UK: Enforcing Foreign Judgments In Mauritius Delivered By A Superior Court Of The United Kingdom

Last Updated: 9 December 2013
Article by Malcolm Moller and Sharmilla Bhima

Until the decision of the Mauritius Supreme Court in Sumputh v Holborn College Limited 2012 SCJ 193 (Sumputh), it was understood that a judgment creditor which sought to enforce a judgment delivered by a superior court of the United Kingdom could avail itself of any of the following three pieces of legislation namely:

  • the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1961 (1961 Act); or
  • the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act 1923 (1923 Act); or
  • article 546 of the Mauritian Code of Civil Procedure ("exequatur" proceedings).

In Sumputh (supra), the Supreme Court, sitting in its first instance jurisdiction, heard and granted an application that was based on the 1961 Act to enforce a judgment delivered by the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of England (Queen's Bench Division).

However, on appeal, the Supreme Court, sitting in its appellate jurisdiction as the Court of Civil Appeal, quashed the judgment delivered in first instance and held that:

  • the 1961 Act had not yet come in force for want of proclamation1 towards this end;
  • the Supreme Court as the Court of Civil Appeal had the necessary discretion to consider the application as having been made under the 1923 Act; and
  • an application for the enforcement of a judgment of the Queen's Bench Division could only be made under the 1923 Act and not under the 1961 Act.

Applying the terms of the 1923 Act to the facts of Sumputh (supra), the Supreme Court, sitting as the Court of Civil Appeal, held that the terms of the 1923 Act had not been satisfied because (i) the Respondent had actually challenged the jurisdiction of the Queen's Bench Division and had refused to submit to its jurisdiction and (ii) the Respondent had applied to set aside the judgment delivered against her in default. The decision of the Supreme Court at first instance wherein the order for enforcement was granted was therefore reversed.

The 1923 Act

Under the 1923 Act, a judgment obtained in the superior courts of England and Wales will be enforced by the Supreme Court without re-examination of the merits of the case provided that:

  • the judgment was obtained in a superior court in the United Kingdom;
  • the superior court in the United Kingdom had the requisite jurisdiction;
  • the judgment was not obtained by fraud;
  • the judgment debtor, being the defendant in the proceedings, was duly served with the process of the original court and either voluntarily appeared or submitted to or agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of that court;
  • the judgment debtor, being a person who was either carrying on business or ordinarily resident within the jurisdiction of the original court either voluntarily appeared or otherwise submitted or agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of the court;
  • the application for enforcement is made to the Supreme Court within a period of 12 months after the date of the judgment unless a longer period is granted by the Supreme Court;
  • the judgment is final and conclusive, notwithstanding that an appeal may be pending against it or it may still be subject to an appeal in the United Kingdom;
  • the judgment has not been given on appeal from a court which is not a superior court; and
  • the judgment is duly registered in the Supreme Court in circumstances in which its registration is not liable thereafter to be set aside.

Article 546 of the Mauritian Code de Procédure Civile

Article 546 of the Code de Procédure Civile is enabling in nature inasmuch as it does not actually set out the conditions that are to be fulfilled for an application for "exéquatur". However, the Supreme Court has developed these conditions and, based on the latest pronouncement of the Supreme Court namely in S.A. Epson France v Société Intervenant Technologie Ltd 2012 SCJ 114, a final and conclusive judgment of a foreign court in respect to the sum of money (not being a sum of money payable in respect of taxes or other charges of like nature, in respect of a fine or other penalty, or in respect of multiple damages) can be enforced by the Supreme Court without reexamination of the merits of the case provided that the following criteria are satisfied namely:

a) the judgment must still be valid and capable of execution in the country where it was delivered;

b) it must not be contrary to any principle affecting public order;

c) the defendant must have been regularly summoned to attend the proceedings; and

d) the court which delivered the judgment must have had jurisdiction to deal with the matter submitted to it.

From a review of the above, clearly the 1923 Act is wider in its application and is more specific than Article 546 of the Mauritian Code of Civil Procedure. First, there is a requirement that the application for enforcement is lodged with the Supreme Court within a period of 12 months that the foreign judgment was delivered. Secondly, there is the element of voluntary appearance or submission to the jurisdiction to the foreign court on the part of the judgment debtor. Thirdly, there is the further requirement that the judgment debtor was either carrying on business or ordinarily resident within the jurisdiction of the foreign court.

In Dallah Albaraka (Ireland) Ltd v Pentasoft Technologies Limited and anor (Dallah Albaraka) in which Appleby appeared for the Applicant, the Supreme Court, sitting in its first instance jurisdiction, assessed the concurrence of the 1923 Act and article 546 of the Mauritian Code of Civil Procedure. It refined the principle established in Sumputh (supra).

In Dallah Albaraka 2012 SCJ 463 (supra), an application was lodged under article 546 of the Mauritian Code of Civil Procedure to enforce a judgment of the Queen's Bench Division. A preliminary point of law was raised by the Respondent and the Co-Respondent to the effect that the application was flawed as a matter of law because there was a specific piece of legislation namely, the 1923 Act, which was in place for the purposes of enforcing a judgment delivered by a superior court of England and Wales. It was contended that the failure by the Applicant to have seized the Supreme Court under the 1923 Act was fatal to the application which therefore had to be set aside.

In an Interlocutory Judgment, the Supreme Court distinguished Sumputh (supra) and held that the focus in Sumputh was not a determination as to which of the existing three pieces of legislation namely the 1923 Act, the 1961 Act and section 546 of the Mauritian Code of Civil Procedure was the appropriate legislation in order to enforce a judgment of the Queen's Bench Division. Rather, the issue was whether it was the 1961 Act or the 1923 Act that was applicable for the enforcement of a judgment of the Queen's Bench Division because both pieces of legislation appeared to be in force. It followed that the principle established in Sumputh had to be distinguished in Dallah Albaraka.

In Dallah Albaraka, the Supreme Court held that section 546 of the Mauritian Code of Civil Procedure and the 1923 Act were not mutually exclusive. Accordingly, it was open to a judgment creditor seeking to enforce a judgment of the Queen's Bench Division to elect whether to resort to the 1923 Act or section 546 of the Mauritian Code of Civil Procedure.

Overall therefore, the net effect of the decisions of Sumputh and Dallah Albaraka is that the 1961 Act is not yet proclaimed. Accordingly, between the 1961 Act and the 1923 Act, it is the 1923 Act which is the relevant piece of legislation for the enforcement of a judgment of a superior court of England and Wales. However and notwithstanding the foregoing, in view of the language of the 1923 Act and the prevalence of section 546 of the Mauritian Code of Civil Procedure, these pieces of legislation are not mutually exclusive.

It follows then that an application for the enforcement of a judgment delivered by a superior court of England and Wales may be lodged under either of section 546 of the Mauritian Code of Civil Procedure or the 1923 Act.

Appleby appeared for Dallah Albaraka (Ireland) Ltd - Sharmilla Bhima (Senior Associate) was counsel for the Applicant.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Malcolm Moller
Sharmilla Bhima
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.