UK: Enforceability Of English Arbitration Agreements And A Cautionary Tale On SAFE Registration In China

Last Updated: 5 June 2013
Article by Wai Yue Loh and Philippa Langton

Beijing Jianlong Heavy Industry Group v. Golden Ocean Group Limited and others [2013]EWHC 1063 (Comm)

This decision answered the question of whether a London arbitration agreement contained in a guarantee governed by English law would be unenforceable by reason of the guarantee itself being unenforceable as a matter of English public policy because it would involve committing an unlawful act in the guarantor's jurisdiction (in this case, China). On appeal from an arbitration award on the question of jurisdiction, the Commercial Court agreed with the Tribunal that the arbitration agreement was not impeached or tainted even if the guarantee in which it was contained was unenforceable. Consequently, the Commercial Court held that the arbitrators had the jurisdiction to rule on the enforceability or otherwise of the underlying guarantees.

The background facts

The matter involved claims pursued by various ship-owners against their charterers' guarantor in London arbitration proceedings. Five claims (which were heard together since they raised essentially the same issue) were brought in arbitration for payment under separate letters of guarantee given by Beijing Jianlong Heavy Industry Group ("Jianlong") to various ship-owning parties ("the Owners") in relation to several time charterparties concluded between the Owners and a subsidiary of Jianlong, Hong Xiang Shipping Holding (Hong Kong) Limited ("HXS"). The Owners sought payment from Jianlong under the guarantees on the basis that HXS had repudiated its obligations under the charterparties. Jianlong claimed that the guarantees were unenforceable as a matter of English public policy and that the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the claims since both the guarantees and the London arbitration agreements incorporated in them formed part of a scheme, the object and intention of which was to contravene the laws of China.

This Commercial Court decision related to Jianlong's appeal of the Tribunal's first instance determination that the arbitration agreements were valid and enforceable and that the Tribunal had jurisdiction over the substantive claim. The Tribunal had also granted the Owners anti-suit injunctive relief restraining Jianlong from continuing proceedings it had commenced in the Tianjin Maritime Court.

The unenforceability of the guarantees - SAFE registration

The parties had agreed to assume, for the purpose of the Commercial Court's determination, that the guarantees themselves would be unenforceable as a matter of English public policy because it would involve committing an unlawful act in China. It is illegal under Chinese law for a Chinese legal person (as Jianlong is) to give a foreign guarantee in favour of a foreign legal entity (as the Owners are) without having obtained the prior authorisation of the State Administration for Foreign Exchange ("SAFE"). Jianlong claimed that, during the negotiation of the charterparties and the guarantees, the Owners were aware of these requirements yet they deliberately conspired with Jianlong to contravene Chinese foreign exchange control law.

Separability of arbitration agreements

Jianlong's case, relying on the decision of Foster v. Driscoll [1929] 1 KB 470, was that an English law contract will not be enforceable if the common intention of the parties was to perform in a foreign-friendly country, some act which is illegal under the law of that country, even if that conduct was not necessarily required by the terms of the contract. Jianlong also asserted that any agreement(s) or ancillary contract(s) (such as the arbitration agreement) would be void or unenforceable by virtue of the illegality of the scheme of which they form a part. They further asserted that the arbitration agreements were directly impeached on the basis that the inclusion of London arbitration agreements substantially improved the chances of recovery under the guarantees by preventing the issue from coming before the Chinese courts (who would, applying the mandatory provisions of Chinese law, refuse to enforce the guarantees, in contrast to a tribunal in London who would only refuse enforcement if it issatisfied that the parties entered into them with the intention of breaking Chinese law in China). The arbitration agreements therefore served an important purpose in enabling the parties to circumvent the applicable provisions of Chinese law and, Jianlong argued, this was the sole purpose for which they were entered into.

The Commercial Court held that the nature and function of an arbitration clause is distinct and different from that of other contractual provisions and an arbitration provision is an agreement distinct and separate from the contract of which it otherwise forms part (Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation v. Privalov (2007) UKHL 50 and Section 7 of the Arbitration Act 1996).

It followed that the question is not the validity of the contract itself (i.e. the guarantee), but the validity of the arbitration clause; the arbitration provisions should not be simply swept away but must be evaluated individually to see whether or not they are impeached. The arbitration agreements would only be rendered void or unenforceable if Jianlong could show that they were directly impeached on grounds relating to the arbitration agreements themselves and not merely as a consequence of the invalidity of the guarantees.

International Comity & Public policy

The Commercial Court found that there was no basis to impeach and invalidate the arbitration agreements. The Judge preferred the Owners' interpretation of Foster v. Driscoll in that this decision did not stand for the sweeping proposition advanced by Jianlong. The Court observed that Jianlong's argument would be tantamount to saying that the arbitration agreements should be struck down simply because it would not be appropriate for the arbitrators (if they were determined to have jurisdiction) to apply the rule in Foster v. Driscoll to determine the validity of the guarantees. The Judge also concluded that upholding the validity of the arbitration agreements would not in any way be contrary to the English court's obligation of international comity; the policy and purpose of the rule which invalidates the guarantees did not strike down the arbitration provisions.

Jianlong attempted to argue that the arbitration agreements were concluded to assist in the furtherance of the illegal foreign guarantees and were therefore unenforceable. Public policy considerations do in fact forbid the English courts from enforcing a contract that is concluded by parties to an illegal adventure to assist in the furtherance or concealment of the illegal purpose or the evasion of a foreign law which is being broken in relation to the contract (Soleimany v. Soleimany [1999] QB 785).

However, this case was distinguished on the basis that the invalidating rule, whose policy must be considered, was not the rule of foreign law that was alleged to have been contravened (here, the Chinese exchange control regulations) but the rule of English public policy and that would not be defeated by giving effect to the arbitration agreements in the present case. The Judge stressed that if the guarantees were in fact found to be illegal by the arbitrators, the guarantees would not be enforced and this would not offend the English court's obligation of international comity or their notions of public policy.


Cases such as this inevitably turn on their own facts, but it seems clear that the courts will generally try to enforce arbitration agreements where possible. In reaching its decision, the Court clearly paid attention to the powerful commercial reasons supporting the upholding of arbitration provisions: the desirability of respecting the parties' choice of a forum to resolve their disputes and the inconvenience of having one issue resolved by the court and then, contingently on the outcome of that decision, further issues decided by the Tribunal.This case can be distinguished from another recent decision of the Commercial Court in the Pacific Champ [2013] EWHC 470 (Comm) (see Shipping E-Brief April 2013), where it was held that a complete lack of consensus between the parties not only prevented the main charterparty contract from coming into existence, but also the arbitration agreement contained in the charterparty. In the present case, there was no dispute that there was consensus between the parties in entering into the guarantees (and the arbitration agreements); rather, the issue was that they had consented to conclude agreements that were contrary to foreign law.

The decision in this case appears to suggest that Chinese parties whose parent companies have given performance guarantees without proper SAFE approval will now have less mileage in their attempts at bettering their bargaining position through invoking SAFE (non-) approval issues. Nonetheless, it remains important to comply with the SAFE requirements when obtaining guarantees from Chinese parties in order to avoid subsequent disputes as to their validity and enforceability.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.