UK: Insurance And (Re)Insurance - 23 April 2013

Last Updated: 29 April 2013
Article by Nigel Brook

Fortress Value Recovery v Blue Skye

Whether third party to a contract could obtain stay of legal proceedings against it and rely on arbitration agreement in the contract

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/367.html

Section 8(1) of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 provides, broadly, that where a third party has a right to enforce a term in a contract to which it is not a party, that right will be subject to any obligation imposed by the contract to arbitrate (ie the third party will be obliged to arbitrate any dispute about its entitlement to enforce the right). Section 8(2) provides that if the third party does not fall within section 8(1), it may submit a dispute about enforcement of a right to arbitration (but is not obliged to do so).

The claimants brought proceedings in court and the defendants sought to stay these proceedings, relying on an arbitration agreement contained in a contract to which they were not a party, but the claimants were (the contract referred to the 1999 Act and advised that any rights given to a third party in the contract would be enforceable under the Act. Furthermore, the defendants argued that the contract had provided them with a defence to the claimants’ action).

At first instance, the judge refused to grant a stay on the basis that the defendants were not seeking to enforce a substantive right but instead were seeking to raise a contractual defence (see Weekly Update 20/12). The defendants appealed against that decision. The Court of Appeal has now held as follows:

(1) The judge had been wrong to draw a distinction between a right of action and a contractual defence: “the third party availing himself of the exclusion is the equivalent of his enforcing a term in the contract”.

(2) However, the Court of Appeal accepted that, whereas a third party might choose to rely on a term in the contract (in which case it should be obliged to arbitrate), a third party has no choice if a party to the contract sues it (and the third party then wishes to raise a defence). It was thought to be contrary to the principle that arbitration is consensual to force the third party to have his right to rely on the defence conclusively determined by arbitrators, even if the third party does not consent to such arbitration. Furthermore, such consequences would be so undesirable “that it must be questioned whether they were really intended”. Accordingly, the third parties here could rely on a contractual defence in the court proceedings and were not obliged to arbitrate their entitlement to the defence.

(3) The third parties might have other defences to the claimant’s case which are unconnected to the contract. It would be “odd and unprincipled” if the entire dispute between the claimants and the third parties had to be settled by arbitration when the third party had not agreed to arbitration. On the other hand, the alternative would be the “unsatisfactory prospect of fragmented dispute resolution”.

(4) Nor could section 8(2) of the 1999 Act apply. It is only applicable where the contract gives to the third party a right to arbitrate and that was not the case here.

Accordingly, the third parties were not entitled to a stay of the proceedings.

COMMENT: Insurance policies commonly expressly exclude the operation of the 1999 Act. Where a policy does not contain such an exclusion, though, but does contain a waiver of subrogation clause (which might afford a third party a defence against a subrogated claim brought against it by the insurer), this case confirms that a dispute about the applicability of that defence should be heard in court proceedings (ie as part of the subrogated claim), even if the policy contains an arbitration agreement.

Uren v Corporate Leisure

Whether Part 36 offer made during an appeal also covers a subsequent re-trial/whether genuine attempt to settle

The claimant lost his personal injury claim. He appealed to the Court of Appeal and his appeal was allowed. The action was then remitted for retrial by a different High Court judge. He won 100% of his claim for damages at the re-trial.

While he was appealing to the Court of Appeal, he made a Part 36 offer to the defendants, in which he offered to accept 90% of the damages which he was seeking. That offer was rejected by the defendants. At the end of the re-trial they raised two arguments in relation to the Part 36 offer:

(1) It did not amount to a true offer to settle and was instead designed merely to secure the enhanced costs consequences of Part 36. Foskett J rejected that argument: “10% of a large sum is itself a large sum”.

(2) The offer related to the appeal but did not also cover the subsequent re-trial which was ordered by the Court of Appeal. This argument was also rejected. The reality was that the offer was designed to settle the case, rather than the appeal. Although it is the position that a Part 36 offer made during proceedings will not apply to any appeal proceedings (and so a fresh Part 36 offer must be made for an appeal), the judge thought that the same did not apply to re-trials ordered by the Court of Appeal following an appeal.

However, in the circumstances of the case, the offer had not been beaten. Furthermore, although the defendants had failed properly to engage with the sensible offer made by the claimant, that did not justify the imposition of a costs penalty. The defendants had not been unreasonable in taking the view that the Court of Appeal was unlikely to set aside the decision of a High Court judge which had been reached after a full hearing of evidence.

Murray & Anor v Neil Dowlman Architecture

Revising an approved costs management order

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2013/872.html

Since October 2011, a costs management pilot scheme has been operating in the TCC. That pilot scheme has now been replaced by the CPR provisions implementing the Jackson/ LASPO reforms (which apply to, inter alia, cases in the Chancery Division and Queens Bench Division as well as certain TCC cases). Although the costs management order in this case was made under the pilot scheme practice direction, it will be of wider interest since the new costs management rules are drafted using similar wording.

After the approval of a costs budget, the defendant’s solicitor pointed out that the claimant’s approved costs budget did not include certain items (namely, a success fee under a CFA and an ATE insurance premium - both of which were recoverable pre-1 April 2013). The claimant then applied for relief from sanctions pursuant to CPR r3.9. Coulson J held as follows:

(1) CPR r3.9 did not obviously apply in this case. There was no sanction as such here - detailed assessment was several months away. The claimant was in reality seeking permission to revise the approved budget.

(2) Referring to Henry v NGN (see Weekly Update 04/13), the judge emphasised the new rigorous approach to be adopted by the courts post 1 April 2013 and that “the courts will generally be less ready than before to grant relief from sanctions for procedural defaults”. A mistake should not normally be capable of being remedied by an increase in the approved budget since “any other approach would make a nonsense of the whole costs management regime”.

(3) However, this case was “very special” and did justify a revision of the costs management order. That was because: (a) the defendant had known throughout about both items (the success fee and the premium) and could not sensibly have thought that liability for those items automatically disappeared just because they were not in the approved budget; and (more importantly) (b) in the form which the claimant should have filled in (it had instead submitted a budget, but this had contained the same information required by the form), there was a box which the claimant could tick in order to exclude certain items (including the success fee and the premium) from the budget. Coulson J did not think it right that the claimant should be penalised “merely because of a failure to tick a box”.

COMMENT: Although this is the second recent case (Henry being the other case) in which the court has allowed a departure from the approved costs budget (albeit whilst emphasising that the courts should generally adopt a strict approach to this issue), this is a very narrow decision. The form in question has now been replaced by a new form - Precedent H - and that form does not contain a tick box. Instead, it excludes various items including success fees and premiums (as well as VAT and court fees). The judge noted that, had the claimant had to complete that form, the mistake which it made would not have arisen.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nigel Brook
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.