UK: Regulated To Death?

Safety Regulation in the Live Event Industry
Last Updated: 25 November 2003
Article by Ben Challis, Barrister-at-law

Music Industry Lawyer and Senior Lecturer in Law, Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, England, UK

Since the death of nine young music fans at the Roskilde Festival in 2000, the industry could not have faced a more challenging year than 2003. The tragic deaths of twenty one clubbers in Chicago on the 17th February was followed within a week by the extraordinary scenes at the Station Club in Rhode Island when pyrotechnics ignited by the band Great White set fire to the sound-proofed interior of the club leaving hundreds of people dead and injured, including one member of the band. In July suicide bombers killed sixteen young people at the Krylya Festival in Moscow. In September a UK court awarded the highest ever level of damages for a performers injury; trapeze artist Suzy Barton fell twenty foot from a hot air balloon at the London Millennium Dome after her safety harness failed and received £510,000 for serious injuries. In the same week twenty members of the cast of a Sound of Music tribute were injured, some seriously, when a temporary wooden stage cover for an unused orchestra pit collapsed at the Alexandra Theatre in Birmingham, England.

Each of these disasters impact on the management of health and safety at live events but also give clues to the failings in the industry’s attempts to promote health and safety as being one of paramount importance. The Chicago was allegedly caused by security staff letting off pepper spray to break up a fight leading to audience to panic and a fatal crush at locked exit doors. The local fire chief pointed out that part of the club was supposedly closed to the public having previously failed fire safety checks. The Rhode Island tragedy was described by state Governor Don Carceieri as 'a real disaster’ and that ‘the building went up so fast no one had a chance'. It was estimated that over 300 people were inside the one story wooden building. The venue had a low ceiling club and had no water sprinkler system as it was too small to require one by law. It also had no pyrotechnics licence although the band claim that they had checked in advance with the venue and permission for their display was given. Reports at the time also suggest that the sound-proofing was not flame resistant.

Denmark’s Roskilde Festival was admired by many as a benchmark for a well run and safe event. And yet on 30th June 2000 nine fans died in crowd surges. Many in the live music industry moved to rethink existing safety procedures and at the 2001 International Live Music Conference a important new panel of live music industry experts was convened named the Safety Focus Group (SFG). But industry event organisers must be aware that the natural reaction of legislators and administrators will be to pass more legislation and implement more stringent regulations.

In the United Kingdom event organisers are already subject to a myriad of legislative Acts of Parliament and associated regulations which are enacted to promote health and safety and to redress policy concerns such as noise pollution, consumer protection and drug abuse. Promoters and venue owners have to satisfy the satisfy the provisions of The Health & Safety at Work Act 1974, The Occupiers Liability Act 1957 (and 1984), The Management of Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1992, The Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982, Civic Government Act (Scotland) 1982, The London Government Act 1963, The Public Entertainment Licence (Misuse of Drugs) Act 1997, The Fire Safety and Safety of Places of Sport Act 1987, The Environment Act 1990, The Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 1995. This is not an exhaustive list!

One of the problems with regulation is that when rules and regulations are made without any input from the industry that such rules are meant to regulate, then those rules at best have little respect or moral authority and at worst are irrelevant to or impracticable within that regulated industry. Likewise when regulations are passed but not implemented or enforced then they can often cause more problems than they cure: Those who are regulated and initially implement changes and follow best practice can become lax where enforcement is weak and costs rise. Some never implement change or follow regulations at all. And of course some regulations are so nonsensical they are ignored by the world at large (even if behind the regulations there is a good idea). It seems almost unthinkable that the two February tragedies could happen in America. How could fire doors be locked? How could security staff create such a panic? How could there be no sprinkler system? How could a venue ignite in seconds?

Two examples of the failure of a regulatory framework can be seen in the management of the state managed National Health Service and the management of the national rail infrastructure in the United Kingdom. It was reported in October that the UK Government’s own Better Regulation Task Force had found that each NHS hospital was regulated by (at least) thirty six regulators and three more were planned by the Government. The target driven system had led to a number of reactions by the (regulated) hospital managers; to meet emergency admission times, injured people were kept in ambulances longer; to meet diagnosis targets, only patients who could be easily diagnosed would be invited to hospital. And as a target driven regulations proliferate, bureaucracy multiplies – there is now one manager for every bed in the NHS. The United Kingdom’s rail infrastructure is similarly regulated and managed by administrators. But since 1999 there have been three major rail disasters involving multiple fatalities in and around London at Hatfield, Potters Bar and Paddington where 31 died. An appalling safety record. Similarly in the United Kingdom the primary and secondary education system, Prison Service and the courts are in danger of becoming paralysed by often well meaning but ill-considered initiatives, regulation, change and ever increasing bureaucracy.

I am not advocating self-regulation as such: self-regulation has its own inherent risks and draw-backs. In Britain the status of the journalists, lawyers and politicians is arguably harmed to a substantial degree of self-regulation. What I am advocating is that the live event industry must involve itself in the regulatory process now and adopts best practice and change when necessary. What the live concert industry has to be aware of is that if it doesn’t put its own ‘house in order’ then regulators in Europe, United States and elsewhere will regulate for the industry. The UK’s Pop Code was and is a good example of a review of industry health and safety which did involve the industry and does work.

A good example of why the live event industry needs to be involved in the regulatory framework is the new Licensing Act in the UK. This will remove liquor licensing from magistrates to local authorities (against the advice of the licensed trade and the Magistrates Association). The Act will also remove exemptions for solo acts and duets from event licensing (they could previously play in pubs without the need for a licence) and pubs will face the administrative hurdles and costs in securing a licence. Even traditional sea-side Punch & Judy acts will now need a licence from the local authority. Both of these provisions faced stiff resistance from politicians of all parties but were implemented by the Government. Whilst the effects have yet to become clear I would suggest that unnecessary costs and bureaucracy will be the first direct result of the new legislation and it will hard to see whether or even if any difference is made to health and safety for patrons. The Institute of Chartered Accountants has estimated that the average UK business spends £11,000 on implementing new legislation, with over half of that burden falling on micro-businesses (those employing ten or less employees). One of the most obvious costs is the increase in employers, public liability and products liability insurance premiums the industry has faced to cover ever increased risk and liabilities.

The live event industry has a number of tasks ahead. Audiences are more different than ever – in terms of age, cultural background and size. Research is needed into audience behaviour and crown dynamics. Event organisers need to be educated and informed about relevant issues. Safety needs to be kept on the agenda and revisited and revisited. Here it is vital that representatives from the industry meet with and work with legislators. Venue operators, security organisers, artists and others with a stake in the industry need to be involved. Regulation won’t work either for the audience or the industry itself when it is imposed by those who regulate.

No one wants unworkable or counter-productive regulation. This can be self defeating and ‘corners are cut’. Surely what the industry needs to do is be pro-active; formulate workable policies; ensure the whole industry adopts basic levels of safety and welfare for all live events; ensure that staff have the right levels of training; think about health, safety and welfare when planning events and when implementing change. It can work; The Event Safety Guide published by HMSO with substantial industry input is used as a health and safety ‘bible’ by the UK concert industry. The Glastonbury Festival was plagued by over-attendance and safety problems towards the end of the nineties. The local authority which licensed the Festival was clearly concerned that it could no longer issue a public entertainment licence. In 2001 the Festival ‘took a year off’ to work on a solution to the problems. The Festival worked with a broad range of industry experts, the local authority, the police and others and came up with a formula which cured almost all of the initial worries which resulted in a good festival in 2002. Further changes in 2003 produced a peaceful, happy and safe festival this year. Changes made included a widespread multi-media campaign to stop members of the public without tickets coming to the Festival; a new and secure perimeter face, improved vehicle access to and from the site, on-site vehicle curfews at night; improved stewarding; constant liaison with the police; a carefully structured chain of command. It was a team effort and overall it seemed to work.

If the live event industry doesn’t make the necessary changes itself it will have only itself to blame when governments and regulators introduce waves of regulatory change – which may or may not be for the best. When that happens the future of the live events business itself may be in doubt.

© 2003 Ben Challis

Ben Challis is an entertainment lawyer in the United Kingdom and a visiting senior lecturer in law at Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College. He edits the ‘Law Updates’ pages for the Music Business Journal and has written the Legal Aspects chapter for the soon to be published Health and Safety Aspects in the Live Entertainment Industry (ETP).


NHS Must Satisfy 36 Regulators The Times 15th October 2003

US Double Tragedy re-focuses Live Industry Attention on Event Safety ILMC Round The Clock News 24th February 2003

The Event Safety Guide (1999) HMSO

Mendip Say Glastonbury 2003 Was Very Successful

Transport Failing Firms Says CBI The Observer, October 25th 2003

Hill, I (2001) Contemporary Crowd Safety Music Business Journal www.musicjournal.og

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.



To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.