UK: Media and Mediation: Putting Wheels on the Deals [Deal Mediation]

Last Updated: 3 November 2004
Article by Sean Mc Ternan

In previous articles placed on this web site, I have explored my interests, as a media lawyer, in the appropriate use of mediation in media disputes. In this article I seek to colour in another section of the media/mediation map by looking at the logical precursor to dispute resolution: Deal Mediation.

What do I mean by this? I am describing any situation where a mediator is employed by parties in constructive negotiation. It is the use of the neutral third party to facilitate the deal. It could be argued that reconciling two conflicting positional bargaining entities, and coming up with an agreement, has exactly the same elements as those we generally recognise in "dispute resolution". I will explore whether that analysis carries any weight, but in any event I am focusing on the negotiation process that results in a commercial contract.

Diplomacy

It has been said that mediation is in many cases merely specialised diplomacy. In terms of behavioural patterns, it cannot be denied that there must be overlap between the roles of the diplomat in the role of the mediator. There are differences. The diplomat has a brief to act for some sovereign entity. Though the mediator may exercise the role through shuttle diplomacy, the greater degree of objectivity and neutrality is essential. As I describe later, in deal mediation I see a potential separation between the "not and bolts" of the commercial deal and the negotiation of the dispute procedures to be established and given contractual status. In media deals, the mediator is role may be confined to the latter. This would distinguish the deals from some of the areas where deal mediation is established, such as BOC contracts for large engineering works (there are documented studies of dam building projects between governments and multinational firms, for example).

Profile of deal mediation

My early interest in this area of mediation was prompted by a very persuasive presentation given at a CEDR forum in 2003. Michael Leathes of BAT gave almost as much weight to mediation as a tool in successfully brokering a deal as he did in its efficacy in reducing the burden of litigation. Hitherto my focus had been on disputes and I decided to review the conventional literature on mediation.

When it is distilled down, it must be accepted that mediation is not rocket science. Its procedure can be adequately described in a few paragraphs. There is scope to muse on what the proper "dos and don'ts" are for a mediator. There are some technical issues, such as liability of mediators, whether confidentiality can be breached by the court or otherwise, and so on. Much has been written on schemes in operation and statistical analysis of the uptake of mediation. What I did not find very much of was "deal mediation".

I found little more than a paragraph in my standard handbook on the subject. I had expected to find more in "International Mediation" but even in that volume it was not confronted directly. I wondered why it was not there. Admittedly, it was not an option that had previously demanded my attention, so I will assume, until told otherwise, that most mediators, and lawyers who are mediation-friendly, have possibly not paid enough attention to this area. If mediation has a relatively low profile (that is rising), its chronological antecedent, deal mediation, is trailing in its wake.

History of deal mediation

A fairly seminal article is that published by Hager and Pritchard1, stating very succinctly:

"Deal mediation is a new potentially powerful tool for lawyers to negotiate global deals and for others who seek their agreements in complex environments. It has as much to do with issues of culture, values, trust and adaptability as it has to do with law and contract."

This article can be traced through a number of mediation projects, including community mediation in Africa2. In an area where published discussion is limited, that article casts a long shadow.

The advantage of having a neutral involved in the establishment and continuation of a relationship has some conceptual appeal, whether it has widespread commercial appeal will probably depend on, as usual, the financial considerations.

In terms of media sector awareness, the objective must be to highlight those areas of the media where lengthy complex disputes are not uncommon, and ask the deal makers and executive players to think long and hard on whether involving a mediator is an added expense or simply another level of insurance.

Media potential

It makes sense to look first at those media contracts that have some of the characteristics of the deals described above. One of the most obvious would be large software projects. I have looked at this example as one of the disputes where mediation lends itself very readily3. It is therefore entirely logical to engage a mediator in the negotiation of such a contract and the early policing of the disagreements that almost inevitably arise.

Taking some note of experience in the tobacco industry, I would alert all those dealing in franchising or licensing, particularly with an international angle, to the consideration of a mediator. It does no harm in any checklist to add in considerations which you may later delete as the deal involves.

Distribution agreements frequently hit the rails and there may be many, in the music business particularly, where the availability of a neutral to police detailed disputes may save time and money. In almost every commercial deal delay is prejudicial to all parties, with distribution in film or music, it can be fatal.

Initial soundings raise4 more questions than anything else. In addition to likely lawyer resistance, it may be expected that commercial clients will require statistical evidence of the benefits of a cost brought forward (the mediator) if it is to be set off against a contingent cost later in the life of the agreement.

This points back to the central theme of my notes on this site: to use mediation effectively requires an expert analysis of any given dispute, or, in this case, commercial agreement. My thoughts repeatedly turn back to those cases where I have seen a high likelihood of dispute materialise into complex and time wasting litigation. The situation of a new software programme being installed by a broadcaster, or similar organisation, is most prominent in my thoughts.

It may be that in such cases the mediator does not mediate the actual commercial nuts and bolts of the deal, but monitors the procedures which are put in place to regulate time-consuming disputes.

It may be argued that this is no more than spending money on having a mediation clause drafted. I would suggest that there is more methodology and structure that can be put in place than a simple standard clause.

A recurring issue is the confidence of the parties in a mediator. To have that mediator known and in place at the outset of negotiations is an advantage which may cost nothing at all. For a nominal fee, the mediator may comment on the mediation clause and any consequential procedures that are put in place. In many situations, these steps may avoid a pre-dispute dispute (about appointing a mediator or a mediation organisation). When a problem does arise (and in the situation which I am thinking of, that is usually when the UATs [User Acceptance

Tests] are showing that the new system is not working) the parties can swiftly move to the mediator. There is so much variation in how these sorts of tests are sets are administered that I have no doubt that the presence of a mediator could forestall litigation and certainly speed up the testing process.

International agreements

In considering transnational agreements, mediation perhaps almost fuses with the diplomacy. Current practice suggests that the vast majority of international deals and trading functions quite happily with standard patterns of negotiation. Nevertheless, anecdotal evidence suggests that in new trading relationships -- for example with former Eastern bloc countries -- there may be limits on accessibility and opportunities for mediators from countries which both of the contracting parties have good relations with two facilitate agreements which might not otherwise happen or at least bring them to a conclusion in the form which is more likely to endure. It is precisely in these sort of situations where any minor disagreement could escalate and the function of the fully-briefed mediator, acting as a "long stop", may forestall a rupture in a contractual relationship which might otherwise occur.

The devil's advocate

I am beginning to consider it almost a necessity to offer the sceptics view of any suggestions I make for greater use of mediation. In terms of objections, the usual suspects may be brought to bear. In this case, the lawyers "we do a good job anyway" argument may sound very loud indeed. It is one case where I would have to accept that mediation is an extra cost. Rather than displacing the inevitable and greater cost of litigation, it is an insurance premium against a contingent problem in the future.

To meet those (and other) objections, I would restate that I am not offering deal mediation as a new or universal practice. Precisely in line with my views on dispute mediation, I suggest that it is the responsibility of contracting parties and their advisers to begin to see those situations where the early use of a mediator is in their own commercial interests. From the above, some possible categories of commercial deal, both within the media and outside it, begin to suggest themselves.

Provisional Conclusion

I believe it is relatively easy to conclude that the reasons why mediation is a "good thing" for disputes with certain characteristics apply equally in deal mediation. There are indicators that can be identified as warning signs. When those feature in your commercial ambitions and potential negotiations, it would be prudent to consider the mediation option, to cost this as a medium to long term adjunct to the contractual relationship, and then reach a decision on whether to use it or not. Inevitably, contingencies are being weighed and there is no accurate way to measure whether the employment of the mediator has been a commercial benefit. I do not consider that that uncertainty should rule out the process of considering the use of the mediator in both assisting the negotiation of a deal and then providing a continuing lifejacket to keep that deal afloat.

My research into this area continues -- and I would be grateful for any response from readers who have experience of deal mediation generally, especially in the media. I am also happy to draw the fire of any who wish to speak from the Devil's Advocate camp!

Footnotes

1 See www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/journal/html/vol6/articles6-12.html
2 See www.africaleadership.org.library.stability.othr.htm
3 See "Media and Mediation: Contracts" – on this website
4 Pettersson, Scott: CEO LEADR, see www.leadr.com.au

© sean mcternan 2004. All rights reserved. Moral Rights asserted.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions