UK: Rihanna vs. Topshop: A Long-Awaited Success For The Celebrity Industry

Last Updated: 23 September 2013
Article by Lisa Broad

Well-known pop star and "style icon" Rihanna has succeeded in a High Court battle against high street fashion retailer Topshop. The court found that the sale by Topshop of t-shirts bearing an image of the singer, without her approval, amounted to passing off. Following previous similar failed claims by celebrities such as Abba and the Spice Girls, the ruling is the first time that a celebrity has succeeded in this country in a passing off case in relation to the use of his or her image on items of clothing.

Passing off and merchandising and endorsement: the law

The law of passing off requires the claimant to establish three elements: (i) goodwill attaching to goods or services; (ii) misrepresentation by the defendant to the public (whether or not intentional) leading the public to believe that the goods or services offered by him are the goods or services of the claimant; and (iii) damage caused to the claimant, by reason of the mistaken belief created by the defendant's misrepresentation. Where the three elements are present, a case for passing off should succeed 1.

The relationship borne by passing off to merchandising and endorsement has historically been problematic with the courts consistently finding that merchandising rights did not exist in English law. In 1977 the court held that use of the name of the pop group Abba on transfers and badges did not amount to passing off on the basis that there was no real possibility that the public would be confused into thinking that Abba had approved the goods merely because their name or photograph appeared on them 2 . Similarly, some years later, the use of a photograph of the Spice Girls on the cover of a sticker collection was held not to amount to passing off 3 .

A notable exception came in 1991 when it was held that passing off had been established where cartoon characters called the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles were used on clothing without authorisation, since the public did expect the goods to be licensed 4. This case was distinguished from the Abba case on the basis that it was brought in the context of the unauthorised reproduction of images of cartoon characters in which copyright subsisted, rather than the name or image of a celebrity. Nonetheless the decision is generally viewed as opening up character merchandising law in England.

It has been established that there is nothing in the law to prevent a case of passing off being made out in a false endorsement case provided that it is supported by the facts. In the deciding case 5, racing car driver Eddie Irvine was held to have a property right in his goodwill which he could protect from unlicensed appropriation consisting of a false suggestion of endorsement of a third party's goods or business.

In the decision that is the subject of this article 6 the High Court made it clear that there is no difference in law between merchandising and endorsement cases. In both, passing off will be established where the three elements of the test referred to above are present. The issue is however always one of fact, and the false belief of the purchaser is key: to constitute passing off, a false belief engendered in the mind of the potential purchaser must play a part in his or her decision to buy the product.


For a number of months in 2012 Topshop sold a t-shirt bearing an image of Rihanna. The image used was a so-called "third party image", meaning that it was taken by an independent photographer and, whilst Topshop had a copyright licence from the photographer to use the photograph, it did not have authorisation from Rihanna. Rihanna issued proceedings against Topshop contending that the sale of the t-shirt without her permission infringed her rights and, in particular, amounted to passing off.

High Court decision

The High Court reiterated that there were no such thing as "image rights" in English law: a person has no free-standing general right to control the reproduction of his or her image 7. The case was therefore concerned with passing off, and in his judgment Mr Justice Birss considered each of the three limbs of the test for passing off in turn.

(i) Goodwill

The court had little difficulty in finding that Rihanna had sufficient goodwill, both as a music artist and in the world of fashion, to satisfy the first limb of the test. She is a world-famous pop star, regarded by many as a style icon, who runs a large merchandising and endorsement operation and promotes a public association between herself and the fashion world, notably in agreements with Gucci, Armani and high street retailer River Island. Rihanna's endorsement in the world of high street fashion was clearly perceived to have tangible value by organisations well-placed to know. Rihanna's perceived approval of an item of clothing is an endorsement of that item in the mind of many people.

(ii) Misrepresentation

Misrepresentation was the key issue in the case. Topshop contended that the garment was simply a t-shirt bearing an image of Rihanna and that the public had no expectation that it was authorised by her. Rihanna submitted that in the particular circumstances of this case customers were misled into believing that she had endorsed the t-shirt.

The court considered the point in detail, addressing the various circumstances of the case before considering the issue as a whole.

The overall context: consumer awareness of authorised merchandising

It was clear to the court that today's customers were aware that celebrities engage in endorsement and merchandising activity in the clothing market. It was also clear that there were many garments on sale bearing Rihanna's image which had not been authorised by Rihanna. In the court's opinion, customers would not expect that any garment bearing a celebrity image must have been authorised by the individual depicted in the image, nor would they believe that any garment bearing an image of Rihanna would necessarily be unauthorised. Consumer awareness of authorised merchandising did not make it more or less likely that customers were misled when buying the t-shirts.

Topshop and Rihanna

The court found that Topshop's customers had no positive expectation either way with regard to endorsement by celebrities when they saw garments in the store carrying recognisable images.

Nonetheless, Topshop had made considerable effort to emphasise connections in the public mind between the store and celebrities, notably with Kate Moss and, importantly, Rihanna. In 2010 the store ran a competition in which entrants could win a personal shopping appointment with Rihanna at the flagship store. In 2012, just weeks before the t-shirt went on sale, Topshop publicised the fact that Rihanna was visiting the store via Twitter, emphasising that Rihanna was wearing, or thinking of wearing, Topshop clothing. Topshop was seeking to take advantage of Rihanna's public position as a style icon and such public links between Topshop and Rihanna would enhance the likelihood in the customer's mind that the garment had been authorised by her.

The t-shirt

The fact that the swing tag and label on the t-shirt made no reference to Rihanna or her 'R slash' logo was neutral. Customers would not assume that the garments were unauthorised simply because there was no express assertion that they were authorised.

The image on the t-shirt was taken during the video shoot for the single "We Found Love" from the 2011 "Talk that Talk" album. Significantly, it showed Rihanna with the same hairstyle and headscarf as the Talk That Talk album cover. This meant that the image was not just recognisably Rihanna but looked like a publicity shot for what was then a recent musical release. The court found that it was entirely likely that, to her fans, the image might be thought to be part of the marketing campaign for that project. This was an important point in the decision.

Misrepresentation: conclusion

The court concluded that, in the circumstances, a substantial portion of those considering the product (namely Rihanna fans) would be induced to think that it was a garment authorised by the artist. They would have recognised that particular image of Rihanna not simply as an image of her but as a particular image of her associated with the particular context of the Talk That Talk album. Many of these people would have bought the product because they thought that she had approved it; others would have bought it because of the value of the perceived authorisation itself. In each case, the idea that it was authorised was part of what motivated them to buy the product and in each case they would have been deceived.

(iii) Damage

The test for damage was easily satisfied. If a substantial number of purchasers were deceived into buying the t-shirt because of a false belief that it was authorised by Rihanna herself, then that would have damaged Rihanna's goodwill, both by way of sales lost to her merchandising business and a loss of control over her reputation in the fashion sphere.

(iv) Conclusion

The mere sale by a trader of a t-shirt bearing an image of a famous person does not, without more, constitute passing off. However, in the particular circumstances of this case, Topshop's sale of the Rihanna t-shirt without her approval was an act of passing off.


The decision is an important one. Whilst character merchandising claims have previously succeeded in relation to fictional characters, this is the first reported case in the UK in which a celebrity has successfully brought a passing off action to prevent third parties from using his or her image on merchandise without authorisation.

The High Court was keen to emphasise that the decision was made on the facts and the particular circumstances of the case were crucial to its outcome. It does not mean that a passing off action can be brought every time the image of a celebrity is used on merchandise without his or her permission. Nonetheless, it will please many in the celebrity industry. It recognises the earning potential in celebrity images and, despite its fact-based approach, gives celebrities a long-awaited precedent on which they can seek to rely when making similar claims in the future. Retailers, on the other hand, will need to be increasingly vigilant to ensure that they do not misrepresent celebrity endorsement of their products to their customers and therefore potentially open themselves up to passing off claims from celebrities who may have a substantial merchandising deal to protect.

There are reports that Topshop is considering seeking an appeal against the judgment. If an appeal is allowed, we could see yet further development of the law in this area which, many would argue, is long overdue.


1 Reckitt & Colman Products Limited v Borden Inc 1990 UKHL 12

2 Lyngstad v Anabas Products 1977 FSR 72

3 Halliwell & Ors v Panini & Ors (unreported)

4 Mirage Studios v Counterfeat Clothing 1991 FSR 145

5 Irvine v Talksport 2003 EWCA Civ 423

6 Fenty and others v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) and another 2013 EWHC 2310 (Ch),

7 Douglas v Hello 2007 UKHL 21

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.