to give evidence on other witness statements

The claimant was ordered to serve its witness statements regarding a certain issue by 24 October 2013 and the defendant was ordered to serve its witness statements in reply by 29 November. The claimant failed to serve a witness statement (subsequently arguing that it could not do so before the defendant had disclosed certain documents to it) and the defendant applied for an extension of time to file its own witness statements.

Turner J criticised the claimant's solicitors for failing to attend the hearing and instead emailing the defendant's solicitors with a proposed consent order. Although the court has a power under CPR r23.11 to re-list an application where one of the parties is absent, that power is to be exercised sparingly. Furthermore, a party cannot assume that it can absent itself in the assumption that if it is unhappy with the order made it can then rely on CPR r23.11: "Absence in these circumstances may very well turn out to be a false economy".

CPR r32.10 provides that the consequence of failing to serve a witness statement in time is that "the witness may not be called to give oral evidence unless the court gives permission". Turner J queried whether, where the statement of a witness was intended to relate to a distinct issue, a defaulting party will also be precluded from relying on that witness's evidence contained in other witness statements (which were served in time). Although not required to decide the point, he suggested that this would not be the case, although he did raise the possibility that deployment of the witness's oral evidence on such other matters might be dependent on obtaining the permission of the court.

Applying the Mitchell decision, the judge declined to grant relief from sanctions. It did not help that the clamant had volunteered a proposed consent order – the parties cannot agree to extend time where the rules provide a sanction for non-compliance: "This court is under a duty...not simply to adjudicate passively upon the applications of the parties or to rubber stamp their reciprocal procedural indulgencies but actively to manage cases. To this end the court has power under CPR r3.3 to make orders of its own initiative".

Finally, the judge said that the defendant here had been "unduly timid". It should have applied to court in respect of the claimant's default in complying with the order. Nor could it be said that the defendant was in default. The obligations imposed by the order on the defendant were to be "in response" to compliance by the claimant with its own obligations. Since the defendant had nothing to respond to, it could not be in default.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Nigel Brook
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.