UK: The Case of Matthew Raveneau

Article 2 Applies Even Though Death Occured After Release From Prison
Last Updated: 7 December 2004
Article by Jocelyn Cockburn

Matthew Raveneau took his own life on the 26th or 27th November 2002, four days after being released on bail from Belmarsh Prison.

The deceased’s mental health had deteriorated during 2002 and in October 2002 he held his children hostage in their home in an effort to get himself shot by police snipers. He did not threaten the children and they were released unharmed. He was prosecuted for false imprisonment and during this period his partner made several requests for him to be given help for his mental health problems.

He was remanded into custody at HMP Belmarsh on 12th November 2002. The Prisoner Escort Record identified him as being at risk of suicide or self harm. However, the nurse and doctor whom he saw in Reception at Belmarsh did not pick up on this and he was recorded as having "no particular medical concerns".

As a result of a bail application the deceased was released to his family (although not to his partner and children). It was at his sister’s house that he was found hanging on 27th November 2002.

The Inquest

HM Coroner, Selina Lynch listed the Inquest for October 2003. However, at this hearing the family raised a number of concerns about the actions of public authorities in failing to treat the deceased’s mental health problems. The Coroner therefore adjourned the Inquest on the basis that a Pre-Inquest Hearing would decide the issue of whether Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights applied to the Inquest.

Article 2 provides that "Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law…" Member states are required not merely to refrain from taking life intentionally but also to take reasonable measures to safeguard life1. A person in custody is in a vulnerable position and the way in which he or she is treated must be subject to strict scrutiny under the Convention.2 There have been various cases showing that the State has been in breach of its duty to protect life where inadequate measures were taken to prevent death where it should have been apparent that a prisoner was suicidal.3

Despite the fact that Mr Raveneau did not die in custody, at the Pre Inquest Hearing in June 2004, the Coroner ruled that indeed the death did come under the scope of Article 2 following the House of Lords decision in Middleton4. Although she decided that the actions of the police could not be criticised, she decided that the actions of the prison were relevant. She gave two reasons for coming to the conclusion that it was an Article 2 Inquest which were, firstly that the deceased had recently been in prison and second, because of the concerns raised by the family that the deceased had not received the appropriate care.

As a result of the decision at the Pre Inquest Hearing the Coroner widened the scope of the Inquest to deal with the question not only of "by what means" the deceased came to die but also "in what circumstances" death took place. The Coroner pointed out in her Judgment that per Middleton the issue of "neglect" was not relevant and it was her practice in Article 2 cases to highlight State failings that may have contributed to the death. Expressly Jamieson5 did not apply.

The Inquest took place in September 2004. Despite identifying failings at the prison the Coroner did not feel that these contributed to the death. The deceased was examined by a number of doctors both in police custody and in prison. Although the index incident itself should have given cause for concern there was very little other medical evidence that the deceased was at risk of suicide or self harm. There were a number of other intervening events. The deceased applied for bail which was supported by his family and a surety was paid. He was granted bail to his uncle’s house. Although he did not in fact stay at his uncle’s house the authorities were not informed of this.

The Verdict

The Coroner reached an "open" verdict stating that "the deceased hanged himself…….. whilst the balance of his mind was acutely disturbed….."

Although the Coroner did not conclude that any failing by the prison contributed to the death there were significant advantages to the broadening of the scope of the inquiry.

The family, who felt there were lost opportunities to save the life of the deceased, were entitled to explore various aspects of the treatment he received. As such they were satisfied that the Inquest represented a full and thorough investigation of the death. If the scope of the Inquest had been narrower and only the immediate circumstances of death had been looked into they would undoubtedly have unanswered questions.

Furthermore, a fuller investigation is more likely to lead to failings being identified which can then be remedied. There is no need for the failing to have contributed to the death. What may be a side issue in one case could be a life and death matter in another. The Coroner indicated that she would have made a Rule 43 Recommendation in relation to the prison’s failure to take account of the warning on the Prisoner Escort Report about the deceased’s risk of suicide, however, she said that she had been assured by HMP Belmarsh that the system for recording and acting upon such warnings had already been significantly tightened as a result of another death.

Suicide and Self harm amongst those released from Prison

Although suicide and self harm amongst prisoners has been recognised as a problem and preventative steps are being taken, there is still little being done about vulnerable people who leave prison. The Howard League states6 that factors associated with heightened suicide risk, including, alcoholism, substance misuse, financial and accommodation problems, mental health problems and break down in family relationships, occur disproportionately in ex-offenders. Yet very little or nothing is being done to help them to readjust to life outside prison.

Where suicidal inmates are prevented from killing themselves in prison only because of constant monitoring or the removal of ligature points it must follow that once these precautions have been removed the risk of suicide is significant. The Home Office has identified the particular problem of short sentences where prisoners do not have the benefit of sentence planning or post-release supervision.

The Howard League report refers to the case of Lester Christopher Shore who killed himself within hours of release from HMP Pentonville in July 1999. Although he was recognised as highly vulnerable in prison no steps were taken to protect his life on release. Despite his family’s concerns about the actions of the prison, no prison investigation was carried out and the remit of the Inquest was restricted to the immediate cause of death.

There was no prison investigation into the death of Matthew Raveneau either. However, the Coroner was persuaded that it was proper to conduct a fuller investigation. The Inquest of Matthew Raveneau shows that coroners should now be willing to look into the wider circumstances of the death even where death does not occur in custody. In terms of the prison investigation, the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman’s terms of reference7 exclude investigating deaths of those released from prison, although the Ombudsman, Stephen Shaw, has in fact recently indicated that he would investigate some cases of those who die after release.

Because of the lack of independent investigations in cases where people die after release from prison, historically, systemic failings have not been highlighted or remedied. Now Article 2 dictates that where a vulnerable person is released from custody the obligation to protect his or her life does not stop at the prison gates. Whether that responsibility lies with the prison, the courts, the probation or the mental health services is another matter.


1. Osman v UK (2000) 29 EHRR 245, paragraph 115.

2.Tomasi v France 15 EHRR 1, paras 108-115; Ribitsch v. Austria 21 EHRR 573, etc.

3. Keenan v UK (3rd April 2001) 33EHRR 913.

4. R v HM Coroner for the Western District of Somerset ex parte Middleton [2004] UK HL10

5. R v HM Coroner for North Humberside and Scunthorpe ex parte Jamieson (1995) QB1

6. in their report "Suicide and Self-harm Prevention Following Release from

7. PSI 20/2004 "Death in Custody Investigations by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman". Annex A

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions