UK: EU General Court Confirms Wide Inspection Powers Of The European Commission

Keywords: EU general court, inspection powers, European Commission, competition, dawn raids

With its judgment of 6 September 20131, the General Court of the European Union ("General Court") confirmed the legality of the far-reaching investigation powers of the European Commission ("Commission") in competition cases and provided instructive guidance on a number of practical issues likely to arise in the course of inspections (dawn raids).

Pursuant to Article 20 (1) Regulation 1/2003, the Commission may conduct all necessary inspections of undertakings. Commission's officials and others persons authorised by the Commission, e.g. Member States' officials, are empowered to enter any premises, examine books and other business records, take copies, and ask for explanations on facts or documents in relation to the subject matter and purpose of the inspection. With respect to electronic data, in March 2013 the Commission amended its notice explaining the far-reaching powers to conduct searches of electronic storage media, such as computers, tablets, mobile phones and USB keys2.

Pursuant to Article 20 (4) Regulation 1/2003, undertakings are required to submit to an inspection.

Facts and Procedure

The inspected companies and applicants in the case at hand – Deutsche Bahn AG and affiliates ("DB") – brought action seeking the annulment of three Commission decisions ordering separate inspections of DB. During the first inspection pertaining to an alleged abuse of dominance in March 2011, the Commission found documents which in its view might prove an additional but separate abuse. As a result, a second and third inspection were ordered and carried out in March and July 2011.

DB appealed these inspection decisions on the following basis: (i) infringement of the fundamental right of inviolability of the company's premises due to a lack of prior judicial authorisation of the Commission's inspections; (ii) infringement of the fundamental right to effective legal remedies; (iii) infringement of defence rights due to the fact that the second and third inspections were based on information obtained during the first inspection; (iv) infringement of defence rights due to a disproportionally wide and non-specific subject matter of the inspection; and (v) infringement of the proportionality principle.

Judgment of the General Court

The General Court dismissed all of the five pleas brought by the applicants against the Commission decisions.

Prior judicial authorisation not required

The General Court examined whether inspection decisions are in accordance with the fundamental rights and in particular if inspections under Article 20(4) Regulation 1/2003 might require prior authorisation by a Court at either a national or an EU level. The General Court held that the mere lack of such a prior judicial authorisation will not necessarily result in the unlawfulness of an inspection. With reference to the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the General Court pointed out that the absence of prior judicial authorisation is counterbalanced by "adequate guarantees" which constitute a sufficiently strict framework for the Commission's investigation powers. The Court regrouped these minimum guarantees into five categories:

  • Statement of reasons for ordering the inspection: the Commission must clearly indicate the subject matter and purpose of the inspection, the suspicions or allegations that justify the inspection (as also mentioned in the recent Nexans judgment3), and the targeted sector. In addition, it must be stated that the inspection decision may be appealed. It is, however, not necessary for the Commission to provide a precise legal qualification of the suspected infringement at this early stage of the investigation, to disclose all available information to the inspected companies, to define precisely the relevant market or to specify the exact time period within which the suspected infringement would have happened.
  • The Commission must respect certain limits while carrying out an investigation: the Commission must provide detailed explanations about the method of carrying out the inspection at its very beginning. The inspected company may receive legal assistance during the inspection and cannot be compelled to provide self-incriminating answers. As for the documents that may be collected by the Commission, those having a non-professional nature are excluded from the scope of the inspection, and the company can also retain any documents that are covered by the client-attorney privilege.
  • Inability to carry out investigations by force: the Commission may not obtain access to premises or furniture by force, nor compel the company staff to give them such access, nor carry out the searches without the permission of the management of the undertaking. However, the Commission can increase fines for undue delays or obstruction of the inspection.
  • Additional controls at national level: in case the inspected company chooses to oppose to the inspection, the Commission is obliged to seek the assistance of the competent national authorities. In most cases, the Commission organizes this assistance well in advance, which triggers the application of national control mechanisms, such as judicial authorizations to verify that if the inspection is neither arbitrary nor excessive.
  • Subsequent judicial review: ex-post judicial review may be initiated by the companies targeted by an inspection. In this respect, the Court specifically underscores that such a judicial review, which concerns both legal and factual aspects of inspections, is of paramount importance to compensate for the lack of prior judicial control. In this respect, the General Court held that the EU system provides for sufficient safeguards given that an action for annulment pursuant to Article 263 TFEU can be brought against inspection decisions, in which case the Court will assess both the factual and legal aspects of the case.

Coincidental findings may be used to launch further inspections

With regard to the legality of the Commission practice to use information obtained during a first inspection in order to motivate further inspection decisions, the General Court stated that information obtained in the course of an inspection must not be used for purposes other than those indicated in the decision under which the inspection is carried out. Violating this principle would constitute a serious infringement to the company's rights of defence.

The General Court, however, confirmed its interpretation of this principle in the event that coincidental findings point to another possible infringement of competition law,4 considering that this principle does not bar the Commission from initiating a new inspection in order to verify or supplement information coincidentally found while investigating another suspected infringement. According to the General Court, as long as these documents were legally obtained and used in the framework laid out by the decision authorizing the Commission's subsequent inspection, the company's rights of defence are not violated.

Other practical developments

The General Court also noted that the Commission is entitled to carry out extensive searches in offices or files, even where there is no obvious indication that information concerning the investigation could be located there, as long as certain elements suggest this possibility.

The inspected companies claimed that there have to be particularly serious reasons for the Commission to order successive inspections. The judges, however, considered that the decision to order inspections may be justified by reasons such as the seriousness of the infringement, or the emergency of a situation, but also from the need for an appropriate inquiry with regard to the special features of the case. As a result, the Commission may legitimately consider that additional inspections are necessary, even if it already holds evidence from previous inspections.

Likewise, the General Court held that it is not an infringement of the proportionality principle if the Commission carries out inspections although the relevant information was partly available, e.g., on the Internet. The General Court confirmed that it is for the Commission to decide whether certain information is necessary for an investigation into a possible infringement of the competition rules. Furthermore, even if there is already evidence of the existence of an infringement, the Commission may well take the view that it is necessary to collect further information.

Practical significance of this judgment

This judgment confirms previous decisions in relation to the scope of the Commission's inspection powers in competition cases5, acknowledging that past decisions predated the most recent judgments of the European Court of Human Rights stressing the importance of prior judicial review in investigations of a criminal nature.

But it is noteworthy that the assessment of all legal and factual aspects brought forward by the applicants was particularly detailed and covered elements such as the relevance of offices inspected or keywords used by the Commission during the inspection, which are generally set aside as not relating to the legality of the inspection decision.

This sheds light on one of the most significant weaknesses in the EU antitrust procedures: While the judicial review of the legality of inspection decisions is available immediately after the inspection, as illustrated by the present case, the judicial review of the implementation of such decisions (offices inspected, documents copied, electronic data seized, etc.) is generally only available years later, when a final decision on the substance of the case is rendered, and such reviews rarely produce satisfactory results for the companies.

Companies are thus well-advised to make themselves familiar with the inspection powers of the Commission, and of national competition authorities, in order to be prepared when faced with an inspection.

Originally published 8 October 2013


1 Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber), Joined Cases T-289/11, T-290/11 and T-521/11 – Deutsche Bahn a.o. / Commission.

2 Explanatory note as to an authorisation to conduct an inspection in execution of a Commission decision under Article 20(4) of Council Regulation N° 1/2003.

3 Judgment of the General Court, 14 November 2012, Case T-135/09.

4 See the judgments of the Court of Justice of 17 October 1989, Case 85/87 – Dow Benelux / Commission, and of the General Court of 20 April 1999, Case T-305/94 – LVM NV / Commission.

5 See notably the judgments of the Court of Justice of 26 June 1980, Case 136/79 – National Panasonic / Commission; 18 May 1982, Case 155/79 - AM&S / Commission; 21 September 1989, Case 46/87 – Hoechst, 17 October 1989, Case 97/87 – Dow Chemical Iberica, 18 October 1989, Case 374/87 – Orkem; 22 October 2002, Case C-94/00 – Roquettes Frères.

Learn more about our Antitrust & Competition practice.

Visit us at

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2013. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.