UK: Tax Update - 14 January, 2013

Last Updated: 1 February 2013
Article by Smith & Williamson

1 General news

1.1 The validity of a discovery assessment and the Charlton case

HMRC has lost its appeal against the First-tier Tribunal decision in the case of Dr Michael Charlton and Others (TC01317)

This was a case where the taxpayer had given substantial disclosure of the computational aspects of a scheme to use a capital loss purported to be generated on a life insurance policy in circumstances where there was no economic loss, to cover gains realised on other assets. It was determined by the High Court and Court of Appeal in a case involving another taxpayer that the scheme failed from a technical perspective.

Mr Charlton's tax returns were submitted after the decision of the High Court, with the DOTAS scheme reference number. An oversight within HMRC meant that not all the tax returns with the relevant SRN were enquired into, so that HMRC were out of time to raise enquiries into Dr Charlton's and others' tax returns. Thus HMRC sought to raise discovery assessments.

The First-tier Tribunal concluded that there had been sufficient disclosure for an officer to be aware that there was a potential insufficiency and to have considered the relevant law or sought further advice internally within HMRC which meant that the conditions for making a discovery assessment were not present.

The Upper Tribunal has reached the same conclusion, but in contrast to the First-tier Tribunal's decision that "...the mere fact that the notional officer is to be treated by s 29(6) as being aware that, once an SRN has been allocated to a particular scheme, an AAG1 form, with relevant scheme information on it, must exist, does not mean that the notional officer must be treated as being aware of the content of that information....", the Upper Tribunal concluded that:

"..on the construction of s 29(6)(d)(i), the form AAG1 submitted by the promoters of the scheme should be regarded as information made available for the purpose of s 29(5). The SRN was included in each Respondent's tax return, but on a different page to the white space disclosures of the scheme and the pages setting out the capital gains computations and the figure for income on the surrender of the policy. We are, however, in no doubt that, first, the existence of the form AAG1 could reasonably have been expected to have been inferred by the hypothetical officer, and secondly, that the physical separation of the SRN number from other relevant entries on the tax return would not have prevented an officer from making the necessary link between them so as reasonably to infer the relevance of the form AAG1 to the insufficiency...."

This decision helpfully clarifies that in assessing whether the discovery assessment conditions have been met, providing the level of disclosure is of sufficient quality, an officer of HMRC can be treated as being aware of the implications of that disclosure in terms of a potential tax insufficiency.

www.tribunals.gov.uk/financeandtax/Documents/decisions/hmrc-v-charlton-corfield-corfield.pdf

1.2 House of Lords enquiry into Government policy on consultations

The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee has completed its inquiry into the Government's new policy on consultations.

By issuing new consultation principles in 2012 the Government wished to apply greater flexibility to consultation processes than the previous guidance under the 2008 Code of Practice seemed in their opinion to allow.

The report on the inquiry comments as below and makes a number of recommendations for improvement of the consultation principles:

The new Principles may allow the Government to make legislation more quickly, but there is a risk that the resulting statute will be less robust because rushed consultation processes make it too difficult for external interests to provide expert critique at the right time. In the light of the evidence, we call on the Government to recognise that the July 2012 Principles are failing to provide the consistency and transparency that others look for in consultation exercises.

We urge the Government to launch an independent, external review of their new approach to consultation without delay, and to publish the outcome by Easter 2013.

If handled properly, consultation improves the formulation and implementation of policy. This is an objective of the Government, but we consider that it will be inadequately achieved unless the July 2012 Principles are reviewed and revised.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldsecleg/100/100.pdf

2 Private client

2.1 Penalties for late payment of tax where there had been a refusal of an application for a time to pay arrangement

Stephen Brand has succeeded in his appeal to the First-tier tribunal against a penalty for late payment of tax arising from the sale of land generating a capital gain of £39,313 payable by 31 January 2011. The proceeds from the disposal had not been paid to Mr Brand, who was nevertheless confident he could borrow the money to pay the tax. On the advice of his local tax office he wrote on 9 February to HMRC Liverpool requesting time to pay, but this was refused on 20 March. He then borrowed the money and paid the tax on 12 April 2012. The penalty of £1,965 was raised as he had not paid the tax by 2 March 2011.

Stephen Brand's brother also had a similar tax liability on the disposal and had applied for and been granted time to pay after the January 2011 deadline. In the circumstances of the case the Tribunal concluded there was a reasonable excuse for non-payment and allowed the appeal.

http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2012/TC02434.html

2.2 Whether HMRC can challenge a main residence election

The First-tier Tribunal has recently considered the case of Ellis v Revenue & Customs. The case concerned an election made by taxpayers to decide which of two private residences should be regarded as the main one for the purposes of capital gains tax exemption. HMRC accepted that the taxpayer had two residences but did not accept that the one that they elected was in fact the main residence.

Property 1 had been purchased on 31 March 1999 for £100,000 and was later sold on 13 April 2005 for £187,500. After the property had been purchased in March 1999 it was continually let until 31 August 2004. Mr and Mrs Ellis then decided to use the property as a residence from 01 October 2004. On 29 October 2004 an election under section 222(5).

CGTA 1992 was sent to the Inland Revenue and duly acknowledged by a letter dated 22 November 2004. The appellants had another residence (Property 2), a detached four- bedroom house.

In HMRC's Statement of Case it said that the point at issue was "Whether the appellant's occupation of a property in the period October 2004 to March 2005 deems that property to be a "residence" for the purposes of a claim for principal private residence relief."

However by the time that the appeal was heard the issue seemed to have changed. In a document headed "Speaking Notes" produced by Mr Boal (HMRC's representative), the 'Point in Dispute' was "Whether the occupation of 1 Jessamine Cottage by the appellants in the 6 1/2 month period from October 2004 to 13 April 2005 was sufficient to deem the property as a "main residence" for the purpose of principal private residence relief."

Mr Boal stated that HMRC accepted that the property was a residence used by the taxpayers but that the nature and extent of the use made of the property did not permit of the conclusion that it was their main residence. It therefore became clear that HMRC was not arguing that the property was not properly to be viewed as a residence used by the taxpayers; but simply that even though it was a residence it was not, as a matter of fact and degree, their main residence.

Mr Boal argued that the tribunal should look at the comparative amount of time spent at each of the two residences, the nature and quality of the use made of each residence and the fact that Property 2 was also used by the taxpayers when two of their granddaughters resided with them, often for significant periods of time, for family reasons.

The judges pointed out to Mr Boal that once HMRC conceded that the property was a residence and it was accepted or admitted that the taxpayers had two residences, the effect of section 222(5) CGTA was to allow the taxpayers to make an election which was determinative of the issue as to which of the two residences was, for capital gains tax purposes, their main residence:

"The important point to note about the construction of section 222 CGTA is that once it is established (or accepted) that a taxpayer has more than one property that can properly be called his residence, it is the taxpayer who can make an election as to which of two or more residences is to be his main residence. It is equally important to note that subsection 5 of section 222 specifically provides that "the individual may conclude that question by notice to the inspector ......... "and that this is a case in which such notice was given.

Thus the section envisages that a taxpayer may make an election; but does not have to do so. It then provides that if a taxpayer does decide to make an election the effect of that election is to conclude the issue as to which of two (or more) residences is his main residence, so far as capital gains tax matters are concerned. In other words, the respondents can challenge the assertion made by a taxpayer that a particular property is a residence used/occupied by him, but once it is proved or accepted that a particular property is a residence used/occupied by the taxpayer, the respondents cannot argue that as a matter of fact and degree that residence is not the taxpayer's main residence if an election has been made in favour of that property under section 222(5). That is because upon its true and proper construction the statute specifically provides that the question of which property is the main residence is conclusively dealt with by the election made under subsection 5.

It follows that, in our judgment, given that the respondents concede that the property was a residence used by the taxpayers, the appeals must succeed because an election was made. The respondents cannot go behind the election notwithstanding Mr Boal's contention that it was open to the respondents to challenge whether or not, as a matter of fact and degree, the property could properly be described as the taxpayers' main residence. If Mr Boal was correct in his submission, it would mean that an election made under section 222 would not be conclusive as provided by section 222(5). In our judgment his submission was contrary to the plain meaning and effect of that statutory provision."

This is a remarkable case where on any analysis it should have been clear to HMRC that it had no prospect of winning. It is understood that HMRC does have a filter system in place to prevent hopeless cases from going before the tribunals, but this filter seems to have failed spectacularly on this occasion.

www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/TC/2012/TC02426.html

3 PAYE and employment matters

3.1 Employment Related Securities Bulletin (January)

HMRC's latest Employment Related Securities Bulletin covers (i) a trial on dealing with enquiries and (ii) academics and spin-out companies.

Quick response to enquiries – a trial

HMRC is aware that customers sometimes need a quick response to enquiries in relation to the tax-advantaged share schemes. It has worked with members of the ERS Forum Tax Advantaged Share Schemes sub group to design a 'quick HMRC response' arrangement for certain enquiries, which will start on a four month trial basis from 14 January 2013. This trial will help HMRC assess whether to offer such an arrangement on a permanent basis.

The terms of the trial are as follows:

  • HMRC will only respond to queries on a 'quick response' basis if it is satisfied that the query is capable of being dealt with quickly and relates to one of the following:


− a variation of share capital;

− an alteration to an identified key feature;

− a company reorganisation;

− other circumstances in which HMRC is satisfied that a quick response can be made and is required.

  • HMRC will only respond to queries using this arrangement if all the necessary information is submitted with the query;

  • A query will not be eligible for this arrangement if it takes HMRC more than one hour to deal with;

To read the full article, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.