UK: Boles Overshadows Bills And Balls At NIPA Conference

Last Updated: 20 May 2013
Article by Angus Walker

Today's entry reports on yesterday's annual conference of the National Infrastructure Planning Association.

Refusing to be diverted by news of the Queen's Speech and Sir Alex Ferguson's resignation, the second annual conference of the National Infrastructure Planning Association (NIPA) took place yesterday in the sumptuous Clifford Chance auditorium in London's Docklands.

NIPA Council Chair Steve Norris chaired the morning session in his usual robust way.  The first speaker was planning minister Nick Boles MP, who had a breezily engaging style as he cantered across the planning landscape.  I liked his reference to China building [insert large number] airports in the time we take to build one, rebutting this by saying we don't want to be like China, we want to protect the environment and uphold democracy, so things will take longer here.

Two quibbles I had with his speech is that first he trotted out the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) line that the 'humdrum reforms' in the Growth and Infrastructure Act improved the 'one stop shop' concept.  All it actually did was to remove some certification requirements that had only been in existence thanks to the Planning Act in the first place.  No pre-existing consents were brought within the regime.

The second quibble was that he said further combining of consents was not possible because of the EU and other reasons.  The EU may have many faults but stopping the UK from having a one-stop consenting regime is not one of them.

In answer to a question he said that as National Policy Statements (NPSs) were not both urgent and important they were not a current priority, although several later speakers said they would be very useful.

No more primary legislation on planning is to be introduced before the general election in two years' time ('if anyone suggests more planning legislation I will shoot them').  Apparently since there will not be time for new legislation to have an impact by the time of the election it can't help to win it for the government and so there is no point in doing it.  Did he really say that?

After yours truly had set out the current status of Planning Act applications and reflected on the efficacy of the new regime (on which the theme of 'inquisitoral not adversarial' was picked up by several later speakers), Nick Boles' opposite number Roberta Blackman-Woods set out Labour's stall.  In a lower-key performance she said that policy reviews were still under way.  Labour would not do anything radical to planning but were likely to tweak the Community Infrastructure Levy and Local Enterprise Partnerships and were considering a National Spatial Plan.

Alison Cremin, DCLG official, set out the proposals for business and commercial projects coming into the regime, saying that the secondary legislation setting out the types of project was due this spring.  A panel of Chris Lewis from Prologis, promoters of the DIRFT 3 application, Martin Tugwell from Oxfordshire County Council and Trudi Elliott, RTPI Chief Executive was then rather sceptical that this extension to the regime would get used.

I found the three case studies very interesting - Tim Cook from Network Rail described the Ipswich and North Doncaster chord projects, Rob Gully the Galloper offshore windfarm and Bethan Edwards and Alex Blake the Brechfa Forest onshore windfarm.  Tim Cook thought that on reflection they had been too accepting of amendments to the Development Consent Order suggested by others during the examination, and would have preferred an NPS.

Rob Gully claimed theirs was the first application to include two separate nationally significant infrastructure projects.  My fact checkers (i.e. me) are working on verifying that.  He said that early Statements of Common Ground had been invaluable, although they had declined to purse them with some parties for various reasons.  He agreed with others that the amount of written material was overwhelming.  He suggested that the Planning Inspectorate provide more guidance on what level of certainty of funding should be expected of project promoters as this had varied considerably to date.

He commented that many interested parties did not really engage until the deadline for written (i.e. the later, fuller) representations, a month after the preliminary meeting and up to six months after the application had been made, and that something should be done to encourage earlier engagement since there were only five months of examination left by then.  He asked that hearing agendas be circulated a few days in advance to make them more effective.

Bethan Edwards managed to sneak a picture of the victorious Welsh rugby team into her slides, and Alex Blake said that the lack of any equivalent of 'statements of case' made hearings difficult to react to as people could raise anything.  The presenters of all three case studies did praise the regime on balance, which was a good sign.

The afternoon session was chaired by NIPA Chair Keith Mitchell and the first speaker was head of the Planning Inspectorate Sir Mike Pitt.  He provided an 'organogram' of the new structure of the part of PINS that included the Planning Act regime.  It had Simone Wilding (35) as head of case management, which I thought was her age at first until the next person was Tom Warth (3).  Rounding off the three people below Mark Southgate, Director of Major Applications and Plans was Adrian Harding (3), head of the new Consents Service Unit.  He was at the conference, which was nice to see, as was the CSU's prospectus, which can be found here along with some frequently asked questions.

Sir Mike said that the shortest time between PINS being notified of a project and an application being made was 4 months (fact-checkers checking that one too), but that wasn't necessarily, and almost certainly wasn't, from a standing start.  He said that the promoters of the Preesall gas storage project had launched a judicial review of the refusal of that application, making a fifth in a week, although I later learned that it was only at the 'letter before action' stage rather than proceedings actually having commenced.

Sir Mike had a slide on 'avoiding the pitfalls' (or Pittfalls - his joke).  First was DCO and Environmental Statement inconsistencies - they were sometimes describing different projects as one had advanced as the project evolved where the other hadn't.  He said that the wording of any relevant NPS was absolutely crucial, that early engagement with statutory bodies such as Natural England was highly recommended, and that people were being left out of books of reference.  My colleague Robbie Owen took him to task on the usability of the PINS website during an examination and he promised that this was being improved and would be improved further.

Julie Foley of the Environment Agency gave a very detailed talk about how willing the EA were to engage with promoters and say 'yes, if' on the main application and associated consents.  If all the rest of the EA and the other statutory bodies are as knowledgeable and engaged as Julie then we should be very encouraged.

Tony Burton of Civic Voice stopped us all getting too carried away with how marvellous we were by reminding us that promoters were still failing to engage fully with those living in the vicinity of major infrastructure projects, and that the stereotypes of people's attitudes to developers and vice versa still often held true.  The Planning Act regime at least allows for such engagement, but does not guarantee it.

Finally John Rhodes of Quod gave an amusing round-up of the day's proceedings and encouraged those present to engage with NIPA for it to be effective.  He said that NIPA were focusing on the pre-application stage (echoing Sir Mike's analysis) and had issued a questionnaire to get feedback on experiences of this.  I will post a link when this finds its way on line.

All in all a good day.  Oh, and the Queen gave a speech that didn't have any planning in it, although she did mention High Speed 2 legislation, as Fergie (not her ex-daughter-in-law) hung up his chewing gum.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Angus Walker
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions