UK: Early Retirement Benefits On Business Transfers

Beckmann v. Dynamco/ Martin & Ors v. Southbank University
Last Updated: 4 February 2004
Article by Michael D. Calvert

1. SUMMARY

On business transfers there is a risk that where the seller provides a company sponsored "occupational" pension scheme which allows benefits to be paid before members reach their normal retirement date, the obligation to provide those benefits will become an obligation of the buyer. The buyer’s obligation would apply to benefits calculated by reference to the period before the transfer as well as to the period after the transfer. It is arguable that this obligation transfers only in certain cases, for example where the employees have at some point been members of public sector schemes. However, these arguments cannot be relied on. Buyers should be advised to take account of the potential obligation to provide the benefits when valuing the business or to seek some form of protection, such as an indemnity from the seller.

2. LEGAL BACKGROUND

In their original form, the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 ("TUPE") provided that contracts of employment effectively transfer to the buyer on a business transfer (regulation 5) with the exception of the contractual terms relating to occupational pension schemes (regulation 7). On this wording, the obligation to provide early retirement benefits under such a scheme would NOT transfer.

Any obligation on the seller to contribute to a personal pension scheme WOULD transfer under TUPE because personal pension schemes are not occupational pension schemes.

However, the government recognised that certain benefits payable solely under public sector schemes were not conventional retirement benefits (eg temporary pensions payable from redundancy up to normal retirement date). The Acquired Rights Directive, which TUPE is designed to implement, suggested that such redundancy benefits should have the protection of TUPE. In 1993, TUPE was therefore amended to provide that the exception under TUPE relating to occupational pension schemes applied only to "benefits for old age, invalidity or survivors". This reflected the wording of the Acquired Rights Directive.

In the 1999 case of Frankling v. BPS the claimant argued that when a pension under an occupational pension scheme which was payable for life was brought into payment early when an employee was made redundant, the pension was not a benefit for old age and that the liability to provide the pension there-fore passed to the buyer on a TUPE transfer. The Employment Appeals Tribunal held that the pension retained its character as a retirement benefit payable in respect of an employee’s old age, even when early payment was triggered by redundancy.

The decision in Frankling was effectively overturned in 2002 by the European Court of Justice in the case of Beckmann v. Dynamco Whicheloe MacfFarlane. The facts in Beckmann were similar to those in Frankling. However, the ECJ felt that there were issues of European law which had not been properly taken into account in the earlier decision. It held that contractual obligations relating to the payment of early retirement benefits payable on redundancy were not old age benefits within the meaning of TUPE or the Acquired Rights Directive and therefore DID transfer to the buyer on a business transfer.

It was not clear whether the Beckmann judgment applied equally to early retirement benefits paid in circumstances other than redundancy. The decision in Martin & Ors. v. Southbank University clarifies the position slightly in that it established that contractual provisions relating to benefits provided on early retirement when an employee is dismissed or when the employee retires by agreement between the employer and the employee will transfer. In either case, of course, there is an element of control on the part of the employer (as to whether to dismiss the employee or agree to the early retirement). It is not clear if the ECJ would say that the same approach should also apply where the early retirement is voluntary on the part of the employee, but the employer does not agree or consent. It is perhaps logical to conclude that the ECJ will take the same view for all early retirement benefits apart from ill-health benefits (which are clearly excluded by the Acquired Rights Directive and TUPE).

3. THE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE BENEFITS

One point which has not been tested is the extent of the employer’s contractual obligation to provide benefits under its occupational pension scheme. This is because the cases which have gone to the ECJ concern transfers out of the public sector where the pension benefits are described in collective agreements and statutory instrument and the argument that they have been incorporated into the contract of employment is a strong one. This will often not be the case with private sector employers where the contract of employment may say nothing more than that an employee will be eligible to join the company’s occupational pension scheme subject to its trust deed and rules. It must at least be arguable that there is no contractual obligation on the employer to provide the benefits under the scheme and that a transfer between private sector employers (where there has not been a previous transfer from a public sector employer) should be treated differently, though it is not clear exactly what the contractual obligation would be in that case. Given the ECJ’s attitude in Beckmann and Martin, there is no great confidence amongst pension lawyers that the ECJ would agree that there is a material difference between such transfers and transfers from a public sector employer.

4. IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSACTIONS

The buyer must be told that there is a risk that, where the seller provides an occupational pension scheme, then the buyer will effectively have to provide the same benefits on early retirement for any reason (other that ill health) as transferring employees would have been entitled to under the seller’s scheme had they been able to remain members of it. This obligation applies to early retirement benefits calculated by reference to service with the seller as well as benefits calculated by reference to service with the buyer.

There are a number of steps which can be taken to address the issue:

  • Calculate the potential liability and reduce the purchase price. This would be unattractive to a seller because it crystallises an obligation which is contingent on employees retiring early (which may require employer consent under the seller’s scheme). Also, the seller will already have contributed to the liability through its contributions to its own pension scheme and would effectively be paying twice for the same benefits.
  • Take an indemnity from the seller. This seems to be the most popular approach in practice, though it obviously depends on the strength of the seller’s covenant. In the past, buyers and sellers have adopted this approach partly in the hope that the Beckmann decision would apply only in the case of early retirement benefits paid on redundancy. The parties may have a good under-standing as to whether redundancies were likely. However, following the Martin decision, it is now more likely that all early retirement benefits are caught, in which case it is much more likely that payments would be made under any indemnity. This may make sellers more reluctant to give them. Also, they would be concerned to limit their scope – for example, to benefits calculated by reference to the period up to completion, leaving the buyer to pick up the tab if it does not replicate the benefit structure in the seller’s scheme for service after completion.
  • Buyer sets up an occupational pension scheme mirroring the provisions of the seller’s scheme and a transfer is made of all the benefits accrued by transferring employees in the seller’s scheme to the buyer’s scheme, together with a transfer value negotiated by the buyer and seller to cover the cost of the benefits for the period up to completion. This is the approach which is most effective in ensuring that there is no latent liability. Effectively, the buyer assumes, through its scheme, the liability for past and future service. The liability for past service is funded by the transfer from the seller’s scheme, which should be negotiated with an appropriate allowance for early retirement benefits. The liability for future service is funded by the buyer and reflected in its valuation of the business. However, this approach is unattractive because buyers do not usually want to replicate the seller’s pension arrangements, particularly where the seller operates a defined benefit scheme where the early retirement issues are most acute. Defined benefit schemes tend to be more expensive than defined contribution schemes (because they generally provide larger benefits) and are subject to volatility in the employer’s contribution rate, particularly where they apply to small numbers of members.
  • Where a number of redundancies are planned following the purchase, the buyer could be allowed to remain a member of the seller’s scheme for a limited period so that the employees affected would receive exactly the same benefits on their redundancy as if the transfer had not taken place. How the cost of any enhancements to the pension benefits on redundancy would be split between buyer and seller would be a matter for commercial negotiation.
  • The buyer could try to change the employees’ contracts of employment to remove any right to early retirement benefits. This will involve dismissing the employees on notice and re-hiring them on new contracts (because it is not possible to agree changes to contracts with employees following a TUPE transfer if the reason for the change is connected with the transfer). The risk is that the dismissals would be automatically unfair unless the buyer can show an economic, technical or organisational reason justifying its actions. The cost of providing the benefits may be such a reason, but the point has not been tested. It is not clear whether this route would be sufficient to close off liability in respect of past service.
  • The transaction could be restructured as a share sale so that there would be no TUPE transfer. The position of the employees would then be the same as on a normal share sale. This doesn’t remove all potential liability – the buyer would still have to consider what the contracts of employment provide in respect of pensions and the extent to which its proposed replacement arrangements discharge these contractual obligations. But the buyer will have greater room for manoeuvre and employees will be able to agree to changes in their contracts to address the new situation.

5. IMPLICATIONS FOR PAST TRANSACTIONS

The Beckmann judgment has retrospective effect, so there could be latent liabilities for companies arising out of past transactions where they have acquired businesses. This should be an issue which is investigated during due diligence, whether on a purchase of shares or of a business. In theory, all purchases of businesses which took place since TUPE was introduced in 1981 could have given rise to such liabilities for the buyers concerned. This is possibly overstating the case. Until TUPE was amended in 1993 (see section 2 above) its wording clearly excluded ALL benefits under occupational pension schemes from transferring. The courts will try to interpret a regulation consistently with European law where they can, but not where the language of the regulation is clearly inconsistent with this interpretation. So most concern should probably focus on business transfers since 30 August 1993 when TUPE was amended to bring its wording into line with the Acquired Rights Directive (although the government may be vulnerable on the basis of the Francovich case to claims that, until that date, it had not properly reflected the Directive in UK law).

6. CONCLUSION

There is no simple solution to the problems arising out of the Beckmann judgment. Each business transfer must be considered on its own facts according to the pension arrangements provided by the seller. The value of the benefits in issue in relation to the purchase price will also be relevant, together with the buyer’s attitude to risk. Also, if the buyer has a comparable defined benefit scheme already, it may be happy to take the transferring employees into that scheme with an appropriate transfer value or price adjustment.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions