UK: How Do You "Know" If Your Employee Is Disabled?

A duty to make reasonable adjustments in respect of a disabled employee will not arise if the employer does not know, and could not reasonably be expected to know:

  • that the individual disabled, or
  • that he or she is likely to be placed at a substantial disadvantage because of that disability

 (paragraph 20, schedule 8 of the Equality Act 2010).

The question which will often arise for employers, therefore, is how do you "know" whether an employee is disabled? Is the employee telling you he thinks he has a certain condition enough? Do you need a formal medical report or diagnosis? What questions do you need to ask?

We take a look at some of the case law surrounding this issue, including last week's judgment of the EAT in Cox v Essex County Fire and Rescue Service, to give some practical guidance on what employers need to consider when assessing whether they need to carry out reasonable adjustments.

"Reasonably expected to know" about the disability

 In many cases it will be obvious to the employer that the employee is disabled, and so there will be no dispute about whether they 'knew' of the disability.

In many cases, though (and especially in cases of mental illness), the situation is more subtle. Employers are not medical professionals – nor are they expected to be – and it will often not be clear that the employee is suffering from an underlying condition, or that that condition constitutes a disability for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. However, if the employer could 'reasonably be expected to know' about the disability (and about the substantial disadvantage the employee is placed under), even if in practice they did not actually know, then the duty to make reasonable adjustments will still arise.

Employers need to be careful, therefore, to keep an open mind as to whether an individual is disabled, and make sure to make all reasonable enquiries.

Information from the employee

The fact that an employee has not told the employer about his condition does not automatically mean the employer could not reasonably have been expected to know he was disabled. In the case of Department of Work and Pensions v Hall, for example, there were sufficient facts to have put the employer on notice that the employee might have been disabled (knowledge about the employee's application for disability tax credit, the fact that a member of the interview panel knew the employee previously, and the employee's 'volatile behaviour', for example) even though she did not ever bring her condition to the employer's intention. The EAT held that employer should have known about the disability.

On the other hand, it does not follow that an employer will be deemed to know about the disability just because the employee has said that he thinks he is suffering from a particular condition, or his doctor has diagnosed him as such, without providing any further medical evidence. In the latest judgment from the EAT on this issue, the case of Cox v Essex County Fire and Rescue Service, Mr Cox had informed his employer that he was suffering from bi-polar disorder, but this was never properly confirmed to the employer by medical evidence (not least because Mr Cox would not agree to the disclosure of his medical records). The Tribunal held, and the EAT agreed, that the employer did not have actual or constructive knowledge of the disability. This may seem surprising at first glance, given that Mr Cox had clearly set out in writing to his employer the dates, symptoms, likely trigger and detailed effects of the condition, but the Tribunal did not look at that fact in isolation. The employer, having been put on notice by the employee of a possible disability, asked "all the right questions" – it obtained occupational health reports, sought medical opinions on whether the employee was disabled, tried to get a report from the employee's GP (which was refused by the employee), and sought a formal diagnosis of the condition. Despite all this, there was no indication, other than what the employee was telling them, that the employee was disabled.

The advice to employers therefore, if an employee is telling you that he thinks he is disabled, or if you have some suspicion that the employee might have a disability but the employee has not said anything, is to always ask further questions. Do not just rely on what the employee is (or is not) telling you.

Medical information

 A significant point to bear in mind in the case of Cox above was Mr Cox's refusal to let his GP hand over medical notes to his employer. Such refusal will be relevant to whether an employer is deemed to have had knowledge of the disability, but employers who encounter such refusal should not simply stop making enquiries at this first hurdle. If the employee will not give consent to release medical notes, ask if there is any alternative – will the employee consent to seeing an occupational health provider ("OHP"), or to this OHP speaking directly to the GP, for example? Always remember that the employer must make reasonable enquiries into whether the employee is likely to be disabled – the standard of what is 'reasonable' may be lower when the employee is not cooperative, but this will not mean the employer can sit back and do nothing.

On the facts of Wilcox v Birmingham CAB Services Ltd, the EAT held that the employer could not reasonably have been expected to know that Ms Wilcox was disabled until it received a consultant's report (which was something which had been jointly commissioned at the direction of the Employment Tribunal following a claim having been commenced). Again, though, this does not mean that an employer can rely on not having sought such a report in the first place – it will still be required to make reasonable enquiries which in most cases will include seeking an OHP report.

Even once a report has been obtained, whether a 'label' or a full medical diagnosis has been attached to the employee's condition in that report is not necessarily relevant, as the Cox case showed. Again, the correct action for the employer is to look at the facts and the medical evidence in the round and consider whether there is anything in them which should lead them to make further reasonable enquiries. Employers should not become fixated on the fact that the OHP does not give a formal diagnosis – the employee might still be disabled.

What about an OHP's report which specifically states that an employee is not disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010? Can an employer rely on this to say that it did not know (and could not reasonably have been expected to know) about the employee's disability?

In the case of Gallop v Newport County Council the employer successfully used this argument both at the Tribunal and the EAT. This is an unusual case, though, and one which a prudent employer might not rely on too heavily, at least for the time being. Although the question of whether an employee is disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 is one which is often asked by employers to OHPs, case law certainly indicates that the test is (or should be) a legal one not a medical one and the OHP's analysis in this regard should therefore not be decisive. It seems strange therefore that, in light of the EAT's decision in this case, an employer is essentially able to argue that they had no knowledge (and could not reasonably have had any knowledge) of an employee's disability, simply "because the OHP report said so". The case has been heard in the Court of Appeal recently and we expect a judgment at any time, but in the meantime employers should remain cautious about simply finding a 'sympathetic' OHP who will tell them what they want to hear (that the employee is not disabled), and relying on that to deny all knowledge of an employee's disability.

"All the right questions"

It is clear therefore that employers should make reasonable enquiries and ask "all the right questions" to ascertain whether an employee is disabled – if they fail to do so then they are unlikely to be able to argue that they "could not reasonably have known" about a disability.

What "all the right questions" are will depend on the circumstances, but employers must be careful not to simply rely on what the employee or the OHP is (or is not) telling them before deciding they have no duty to make reasonably adjustments. Cases such as Cox, Gallop and Wilcox are helpful to employers who are faced with having to argue at Tribunal that they did not know (and could not reasonably have been expected to know) about a disability, but asking "all the right questions" in the first place will hopefully ensure an employer never has to rely on such arguments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.