UK: Sanctioning Non-Compliance?

Last Updated: 12 August 2003

Richard Harrison and Ashleigh Williamson

Are the Courts taking the right approach to penalising parties for failing to comply with Pre-action Protocols? Richard Harrison and Ashleigh Williamson take stock.

It might be expected that a significant body of case law demonstrating the Courts’ willingness to apply sanctions for noncompliance with Pre Action Protocols would have by now been built up. Surprisingly, the cases are few and far between. In 2002 the Law Society surveyed solicitors involved in all areas to which Protocols apply. 60% of the litigation solicitors who responded to their fourth "Woolf Network Questionnaire" survey had never applied to the Courts for sanctions following a breach of a Protocol. Perceived judicial inconsistency deterred many from embarking on what they saw to be costly and unpredictable applications. However, even in the field of professional negligence, where the costs and damages at stake tend to be higher (and a Protocol has been in force since July 2001), there is little indication that the Courts have been willing to flex their muscles in all but the most extreme cases.


Sanctions can be imposed either when considering directions or when making orders as to costs.


Sanctions at the directions stage are arguably of more practical benefit than adverse costs orders, particularly if the Court orders a stay for the Protocol to be followed or requires a party to give fuller disclosure. The standard Allocation Questionnaire requires each party to state whether or not the Pre-Action protocol has been followed and, if not, to explain why not. However, there is disappointingly little evidence of Masters and District Judges proving receptive to arguments based on non-compliance with a Protocol at the first CMC. In fact, in our experience, once proceedings are underway, the Courts are often reluctant to impose on the defaulting party the timetable which would have been followed under the Protocol, often requiring the parties to operate within a much shorter period.

CPR 3.1(5) gives the Courts the power to order a party to pay a sum of money into Court if it has failed to comply with a Protocol. However, Mealey Horgan plc v Horgan (1999) suggests that such orders should be confined to extreme cases where there has been a history of repeated breaches. We have never seen such an order made in a professional liability claim.


It is now taken as read that pre-action costs will be visited upon the losing party in subsequent proceedings and that the parties’ pre-action conduct will be taken into account. The Courts are encouraged to treat compliance with a Protocol as a benchmark for good conduct. CPR 3.1(4) and 44.1(3) give them wide discretion when making orders for costs. Suggested orders contained in the Protocols Practice Direction are that

  • The party at fault pay all or part of the costs of the proceedings to date.
  • The party at fault pay costs on an indemnity basis.
  • A defaulting claimant be deprived of interest on any damages awarded.
  • A defaulting defendant pay additional interest of up to 10% on any damages awarded against him.


The amendments to the Protocols Practice Direction in the 30th update to the CPR in April this year to some extent dissipated the deterrent effect of the Protocols. It has now been made clear that the Courts expect compliance "in substance" rather than to the letter. They are not concerned with "minor infringements" and will look first to the effect of non-compliance on the other party when deciding whether to impose sanctions. The object of sanctions is to put the innocent party "in no worse a position than he would have been in if the Protocol had been complied with."

Arguably, the premature issue of proceedings is the most fundamental breach of Protocol. Other examples of non-compliance given in the Practice Direction are failure to provide sufficient information (Claimants) or failure to disclose documents (Defendants), as well as failure to respond within the prescribed time limits. However, the Professional Negligence Pre-Action Protocol also highlights two key circumstances in which sanctions may be imposed: where the Letter of Claim and subsequent Particulars of Claim differ materially (B2.3) and where the Letter of Response and subsequent Defence differ materially (B5.3). These requirements go to the heart of the Protocol yet, surprisingly, we cannot find a single example of a party being criticised, much less punished, for their breach.

Jimaale v London Buses Limited (2000), a County Court decision, is a rare instance of a Court invoking the obligation on a Claimant to send a detailed Letter of Claim as soon as he decides that there are grounds for the claim. There, it was held that even though proceedings were commenced within the Limitation Period, the Claimant had failed to comply with the Personal Injury Pre-Action protocol by delaying three years between his first indication that there might be a claim and actually setting out the claim in detail. The claim was struck out. However, the Defendants were able to show that they had been severely prejudiced by the delay and the nonobservance of the Protocol was only one of a number of factors taken into account.

Indemnity costs

The threat of an application for indemnity costs is often brandished as a stick with which to beat errant parties into compliance with the Protocol. An order for indemnity costs can make a big difference to a party’s (and therefore potentially an insurer’s) costs bill, but it seems that Judges are setting very high thresholds for the extent to which they must disapprove of a party’s conduct before applying this particular sanction.

In SITA v Watson Wyatt (2002), the Claimants failed to respond to the Defendants’ lengthy Protocol Response and issued Part 20 proceedings against our solicitor clients more or less straight after receiving it. In finding that the solicitors had no liability to the Part 20 Claimant, the Judge remarked that his judgment closely reflected the Protocol Response. However, he declined to award indemnity costs to the solicitors because the Part 20 Claimants had conducted their claim "scrupulously, fairly and without any impropriety".

This case may not necessarily evidence a trend against awarding indemnity costs. Firstly, the claim was brought by way of Part 20 Proceedings. When a main claim is already on foot we have seen other instances of the Courts being less receptive to arguments that the Protocol should be followed. Secondly, there is no obligation on Claimants to respond to a Letter of Response which denies liability before issuing proceedings – while the Claimants did not act within the sprit of the Protocol, they did not actually breach it.

In Paul Thomas Construction Limited v Damian Hyland and Anr (2000, unreported), an order for the Claimant to pay indemnity costs was made, but his conduct was extreme – he disregarded the Defendant’s offers to negotiate, ignored requests for information and issued proceedings prematurely in what was described as "very modest litigation".

Finally, the Courts may be willing to consider other punitive costs orders. In Northern Electric plc v Stockton on Tees BC, judgment was ordered in the defendant's favour but there was no order as to costs or interest because both parties had failed to adopt suitable pre-action behaviour. The Claimant had issued proceedings without giving the Defendant sufficient time to consider a pre-action letter, but the Defendant had failed for six months to consider the dispute. Similar examples are however few and far between.


Pre-action Protocols are now widely observed and have proved very effective in achieving their aim of enabling parties to resolve disputes without recourse to litigation. However, if the Courts do not become more robust and more consistent in their approach to sanctions, there is a very real risk that the Protocols will be devalued.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions