UK: LIBOR Manipulation Press Coverage - August 2013

Last Updated: 18 August 2013
Article by James Cooper

Investigations and regulator action


Until now, LIBOR investigations have targeted the institutions involved rather than individual traders, but this is about to change. In early July 2013, the SFO stated it had worked closely with the FSA (now FCA) during its investigation into LIBOR and was considering whether it was both appropriate and possible to bring criminal prosecutions. It was also aware of investigations in other jurisdictions and was working with the relevant authorities. Shortly after this statement the SFO charged one trader and two former brokers with conspiracy to defraud in relation to the manipulation of LIBOR rates - see more below under 'Litigation'.

US and UK authorities originally envisioned bringing both civil and criminal charges against individual traders following the settlements reached with their banks. However, investigations have proceeded much more slowly than expected owing to the complexity of LIBOR, and the difficulties of coordinating amongst authorities in multiple jurisdictions.

This does not mean investigations into institutions have ended. In a speech in June 2013 Tracey McDermott, the FCA director of enforcement and financial crime, confirmed that the FCA will continue to focus on LIBOR. There is press coverage suggesting that between 5-7 banks are being targeted by the FCA, but this has not been officially confirmed. So far the FSA (as it then was) has fined three banks: Barclays GBP 59.5 million in June 2012, UBS GBP 160 million in December 2012 and Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) GBP 87.5 million in February 2013.

RBS has agreed to provide the Canadian Competition Bureau with documents requested in relation to the ongoing LIBOR investigation in Canada. RBS had previously launched a legal challenge against its demand for the documents, and the bank has not stated why it has dropped the legal challenge.

Following an 11-month investigation into rate-manipulation activities, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, a part of the Singapore Foreign Exchange Market Committee (SFEMC), issued censures to 20 banks for SIBOR rate-manipulation by 133 traders. It also ordered them to ring fence USD 9.6 billion collectively at zero interest to be held by the Central Bank for a year, in order to strengthen internal controls. SFEMC will not be imposing criminal sanctions at this time, but said that it will make rates-manipulation a criminal offence in future, and is bringing the monitoring of rate-setting under its own jurisdiction. Singapore is also overhauling its rate-setting system, and it will be one of the first countries to start using real trading data as opposed to estimates and submissions from traders in order to set rates.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has announced that they are expanding their investigation into the manipulation of HIBOR rates. Initially investigations focused solely on Swiss bank UBS, but HKMA will now look into other banks, although it won't announce at this time which banks.

According to a statement published in July, the Japanese Bankers' Association is to tighten supervision of Japan's interbank lending market, forming part of a trend of regulatory reaction worldwide to the global LIBOR scandal (although there has been no proven case of Tokyo's interbank offered rate (TIBOR) manipulation to date). Part of the TIBOR overhaul will include revised rules and a formal code of ethics that banks must observe when making submissions. It will also establish an independent monitoring body to oversee the operation of the process and related administration.

Regulator action

A subsidiary of the New York Stock Exchange Euronext (NYSE Euronext Rate Administration Ltd) will replace a subsidiary of the British Bankers' Association (BBA LIBOR Ltd) in the administration of LIBOR from January 2014. This meets one of the principle recommendations of the Wheatley Review of LIBOR which recommended

"The BBA should transfer responsibility for LIBOR to a new administrator, who will be responsible for compiling and distributing the rate, as well as providing credible internal governance and oversight. This should be achieved through a tender process to be run by an independent committee convened by the regulatory authorities."

NSYE Euronext Rate Administration Ltd will be regulated in the UK by the FCA.

In the meantime BBA LIBOR Ltd, as the interim benchmark administrator published an interim Code of Conduct which was accepted as industry guidance by the FCA on 12 July 2013. It has also published its Whistle Blowing policy, which outlines how concerns about perceived irregularities in conduct relating to the administration of LIBOR and/ or LIBOR submissions can be raised. Both documents are available on the BBA's website.

Guidance on the principles relating to benchmarks has been provided at both International and European level following respective consultations.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) published a final report in June 2013 containing a set of principles for setting benchmarks. The principles cover all stages of the benchmark process eg, data submission, administration, calculation, publication, the continuity of benchmarks and the use of them. ESMA and EBA note in their introductory paragraph in the final report that they consider it is

"important that these Principles are implemented not only by all market participants, with the aim of reinforcing the robustness of the procedures, ensuring a minimal level of transparency to the public and creating a level-playing field, but also by Supervisory Authorities in their supervisory practices, where relevant and possible."

In July the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published its Final Report setting out principles for financial benchmarks. These principles provide an overarching framework of principles for benchmarks used in the financial markets. They are aimed at administrators and other relevant bodies as they provide guidance relating to governance, benchmark quality, the quality of the methodology and accountability mechanisms. Under the guidelines Benchmark administrators must publicly disclose their compliance with the principles within twelve months of the publication of the report, with the intention of IOSCO reviewing within an 18 month period the extent to which the principles have been implemented. A copy of the Principles can be found on the IOSCO website.

There have been suggestions in the press that the European Commission is considering whether or not to give ESMA oversight of LIBOR in future. This would take it away from the FCA. However, neither ESMA, or the FCA have commented on this proposal.

Other financial benchmark rates investigations

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has opened a formal investigation into the process for setting prices for crude oil and petroleum products. This follows a similar investigation currently ongoing by regulators in the European Union. The investigation is expected to branch off into multiple jurisdictions, in the same manner as LIBOR investigations. This investigation also marks the third global investigation into pricing benchmarks, after LIBOR and ISDAFix.

Price assessments to reporting agencies for certain key metals are being withheld by traders in the wake of the LIBOR scandal and the European Commission's (EC) proposed regulatory framework for benchmarks (in September 2012 the EC published a consultation document seeking views on issues relevant to a possible framework for the regulation and production and use of indices serving as benchmarks in both financial and other contracts. The consultation closed in November 2012 and a summary of responses was published in January 2013. The expected publication date for the EC's proposed legislation for a framework on benchmarks is September 2013). Although the focus of the proposed framework is on LIBOR and the more widely used oil indexes, the metals market is unsettled as some take the view that metal benchmarks are especially vulnerable to charges of "manipulation".

Industry response

The LIBOR move to New York has generated some scepticism. NYSE currently administers London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange (LIFFE), Europe's second largest derivatives exchange, some of which are tied to LIBOR and LIBOR-related benchmarks. Whilst NYSE's profitability depends on LIBOR's continued credibility (a good thing as the administrators of the benchmark), it also creates a conflict in that, as the new owners, they may be less motivated to undertake a complete overhaul of the system. Indeed, the NYSE has indicated that, other than adding some additional safeguards, the system will remain the same.

Commentators have observed that any transfer of the oversight of LIBOR from the UK's FCA to the Paris-based ESMA would be purely symbolic, but makes little sense pragmatically. If regulatory oversight shifts to Paris, ESMA may not have the power or resources to intervene directly; it would have to rely on the FCA to assist. Structurally, very little would change, other than Martin Wheatley - the FCA's chief executive - would report to Verena Ross, the executive director at ESMA. One significant change, however, is in relation to regulatory powers of compulsion: currently the FCA only has an "emergency power" to force banks to make submissions in certain circumstances, whereas there are proposals by the ESMA to oblige banks to make submissions for key rates.


Against individuals

Following its investigation into the manipulation of LIBOR, the SFO announced in June and July that it had:

  • Charged a former yen LIBOR trader at UBS and Citigoup (Tom Hayes) with eight counts of fraud. He has also been charged by the US Justice Department who is running a parallel investigation
  • Charged two former brokers at RP Martin Holdings Ltd (Terry Farr and James Gilmour) with conspiracy to defraud

These three individuals were arrested by the SFO in relation to LIBOR in December 2012. To date, they are the only individuals who have been charged with criminal offences in relation to the LIBOR manipulation scandal in the UK.

Against institutions

On 25 June, the Regents of the University of California launched an anti-trust claim against more than a dozen banks including Barclays and Bank of America for alleged LIBOR manipulation. The claim was filed in a federal court in San Francisco and accuses the banks of fraud, deceit and unjust enrichment, amongst other things. The claim seeks unspecified damages in respect of inflated interest rate payments and artificially depressed returns on the University of California's LIBOR-linked investments.

Deutsche Bank has been sued for wrongful termination by five ex-employees who were fired in connection with the bank's internal investigation into LIBOR manipulation. The former employees suing the bank consist of two managing directors, two directors and a vice president. One of the claimants has already settled in a confidential settlement with the bank, although the other four continue to pursue the claim. The bank has dismissed at least seven employees in relation to the LIBOR scandal.

A number of municipalities are suing for financial losses incurred as a result of the manipulation of LIBOR, more specifically for either or both receiving artificially low rates and paying artificially high rates on municipal investments for example:

  • City of Houston filed lawsuits in the Southern District of Texas against 16 international banks including Barclays, Bank of America and Citigroup
  • City of Philadelphia issued lawsuits in the Pennsylvania Federal Court against nine banks and several subsidiaries. The banks named are Bank of America, Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan Chase, Royal Bank of Canada, RBS and UB AG
  • Baltimore filed a federal lawsuit in Manhattan against several major banks including JP Morgan, Bank of America, Barclays, Citigroup and Deutsche Bank

Others include the California Counties of San Diego and Sacramento, and County of Sonoma, San Francisco.


A corner seems to have turned on both a regulatory and investigatory level. The BBA has published an interim code of conduct and a whistle blowing policy whilst it remains the administrator of LIBOR (in January 2014 NSYE Euronext takes over this task). Frameworks setting out the principles for benchmarks at both European and International level have been, or are about to be, introduced, and there is speculation that the ESMA may be given oversight of LIBOR in the future. In the meantime investigations by regulatory authorities across the globe extend and/or reach the prosecution stage. The FCA has indicated it is looking at a number of other banks after its initial round of fines. The Singapore Foreign Exchange Market Committee, Hong Kong Monetary Authority and Japanese Bankers' Association make statements about the steps taken in relation to their own rates (SIBOR, HIBOR and TIBOR). The US Federal Trade Commission casts its eye on the process for setting prices for crude oil and petroleum products on the back of the EU's similar investigations. In the UK a trader and two brokers are the first individuals to be charged for offences arising out of LIBOR manipulation, whilst in the US a number of municipalities file lawsuits against multiple banks for financial losses arising out of the manipulation of LIBOR.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.